David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks everybody knows that the wacko Sally Cunliffe has to learn some new tricks before the RCMP pull out a Section 10 document on her or prosecute her under Section 300 N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnTjXbbNn_w
http://indiemediaeastcoastcanada.blogspot.com
METHINKS FOLKS SHOULD SCROLL DOWN IF THEY WISH TO READ THE ENTIRE EMAIL N'ESY PAS?
---------- Orginal message ----------
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:44:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that
Megan Mitton knows Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust
certainly does
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. MLA Megan Mitton is out of the office and
will return the week of July 8th. We appreciate your patience, and
will read your email as soon as possible. If you require assistance
promptly, please email Alice Cotton, Constituency Coordinator
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). For more urgent matters, you can also call the
office at (506) 378-1565. Merci pour votre courriel. La députée Megan
Mitton sera absente du bureau et reviendra la semaine du 8 juillet.
Nous apprécions votre patience, et nous lirons votre courriel dès que
possible. Si vous avez besoin d'aide plus rapidement, veuillez envoyer
un courriel à Alice Cotton, coordonnatrice de circonscription
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). Pour des questions plus urgentes, vous pouvez
également appeler le bureau au (506) 378-1565.
---------- Orginal message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:44:44 -0400
Subject: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that Megan Mitton knows
Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust certainly does
To: tomcat@tnt21.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
wharrison@nbpower.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://canadiantruths.
Canadian Truths
Exposing corruption in Canada and elsewhere
tomcat@tnt21.com
or call me at
519-396-1958
Skype – ron.stephens7
Thank You
31 thoughts on “Contact”
Sally Cunliffe October 12, 2018 at 8:07 pm
Its always amusing when they say ‘the community’ wants the thing
[windfarm] when you know the crony green capitalist scumbags want it
.. what can you do.. not much because they’re friggin thugs ..
https://www.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Holland, Mike Hon. (ERD/DER)" <Mike.Holland@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 14:47:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Go Figure just how dumb the NCA, Don Darling, Silas Brown and Joshua Counsil truly are
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Cheryl Layton at my constituency office in Albert at (506) 856-4961 or Cheryl.Layton@gnb.ca.
Thanks again for your email!
Mike Holland
Minister
MLA, Albert
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Si votre courriel est lié à un enjeu de circonscription, veuillez contacter Cheryl Layton à mon bureau de circonscription dans Albert au (506) 856-4961 ou Cheryl.Layton@gnb.ca.
Merci encore pour votre courriel!
Mike Holland
Ministre
Député, Albert
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:47:14 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Go Figure just how dumb the NCA, Don Darling, Silas Brown and
Joshua Counsil truly are
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
lenorezannmla@bellaliant.com, leader@greenparty.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, mike.cameron3@bellmedia.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca,
votejohnw@gmail.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca,
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:41:22 -0400
Subject: Go Figure just how dumb the NCA, Don Darling Silas Brown and
Joshua Counsil truly are
To: josh@goodrobotbrewing.ca, info@nationalcitizensalliance.
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, don.darling@saintjohn.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, silas.brown@globalnews.ca, megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 29 June 2019
Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Go Figure just how dumb Silas Brown and Joshua Counsil are
"Stephen Garvey did approach Global News to see if we would be interested in an interview but that request was declined"
https://globalnews.ca/news/5443384/two-members-of-national-citizens-alliance-greeted-by-protesters/
Two members of National Citizens Alliance greeted by protesters during Saint John appearance
WATCH: A Halifax brewery says it has learned a lesson
after serving drinks to members of a far-right political party led to
serious social media backlash. Elizabeth McSheffrey has more."Stephen Garvey did approach Global News to see if we would be interested in an interview, but that request was declined, and after some discussion Garvey criticized Global’s ongoing coverage of the group as heavily biased."
© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks protesting often defeats its intended purpose This article is
one of many making a fool out Don Darling et al as they make the NCA
better known N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/06/controversial-political-party-greeted.html
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/06/controversial-political-party-greeted.html
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/saint-john-mayor-joins-protest-against-national-citizens-alliance-1.4487902
Saint John mayor joins protest against National Citizens Alliance
CTV Atlantic
Published Friday, June 28, 2019 10:22PM ADT
Saint John Mayor
Don Darling thinks the city of Saint John should send a bill to the
National Citizens Alliance for the 12 police officers that were
dispatched to the far-right political party's rally in front of City
Hall.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks my political foes know I would game to meet the NCA in Sussex but it wasn't in the cards to get to the Golden Jubilee Hall in time for the circus today So I tried to fair and called them in order to introduce myself N'esy Pas?
Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
43 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David R. Amos
For
the record I have never heard of these dudes and I certainly agree with
Mayor Gary Clark and not the Mindless Don Darling. Whereas the nasty
Conservative Madame Bell decided to tease me about this politcal party
methinks her buddy the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore and I should talk to
them later today in Sussex N'esy Pas?Lou Bell
Reply to @David R. Amos: This guy had one less supporter than you had when you ran !
Lou Bell
Perhaps Liberals / SANB could recruit these two. Maybe one could replace the Security Guard when he's defeated
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Methinks you and Kevin Vickers both know that your buddy Richard Bell
ran two elections for you Conservatives in NB and after I ran in Fat
Fred City against Andy Scott another dude who went to High School with
your hubby and I Bell was the first Judge Harper ever appointed N'esy
Pas?
Donald Gallant
And the protesters are members of what political party ?
Surely that should have been mentioned in the article by BJM.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Donald Gallant: Why? It's not relevant.
David R. Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Yes it is
Matt Steele
If protesters were not there drawing a crowd , then most Saint Johner's would not even know that they were in town . Having protests , drawing a crowd , and getting attention from the press ; just gives these groups credibility . The best way to handle people who want attention is to ignore them , and they will go away when they can't get an audience .
David R. Amos
Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks that is the logic you use to ignore me N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
A meeting of these people ? Like a flea on an Elephants --s !!
Dan Lee
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Ohhh....i thought it was about PANB.........
Ohhh....i thought it was about PANB.........
Lou Bell
Reply to @Dan Lee: Naw, it's the last two Anglophone Liberals !
Josef Blow
Reply to @Lou Bell: Get over yourself Lou Bell. A broken record you are.
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you should get over yourself At least Lou has a real name N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
These
guys draw about the same numbers as Trump ! Or at least from the
numbers they'll probably post ! Wonder how many zeros they'll add TO
THAT ONE SUPPORTER ????Dan Lee
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Prabably same amount of zeros as PANB meetin last week
Prabably same amount of zeros as PANB meetin last week
Lou Bell
Reply to @Dan Lee: Marc ? Where's Marc uerite ?
Reply to @Dan Lee: Liberals / SANB have you and Marc uerite !
Josef Blow
Reply to @Lou Bell: I wonder if booze is not at play with you ?
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks many think the same of you N'esy Pas?
Dan Lee
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Nahhh....not a Marc or a uerite.....hmmmm more like a hood.....
Nahhh....not a Marc or a uerite.....hmmmm more like a hood.....
Alexander Forbes
Amazing how the left always just tries to drown out the opposition instead of actually trying to converse with them. Even if the protesters are right, you won't get people to see your point of view yelling at them.
SarahRose Werner
Content disabled
Josef Blow
Content disabled
David R. Amos
Reply
to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks protesting often defeats its intended
purpose and this article is a fine example by making a fool out Don
Darling and his cohorts and the people they are protesting better known
N'esy Pas?
Alexander Forbes
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Unless it's a quiet protest that wouldn't convince me to join their side.
Alexander Forbes
Reply to @Josef Blow: Yelling at people and drowning them out is exactly what tbey were doing. Try literacy...it does wonders.
Lou Bell
Wow, look at all the supporters. Even Amos could beat this party !
