‘Andrew Wilkinson has a lot to answer for’: Bowinn Ma calls out BC Liberal leader for sexist roast video
By Richard Zussman Global News
Posted October 12, 2020 2:56 pm
Updated October 12, 2020 11:14 pm
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Minister, AG AG:EX" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:47 +0000
Subject: Your Email has been received
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
This automated response is to confirm that your email has been received.
If you have made inquiries that fall within the mandate of the
Ministry of Attorney General, your email will be reviewed for
consideration.
In the event that your inquiry is the responsibility of another area
of government, we will refer your email appropriately for review and
consideration.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to write.
Sincerely,
David Eby, QC
Attorney General and Minister responsible for Liquor, Gaming and ICBC
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else
knows why the lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out
of the NDP sails N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:39 -0300
Subject: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else knows why the
lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out of the NDP
sails N'esy Pas?
To: contact <contact@andrewwilkinson.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"AG.Minister" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
< premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.yk.ca>, pres <pres@ryerson.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
< Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "Beverley.Busson"
< Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect" < barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
eva.uguen-csenge@cbc.ca, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
eva.uguen-csenge@cbc.ca, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>
https://twitter.com/
Methinks when CBC deleted my comment to Mr Money they already knew their wicked partisan “Social Media Fury” game was backfiring bigtime Clearly comments by many others support my reasoning N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/thornthwaite-comments-bowinn-ma-1.5759112
Methinks if any BC Liberal had two clues between their ears they would check my work but we all know why no cop or politician will ever say my name N'esy Pas? @BCRCMP @JustinTrudeau
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
#bcpoli
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/bc-liberal-candidates-comments-about.html
Welcome to the circus Madame Ma
Methinks you should ask your Queens Counsel buddy Mr Eby to explain my concerns to you ASAP N'esy Pas??
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/thornthwaite-comments-bowinn-ma-1.5759112
B.C. Liberal candidate's comments about young, female NDP candidate spark social media fury
Liberal Jane Thornthwaite said Bowinn Ma was 'cuddling' another MLA at a networking event
· CBC News · Posted: Oct 11, 2020 12:14 PM PT
B.C. Liberal candidate Jane Thornthwaite, left, who is running in North Vancouver-Seymour, has apologized for comments she made about B.C. NDP candidate Bowinn Ma, right. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press)
B.C. NDP candidate Bowinn Ma says comments made by a Liberal candidate sexualized Ma's interactions with another politician and are a disservice to women who want to enter politics.
A video leaked on Twitter sparked social media outrage after it showed Liberal Jane Thornthwaite saying Ma, 35, used her appearance to charm retiring Liberal MLA Ralph Sultan during a networking event.
"The video of B.C. Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson watching on as a multi-term B.C. Liberal North Shore MLA sexualized my interactions with another multi-term B.C. Liberal North Shore MLA is a deeply uncomfortable characterization of my efforts to extend kindness across partisan lines," Ma said Sunday in a statement posted on Facebook and Twitter.
In the video, Thornthwaite says Ma is "a very pretty lady and she knows that she's got 'it' and she knows how to get Ralph going."
The comments were made during a virtual "roast" event held in honour of Sultan on Sept. 17.
WATCH | Thornthwaite says Ma 'knows how to get Ralph going':
Jane
Thornthwaite is apologizing for comments she made about NDP candidate
Bowinn Ma during a virtual "roast" event held in honour of retiring
Liberal MLA Ralph Sultan. Thornthwaite claimed Ma, 35, used her
appearance to charm Sultan during a networking event. 2:06
The video sparked outrage on social media after it was posted to Twitter on Saturday by Mo Amir, who hosts a B.C. political and pop culture podcast. Many called Thornthwaite's comments sexist and disparaging to women in politics.
Thornthwaite has since responded to the backlash on Twitter. "I have huge respect for all women who push through glass ceilings. I'm one of them. So is Bowinn Ma," she said in a tweet.
"Ralph Sultan has the same respect and a soft spot for his fellow UBC engineer, and I made light of that at a roast. I have always and will always support more women in politics."
B.C. Liberal Jane Thornthwaite, who is running in North Vancouver Seymour, has apologized for comments she made about Bowinn Ma. (THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Thornthwaite has since followed up her initial tweet with an apology.
"The comments I made at the roast for my colleague Ralph Sultan fell flat and were inappropriate. I unreservedly apologize for making these comments."
Thornthwaite says she's reached out to Ma to apologize directly.
B.C. politicians took to social media Sunday to condemn the comments as sexist and insulting to Ma.
NDP candidate David Eby, who served as attorney general in the last provincial government, tweeted Sunday that the comments amounted to slander of Ma, "a powerhouse representative who is also a young woman."
I wish to add this. The comments I made at the roast for my colleague Ralph Sultan fell flat and were inappropriate. I unreservedly apologize for making these comments. I have reached out to Bowinn Ma to apologize to her directly as well. I commit to doing better moving forward.
Support for Ma also poured in from other parties, with Green Party Leader Sonia Furstenau calling for an apology.
In the video, Thornthwaite goes on to describe the interaction between Sultan and Ma, saying "Ralph would be sitting on the middle of the couch and Bowinn would be right up right there and cuddling, cuddling, cuddling, a little bit of cleavage there, and Ralph would be enthralled."
"I go to an event and one of them was the [Capilano University] student union luncheon and both Bowinn Ma and Ralph were stuck on the couch together very, very, close together for almost the entire time."
The comments were met by laughs from the other Liberals on the video call, including Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson and candidates Mike de Jong, Karin Kirkpatrick, Ralph Sultan, Kevin Falcon, Jess Ketchum, Jordan Sturdy, and Gordon Hogg.
Ma, the NDP candidate
for North Vancouver-Lonsdale, was one of the youngest MLAs in the B.C.
legislature prior to the election being called.