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell:
Shame on you Lourdes Methinks you likely laughed when you heard I was
illegally forced to eat your food at the DECH N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnTjXbbNn_w
NCA Statement on the State of Canada
275 views
155 Comments
Eastcoast Blogger
You tweeted about me .. how big of you Dave... before Twitter suspended my account I had 1000 followers... they were more interesting than you could be my dude... but carry on with your " me thinks and nest pas ' schtick it really seems to be taking you far .. did you catch Stephen's interview
Reply
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN-_1lUskYY
Eastcoast Blogger Published on Jun 13, 2019 Censored and taking notes, described by the important people as: " low class " - "unimportant " - a "troublemaker "..
Reply
David Amos "Comments are disabled for this video."
TOO LATE and TOO TOO FUNNY
Reply
What you are publishing is libel which is a criminal act under Section 300
If you wish to continue to play dumb Check this YouTube tos ee an email I got from the RCMP when I was helping your buddy Werner Bock and the woman from Lyme CT then later the woman from Long Island in the Petiticodiac area 13 years ago
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com, John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca, "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC
Caledonia
RCMP Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
If Dave Amos has been threatening and harassing you welcome to the club .. you're not alone.. he does that... he was also abusing a relative of mine in Ontario by telephone for what reason only Dave knows.. he's technically insane and barely functional... a complete waste of skin.. a compulsive liar and a weirdo.
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1azdNWbF3A
Reply
@Kata List Productions Methinks I am dealing with another case of the pot attempting to call the kettle black. You know as well a I that YOU picked this fight with me many years ago after I alowed you to snoop arounf inside my Facebook. I just recognized you supporting the NCA 2 days ago. 3 days ago i did not know who they were until Lou Bell another nasty old right wing woman in NB teased me about them within the CBC comment sections N'esy Pas?
Reply
Reply
@Kata List Productions My computer informed me this morning that your buddy Werner Bock tried to call me last evening Methinks you must be making your in the RCMP in Petiticodiac nervous N'esy Pas?
?You received a new 0:05 minutes voicemail message, on Saturday, July 06, 2019 at 07:33:13 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from "BOCK WERNER" <5067568687>."
<5067568687>Reply
<5067568687>
@Kata List Productions DUHHHH???
<5067568687>Reply
<5067568687>
David Amos
Yo Sally why did ya delete the link to your hero Chucky Leblanc yapping about me in Federal Court?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8&t=124sReply
Reply
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgWbTJnScUs
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
@Kata List Productions Trust that you friends the mindless nasty bastards in CSIS know exactly who I am
Reply
Kata List Productions I suspect if you decide to be a nicer man and behave in good faith you
will be happier too .. your video titles are embarassing.. if your
channel run by a teenager?
Reply
Reply
Hey Dave.. still threatening the life of people in Ontario? Yeah, the police know your game.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Highlighted reply
Reply
@Kata List Productions I provided proof of litigation earlier byway of your hero Chucky Leblanc but you deleted it before you responded Even his buddies Andre Faust and the Fat Fred City Finest are clever enough to see through your BS N'esy Pas Sally Baby?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8&t=124s
Reply
Hey Dave.. you know why people avoid Freddy doncha?
Reply
Dave's Crazy ASS Crusade...
Reply
Here is the aforementioned Tweet for your fans and the RCMP to review
Reply
Hey Dave.. you know why people avoid Freddy doncha?
Reply
Reply
@Eastcoast Blogger Methinks you should call the RCMP and have them explain my concerns to you real slow N'esy Pas?
Reply
leave the RCMP alone... they are bothered enough by retards in this town.. and by the way.. I am aware of your situation with the loss of wealth in America and your background.. I'm not attacking you unless you come after me Dave .. you know those occupy idiots were commies so why are you being such a little twat?
Highlighted reply
Reply
Highlighted reply
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks everybody knows that the wacko Sally Cunliffe has to learn some new tricks before the RCMP pull out a Section 10 document on her or prosecute her under Section 300 N'esy Pas?
http://indiemediaeastcoastcanada.blogspot.com
Reply
Trust that i know Percy Best
Reply
@Eastcoast Blogger I am bored with your nonsense
David Amos
Oh My MY are you going to delete all my comments? So much for what Garvey is claiming in this video EH?
Reply
don't like nca.. check out nationalist.ca
Reply
Reply
Oh My MY are you going to delete all my comments? So much for what Garvey is claiming in this video EH?
Reply
Reply
@Kata List Productions Why do you delete your own malice?
are you leaving a lot of comments because no one listens to you?
Reply
@Eastcoast Blogger Methinks it is you and your local heroes such as Byron Prior, Chucky Leblanc and Werner Bock who delete your own comments and lots of mine for very malicious reasons N'esy Pas?
Reply
BTW The RCMP know that I gave all 3 of the aforementioned stooges free computers many years ago because they whined and cried a lot and all 3 stabbed me in the back when the corrupt cops scared them enough.
Reply
My only hero died last year.. My Dad .. fuck off Dave.. seriously .. go fuck yourself you piece of shit.
Reply
@Eastcoast Blogger OH My My Methinks your forgot it was you who picked this fight not I I am merely finishing tis all. Clearly you can't argue yourself out of a wet paper bag today Perhaps need another 72 hour visit to the looney bin and some meds to calm down N'esy Pas?
Reply
@Eastcoast Blogger Methinks you are obviously too dumb to know that my friend Roger has run as an Independent as well N'esy Pas?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
Reply
globalbem.com november 9 & 10, 2019 the netherlands
Reply
@Kata List Productions Methinks you should grow up and get a name then you can put it on a ballot instead being just another troll in YouTube N'esy Pas?
Reply
weren't you promoting dr. judy wood on twitter?
Reply
I don't mind promoting nationalism... but I think you're the ultimate waste of skin Dave.... change your diaper
Reply
@Kata List Productions Methinks you are so witty that they had to bar you from Twitter because you were embarrassing your hero Mr Trump N'esy Pas?
Highlighted reply
Reply
@Kata List Productions So what?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Highlighted reply
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/06/controversial-political-party-greeted.html
Eastcoast Blogger
did you ever meet charlie leblanc? he's a blogger downeast too.. not a bright guy but apparently famous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
Reply
Kata List Productions did you vote for the purple people's party alliance amos?
Say Hey to Dale Morgan and all the other members of the RCMP in Fundy Royal for me will ya?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
Reply
Kata List Productions are you blogging about corruption and paul martin still?
the silent majority are silent because they know the thugs and mobs are capable of bullying, shunning, lying, and destroying people and their reputation .. they're in small clubs of control freaks.. hiding in rotary and sucking up to technocrats/green team.. new brunswick is full of protestors and conservationists who don't care about their youth.. they watch them leave every year in large numbers for work elsewhere.. the boomer in new brunswick are zero help .. absolutely clueless CBC watching fools.
petitcodiac... check into werner bock .. a farmer there
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
Reply
petitcodiac... check into werner bock .. a farmer there
Reply
How stupid are you trolls?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSY0nxkZIxM
Reply
"did you ever meet charlie leblanc? he's a blogger downeast too.. not a bright guy but apparently famous"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSY0nxkZIxM
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8&t=124s
Reply
David Amos Yo Sally why did ya delete the link to your hero Chucky Leblanc yapping about me in Federal Court?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8&t=124s
Reply
You're confused... you keep repeating comments about deleted comments.. why? No one is listening to your mad crazy shit Dave.
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8&t=124s
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Perhaps run in Truro... Lenore Zann wants to run now federally there .. that would be a great match up .. the NDP are a joke .. and its amazing to see how out to lunch this woman is .. are you following her Facebook commentary against the NCA ? amusing.. she writes:
Reply
@Kata List Productions Abusing people is your reputation not mine and as you well know methinks it is you who is the shill for the liberals Everybody knows Zann is an Independent and a wannabe liberal now. How could you not know that yet brag that you may run against her?
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgWbTJnScUs
Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgWbTJnScUs
National Citizens Alliance - Canada Grassroots 2019
21 views
Published on Jul 2, 2019
http://nationalcitizensalliance.ca .. a new Canadian political party.... federal election October 21, 2019..
Kata List Production, indie media downeast
4 Comments
I like how these politician leeches (e.g., Lenore Zann) love to slander those that vouch for small government. Fear mongering is their only game. So easy to slay with facts :) Wash, rinse, repeat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN-_1lUskYY
Town of Sackville - Facebook Censors
11 viewsPublished on Jun 13, 2019
Censored and taking notes, described by the important people as: " low class " - "unimportant " - a "troublemaker "..
2 Comments
David Amos
Yo Sally Baby ask yourself why I saved this nonsense of yours?
Reply
Because you're an obsessed lil dude?
Reply
Because you're an obsessed lil dude?
David Amos "Comments are disabled for this video."
TOO LATE and TOO TOO FUNNY
CNP - Canadian Nationalist Party - Trav Patron
https://youtu.be/8RQvA-Ox20s
Published on May 28, 2019
RCMP launch hate crime probe of leader of nationalist group vying for party status in federal election
Elections Canada gives Canadian Nationalist Party until mid-July to meet requirements
RCMP
in Saskatchewan have launched an investigation into an online video
featuring the head of an extremist group that's poised to become
Canada's next official political party.
The video was posted on the website of the Canadian Nationalist Party and on its Facebook and YouTube pages. It shows the leader of the group, Travis Patron, denouncing what he describes as "the parasitic tribe" or "black sheep" who he claims control the media and the central bank in Canada.
"What we need to do, perhaps more than anything, is remove these people once and for all from our country," Patron says, speaking directly to the camera.
The Canadian Nationalist Party, which promotes anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ views — and calls for the removal of "globalists" from the country — is in the final stages of applying to be able to collect tax-deductible political donations and run a slate of candidates in the upcoming federal election.
Elections Canada has given it until July 15 to provide the 250 signed declarations from members who are eligible voters that it needs to officially register as a federal political party.
The Canadian Anti-Hate Network, a non-profit watchdog group, has filed a formal complaint with the RCMP and Elections Canada to try to derail that effort.
"This is a group that is pure and simple a hate group," said Bernie M. Farber, the anti-hate network's chair and a human rights consultant.
"The way our laws stand today, there is nothing standing in their way save, right now, maybe 37 signatures to become an official political party here in Canada."
Patron told CBC News there are no grounds to bar his group from official party status and that his members have not violated hate speech laws.
"To date, our party has not said a hateful word, we've caused no violence, and we've done nothing illegal," he said in an email from Redvers, Sask., where he plans to run as a CNP candidate in October's federal election.
Saskatchewan RCMP confirmed they opened an investigation Wednesday into the video featuring Patron posted on the CNP website.
Farber called the video hateful and "clearly" anti-Semitic although he acknowledged Patron makes no explicit reference to Jews.
"The kind of tropes that Jews have been subject to for much of our collective lives have been exactly the words used by Mr. Patron in this video — controlling the media, controlling the entertainment business," said Farber, who is a former chief executive of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
"So, instead of using the word 'Jews,' which would immediately not just raise the ire of Canadians but would, I think, shine a spotlight for law enforcement … they're trying to walk this fine line. They just don't, in my view, do a very good job about it."
WATCH | The leader of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network explains why he asked the RCMP to investigate Travis Patron's political message:
The video was posted on the website of the Canadian Nationalist Party and on its Facebook and YouTube pages. It shows the leader of the group, Travis Patron, denouncing what he describes as "the parasitic tribe" or "black sheep" who he claims control the media and the central bank in Canada.
"What we need to do, perhaps more than anything, is remove these people once and for all from our country," Patron says, speaking directly to the camera.
The Canadian Nationalist Party, which promotes anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ views — and calls for the removal of "globalists" from the country — is in the final stages of applying to be able to collect tax-deductible political donations and run a slate of candidates in the upcoming federal election.
Elections Canada has given it until July 15 to provide the 250 signed declarations from members who are eligible voters that it needs to officially register as a federal political party.
The Canadian Anti-Hate Network, a non-profit watchdog group, has filed a formal complaint with the RCMP and Elections Canada to try to derail that effort.
"This is a group that is pure and simple a hate group," said Bernie M. Farber, the anti-hate network's chair and a human rights consultant.
"The way our laws stand today, there is nothing standing in their way save, right now, maybe 37 signatures to become an official political party here in Canada."
Patron told CBC News there are no grounds to bar his group from official party status and that his members have not violated hate speech laws.
"To date, our party has not said a hateful word, we've caused no violence, and we've done nothing illegal," he said in an email from Redvers, Sask., where he plans to run as a CNP candidate in October's federal election.
Group's message targets 'globalists'
Saskatchewan RCMP confirmed they opened an investigation Wednesday into the video featuring Patron posted on the CNP website.
Farber called the video hateful and "clearly" anti-Semitic although he acknowledged Patron makes no explicit reference to Jews.
"The kind of tropes that Jews have been subject to for much of our collective lives have been exactly the words used by Mr. Patron in this video — controlling the media, controlling the entertainment business," said Farber, who is a former chief executive of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
"So, instead of using the word 'Jews,' which would immediately not just raise the ire of Canadians but would, I think, shine a spotlight for law enforcement … they're trying to walk this fine line. They just don't, in my view, do a very good job about it."
WATCH | The leader of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network explains why he asked the RCMP to investigate Travis Patron's political message:
CBC News
Canadian Anti-Hate Network files formal complaint to RCMP, Elections Canada
00:00
01:35
"They go by many different names," he said. "We refer to them simply as the globalists because they conduct their business everywhere while simultaneously calling no place in particular home. We would remove [them] from our country. We have no use for them."
The RCMP say they are consulting hate crime specialists to determine whether Patron's comments in the video contravene criminal laws against advocating genocide or hatred against an identifiable group.
Tax-supported party funding
Patron grew up in a small farming community near in Redvers, Sask. As a university student in 2012 in the economics and business department of University of Saskatchewan, he discovered bitcoin.
He became an early investor in the cryptocurrency, an enterprise that Patron said has been "very profitable." In 2014, he published an e-book on the subject, The Bitcoin Revolution: An Internet of Money.
Patron founded the Canadian Nationalist Party in June 2017.
If it gets official party status, the group will be able to issue tax receipts for party contributions and qualify to get 50 per cent of its election expenses paid if it manages to get at least two per cent of the valid votes cast nationally or at least five per cent of the valid votes cast in the electoral districts in which it endorsed a candidate.
The Canadian Anti-Hate Network filed a complaint with Elections Canada last week denouncing the CNP as a hate group.
"For obvious reasons, we don't want to see the CNP become a tax-supported (via contribution reimbursements) and officially recognized party," the network's complaint says.
"What can be done to prevent this neo-Nazi party from becoming an official party?"
Under the existing laws, not much.
Farber says Canada should follow countries like Germany that bar groups promoting anti-democratic views from registering in the political process.
"We have to be very careful in between finding that balance of our rights in a free and democratic society to gather and to create political parties and then balance that with hate speech and hate groups that are out there who are trying to destroy society."
"Basically anybody can apply to be registered," she said. "They have to choose a name. They have to have a certain number of signatures. But after that, it is not Elections Canada's job to decide who should or who should not become a political party."
There is always a risk of extreme views on the left or right, she said, but whether the groups that espouse those views actually gain a political foothold is another matter.
"We have had parties on the extreme left like the Marxist-Leninist Party, the Communist Party of Canada. So, we have tolerated those. They have not hijacked democracy in any way, shape or form. And again, I rely on Canadian voters and their judgment."
Anti-Pride
Members of the CNP, and supporters wearing party T-shirts, appeared at recent Pride celebrations in Hamilton and Toronto.
Patron says he's reviewed numerous videos of violent clashes between protesters at those events and insists his supporters adhered to his party's code of conduct, which prohibits incitement of violence and use of hateful language.
"Taking a look at the video footage [from Pride events], at least what has been released, I'm happy to see that our members acted with professionalism, and they stood by, and they did not cause any violence," he told CBC News.