David Eby @Dave_Eby
This is the BC Liberal leader and several candidates. The BC Liberal speaking is seeking re-election on the North Shore. A retiring BC Liberal is being “roasted”. They are slandering , a powerhouse representative who is also a young woman. The year is 2020.
Mo Amir ॐ This is VANCOLOUR
@vancolour
·
I’m not going to editorialize this.
Rather, I’d like to hear from women on how they feel about this clip.
I’m sharing because a woman reached out to me and asked me to do so (her email in below tweet).
#bcpoli
Wilkinson offered Ma his own apology in a tweet Sunday afternoon, saying the comments were inappropriate.
"I understand why many people are upset, and I continue to be committed to doing everything I can to make sure women are welcomed, encouraged, and treated with respect in politics and public life," he added in the tweet.
863 Comments
The tally of comment is dropping when I loaded a second page to double check
it was down to 829
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks everybody knows how much I enjoy the circus N'esy Pas?
John Money
“Social media fury” LOLOLOL
If something happens in social media, does it really matter?
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @John Money:
Methinks you should ask the many minions who support Yankee President
the political lawyer Biden called a clown and told him to shut up in
front of the whole world. He was often referred in the corporate media
as "The Donald" until he fooled them all and got elected N'esy Pas?
Pierre Sylvan
Reply to @John Money:
Social media fury has destroyed people’s careers... so it matters to them.
Social media fury has destroyed people’s careers... so it matters to them.
David Amos
Reply to @Pierre Sylvan: I concur
Linda Lafortune
Jeremiah
Johnson, outraged describes what I would have felt were I Bowinn Ma.
In order to roast her colleague, the woman demeaned her fellow female
politician. Had a male said what she did, he would have been crucified.
A female resorting to such comments deserves equal treatment.
Bob Ols
Reply to @Linda Lafortune: OK, whatever. Find a safe space until you feel better.
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Bob Ols: Envision yourself in Thornwaites position saying what she said.
David Amos
Reply to @Bob Ols: Well putDavid Amos
Reply to @Valerie Hayes: Methinks no man can imagine what a woman would think about most things N'esy Pas?
Jeremiah Johnson
Before this story
broke I'd never even heard Bowinn Ma's name mentioned before. She must
be an NDP backbencher, as in way back.
The CBC reporter's usage of the word outrage is way overdone, as in another word that is used far too often on this site, beloved. Perhaps some of the upcoming job reductions at the already over staffed national broadcaster will weed out some of these folks.
The CBC reporter's usage of the word outrage is way overdone, as in another word that is used far too often on this site, beloved. Perhaps some of the upcoming job reductions at the already over staffed national broadcaster will weed out some of these folks.
David Amos
Reply to @Jeremiah Johnson: Methinks if you are that old Mountain Man then I am the King of Siam N'esy Pas?
Chris Halford
Reply to @Jeremiah Johnson:
It doesn't matter if Ma is a backbencher, thornthwaite's remarks would be just as bad. BTW, I hadn't heard of either of those two women until today.
It doesn't matter if Ma is a backbencher, thornthwaite's remarks would be just as bad. BTW, I hadn't heard of either of those two women until today.
Valerie Hayes
Reply
to @Chris Halford: Me neither. That's why Thornwaites comments about
breaking through the glass ceiling seem a little odd. I don't think she
knows what that means either.
Wade Richter
Now imagine the outrage if the 80 plus year old Ralph Sultan was the one who initiated sitting too close?
Valerie
Hayes
Reply to @Wade Richter: Or forty something year old JT?
David Amos
Reply to @Wade Richter @Wade Richter:: Good Points
Chris Halford
Reply to @Wade Richter:
He didn't and how close is too close - 2 metres? Nor did Thornthwaite make the remark about him but about Ma who is in a different party too - odd eh? Your post is a classic red herring channel-changer.
He didn't and how close is too close - 2 metres? Nor did Thornthwaite make the remark about him but about Ma who is in a different party too - odd eh? Your post is a classic red herring channel-changer.
M.Ann Morwood
Reply to @Valerie
Hayes: He does it all the time, no one seem to be outraged over that or
the watch the hands either. Wonder why.
Wade Richter
Reply to @Chris Halford:
Your reply is classic partisan outrage. If anyone should be offended it’s Ralph Sultan. They make fun of his discomfort with the situation. But speaking about odd pal, why did it take this long and election to elicit NDP outrage. Classic political over the top faux outrage!
Your reply is classic partisan outrage. If anyone should be offended it’s Ralph Sultan. They make fun of his discomfort with the situation. But speaking about odd pal, why did it take this long and election to elicit NDP outrage. Classic political over the top faux outrage!
Chris Halford
Reply to @Wade Richter:
"Partisan outrage"? The headline is talking about social media outrage. I would expect Ms Ma to defend herself, wouldn't you if you'd been accused of doing something that you didn't do? It was Mr Sultan being roasted but I wouldn't be surprised if he thought Ms Thornthwaite had crossed a line.
"Partisan outrage"? The headline is talking about social media outrage. I would expect Ms Ma to defend herself, wouldn't you if you'd been accused of doing something that you didn't do? It was Mr Sultan being roasted but I wouldn't be surprised if he thought Ms Thornthwaite had crossed a line.
Chris Halford
Reply to @Chris Halford:
Of course the NDP will take advantage of the off-colourremark as would the BC "Liberals" if the shoe were on the other foot.
Of course the NDP will take advantage of the off-colourremark as would the BC "Liberals" if the shoe were on the other foot.
Wade Richter
Reply to @Chris Halford:
Apparently many NDP followers and Politicians use Social Media to garner votes and display faux outrage. What was your point?
Apparently many NDP followers and Politicians use Social Media to garner votes and display faux outrage. What was your point?
Donald Fox
This story is like a
"tempest in a teapot" - it is like listening to gossip - she said this
and she said that. I can't believe that Canada's national news media
would give this any attention. Whoever decided that it was newsworthy -
give your head a shake!
Rhiannon Simms
Reply to @Donald Fox:
Faux outrage is the rage these days.
Faux outrage is the rage these days.
Chuck Barris
Reply to @Donald Fox: How is it "he said she said" when the actual video is posted? It was obviously said
Donald Fox
Reply to @Chuck Barris:
Uh? You better read again what you have written.
Uh? You better read again what you have written.
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Donald Fox: But it was all recorded. How dumb was that?
David Amos
Reply to @Donald Fox: I concur but it is this sort of gossip that can can change government mandates.
Methinks my tweet to Eby just now easily proves that I enjoy this circus
very much Furthermore I doubt the reporters will bother giving their
heads a shake because not only will no read our comments but they have
no brains to rattle anyway N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Rhiannon Simms: C'est Vrai
Chris Halford
Reply to @Donald Fox:
Thornthwaite said precisely what she is reported to have said, didn't she? As far as I know, Mr Sultan was simply being roasted on his retirement and isn't quoted.
Thornthwaite said precisely what she is reported to have said, didn't she? As far as I know, Mr Sultan was simply being roasted on his retirement and isn't quoted.
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Chris Halford: But then why was the roast directed at the young woman?
Agan kunic
Young
women candidate not a young female. We are talking about women not
animals. Only the military and police use the word female to describe
the better sex.
Chris Halford
Reply to @Agan kunic:
"Young female NDP candidate" is what is in the headline. So far, no political party has fielded a candidate who is not human so there is no ambiguity.
"Young female NDP candidate" is what is in the headline. So far, no political party has fielded a candidate who is not human so there is no ambiguity.
Agan kunic
Reply to @Chris Halford: I prefer to call women women. I refer to pets as male or female, otherwise it’s boy girl man woman.
Chris Halford
Reply to @Agan kunic:
So it should say "Young woman NDP candidate"? I think you're making a r e a l l y long stretch there to try to accuse the headline writer of something that was clearly not intended.
So it should say "Young woman NDP candidate"? I think you're making a r e a l l y long stretch there to try to accuse the headline writer of something that was clearly not intended.
David Amos
Reply to @Chris Halford: Methinks nobody cares because it is the gossip they relish just like you obviously do N'esy Pas?
Russell Clark
Confirming again that BC-Libs are really Westcoast-Cons.
David Amos
Reply to @Russell Clark: YUP
Ed Kingston
Only " outrage" is from the CBC
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Ed Kingston: No it is all over twitter and other media as well
Jim Cyr
Reply to @Valerie Hayes: OH!! Well that's different then. What Twitter thinks is SOOO important.........
Donald Fox
Reply to @Valerie Hayes:
But seriously - is this newsworthy and is it worth coast to coast coverage on the CBC? Hardly
But seriously - is this newsworthy and is it worth coast to coast coverage on the CBC? Hardly
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Donald Fox:
It is newsworthy because of the toxic and sexist culture cultivated by
the BC Liberals. It is good to bring it out in the open. Or it will
never stop.
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @Jim Cyr: I don't think twitter is all that important but it does reach a wide audience.
Jim Cyr
Reply to @Valerie Hayes: No no.........you were correct: Twitter rules our world.
David Amos
Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks your Yankee President uses it to great effect N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Donald Fox:
Methinks folks should enjoy the various circuses we are paying for
instead of complaining about the reporting of them that we are also
funding N'esy Pas?
carl clark
Must be a election to get such fake outrage.Denying the undeniable
Valerie
Hayes
Reply to @carl clark: The outrage is not fake. It seems to be genuine.
David Amos
Reply to @Valerie
Hayes: Methinks many would agree that you are truly outraged then you
don't understand politicking or even the nature of a circus offered to
us N'esy Pas?
Valerie Hayes
Reply to @David Amos: I am not that outraged but I do see the need to address sexism in politics - on both sides of the fence.
David Amos
Reply to @Valerie Hayes: Yea Right
Methinks many would agree that you are playing politics jut like everybody else including me N'esy Pas?
Methinks many would agree that you are playing politics jut like everybody else including me N'esy Pas?
Ethan Beaver
Sounds like Ralph is the one deserving an apology.
Chris Halford
Reply to @Ethan Beaver:
Both Ma and Sultan. At least Mr Sultan was the person being roasted but it's a bit much to accuse him of being easily manipulated by attractive young women.
Both Ma and Sultan. At least Mr Sultan was the person being roasted but it's a bit much to accuse him of being easily manipulated by attractive young women.
David Amos
Reply to @Ethan
Beaver: Methinks many would agree hat its rather obvious from what is
offered that Ralphy had every opportunity to defend himself Hence he
deserve no apology from anyone N'esy Pas?
Barry Bondar
I guess "PrettyPeople" never ever use their appearance for self-benefit?! ... ;) ...
Chris Halford
Reply to @Barry Bondar:
Of course they do but what advantage was Ms Ma trying to achieve when Mr Sultan has retired? Are you going to say now that she's after his money or something?
Of course they do but what advantage was Ms Ma trying to achieve when Mr Sultan has retired? Are you going to say now that she's after his money or something?
David Amos
Reply to @Barry Bondar: Methinks many a true word is said in jest N'esy Pas?
Seth McKenny
Reply to @David Amos: and it’s n’esT pas.
David Amos
Reply to @Seth McKenny: BINGO
Earl Korn1
Not the first time someone tried to slander another just because they are more attractive. Quite common in humans.
Dave Brians
Reply to @Earl Korn1:
let's call a spade a spade. Dumpy, liberal, middle aged woman is
somehow offended by a very attractive younger woman. Nothing to see
here people... at least nothing new...
Earl Korn1
Reply to @Dave Brians: offended I doubt it, jealous yes.
Chris Halford:
Reply to @Dave Brians:
Dumpy, middle-aged CONSERVATIVE woman, the BC "Liberals" are Conservatives, paradoxically.