However, one video being circulated on social media from Toronto last weekend shows two men wearing CNP shirts taking part in the violence.
A
man wearing a Canadian Nationalist Party T-shirt is seen in a video
hitting another man on the ground with a bike helmet at Toronto’s Eaton
Centre on June 22. (YouTube/Facts VS. Feelings)
The clip, shot inside the Eaton Centre mall in downtown Toronto, shows one of the men pummelling a downed protester with a bike helmet.
Moments later, a different man wearing a CNP shirt is seen shoving a security guard.
In the same clip, a man wearing a Canadian Nationalist Party T-shirt is seen shoving a security officer. (YouTube/Facts VS. Feelings)
In a video on the party's YouTube channel, Patron calls for the defunding of Pride parades across the country. He criticizes Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for "normalizing homosexuality" by appearing at Pride events.
When asked by CBC to explain his views on LGBTQ issues, he replied that homosexuality "leads to self-destruction."
"A prerequisite for the continuity of our nationhood is that of future generations, progeny and fertility ... In regards to same-sex couples, there is no biological progeny, and therefore, a nationalist government would not support such a lifestyle choice by publicly financing it."
Only prisoners are prohibited from running for office.
Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
National Citizens Alliance holds forum outside City Hall after legion cancels its booking
National
Citizens Alliance Leader Stephen Garvey, wearing the red shirt, had
only one supporter with him as he faced down a group of vocal protesters
in Saint John. (Shane Fowler/CBC)
A controversial federal political party got less than a warm welcome in Saint John on Friday.
Two
members of the National Citizens Alliance were greeted by about 40
protesters, including Mayor Don Darling, during a lunch-hour forum in
front of City Hall.
About 15 police officers stood watch as the protesters toted signs bearing slogans, such as "NCA Go Away," and "In Saint John We Love Our Newcomers," and chanted, "Off our streets Nazi scum."
Party leader Stephen Garvey, armed with a bullhorn, fired back. "Read our policies," he shouted over the protesters, who blew whistles in an attempt to drown him out. "The silent majority in Canada are about to wake up."
The National Citizens Alliance, which is based in Calgary, became a registered federal party in January, according to Elections Canada.
The Alliance is calling for a drastic reduction in immigrants to Canada and rescinding the Multiculturalism Act and it opposes hate speech laws and anti-Islamophobia policies. The party also believes climate change is a hoax.
Earlier in the day, the mayor took to social media to denounce the party.
"I want folks to know, that the city has nothing to do with this group," he posted on Twitter. "Their hate filled views are disgusting and I don't want them in our city.
"They serve only to fuel divisive views and hatred. Worse is this political party actually play to these views for votes."
Saint John Mayor Don Darling was front and centre at the protest against the National Citizens Alliance on Friday, carrying a sign with the slogan, 'Love Not Hate Makes Canada Great.' (Shane Fowler/CBC)
The party's forum was originally planned for the Royal Canadian Legion's Lancaster Branch 69 but was moved to City Hall after the legion cancelled the booking, according to Garvey.
Forums slated for the qplex in Quispamsis Friday evening and at the Golden Jubilee Hall in Sussex on Saturday are expected to proceed as scheduled, unless they get another call, he said.
Some Quispamsis residents have expressed concerns about the group using the town's arena and called for it to be cancelled, but Mayor Gary Clark said the booking of the Moosehead Breweries Conference Centre would stand.
"I personally do not agree with their views but feel it is important that we uphold rights given by Legislation in our Province," he posted on the town's Facebook page.
About 15 police officers stood watch as the protesters toted signs bearing slogans, such as "NCA Go Away," and "In Saint John We Love Our Newcomers," and chanted, "Off our streets Nazi scum."
Party leader Stephen Garvey, armed with a bullhorn, fired back. "Read our policies," he shouted over the protesters, who blew whistles in an attempt to drown him out. "The silent majority in Canada are about to wake up."
The National Citizens Alliance, which is based in Calgary, became a registered federal party in January, according to Elections Canada.
The Alliance is calling for a drastic reduction in immigrants to Canada and rescinding the Multiculturalism Act and it opposes hate speech laws and anti-Islamophobia policies. The party also believes climate change is a hoax.
Earlier in the day, the mayor took to social media to denounce the party.
"I want folks to know, that the city has nothing to do with this group," he posted on Twitter. "Their hate filled views are disgusting and I don't want them in our city.
"They serve only to fuel divisive views and hatred. Worse is this political party actually play to these views for votes."
Saint John Mayor Don Darling was front and centre at the protest against the National Citizens Alliance on Friday, carrying a sign with the slogan, 'Love Not Hate Makes Canada Great.' (Shane Fowler/CBC)
The party's forum was originally planned for the Royal Canadian Legion's Lancaster Branch 69 but was moved to City Hall after the legion cancelled the booking, according to Garvey.
Forums slated for the qplex in Quispamsis Friday evening and at the Golden Jubilee Hall in Sussex on Saturday are expected to proceed as scheduled, unless they get another call, he said.
Some Quispamsis residents have expressed concerns about the group using the town's arena and called for it to be cancelled, but Mayor Gary Clark said the booking of the Moosehead Breweries Conference Centre would stand.
"I personally do not agree with their views but feel it is important that we uphold rights given by Legislation in our Province," he posted on the town's Facebook page.
CBC News New Brunswick
More protesters than party members show up for Saint John political rally
Two National Citizens
Alliance members were confronted by 40 protesters with signs and
whistles condemning the party's call for a drastic reduction in
immigration. 1:10
- a) deny to any person or class of person any accommodation, services or facilities available to the public, or
- b) discriminate against any person or class of persons with respect to any accommodation, services or facilities available to the public.
"Canada and New Brunswick take very seriously the right to free speech and the protection of rights for all Canadians. The Town of Quispamsis has a duty to protect those rights as well, even if we do not agree with the group's political views."
About 40 protesters greeted the National Citizens Alliance at Saint John City Hall. (Shane Fowler/CBC)
He stressed that the town and Moosehead Breweries have no affiliation with the party and that it's a private booking.If anyone chooses to continue to voice concerns, Clark urged them to do so in a "respectful and peaceful manner."
Several of the Saint John protesters yelled, "See you tonight at the qplex," as they left around 1 p.m.
With files from Shane Fowler
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:41:22 -0400
Subject: Go Figure just how dumb the NCA, Don Darling Silas Brown and
Joshua Counsil truly are
To: josh@goodrobotbrewing.ca, info@nationalcitizensalliance.
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, don.darling@saintjohn.ca,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, silas.brown@globalnews.ca,
megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 29 June 2019
Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Go Figure just how dumb Silas Brown and Joshua Counsil are
"Stephen Garvey did approach Global News to see if we would be
interested in an interview but that request was declined"
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://globalnews.ca/news/
Two members of National Citizens Alliance greeted by protesters during
Saint John appearance
By Silas Brown Reporter Global News
https://www.thecoast.ca/
Re: “Good beer, bad vibes”
Hi Domo,
My name is Josh and I'm a Co-founder and Marketing Director at Good
Robot, which I assume is the "north end beer bar" you're addressing. I
apologize that this has been happening to you. I agree that this is in
bad taste. I have at least 10 staff who use our Instagram account and
will be investigating this issue and instructing all of the staff that
this is not acceptable. One of our policies regarding social media is
to stay away from cheap tactics to garner new users, including
following users simply to be followed back.
If the issue continues or if you wish to help us resolve this quickly,
please email me (josh@goodrobotbrewing.ca) with some more information.
Cheers and thanks.
On 6/29/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
>
> National Citizens Alliance holds forum outside City Hall after legion
> cancels its booking
> Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jun 28, 2019 1:56 PM AT
>
>
> 43 Comments
>
> David R. Amos
> For the record I have never heard of these dudes and I certainly agree
> with Mayor Gary Clark and not the Mindless Don Darling. Whereas the
> nasty Conservative Madame Bell decided to tease me about this politcal
> party methinks her buddy the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore and I should
> talk to them later today in Sussex N'esy Pas?