Dumpy, middle-aged CONSERVATIVE woman, the BC "Liberals" are Conservatives, paradoxically.
David Amos
Reply to @Earl Korn1:
Methinks at the end of the day this is merely a woman teasing a
political buddy about his interaction with another woman of a different
party. No More No Less
It should be obvious that this is just another example of the the Crown's Fake Left Media ignoring their non-partisan mandate and making a Mountain out a Molehill for the benefit of their favourite BC Party's reection N'esy Pas?
It should be obvious that this is just another example of the the Crown's Fake Left Media ignoring their non-partisan mandate and making a Mountain out a Molehill for the benefit of their favourite BC Party's reection N'esy Pas?
Earl Korn1
Reply
to @David Amos: I dont disagree with some of the things you say. But it
seems to me the internet has a negative effect of magnifying bland and
marginal events/immature conversation between officials.
Irrelevant events are made important by public web participation.
Irrelevant events are made important by public web participation.
Earl Korn1
Reply to @Earl Korn1:
I cannot judge by myself if this is good or bad on the long run. Merely
an observation on how internet changes our world. Taking notes on
changes and acknowledging them is important to me.
Valerie Hayes
The objective of a
political roast is supposed to be political satire based on politics,
not who is the most attractive, and who they are cuddling up to. So to
call that a roast - is a stretch in itself.
David Amos
Reply to @Valerie Hayes: Surely you jest
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Minister, AG AG:EX" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:47 +0000
Subject: Your Email has been received
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
This automated response is to confirm that your email has been received.
If you have made inquiries that fall within the mandate of the
Ministry of Attorney General, your email will be reviewed for
consideration.
In the event that your inquiry is the responsibility of another area
of government, we will refer your email appropriately for review and
consideration.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to write.
Sincerely,
David Eby, QC
Attorney General and Minister responsible for Liquor, Gaming and ICBC
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else
knows why the lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out
of the NDP sails N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else
knows why the lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out
of the NDP sails N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
https://811.novascotia.ca/ and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment
tool, which will help you determine if you need to call 811 for
further assessment.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:45 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:39 -0300
Subject: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else knows why the
lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out of the NDP
sails N'esy Pas?
To: contact <contact@andrewwilkinson.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"AG.Minister" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
< premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.yk.ca>, pres <pres@ryerson.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
< Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "Beverley.Busson"
< Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
< barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
eva.uguen-csenge@cbc.ca, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:17:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Ron Vaillant, Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson and
her new political party should finally connect the dots
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
For further information on BC's Restart Plan, please visit:
https://www.gov.bc.ca/
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/
Thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Office of the Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Minister, AG AG:EX" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:17:08 +0000
Subject: Your Email has been received
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
This automated response is to confirm that your email has been received.
If you have made inquiries that fall within the mandate of the
Ministry of Attorney General, your email will be reviewed for
consideration.
In the event that your inquiry is the responsibility of another area
of government, we will refer your email appropriately for review and
consideration.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to write.
Sincerely,
David Eby, QC
Attorney General and Minister responsible for Liquor, Gaming and ICBC
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 12 October 2020
B.C. Liberal candidate's comments about young, female NDP candidate
spark social media fury
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks when CBC deleted my comment to Mr Money they already knew
their wicked partisan “Social Media Fury” game was backfiring bigtime
Clearly comments by many others support my reasoning N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to@BowinnMa and @Wilkinson4BC
Methinks if any BC Liberal had two clues between their ears they would
check my work but we all know why no cop or politician will ever say
my name N'esy Pas? @BCRCMP @JustinTrudeau
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
#bcpoli
https://davidraymondamos3.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to@BowinnMa and @Dave_Eby
Welcome to the circus Madame Ma Methinks you should ask your Queens
Counsel buddy Mr Eby to explain my concerns to you ASAP N'esy Pas??
http://davidraymondamos3.
#bcpoli #cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
B.C. Liberal candidate's comments about young, female NDP candidate
spark social media fury
Liberal Jane Thornthwaite said Bowinn Ma was 'cuddling' another MLA at
a networking event
Eva Uguen-Csenge · CBC News · Posted: Oct 11, 2020 12:14 PM PT
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:16:51 -0300
Subject: Ron Vaillant, Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson and her new political
party should finally connect the dots
To: savecanadappc@gmail.com, callto@action4canada.com, premier
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
bruce.banman@bcliberals.com, voteflavelle@bcgreens.ca,
lauralynn@chpbc.ca, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, leader@chp.ca,
deekranz@chpbc.ca, aeriolalderking@chpbc.ca, dwstuart
< dwstuart@telus.net>, paul@paulfromm.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson - Ron Vaillant Interview. Mandatory V.axe in
Health Act.
2,574 views
•Oct 3, 2020
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 July 2016
RE David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no MLA
whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me for
that matter.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Eby.MLA, David"
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:55:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS
Thus I have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak
for me or to me for that matter.
To: David Amos
Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
Grey.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
the status of your query.
Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867 and they will connect you
to the appropriate government ministry.