>
> Lou Bell
> Reply to @David R. Amos: This guy had one less supporter than you had
> when you ran !
>
>
> Chief Agent:
> Mr. Adrien J. Bordage
> 101-3423 Alfred-Desrochers Street
> Sherbrooke QC J1K 0A7
>
> Tel.: 506-343-5760
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:02:42 -0400
> Subject: I just called
> To: Alliancedunord2012@yahoo.ca
>
> Chief Agent:
> Mr. Derek Basque
> 32 Xavier Street
> Tracadie NB E1X 2G9
> Tel.: 506-395-4557
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:32:13 -0400
> Subject: RE Rachael Rollins 617-792-6152 and Mike Maloney 617-419-6719
> I just called Rollins AGAIN
> To: team@rollins4da.com, inquiries@dasuffolkcounty.com, bbachrach
> <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> <Lon.Povich@state.ma.us>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
>
> On 9/20/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://rollins4da.com/
>>
>> https://dasuffolkcounty.com/
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>>> matters.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> David A. Hansen
>>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>>> services de consultation
>>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>>> B3J 1P3
>>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>>> 426-2329
>>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>>> this entire e-mail.
>>> Before printing think about the Environment
>>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> FBI Boston
>>>> One Center Plaza
>>>> Suite 600
>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>>
>>>> Hours
>>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>>
>>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>>> a lot to you
>>>>
>>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Tuesday, 14 February 2017
>>
>> RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got
>> off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie
>> to me after all this time???
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
>> called and left a message for you
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ______________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
>> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
>> electronic signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:18:26 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Leona Alleslev MP I just called and
>> Tweeted you as well correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:18:17 -0400
>> Subject: ATTN Leona Alleslev MP I just called and Tweeted you as well
>> correct?
>> To: Leona.Alleslev@parl.gc.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
>> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
>> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant"
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
>> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
>> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> therien.mike@brunswicknews.com
>> <news@kingscorecord.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:36 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Suzelle Bazinet.(613-995-5117) I just earlier
>>> Whereas I was not allowed to speak to you today its best that we
>>> confer in writng anyway (Away from the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office June 26 to 28, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau du 26 au 28 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sandra Lofaro
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:29:03 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: So says the Mean Mindless New Neo Con
>>> Dominic Cardy so say you all?
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:28:58 -0400
>>> Subject: So says the Mean Mindless New Neo Con Dominic Cardy so say you
>>> all?
>>> To: ATIP-AIPRP@clo-ocol.gc.ca, Ghislaine.Saikaley@clo-ocol.
>>> mylene.theriault@ocol-clo.gc.
>>> "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
>>> <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>>> "Katherine.dEntremont" <Katherine.dEntremont@gnb.ca>,
>>> andre@jafaust.com, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, briangallant10
>>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>> "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "jody.carr" <jody.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>,
>>> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
>>> anglophonerights@mail.com, info@thejohnrobson.com, ronbarr@rogers.com,
>>> kimlian@bellnet.ca, iloveblue.beth@gmail.com, "randy.mckeen"
>>> <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
>>> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
>>> "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
>>> <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT
>>> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, Geoff Regan
>>> <geoff@geoffregan.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca, jbosnitch
>>> <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Rachel.Blaney" <Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>> "elizabeth.thompson" <elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "dan. bussieres <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
>>> Tim.RICHARDSON <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, info ," <info@gg.ca>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:02:30 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: RE A legal state known as "functus" For the Public Record
>>> I talked to Mylene Theriault in Moncton again and she told me that
>>> same thing she did last year
>>> To: "Wright, Hamish (LEG)" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hamish,
>>>
>>> Did you contact Mr. Amos about the elk? How many elk were there? Were
>>> the police involved and if so did they wear the antlers you bought
>>> them?
>>>
>>> DC
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Patrick Bouchard <patrick.bouchard@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:44:18 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE A legal state known as "functus" Perhaps you,
>>> Governor General Johnston and Commissioner Paulson and many members of
>>> the RCMP should review pages 1 and 4 one document ASAP EH Minister
>>> Goodale? (AOL)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be AOL until July 6th 2017.
>>>
>>> I will not have access to Groupwise.
>>>
>>> I may be reached at my personal e-mail thebouchards15@gmail.com
>>> depending on data coverage.
>>>
>>> ******************************
>>>
>>> Je vais être en vacances jusqu'au 6 Juillet 2017.
>>>
>>> Je n'aurais pas accès a mon GroupWise.
>>>
>>> Il est possible que je vérifies mon courriel personnel
>>> thebouchards15@gmail.com de temps à autre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cpl.Patrick Bouchard
>>> RSC 5 RCMP-GRC
>>> Sunny-Corner Detachment
>>> English/Français
>>> Off: 506-836-6015
>>> Cell : 506-424-0071
>>>
>>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 06/22/17 16:43 >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.ocol-clo.gc.ca/en/
>>>>
>>>> Atlantic Region
>>>> Commissioner’s Representative:Mylène Thériault
>>>> Heritage Court
>>>> 95 Foundry Street, Suite 410
>>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 5H7
>>>> Telephone: 506-851-7047
>>>>
>>>> BTW I called this dude too and left a voicemail telling him to dig
>>>> into his records and find what he should to give to his temporary boss
>>>> ASAP
>>>>
>>>> Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator
>>>> Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages
>>>> 30 Victoria Street, 6th Floor
>>>> Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0T8
>>>> Telephone: 819-420-4718
>>>> E-mail: ATIP-AIPRP@clo-ocol.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Clearly I have very good reasons to make these calls N'esy Pas Mr
>>>> Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger and Mr Speaker Geof Regan???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vertias Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:41:22 -0400
Subject: Go Figure just how dumb the NCA, Don Darling Silas Brown and
Joshua Counsil truly are
To: josh@goodrobotbrewing.ca, info@nationalcitizensalliance.
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, don.darling@saintjohn.ca,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, silas.brown@globalnews.ca,
megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 29 June 2019
Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Go Figure just how dumb Silas Brown and Joshua Counsil are
"Stephen Garvey did approach Global News to see if we would be
interested in an interview but that request was declined"
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://globalnews.ca/news/
Two members of National Citizens Alliance greeted by protesters during
Saint John appearance
By Silas Brown Reporter Global News
https://www.thecoast.ca/
Re: “Good beer, bad vibes”
Hi Domo,
My name is Josh and I'm a Co-founder and Marketing Director at Good
Robot, which I assume is the "north end beer bar" you're addressing. I
apologize that this has been happening to you. I agree that this is in
bad taste. I have at least 10 staff who use our Instagram account and
will be investigating this issue and instructing all of the staff that
this is not acceptable. One of our policies regarding social media is
to stay away from cheap tactics to garner new users, including
following users simply to be followed back.
If the issue continues or if you wish to help us resolve this quickly,
please email me (josh@goodrobotbrewing.ca) with some more information.
Cheers and thanks.
On 6/29/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Controversial political party greeted by vocal protesters in Saint John
>
> National Citizens Alliance holds forum outside City Hall after legion
> cancels its booking
> Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jun 28, 2019 1:56 PM AT
>
>
> 43 Comments
>
> David R. Amos
> For the record I have never heard of these dudes and I certainly agree
> with Mayor Gary Clark and not the Mindless Don Darling. Whereas the
> nasty Conservative Madame Bell decided to tease me about this politcal
> party methinks her buddy the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore and I should
> talk to them later today in Sussex N'esy Pas?
>
> Lou Bell
> Reply to @David R. Amos: This guy had one less supporter than you had
> when you ran !
>
>
> Chief Agent:
> Mr. Adrien J. Bordage
> 101-3423 Alfred-Desrochers Street
> Sherbrooke QC J1K 0A7
>
> Tel.: 506-343-5760
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:02:42 -0400
> Subject: I just called
> To: Alliancedunord2012@yahoo.ca
>
> Chief Agent:
> Mr. Derek Basque
> 32 Xavier Street
> Tracadie NB E1X 2G9
> Tel.: 506-395-4557
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:32:13 -0400
> Subject: RE Rachael Rollins 617-792-6152 and Mike Maloney 617-419-6719
> I just called Rollins AGAIN
> To: team@rollins4da.com, inquiries@dasuffolkcounty.com, bbachrach
> <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> <Lon.Povich@state.ma.us>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
>
> On 9/20/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://rollins4da.com/
>>
>> https://dasuffolkcounty.com/
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>>> matters.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> David A. Hansen
>>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>>> services de consultation
>>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>>> B3J 1P3
>>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>>> 426-2329
>>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>>> this entire e-mail.
>>> Before printing think about the Environment
>>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> FBI Boston
>>>> One Center Plaza
>>>> Suite 600
>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>>
>>>> Hours
>>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>>
>>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>>> a lot to you
>>>>
>>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Tuesday, 14 February 2017
>>
>> RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got
>> off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie
>> to me after all this time???
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
>> called and left a message for you
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ______________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
>> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
>> electronic signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:18:26 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Leona Alleslev MP I just called and
>> Tweeted you as well correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:18:17 -0400
>> Subject: ATTN Leona Alleslev MP I just called and Tweeted you as well
>> correct?
>> To: Leona.Alleslev@parl.gc.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
>> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
>> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
>> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant"
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
>> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
>> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> therien.mike@brunswicknews.com
>> <news@kingscorecord.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:36 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Suzelle Bazinet.(613-995-5117) I just earlier
>>> Whereas I was not allowed to speak to you today its best that we
>>> confer in writng anyway (Away from the office/absente du bureau)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be away from the office June 26 to 28, 2017. In my absence,
>>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Je serai absente du bureau du 26 au 28 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.
>>>
>>> Thank you / Merci
>>> Liliana
>>>
>>>
>>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>>> Ottawa, Ontario
>>> K1A 0R2
>>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Sandra Lofaro
>>> Executive Assistant /
>>> Adjointe exécutive
>>> (613)843-3540
>>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:29:03 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: So says the Mean Mindless New Neo Con
>>> Dominic Cardy so say you all?
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:28:58 -0400
>>> Subject: So says the Mean Mindless New Neo Con Dominic Cardy so say you
>>> all?
>>> To: ATIP-AIPRP@clo-ocol.gc.ca, Ghislaine.Saikaley@clo-ocol.
>>> mylene.theriault@ocol-clo.gc.
>>> "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
>>> <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>>> "Katherine.dEntremont" <Katherine.dEntremont@gnb.ca>,
>>> andre@jafaust.com, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, briangallant10
>>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>> "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "jody.carr" <jody.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>,
>>> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
>>> anglophonerights@mail.com, info@thejohnrobson.com, ronbarr@rogers.com,
>>> kimlian@bellnet.ca, iloveblue.beth@gmail.com, "randy.mckeen"
>>> <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald
>>> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
>>> "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
>>> <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT
>>> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, Geoff Regan
>>> <geoff@geoffregan.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca, jbosnitch
>>> <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Rachel.Blaney" <Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>> "elizabeth.thompson" <elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "dan. bussieres <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
>>> Tim.RICHARDSON <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, info ," <info@gg.ca>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:02:30 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: RE A legal state known as "functus" For the Public Record
>>> I talked to Mylene Theriault in Moncton again and she told me that
>>> same thing she did last year
>>> To: "Wright, Hamish (LEG)" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hamish,
>>>
>>> Did you contact Mr. Amos about the elk? How many elk were there? Were
>>> the police involved and if so did they wear the antlers you bought
>>> them?
>>>
>>> DC
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Patrick Bouchard <patrick.bouchard@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:44:18 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE A legal state known as "functus" Perhaps you,
>>> Governor General Johnston and Commissioner Paulson and many members of
>>> the RCMP should review pages 1 and 4 one document ASAP EH Minister
>>> Goodale? (AOL)
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be AOL until July 6th 2017.
>>>
>>> I will not have access to Groupwise.
>>>
>>> I may be reached at my personal e-mail thebouchards15@gmail.com
>>> depending on data coverage.
>>>
>>> ******************************
>>>
>>> Je vais être en vacances jusqu'au 6 Juillet 2017.
>>>
>>> Je n'aurais pas accès a mon GroupWise.
>>>
>>> Il est possible que je vérifies mon courriel personnel
>>> thebouchards15@gmail.com de temps à autre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cpl.Patrick Bouchard
>>> RSC 5 RCMP-GRC
>>> Sunny-Corner Detachment
>>> English/Français
>>> Off: 506-836-6015
>>> Cell : 506-424-0071
>>>
>>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 06/22/17 16:43 >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.ocol-clo.gc.ca/en/
>>>>
>>>> Atlantic Region
>>>> Commissioner’s Representative:Mylène Thériault
>>>> Heritage Court
>>>> 95 Foundry Street, Suite 410
>>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 5H7
>>>> Telephone: 506-851-7047
>>>>
>>>> BTW I called this dude too and left a voicemail telling him to dig
>>>> into his records and find what he should to give to his temporary boss
>>>> ASAP
>>>>
>>>> Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator
>>>> Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages
>>>> 30 Victoria Street, 6th Floor
>>>> Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0T8
>>>> Telephone: 819-420-4718
>>>> E-mail: ATIP-AIPRP@clo-ocol.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Clearly I have very good reasons to make these calls N'esy Pas Mr
>>>> Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger and Mr Speaker Geof Regan???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vertias Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
---------- Orginal message ----------
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:44:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that
Megan Mitton knows Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust
certainly does
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. MLA Megan Mitton is out of the office and
will return the week of July 8th. We appreciate your patience, and
will read your email as soon as possible. If you require assistance
promptly, please email Alice Cotton, Constituency Coordinator
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). For more urgent matters, you can also call the
office at (506) 378-1565. Merci pour votre courriel. La députée Megan
Mitton sera absente du bureau et reviendra la semaine du 8 juillet.
Nous apprécions votre patience, et nous lirons votre courriel dès que
possible. Si vous avez besoin d'aide plus rapidement, veuillez envoyer
un courriel à Alice Cotton, coordonnatrice de circonscription
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). Pour des questions plus urgentes, vous pouvez
également appeler le bureau au (506) 378-1565.
---------- Orginal message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:44:44 -0400
Subject: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that Megan Mitton knows
Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust certainly does
To: tomcat@tnt21.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
wharrison@nbpower.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://canadiantruths.
Canadian Truths
Exposing corruption in Canada and elsewhere
tomcat@tnt21.com
or call me at
519-396-1958
Skype – ron.stephens7
Thank You
31 thoughts on “Contact”
Sally Cunliffe October 12, 2018 at 8:07 pm
Its always amusing when they say ‘the community’ wants the thing
[windfarm] when you know the crony green capitalist scumbags want it
.. what can you do.. not much because they’re friggin thugs ..
https://www.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 00:58:36 -0400
Subject: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow Justice
and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete my emails N'esy Pas/
Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"Lynn.Chaplin" <Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau,
Kevin (LEG)" <Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)" <Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:59:37 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Lynn Chaplin needa a lawyer who
knows how to read emails better than the ex Fat Fred City Finest LIARS
Carl Urquhart and Stephen Horsman N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
my constituency office at
Lisa.Bourque@gnb.caLis
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:44:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that
Megan Mitton knows Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust
certainly does
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. MLA Megan Mitton is out of the office and
will return the week of July 8th. We appreciate your patience, and
will read your email as soon as possible. If you require assistance
promptly, please email Alice Cotton, Constituency Coordinator
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). For more urgent matters, you can also call the
office at (506) 378-1565. Merci pour votre courriel. La députée Megan
Mitton sera absente du bureau et reviendra la semaine du 8 juillet.