To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
your postal code here to get their contact information:
https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
Thanks again for writing,
Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 14:02:24 -0300
Subject: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your fellow lawyer Maxime
Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill Morneau
To: info@electbawa.ca, info@nota.ca, mdsmith@postmedia.com,
rhinoshornyyz@gmail.com, hello@anchor.fm, news@citynews.ca,
"MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
< fin.minfinance-financemin.
info@brianchang.ca, hello@ryanlester.ca, votemarci@liberal.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
< erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: Toronto Centre
Resignation of Bill Morneau
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Marci Ien*
Conservative Ryan Lester
Green Annamie Paul
New Democratic Brian Chang
Free Party Canada Dwayne Cappelletti*
People's Baljit S. Bawa
Rhinoceros Sean Carson
No Affiliation Above Znoneofthe*
Baljit Bawa
Principled. Proven. Progressive.
info@electbawa.ca
416.728.4142
https://nationalpost.com/news/
Meet Above Znoneofthe, the fringe candidate who keeps running in
Ontario by-elections
Not only is he willing to legally change his name; he’s willing to
'pull a Mrs. Doubtfire,' cross-dress and sneak by security to mouth
off on debate stages
Author of the article:
Marie-Danielle Smith
Publishing date:
Nov 21, 2016
Email info@nota.ca
Facebook NOTA (Ontario) | NOTA (Canada)
YouTube NOTA (Ontario)
Phone (905) 501-0010
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Johanne Mennie <johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:51:03 -0700
Subject: Automatic Response Re: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know
what CBC and everybody else knows
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello,
Johanne Mennie is no longer an employee of the People's Party of
Canada and as a result this email address is no longer active.
Your message has been forwarded to the current Executive Director, Daniel Tyrie.
Thank you for reaching out to the PPC.
Regards,
PPC Team
______________________________
Bonjour,
Johanne Mennie n'est plus une employée du Parti populaire du Canada
et, par conséquent, cette adresse courriel n'est plus active.
Votre message a été transmis au directeur Directeur général, Daniel Tyrie.
Merci d'avoir contacté le PPC.
Cordialement,
L'équipe PPC
--
Johanne Mennie
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:50:56 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
To: votesaks@liberal.ca, andrea4yorkcentre
< andrea4yorkcentre@gmail.com>, johnturmel <johnturmel@yahoo.com>,
info@votejulius.ca, johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.
maxime@peoplespartyofcanada.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: York Centre
Resignation of Michael Levitt
Liberal Ya'ara Saks*
Conservative Julius Tiangson*
Green
New Democratic Andrea Vásquez Jiménez
People's Maxime Bernier
Independent John The Engineer Turmel*
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Toronto lawyer Annamie Paul elected leader of the federal Green Party
Paul is the first Black permanent leader of a major federal political party
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2020 5:00 PM ET
2003 Comments
Al Arres
Nutcases + Communists = Green Party
Ken Theule
Reply to @Al Arres:
Open your mind a little
Jim Ryan
Reply to @Al Arres: I think perhaps more of the nutcases are posting
on here. As for the communists ... lets get rid of healthcare,
schools, roads, police, fires etc ... all universal programs run by
the government and funded by taxpayers
David Amos
Reply to @Ken Theule: Methinks a lot of folks should ASAP N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Trust that I contacted the latest Green Party leader as soon as i read
this article
Greg Lang
So yet another leader of a (sigh) federal party without a seat in the
HoC. This is a usless waste of tax payers money.
Bob Rodgers
Reply to @Greg Lang: How? The Green Party Pays her salary, not the
government of Canada.
David Amos
Reply to @Bob Rodgers: True
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:54:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and
everybody else knows
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news cov
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 22:54:34 -0300
Subject: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
To: connect@annamiepaul.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.annamiepaul.ca/
connect@annamiepaul.ca
1-833-ANNAMIE 266 2643
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:29:22 +0000
Subject: RE: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
Martin last week
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:29:05 -0300
Subject: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
Martin last week
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
< PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
< steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
"andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca \"Hannah.Thibedeau\""
< Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
< Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
newsroom@globeandmail.com, "Nathalie.Drouin"
< Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, pm
< pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, info
< info@lewislaw.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:27:56 +0000
Subject: RE: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved
the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:27:37 -0300
Subject: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved the
voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
< PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
< steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Hannah.Thibedeau"
< Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
< Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"mc \"Newsroom\"" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
< Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
On 1/26/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Social conservative MP Derek Sloan running for Conservative
> leadership, promises 'bold ideas'
>
> Sloan is trying to position himself as an alternative to 'boring"
> candidates'
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 2:08 PM ET
>
>
> https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> House of Commons *
> Ottawa, Ontario,
> Canada K1A 0A6
> Telephone: 613-992-5321
> Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca,
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Businessman Rick Peterson is taking a second run at the Conservative
> leadership
>
> 'I'm probably going to be the only candidate who has to meet a
> payroll,' Peterson tells CBC News
> Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 1:15 PM ET
>
> https://www.petersoncapital.
>
>
> Rick Peterson - President
>
> More than 30 years in Canadian capital markets. Investment Advisor,
> institutional sales, investment banking experience at senior roles at
> Midland Walwyn Capital Inc, Merrill Lynch Canada, Yorkton Securities
> and HSBC Securities.
>
> Founded Peterson Capital in 2003; Conservative Party of Canada 2017
> leadership - candidate
>
> 780-868-6822
> rick@petersoncapital.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:40 +0000
> Subject: RE: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>
> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
> follow-up is required.
> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>
> In your email, if you:
>
> * have verified that you are a constituent by including your
> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
> will be provided in a timely manner.
> * have not included your residential postal mailing address,
> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
> contact your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is,
> you can find them by searching your postal code at
> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>
> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>
> Once again, thank you for your email.
>
> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
> Wellington-Halton Hills
> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<
> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://
>
> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> ?
> Hello -
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Erin O'Toole.
>
> Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
> has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
> best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
> to respond to your message immediately, as we receive a large volume
> of correspondence. If your matter is urgent please contact our office
> at:
>
> Office of MP Erin O'Toole
> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
> Bowmanville, ON
> L1C 1N3
> Tele. 905-697-1699 or Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:27 -0400
> Subject: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jbradley@canadian-republic.ca,
> tfreda@canadian-republic.ca, info@canadian-republic.ca,
> darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
> cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sturgeon.nathalie@
> news@dailygleaner.com, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca,
> Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca
> Cc: Marilyn.gladu@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Wednesday, 15 January 2020
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> https://twitter.com/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> I never heard of Marilyn Gladu so I called her to explain why MacKay
> made my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account
> to verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made my day Trudeau The
> Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered this lawsuit while Harper
> was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> MacKay's leadership run has been in the rumour mill for months
>
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 15, 2020 12:11 PM ET
>
> 1213 Comments
>
>
> David Sampson
> But will intelligent "progressive" conservatives ever forgive Peter
> for giving away a once proud national political institution to a horde
> of western based reform fundamentalists?
>
> Eugene Peabody
> Reply to @David Sampson: Not only can former PC members not trust him
> but Canadians cannot also.When a man.s word is no good ,he is the
> same.
>
> Anne Clarke
> Reply to @David Sampson: they will do anything to win right?
>
> Frank Paul
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nope.
>
> Neil Denman
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer. Peter Mackay, Jean Charest...I'm no fan of either, but it's
> a step away from Harper and Scheer.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Sampson: Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made
> my day N'esy Pas?
>
> David Allan
> Reply to @Neil Denman:
> "I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer."
>
> He's a reformer now. He solidly demonstrated so with his last 9 years
> in Parliament.
> Or is he just an opportunist who doesn't really care aside from his
> quest for personal power?
>
> Sean Cronin
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I will. It's ancient history now.
>
> Art Rowe
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> Like there was ever a doubt he would run?
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks its comical that even Trudeau
> The Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered my lawsuit in Federal
> Court while Harper was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> Craig Hall
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nobody cares except the Liberals. And David
> Orchard.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: I still do
>
> David Linkletter
> Reply to @Frank Paul: cough robo calls to name but one
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: BTW I remember talking to David Orchard in early
> 2004 about what went down and explained to him why I was preparing to
> run for a seat in the 38th Parliament Furthermore I put proof of our
> contact in a email which can still be found on the Internet to this
> very day
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: By the same token I never heard of Marilyn Gladu
> until I read this article so I called her to explain why MacKay made
> my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account to
> verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC for me will ya?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
> RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
> actions CORRECT?
> To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
> < admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
> "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
> "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> < Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> < mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
> < jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> < carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> < Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
> be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
> Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
> Lofaro 613 843 3540..
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
> mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
> Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
> Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
> email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
> our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
> receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
>
> Constituent of Fundy Royal:
>
> The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
> ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
> appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
> ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
> manner.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
> consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
> activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
> staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
> 506-832-4200.
>
> Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
>
> If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
> appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
> if his schedule can accommodate.
>
> Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
> Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
> office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
>
> Non-Constituent Enquiries:
>
> If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
> we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
>
> If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
> as necessary.
>
> Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
> office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
> Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
> November 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
> Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
> benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
> Gallant
> To: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
> < Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
> Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
> < Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca
> < pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.
> ps.publicsafetymcu-
> < ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> < david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
> < david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
> "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> < David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
> < bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
> < andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
> < Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
> "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
> < Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
> pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
> < Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
> "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> < Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> < macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
> < David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
> < news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
> < newstips@cnn.com>
>
> ethinks after all my phone calls emails, tweets, blogs and lawsuit CBC
> and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
> N'esy Pas?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
> Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
> one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
> money and shook my head
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
> ******************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
From: "Minister, AG AG:EX" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:47 +0000
Subject: Your Email has been received
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
This automated response is to confirm that your email has been received.
If you have made inquiries that fall within the mandate of the
Ministry of Attorney General, your email will be reviewed for
consideration.
In the event that your inquiry is the responsibility of another area
of government, we will refer your email appropriately for review and
consideration.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to write.
Sincerely,
David Eby, QC
Attorney General and Minister responsible for Liquor, Gaming and ICBC
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else
knows why the lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out
of the NDP sails N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else
knows why the lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out
of the NDP sails N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http
or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
https://811.novascotia.ca/ and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment
tool, which will help you determine if you need to call 811 for
further assessment.
Kind Regards,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:29:45 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:29:39 -0300
Subject: Methinks Trudeau The Younger everybody else knows why the
lawyer Andrew Wilkinson will never try to take wind out of the NDP
sails N'esy Pas?
To: contact <contact@andrewwilkinson.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"AG.Minister" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
< premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.yk.ca>, pres <pres@ryerson.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
< Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "Beverley.Busson"
< Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
< barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Baumberg, Andrew" <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
eva.uguen-csenge@cbc.ca, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" <Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:17:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Ron Vaillant, Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson and
her new political party should finally connect the dots
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
If you are writing about COVID-19, please refer to the information below:
For further information on BC's Restart Plan, please visit:
https://www.gov.bc.ca/
If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/
demonstrating relevant symptoms, please call 8-1-1 to speak with a
healthcare professional.
For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-
To learn more about federal government programs and information,
please click here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/
Thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
Office of the Premier
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Minister, AG AG:EX" <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:17:08 +0000
Subject: Your Email has been received
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
This automated response is to confirm that your email has been received.
If you have made inquiries that fall within the mandate of the
Ministry of Attorney General, your email will be reviewed for
consideration.
In the event that your inquiry is the responsibility of another area
of government, we will refer your email appropriately for review and
consideration.
I appreciate that you have taken the time to write.
Sincerely,
David Eby, QC
Attorney General and Minister responsible for Liquor, Gaming and ICBC
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 12 October 2020
B.C. Liberal candidate's comments about young, female NDP candidate
spark social media fury
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks when CBC deleted my comment to Mr Money they already knew
their wicked partisan “Social Media Fury” game was backfiring bigtime
Clearly comments by many others support my reasoning N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to@BowinnMa and @Wilkinson4BC
Methinks if any BC Liberal had two clues between their ears they would
check my work but we all know why no cop or politician will ever say
my name N'esy Pas? @BCRCMP @JustinTrudeau
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
#bcpoli
https://davidraymondamos3.
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to@BowinnMa and @Dave_Eby
Welcome to the circus Madame Ma Methinks you should ask your Queens
Counsel buddy Mr Eby to explain my concerns to you ASAP N'esy Pas??
http://davidraymondamos3.