Nous apprécions votre patience, et nous lirons votre courriel dès que
possible. Si vous avez besoin d'aide plus rapidement, veuillez envoyer
un courriel à Alice Cotton, coordonnatrice de circonscription
(alice.cotton@gnb.ca). Pour des questions plus urgentes, vous pouvez
également appeler le bureau au (506) 378-1565.
---------- Orginal message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:44:44 -0400
Subject: RE Canadian Truths I would lay odds that Megan Mitton knows
Sally Cunliffe I know for a fact that Andre Faust certainly does
To: tomcat@tnt21.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
wharrison@nbpower.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com
https://canadiantruths.
Canadian Truths
Exposing corruption in Canada and elsewhere
tomcat@tnt21.com
or call me at
519-396-1958
Skype – ron.stephens7
Thank You
31 thoughts on “Contact”
Sally Cunliffe October 12, 2018 at 8:07 pm
Its always amusing when they say ‘the community’ wants the thing
[windfarm] when you know the crony green capitalist scumbags want it
.. what can you do.. not much because they’re friggin thugs ..
https://www.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 00:58:36 -0400
Subject: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the LIEbrano Shadow Justice
and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete my emails N'esy Pas/
Andrea Anderson-Mason.
To: Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"Lynn.Chaplin" <Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau,
Kevin (LEG)" <Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)" <Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:59:37 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Lynn Chaplin needa a lawyer who
knows how to read emails better than the ex Fat Fred City Finest LIARS
Carl Urquhart and Stephen Horsman N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
my constituency office at
Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca
Thank you.
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Si c’est au sujet du bureau de circonscription, veuillez contacter
Lisa Bourque à Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca
(506)755-2810.
Merci.
Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C. / c.r.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
French will follow
Thank you for your email.
For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
------------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel.
Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
Kevin Leahy
Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
T 613-996-5048
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
erreur et supprimez-le.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
(857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write. I appreciate hearing feedback
and suggestions from the people of British Columbia as we work
together to build a better BC.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
In the event that your inquiry more appropriately falls within the
mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer
your email for review and consideration.
Again, thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
John Horgan
Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
(857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:32 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov, "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Cc: richard.dahill@pd.boston.gov, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.
'If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue'
By Teresa Hanafin, Globe Staff
Good morning! It's Friday, June 28, the 179th day of the year. Sunrise
in Boston was at 5:09 a.m.; sunset will be at 8:25 p.m. for 15 hours
and 16 minutes of sunlight. The waning moon is 17 percent full.
US Senator Kamala Harris's challenge to former VP Joe Biden's comments
about working with segregationists in Congress and his opposition to
federal court-ordered busing got the most attention after the
Democratic debate last night. And Biden seemed unprepared in his
rather rambling answer.
By the way, it will be interesting to see how Biden tries to clean
things up when he speaks this afternoon at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow
PUSH Coalition Convention in Chicago.
And predictably, conservatives almost immediately began attacking
Harris, including by launching a coordinated campaign on Twitter in
which accounts pretended to be black people offended that she would
claim to be black (and all used the exact same wording):
"Kamala Harris is *not* an American black. She is half Indian and half
Jamaican. I'm so sick of people robbing American Blacks (like myself)
of our history. It's disgusting ... These are my people not her
people. Freaking disgusting."
Because, you know, racists would look at Harris throughout her life
and say, "Oh, she has black skin, but she's actually half Jamaican, so
we won't discriminate against her."
For the record, Harris was born in Oakland. Her mother, Shyamala
Gopalan Harris, was a Tamil Indian, a breast cancer scientist who
immigrated to the US from Madras (present-day Chennai) in 1960. Her
father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University economics professor
who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at
the University of California at Berkeley.
Progressives in the US House are still fuming today over Speaker Nancy
Pelosi's decision to accept the Senate version of the border funding
bill instead of the House version that had more protections for
migrant kids held in detention and restricted how the Trump
administration could spend the money.
Pelosi tried to add those elements to the Senate bill, but House
moderates threatened to withhold their support if she did. So it's the
Senate bill, with money for the Pentagon to send more soldiers to the
border and no health and care standards for the detention centers,
that goes to Trump for his signature. Vox has a good rundown of the
differences between the bills.
Trump is scheduled to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Osaka
about their ongoing trade war.
I missed this for yesterday's newsletter: The two friends whom writer
E. Jean Carroll told about her alleged rape by Trump immediately after
it happened in the mid-90s have identified themselves and publicly
corroborated her account.
Here's a New York Times podcast interview with the women.
One friend, Lisa Birnbach, an author best known for co-authoring "The
Official Preppy Handbook" in 1980, urged Carroll to go to the police.
The other, Carol Martin, a longtime news anchor for WCBS-TV in New
York, advised Carroll not to tell anyone because she believed that
Trump would use his army of lawyers to make her life hell.
Carroll, who blamed herself for the assault -- as far too many women
do -- stayed silent. Until now.
Mass. Governor Charlie Baker, still in London, meets with US
Ambassador Woody Johnson. Boston Mayor Marty Walsh is at the US
Conference of Mayors annual meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii. I wonder if
they've ever met in say, Albany.
Finally, let's end with Rudyard Kipling's most famous poem, "If—".
Pretty good use of the English language, I'd say.
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream — and not make dreams your master;
If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with worn-out tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings — nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And — which is more — you'll be a Man, my son!
On 6/27/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:14:34 -0400
> Subject: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083)
> on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
> Robert.Ridge@pd.boston.gov, N.Decosta-Klipa@boston.com,
> John.Conroy@pd.boston.gov
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
> <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
>
> https://www.boston.com/news/
>
> How a policy dispute between Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins
> suddenly turned personal
> "We are allowed to disagree with each other, but what you are not
> going to do is disrespect this office."
>
>
> "Gov. Charlie Baker and Rachael Rollins have purportedly hit the
> “reset button,” but the Suffolk Country district attorney still thinks
> there’s something “funny” about the way she — the first woman to hold
> the Boston-area prosecutor job — has been treated.
>
> The two elected officials clashed over the weekend, after Baker’s top
> public safety official sent Rollins a letter last week asking her to
> revise some of her new policies — including not prosecuting certain
> misdemeanor crimes. In a press conference Friday, the Democratic
> district attorney shot back at the Republican administration,
> suggesting that “not everyone gets the benefit of the Baker family,”
> alluding to groping allegations against the governor’s son last year."
>
> https://bpdnews.com/news/2019/
>
> The men and women of the BPD would like to congratulate John Conroy on
> his promotion from Sergeant Detective to Lieutenant and Robert Ridge
> on his rating of Sergeant Detective. We wish them the best of luck in
> their new chapters with the BPD.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:09:31 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should
> cantact the Yankee Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the
> warrants for my arrest erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:09:12 -0400
> Subject: Perhpas your buddy Ralph Goodale should cantact the Yankee
> Governor Charlie Baker and finally have the warrants for my arrest
> erased EH Franky Boy McKenna?
> To: "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
> barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, gov.press@state.ma.us,
> bob.ross@state.ma.us, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, jfetzer
> <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
> <sfine@globeandmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
> <news@dailygleaner.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jbosnitch
> <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>,
> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>
> Brendan Moss, Press Secretary, Governor's Office
> (617) 725-4025
> gov.press@state.ma.us
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:03:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barbara Massey I just called AGAIN
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
> On 6/26/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.goc411.ca/en/95200/
>>
>> Barbara Massey
>> Barbara Massey works as Executive Director and Senior General Counsel
>> for Justice Canada.
>> Barbara can be reached at 613-843-6394
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:36 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Attn Suzelle Bazinet.(613-995-5117) I just earlier
>> Whereas I was not allowed to speak to you today its best that we
>> confer in writng anyway (Away from the office/absente du bureau)
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office June 26 to 28, 2017. In my absence,
>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613) 843-6394.
>>
>> Je serai absente du bureau du 26 au 28 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613) 843-6394.