#bcpoli #cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
B.C. Liberal candidate's comments about young, female NDP candidate
spark social media fury
Liberal Jane Thornthwaite said Bowinn Ma was 'cuddling' another MLA at
a networking event
Eva Uguen-Csenge · CBC News · Posted: Oct 11, 2020 12:14 PM PT
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:16:51 -0300
Subject: Ron Vaillant, Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson and her new political
party should finally connect the dots
To: savecanadappc@gmail.com, callto@action4canada.com, premier
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
bruce.banman@bcliberals.com, voteflavelle@bcgreens.ca,
lauralynn@chpbc.ca, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, leader@chp.ca,
deekranz@chpbc.ca, aeriolalderking@chpbc.ca, dwstuart
< dwstuart@telus.net>, paul@paulfromm.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson - Ron Vaillant Interview. Mandatory V.axe in
Health Act.
2,574 views
•Oct 3, 2020
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 July 2016
RE David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no MLA
whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me for
that matter.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Eby.MLA, David"
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:55:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS
Thus I have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak
for me or to me for that matter.
To: David Amos
Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
Grey.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
the status of your query.
Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867 and they will connect you
to the appropriate government ministry.
To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
your postal code here to get their contact information:
https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
Thanks again for writing,
Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 14:02:24 -0300
Subject: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your fellow lawyer Maxime
Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill Morneau
To: info@electbawa.ca, info@nota.ca, mdsmith@postmedia.com,
rhinoshornyyz@gmail.com, hello@anchor.fm, news@citynews.ca,
"MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
< fin.minfinance-financemin.
info@brianchang.ca, hello@ryanlester.ca, votemarci@liberal.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
< erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: Toronto Centre
Resignation of Bill Morneau
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Marci Ien*
Conservative Ryan Lester
Green Annamie Paul
New Democratic Brian Chang
Free Party Canada Dwayne Cappelletti*
People's Baljit S. Bawa
Rhinoceros Sean Carson
No Affiliation Above Znoneofthe*
Baljit Bawa
Principled. Proven. Progressive.
info@electbawa.ca
416.728.4142
https://nationalpost.com/news/
Meet Above Znoneofthe, the fringe candidate who keeps running in
Ontario by-elections
Not only is he willing to legally change his name; he’s willing to
'pull a Mrs. Doubtfire,' cross-dress and sneak by security to mouth
off on debate stages
Author of the article:
Marie-Danielle Smith
Publishing date:
Nov 21, 2016
Email info@nota.ca
Facebook NOTA (Ontario) | NOTA (Canada)
YouTube NOTA (Ontario)
Phone (905) 501-0010
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Johanne Mennie <johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:51:03 -0700
Subject: Automatic Response Re: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know
what CBC and everybody else knows
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello,
Johanne Mennie is no longer an employee of the People's Party of
Canada and as a result this email address is no longer active.
Your message has been forwarded to the current Executive Director, Daniel Tyrie.
Thank you for reaching out to the PPC.
Regards,
PPC Team
______________________________
Bonjour,
Johanne Mennie n'est plus une employée du Parti populaire du Canada
et, par conséquent, cette adresse courriel n'est plus active.
Votre message a été transmis au directeur Directeur général, Daniel Tyrie.
Merci d'avoir contacté le PPC.
Cordialement,
L'équipe PPC
--
Johanne Mennie
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:50:56 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
To: votesaks@liberal.ca, andrea4yorkcentre
< andrea4yorkcentre@gmail.com>, johnturmel <johnturmel@yahoo.com>,
info@votejulius.ca, johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.
maxime@peoplespartyofcanada.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: York Centre
Resignation of Michael Levitt
Liberal Ya'ara Saks*
Conservative Julius Tiangson*
Green
New Democratic Andrea Vásquez Jiménez
People's Maxime Bernier
Independent John The Engineer Turmel*
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Toronto lawyer Annamie Paul elected leader of the federal Green Party
Paul is the first Black permanent leader of a major federal political party
John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2020 5:00 PM ET
2003 Comments
Al Arres
Nutcases + Communists = Green Party
Ken Theule
Reply to @Al Arres:
Open your mind a little
Jim Ryan
Reply to @Al Arres: I think perhaps more of the nutcases are posting
on here. As for the communists ... lets get rid of healthcare,
schools, roads, police, fires etc ... all universal programs run by
the government and funded by taxpayers
David Amos
Reply to @Ken Theule: Methinks a lot of folks should ASAP N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Trust that I contacted the latest Green Party leader as soon as i read
this article
Greg Lang
So yet another leader of a (sigh) federal party without a seat in the
HoC. This is a usless waste of tax payers money.
Bob Rodgers
Reply to @Greg Lang: How? The Green Party Pays her salary, not the
government of Canada.
David Amos
Reply to @Bob Rodgers: True
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:54:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and
everybody else knows
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news cov
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 22:54:34 -0300
Subject: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
To: connect@annamiepaul.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://www.annamiepaul.ca/
connect@annamiepaul.ca
1-833-ANNAMIE 266 2643
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:29:22 +0000
Subject: RE: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
Martin last week
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:29:05 -0300
Subject: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
Martin last week
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
< PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
< steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
"andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca \"Hannah.Thibedeau\""
< Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
< Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
newsroom@globeandmail.com, "Nathalie.Drouin"
< Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, pm
< pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, info
< info@lewislaw.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:27:56 +0000
Subject: RE: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved
the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:27:37 -0300
Subject: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved the
voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
Petey Baby MacKay?
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
< PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
< steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Hannah.Thibedeau"
< Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
< Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"mc \"Newsroom\"" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
< Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
On 1/26/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Social conservative MP Derek Sloan running for Conservative
> leadership, promises 'bold ideas'
>
> Sloan is trying to position himself as an alternative to 'boring"
> candidates'
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 2:08 PM ET
>
>
> https://www.ourcommons.ca/
>
> House of Commons *
> Ottawa, Ontario,
> Canada K1A 0A6
> Telephone: 613-992-5321
> Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca,
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Businessman Rick Peterson is taking a second run at the Conservative
> leadership
>
> 'I'm probably going to be the only candidate who has to meet a
> payroll,' Peterson tells CBC News
> Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 1:15 PM ET
>
> https://www.petersoncapital.
>
>
> Rick Peterson - President
>
> More than 30 years in Canadian capital markets. Investment Advisor,
> institutional sales, investment banking experience at senior roles at
> Midland Walwyn Capital Inc, Merrill Lynch Canada, Yorkton Securities
> and HSBC Securities.
>
> Founded Peterson Capital in 2003; Conservative Party of Canada 2017
> leadership - candidate
>
> 780-868-6822
> rick@petersoncapital.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:40 +0000
> Subject: RE: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>
> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
> follow-up is required.
> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>
> In your email, if you:
>
> * have verified that you are a constituent by including your
> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
> will be provided in a timely manner.
> * have not included your residential postal mailing address,
> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
> contact your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is,
> you can find them by searching your postal code at
> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>
> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>
> Once again, thank you for your email.
>
> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
> Wellington-Halton Hills
> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<
> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://
>
> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
> everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> ?
> Hello -
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Erin O'Toole.
>
> Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
> has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
> best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
> to respond to your message immediately, as we receive a large volume
> of correspondence. If your matter is urgent please contact our office
> at:
>
> Office of MP Erin O'Toole
> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
> Bowmanville, ON
> L1C 1N3
> Tele. 905-697-1699 or Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:27 -0400
> Subject: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
> agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
> knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
> To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jbradley@canadian-republic.ca,
> tfreda@canadian-republic.ca, info@canadian-republic.ca,
> darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
> cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sturgeon.nathalie@
> news@dailygleaner.com, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca,
> Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca
> Cc: Marilyn.gladu@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Wednesday, 15 January 2020
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> https://twitter.com/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> I never heard of Marilyn Gladu so I called her to explain why MacKay
> made my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account
> to verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
> Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made my day Trudeau The
> Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered this lawsuit while Harper
> was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
> MacKay's leadership run has been in the rumour mill for months
>
> Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 15, 2020 12:11 PM ET
>
> 1213 Comments
>
>
> David Sampson
> But will intelligent "progressive" conservatives ever forgive Peter
> for giving away a once proud national political institution to a horde
> of western based reform fundamentalists?
>
> Eugene Peabody
> Reply to @David Sampson: Not only can former PC members not trust him
> but Canadians cannot also.When a man.s word is no good ,he is the
> same.
>
> Anne Clarke
> Reply to @David Sampson: they will do anything to win right?
>
> Frank Paul
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nope.
>
> Neil Denman
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer. Peter Mackay, Jean Charest...I'm no fan of either, but it's
> a step away from Harper and Scheer.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Sampson: Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made
> my day N'esy Pas?
>
> David Allan
> Reply to @Neil Denman:
> "I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
> least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
> Reformer."
>
> He's a reformer now. He solidly demonstrated so with his last 9 years
> in Parliament.
> Or is he just an opportunist who doesn't really care aside from his
> quest for personal power?
>
> Sean Cronin
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> I will. It's ancient history now.
>
> Art Rowe
> Reply to @David Sampson:
> Like there was ever a doubt he would run?
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks its comical that even Trudeau
> The Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered my lawsuit in Federal
> Court while Harper was still the boss N'esy Pas?
>
> Craig Hall
> Reply to @David Sampson: Nobody cares except the Liberals. And David
> Orchard.
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: I still do
>
> David Linkletter
> Reply to @Frank Paul: cough robo calls to name but one
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: BTW I remember talking to David Orchard in early
> 2004 about what went down and explained to him why I was preparing to
> run for a seat in the 38th Parliament Furthermore I put proof of our
> contact in a email which can still be found on the Internet to this
> very day
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Reply to @Craig Hall: By the same token I never heard of Marilyn Gladu
> until I read this article so I called her to explain why MacKay made
> my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account to
> verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
> of CBC for me will ya?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
> RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
> actions CORRECT?
> To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
> < admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
> "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
> "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> < Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> < mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
> < jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> < carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> < Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
> Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
> be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
> Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
> Lofaro 613 843 3540..
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
> mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
> Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
> Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
> email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
> our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
> receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
>
> Constituent of Fundy Royal:
>
> The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
> ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
> appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
> ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
> manner.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
> consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
> activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
> staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
> 506-832-4200.
>
> Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
>
> If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
> appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
> if his schedule can accommodate.
>
> Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
> Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
> office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
>
> Non-Constituent Enquiries:
>
> If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
> we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
>
> If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
> as necessary.
>
> Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
> office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
> Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
> November 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
> CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
> on Brian Gallant
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
> Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
> benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
> Gallant
> To: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
> < Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
> Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
> < Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca
> < pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.
> ps.publicsafetymcu-
> < ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> < david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
> < david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
> "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> < David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
> < bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
> < andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
> < Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
> "marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
> < Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
> pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
> < Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
> "sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
> < Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> < macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
> < David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
> < news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
> < newstips@cnn.com>
>
> ethinks after all my phone calls emails, tweets, blogs and lawsuit CBC
> and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
> N'esy Pas?
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
> Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
> one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
> money and shook my head
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
> ******************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
>
Nice replies in return of this issue with real arguments and telling all concerning that.
ReplyDeleteI am truly thankful to the owner of this site who has shared this fantastic post at at this time.
ReplyDeleteRidiculous story there. What occurred after? Take care!
ReplyDeleteWow! After all I got a weblog from where I be able to actually take valuable information regarding my study and knowledge.
ReplyDeleteWith havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I've either written myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any ways to help prevent content from being stolen? I'd genuinely appreciate it.
ReplyDelete