>>
>> Thank you / Merci
>> Liliana
>>
>>
>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>> Ottawa, Ontario
>> K1A 0R2
>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Sandra Lofaro
>> Executive Assistant /
>> Adjointe exécutive
>> (613)843-3540
>> sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 06/27/17 11:28 >>>
>>
>> Good Day
>>
>> Please view attachments
>>
>> Before I file my next lawsuit please explain why my documents which
>> included a letter to you and an unsigned draft of a motion that you
>> did not want me to file that I sent you in confidence as per your
>> request were filed in the Public Record then argued by the Crown and
>> even quoted from by Judges of the Federal Court of Appeal?
>>
>> Whereas the clerks of Federal Court are reluctant to file my brief
>> and its exhibits Jan Jensen should at very least give his copy to his
>> associate Paul Adams ASAP.EH?
>>
>> This is Canada Post's tracking history of my documents
>>
>> Tracking Number PG399580893CA
>>
>> FREDERICTON, NB
>> HALIFAX, NS
>> Accepted
>>
>> Out for delivery
>> Date received 2017/06/26
>> Current date 2017/06/27
>> Expected delivery 2017/06/27
>> Delivery details
>> ServiceXpresspost
>>
>> Expected delivery is 2017/06/27
>>
>> Perhaps somebody should start acting ethically before the lawyers Bill
>> Pentney and John Laskin take a seat on the bench N'esy Pas Mr Prime
>> Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???? Better yet have your lawyers even
>> bothered to read paragraph 83 of my first lawsuit yet?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Elizabeth Caverly Director:
>> Courts Administration Service
>> 1720-1801 Hollis St.
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3N4
>> Phone: 902-426-9619
>> Fax: 902-426-5514
>> Email: elizabeth.caverly@cas-satj.gc.
>>
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> PROCEEDINGS QUERIES
>> Recorded entry(ies) for A-48-16
>>
>> Court number information Court Number : A-48-16
>> Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Proceeding Category : Appeals Nature : Appeal (S.27 - Interloc.) -
>> Others
>> Type of Action : Non-Action
>>
>>
>> 70 records found for court number A-48-16 Doc Date Filed Office
>> Recorded Entry Summary
>>
>> - 2017-06-26 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Catharine M. Wilson
>> dated 26-JUN-2017 On June 26, 2017, the Appellant/Respondent on
>> Cross-Appeal submitted a post hearing brief per the direction of Webb,
>> J.A., dated 08-JUN-2017, which is being sent to the FCA for direction
>> as the document was submitted late and exceeds the number of pages.
>> placed on file.
>>
>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from both
>> parties by email with respect to the Directions dated June 8, 2017
>> placed on file on 08-JUN-2017
>>
>> - 2017-06-08 Ottawa Written directions of the Court: The Honourable
>> Mr. Justice Webb dated 08-JUN-2017 directing "Please advise the
>> parties that Mr. Amos has the right to submit a brief summary (not to
>> exceed 5 pages) to explain the exact conflict that, in his view,
>> arises in this matter with any of the judges assigned to this appeal
>> and to submit any additional documents that are relevant to this
>> issue. This summary and documents are to be submitted on or before
>> June 23, 2017. [...]" received on 08-JUN-2017 Confirmed in writing to
>> the party(ies)
>>
>> - 2017-05-26 Fredericton Letter from the respondent to Appellant,
>> provided by Appellant (copy of the letter) dated 26-MAY-2017 The
>> Respondent mentions they want communication from Appellant in written
>> letters by mail only, from now on. received on 26-MAY-2017
>>
>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from MR
>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton Request received from Appellant for CD audio
>> of the hearing on 24-MAY-2017 for transcript. Tarriff: $15 paid placed
>> on file on 24-MAY-2017
>>
>> - 2017-05-24 Fredericton This matter comes on for hearing on
>> 24-MAY-2017 at Fredericton before The Honourable Mr. Justice Webb The
>> Honourable Mr. Justice Near The Honourable Madam Justice Gleason
>> Appearances: David Raymond Amos (self-litigant) 902-800-0369 for the
>> appellant Jan Jensen 902-426-8177 for the respondent Language of
>> Hearing: E Court Usher: Jason Kennedy Duration: on 24-MAY-2017 from
>> 14:03 to 15:58 Courtroom : Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court
>> Registrar Michel Morneault Total duration: 1h55min Before the Court:
>> Cross-appeal Result: reserved Comments: DARS Z005130 was used for the
>> recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 222
>> page(s) 411 - 413 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
>>
>> 33 2017-04-24 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos on behalf of
>> Appellant/Respondent on cross-appeal sworn on 24-APR-2017 confirming
>> service of doc.32 on Respondent/Appellant on cross-appeal by
>> Xpresspost on 24-APR-2017 filed on 24-APR-2017
>>
>> 32 2017-04-24 Fredericton Book of Authorities with copy on DVD
>> consisting of 1 volume(s) on behalf of Appellant/Respondent on
>> cross-appeal Filed on 24-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the Court stored in
>> Ottawa One copy placed in Annex
>>
>> 31 2017-04-20 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
>> Jan Jensen confirming service of doc #30 upon Appellant by courier on
>> 20-APR-2017 filed on 20-APR-2017
>>
>> 30 2017-04-20 Halifax Book of Authorities consisting of 1 volume(s) on
>> behalf of HMQ (cross-appeal) Filed on 20-APR-2017 3 copy(ies) for the
>> Court stored in Ottawa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Liliana (Legal Services) Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:44:06 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Yo Mr Jensen see attached file I see that you corrupt
>> FEDS are on the attack bigtime as of May 24th N'esy Pas? (Away from
>> the office/absente du bureau)
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office until June 2, 2017. In my absence,
>> Barbara Massey will be acting and she can be reached at (613)
>> 843-6394.
>>
>> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu'au 2 juin 2017. En mon absence,
>> Barbara Massey sera interimaire et peut être rejointe au (613)
>> 843-6394.
>>
>> Thank you / Merci
>> Liliana
>>
>>
>> Liliana Longo, Q.C., c.r.
>> Senior General Counsel / Avocate générale principale
>> RCMP Legal Services / Services juridiques GRC
>> 73 Leikin Drive / 73 Promenade Leikin
>> M8, 2nd Floor / M8, 2ième étage
>> Mailstop #69 / Arrêt Postal #69
>> Ottawa, Ontario
>> K1A 0R2
>> Tel: (613) 843-4451
>> Fax: (613) 825-7489
>> liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Sharon Dickson
>> Executive Assistant /
>> Adjointe exécutive
>> (613)843-3540
>> Sharon.Dickson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
> Subject: You wished to speak with me
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
> years.
>
>
> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
> productive use of either of our time.
>
>
> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
> given due consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Charles Murray
>
> Ombud NB
>
> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>
>
>
>
>>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> From: "David Raymond Amos" davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>> Subject: I already know that you are as crooked as Hell Mr Leger. I am
>>>> fishing for an honest cop not another corrupt bureaucrat. i am just
>>>> proving that you know the truth Get it?
>>>> To: Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>> CC: Day.S@parl.gc.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
>>>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
>>>> infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, infomorning@halifax.cbc.ca,
>>>> webo@xplornet.com, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
>>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>> Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, amerrino@gmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
>>>> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, rfowlo@comcast.net, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, pcollin@cpa-acp.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
>>>> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Mr. Amos
>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0300
>>>> From: "Leger, Marc (DPS/MSP)" Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>> To: "David Raymond Amos" davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>> David Amos,
>>>>
>>>> I am not able to address your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Your calls and emails are not welcome and I would like you to stop
>>>> communicating with me by phone and email
>>>>
>>>> Marc Léger
>>>> Deputy Minister / Sous-ministre
>>>> Public Safety / Sécurité publique
>>>> (506) 453-7412 marc.leger@gnb.ca
>>>> Working together to build a safer New Brunswick / Travaillons ensemble
>>>> pour bâtir un Nouveau-Brunswick plus sûr
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>>> as usual
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.
>>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I. Introduction
>>>
>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III. Issue
>>>
>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV. Analysis
>>>
>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V. Conclusion
>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment