https://twitter.com/
Content disabled
Methinks Paul Champ and the RCMP should surf the web with our names and see it rings any bells for them this time N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-pension-women-supreme-court-1.5765134
RCMP pension plan discriminates against women, says Supreme Court
Three of the top court's nine justices dissented
· CBC News · Posted: Oct 16, 2020 12:36 PM ET
Retired RCMP Sgt. Joanne Fraser, right, is one of three women who took the national police force to court, arguing its pension plan discriminates against women who work part-time to care for young children. (Joanne Fraser)
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police pension plan discriminates against women and violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court ruled in a divided decision released today.
The case was brought forward by three retired female Mounties who argued that elements of the RCMP's pension plan are outdated and sexist.
Joanne Fraser, Allison Pilgrim and Colleen Fox all had children in the 1990s, when the RCMP wasn't allowing members to work part-time.
Fraser said she was "overwhelmed" by the effort to balance work and family, Pilgrim described it as a "treadmill" and Fox called the experience "hell on earth," said Friday's decision.
The RCMP introduced a program in 1997 that allowed job-sharing as an alternative to unpaid leave, permitting two or three people to split the duties of one full-time position. All three women signed up for that program, as did 137 other members between 1997 and 2011.
The court's decision noted that most people who joined the program at the time were women and most of them cited child care as their reason for joining.
When Fraser, Pilgrim and Fox returned to their full-time jobs, they learned their part-time work was not considered pensionable service and they would not be permitted to make doubled-up contributions to buy back the time.
But other members with gaps in full-time service, such as leave without pay, were allowed to buy back the service they missed by making the contributions.
The plaintiffs argued that the force's pension plan treated job-sharers worse than it did other members and breached the section of the Charter of Rights that says the "law should treat everyone equally, without discrimination on certain characteristics."
SCC decision notes 'historical disadvantage'
A Federal Court judge disagreed, but the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear their arguments.
Today, most of the Supreme Court justices ruled the pension plan discriminated against the job-sharers because they were women.
Justice Rosalie Abella, writing for the majority, called it a clear violation of the charter.
"Full-time RCMP members who job-share must sacrifice pension benefits because of a temporary reduction in working hours. This arrangement has a disproportionate impact on women and perpetuates their historical disadvantage," says the decision.
"I agree with Ms. Fraser that the negative pension consequences of job-sharing perpetuate a long-standing source of disadvantage to women: gender biases within pension plans, which have historically been designed 'for middle and upper-income full-time employees with long service, typically male.'"
Paul Champ, who defended the three women, called today's decision a win for equality.
"The federal government has tinkered with the RCMP pension plan over the years to make it fairer for women who have interruptions in their service for childbirth and care for small children. But it continued to penalize women who wanted to balance their job duties and childcare responsibilities for young children," he said.
"My clients fought for over 20 years to bring this fundamental equality issue to the attention of the RCMP and, eventually, the courts. They understood it was wrong and unfair to women and they fought all these years to make it right."
Three justices dissented.
Justices Russell Brown and Malcolm Rowe wrote that the job-sharing program was an attempt by the RCMP to accommodate employees with child care responsibilities and argued that the initiative's failure to remove disadvantages didn't make it discriminatory.
Justice Suzanne Côté, meanwhile, argued that the pension plan didn't single women out for discrimination.
Abella said it will be up to government officials to come up with a plan to allow full-time members who reduced their hours under the job-sharing program to buy back their full pension credit.
A spokesperson for the RCMP said the force is still reviewing Friday's decision.
"We are currently in the process of reviewing the decision and its implications to determine what steps must be taken. This being said, we are committed to reviewing the job-sharing arrangement," said Cpl. Caroline Duval.
"The RCMP remains committed to building an inclusive and barrier-free workplace for all of its employees."
1140 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Paul Champ and the RCMP should surf the web with our names and see it rings any bells for them this time N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos:
Methinks they should recall that years ago I agreed with Justice
Catherine Kane and simply stated that deal is deal is a deal N'esy Pas?
"Justice Catherine Kane decided the women did not lose pension benefits because they were women or parents, but because they chose to work part-time.
"They worked part-time in a job-sharing arrangement to meet the competing demands of their child-care responsibilities and their career," Kane wrote.
The judge agreed that while the majority of Mounties who work part-time are women with young children, she said they also benefited from spending more time with their children and less stress in trying to find child care.
As for the overall impact on their pensions, Kane found it would be reduced, on average, by five per cent but that "it is difficult to conclude that the impact is necessarily adverse."
"Justice Catherine Kane decided the women did not lose pension benefits because they were women or parents, but because they chose to work part-time.
"They worked part-time in a job-sharing arrangement to meet the competing demands of their child-care responsibilities and their career," Kane wrote.
The judge agreed that while the majority of Mounties who work part-time are women with young children, she said they also benefited from spending more time with their children and less stress in trying to find child care.
As for the overall impact on their pensions, Kane found it would be reduced, on average, by five per cent but that "it is difficult to conclude that the impact is necessarily adverse."
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos:
The women's lawyer, Paul Champ, said today's judgment is a big
disappointment for his clients, who fought the issue inside the RCMP for
10 years before turning to the courts.
"The court recognized that care for children disproportionately falls to women in Canada, including women in dual-earner families, Champ wrote in an email to CBC News.
He said his clients are reviewing the judgment and considering an appeal.
"Hopefully the federal government will take a close look at this decision and recognize that pension plans for RCMP and public service workers need to be reformed to be more equitable for parents who choose to temporarily work part-time to care for their children. This would be the right policy choice for a feminist prime minister," Champ said, in reference to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's own oft-stated description.
It is likely that Thursday's ruling, however, will be a relief to the federal government. If the Federal Court had changed the RCMP pension plan to allow people to accrue pensionable service while job sharing or working part-time, the government would likely have had to do it for all other public servants.
"The court recognized that care for children disproportionately falls to women in Canada, including women in dual-earner families, Champ wrote in an email to CBC News.
He said his clients are reviewing the judgment and considering an appeal.
"Hopefully the federal government will take a close look at this decision and recognize that pension plans for RCMP and public service workers need to be reformed to be more equitable for parents who choose to temporarily work part-time to care for their children. This would be the right policy choice for a feminist prime minister," Champ said, in reference to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's own oft-stated description.
It is likely that Thursday's ruling, however, will be a relief to the federal government. If the Federal Court had changed the RCMP pension plan to allow people to accrue pensionable service while job sharing or working part-time, the government would likely have had to do it for all other public servants.
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/06/federal-court-dismisses-claims-that.html
Friday, 9 June 2017
Federal Court dismisses claims that RCMP pension plan discriminatory
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-pension-young-mothers-federal-court-1.4151519
Federal Court dismisses claims that RCMP pension plan discriminatory
Lawyer says claimants are disappointed and considering appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jun 08, 2017 12:14 PM ET
Retired RCMP Sgt. Joanne Fraser, right, is one of three
women who took the national police force to Federal Court to argue the
RCMP pension plan discriminates against women who work part-time to care
for young children. (Joanne Fraser)
Joanne Fraser, Allison Pilgrim and Colleen Fox decided to work part-time temporarily for the national police force after having children, in order to accommodate child-care arrangements while doing shift work.
When they returned to their full-time jobs they learned their part-time work was not considered pensionable service and they would not be permitted to make doubled-up contributions to buy back the time they had not worked.
On Thursday, Justice Catherine Kane decided the women did not lose pension benefits because they were women or parents, but because they chose to work part-time.
"They worked part-time in a job-sharing arrangement to meet the competing demands of their child-care responsibilities and their career," Kane wrote.
The judge agreed that while the majority of Mounties who work part-time are women with young children, she said they also benefited from spending more time with their children and less stress in trying to find child care.
As for the overall impact on their pensions, Kane found it would be reduced, on average, by five per cent but that "it is difficult to conclude that the impact is necessarily adverse."
The women's lawyer, Paul Champ, said today's judgment is a big disappointment for his clients, who fought the issue inside the RCMP for 10 years before turning to the courts.
"The court recognized that care for children disproportionately falls to women in Canada, including women in dual-earner families, Champ wrote in an email to CBC News.
He said his clients are reviewing the judgment and considering an appeal.
"Hopefully the federal government will take a close look at this decision and recognize that pension plans for RCMP and public service workers need to be reformed to be more equitable for parents who choose to temporarily work part-time to care for their children. This would be the right policy choice for a feminist prime minister," Champ said, in reference to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's own oft-stated description.
It is likely that Thursday's ruling, however, will be a relief to the federal government. If the Federal Court had changed the RCMP pension plan to allow people to accrue pensionable service while job sharing or working part-time, the government would likely have had to do it for all other public servants.
141 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Darren MacDonald
Daquano Sullivan Brown
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Darren MacDonald
"they chose to work part-time"
That makes sense with the key word being "chose".
That makes sense with the key word being "chose".
David Raymond Amos
@Darren MacDonald Its rather
simple to me a deal is a deal is a deal. The ladies knew the scoop
before they opted to work part time. However their lawyer is getting
well paid full time all the time. You bet he wants to appeal.
Anthony Laface
".....to buy back the time
they had not worked." Huh? They expected to get a pension for time
that they had not worked? Really? Only spoiled civil servants would
even broach this sort of ludicrous entitlement.
linda romero
@Anthony Laface ..and they are entitled to full pension I believe at 55,and the pension plan is really "GOLDEN"..
David Raymond Amos
@linda romero I checked out their pension years ago and it truly is "Golden"
Jim Redmond
I don't even understand what that basis was for the claim of
discrimination. If someone willingly decides to work part-time,
obviously their pension benefits do not accumulate during the period in
which they end up working part-time. Why is that such a difficult
concept for some people to grasp?
David Raymond Amos
@Jim Redmond How can hundreds of lady cops be sexually assaulted etc for years then suddenly be offended after they retire?
Jim Redmond
@David Raymond Amos It's called taking a shot at winning the lottery.
Nick O'Reilly
Of course, it is not
discrimination, but way to take it up in court, ladies! Could you
imagine being in their chain-of-command and having to listen to them for
10 years?
Jack O Hill
@Natalie Jameson
Change is done on a going-forward basis, through negotiations.
It is NOT done retroactively through the courts.
Change is done on a going-forward basis, through negotiations.
It is NOT done retroactively through the courts.
David Raymond Amos
@Jack O Hill I would like to think that were so
Daquano Sullivan Brown
I suppose they are entitled to their entitlements.
David Raymond Amos
@Daquano Sullivan Brown Only
sneaky political lawyers such David Dingwall can say such nonsense and
get away with making us pay for his bubble gum etc.
Awistoyus Nahasthay
@Daquano Sullivan Brown
Um, if they are "entitlements" then they are, by definition, "entitled" to them. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be "entitlements".
Um, if they are "entitlements" then they are, by definition, "entitled" to them. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be "entitlements".
Awistoyus Nahasthay
@David Raymond Amos
It is NOT nonsense David, it is plain, simple, logic.
It is people speaking against the concept - that someone is entitled to their entitlements - that is pure nonsense!
It is NOT nonsense David, it is plain, simple, logic.
It is people speaking against the concept - that someone is entitled to their entitlements - that is pure nonsense!
David Cradden
@Awistoyus Nahasthay
I think the point is they aren't entitled just because they have a sense of entitlement!
I think the point is they aren't entitled just because they have a sense of entitlement!
Steve Sullivan
@Awistoyus Nahasthay Its a famous quote from a politician.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-pension-plan-constitutional-challenge-women-part-time-1.3898780
Pension plan discriminatory, female Mounties tell court
If judge agrees, it could affect all federal public service pensions, lawyer says
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Dec 19, 2016 5:00 AM ET
Retired RCMP Sgt. Joanne Fraser on duty in 2010. She
belongs to a group of female Mounties who are fighting for lost pension
benefits. (Joanne Fraser)
Joanne Fraser, Allison Pilgrim and Colleen Fox decided to work part time temporarily for the national police force after having children, in order to accommodate child-care arrangements while doing shift work.
Yet when they returned to work full time they learned their part-time stints were not considered pensionable service for which they could "buy back" the time they didn't work by making doubled-up contributions on behalf of themselves and the RCMP.
What really annoyed the women, though, was that RCMP employees who were suspended with or without pay, or who chose to take as much as five years off work without pay, were allowed to buy back their pension contributions.
Any decision to permit RCMP members to buy
back pension benefits should be left to Parliament, lawyers for Canada's
attorney general argue. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
Documents filed on the women's behalf by Ottawa labour lawyer Paul Champ say the RCMP pension plan discriminates on the grounds of sex and family status.
"The plan perpetuates the stereotype that it is acceptable for women to fill one of two roles in society — that of caregiver or member of the labour force, but not both at the same time."
The RCMP first allowed people to work in job-share agreements in 1997. According to the RCMP's 2012 gender-based assessment, the aim was to accommodate women and others who need "maternity/parental leave."
The same year, a draft employment equity plan said the force would promote part-time work "to support women and others achieve a better balance in coping with work and family responsibilities."
'I felt as though I was excelling as a mother and as a member of the RCMP.' — Colleen Fox
Fraser was one of the first people to try out the new scheme. Like many women in Canada in the 1990s, she returned to work six months after having her first child. It was tough.
"I'm married to a member as well. We were working shift work. We had no family in Alberta, all of our family is in Quebec and Ontario," she told CBC News.
When Fraser had her second child, she decided to take a leave without pay. After three years, Fraser said, she was encouraged to try job-sharing. She worked part time for three years before resuming her full-time job.
Child-care challenges
It was then she learned that while her three years of unpaid leave were fully deemed pensionable service, she could not buy back the hours she didn't work while part-time.
Fox also described in court documents the challenge of balancing police work and life with an infant.
She had to meet her husband, who is also a Mountie, "at coffee shops and on lunch breaks while she was on patrol so she could breastfeed her son."
After having her second child in a rural community with limited child-care options before part-time work was introduced in 1997, Fox felt she had no option but to retire.
In 2000 she re-enrolled because she could job-share. "I felt as though I was excelling as a mother and as a member of the RCMP."
'The federal Public Service Superannuation Act also has this discriminating element to it.' — Lawyer Paul Champ
"The applicants all face lower pension benefits on retirement because they chose to job-share and balance their police duties with their family obligations while their children were young," Champ argues, citing statistics that show everyone who shared jobs between 2010 and 2014 was a woman.
The women hope the Federal Court will find the pension plan discriminatory and grant all Mounties who've worked reduced, job-share hours the right to buy back pensionable service.
Big changes possible
In their documents, lawyers for Canada's attorney general dispute that most of the RCMP's part-time employees are women with young children. They say any decision to permit members to buy back pension benefits "would be making a significant policy choice that is best left to Parliament."
"The aim of the RCMP pension plan is to provide retirement income and benefits for members. It is not to offset the costs associated with child care, to provide 'universal welfare benefits,' or to meet all of the needs of its beneficiaries."
What the government is likely more concerned with though, is a ripple effect, Champ said.
"If they change the RCMP pension plan to allow people to get pensionable service while working part time, they would have to do it for other public service workers because the federal Public Service Superannuation Act also has this discriminating element to it, and I think they might be concerned about costs," said Champ.
571 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Ene' Baziuk
How is this discriminatory
when fathers who take time off get treated the exact same way? Do
feminists want equality or do they want special treatment?
Jay Leno
@Ene' Baziuk
The Pension plan for Mounties is not "outdated", on the contrary, and if anything, it's too much Gold-Plated.
The Pension plan for Mounties is not "outdated", on the contrary, and if anything, it's too much Gold-Plated.
Jay Mann
@Chelle Baldwin
I would most certainly complain if employees on leave were allowed to continue to make full-time level contributions but part time employees were not.
I would most certainly complain if employees on leave were allowed to continue to make full-time level contributions but part time employees were not.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:44:47 -0400
Subject: Mr Champ I just called Does this old email ring any bells?
To: info@champlaw.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: seankis@rogers.com, thehouse@cbc.ca, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
For a consultation, please contact:
Champ & Associates
43 Florence Street
Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
Phone: 613-237-4740
Fax: 613-232-2680
info@champlaw.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Ottawa ditches mediation talks in $27M Abdelrazik lawsuit
Lawsuit personally names former foreign minister Lawrence Cannon, who
blocked Abdelrazik's return from Sudan
Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: Apr 17, 2018 4:00 AM E
"Lawyer Paul Champ says he detects political calculation in the
Trudeau government's decision to abandon mediation talks"
On 10/9/10, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> If not at least a former intelligence officer should know who these dudes
> are and why Petey Mackay is very nervous about what I am up to these days.
>
>
>
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location > Visit Detail
> Visit 12,009
>
>
>
> [<<] [>>]
>
> Domain Name
>
> gc.ca ? (Canada)
>
> IP Address
>
> 131.137.245.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
>
> ISP
>
> Defense Research Establishment
>
> Location
>
>
>
>
>
> Continent
> :
> North America
>
> Country
> :
> Canada (Facts)
>
> State/Region
> :
> Ontario
>
> City
> :
> Ottawa
>
> Lat/Long
> :
> 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>
> Language
>
> English (Canada)
> en-ca
>
> Operating System
>
> Microsoft WinXP
>
> Browser
>
> Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>
> Javascript
>
> version 1.3
>
> Monitor
>
>
>
>
>
> Resolution
> :
> 1024 x 768
>
> Color Depth
> :
> 32 bits
>
> Time of Visit
>
> Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
>
> Last Page View
>
> Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
>
> Visit Length
>
> 0 seconds
>
> Page Views
>
> 1
>
> Referring URL
>
>
>
> Visit Entry Page
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Visit Exit Page
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Out Click
>
>
>
> Time Zone
>
> UTC-5:00
>
> Visitor's Time
>
> Sep 28 2010 11:48:22 am
>
> Visit Number
>
> 12,009
>
>
>
>
> BTW You pissed me off when you asked the same question bureaucrats ask three
> times
>
> In my humble opinion the better question for you to ask after you quit
> interupting with the same dumb question would how can I help you My number
> is 902 800 0369 perhaps your lawyer should check the pdf hereto attached and
> try to talk to a very serious whisteblower EH?
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/
>
> FYI check this lawyer's work about your Fed buddies
>
> http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/
>
> New Deputy Minister of Justice - Myles Kirvan
>
>
>
> Deputy Minister of Justice in a nation that is covering up a major
> international crime is a dangerous job. Astute observers are asking: How
> long will Canada's newest Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney
> General, Mr. Myles Kirvan last in his new job?
>
> Formerly Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, Mr. Kirvan becomes
> Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of Canada, effective
> April 6.
>
> Mr. Kirvan replaces outgoing Deputy Minister, John Sims, Q.C., who was
> caught making fraudulent submissions in the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit in
> Canada's Federal Court, who refused to retract the submission and who
> suddenly resigned, effective April 1, 2010, a few short weeks after his
> misconduct was broadcast internationally via several whistle blowing sites
> on the internet, such as Paul Drockton, Jeff Rense and David Icke. Canada's
> mainstream media ignored the story.
>
> As Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, (RCMP) from October 1, 2007
> to date, Mr. Kirvan would probably have been privy to the secret police
> files containing the identity of the Water War Criminals - a group that
> Canadian legal authorities have consistently refused to investigate and
> prosecute.
>
> We at the WaterWarCrimes crimes web site and blog welcome the appointment of
> Mr. Myles Kirvan to the position of Deputy Minister of Justice and Attorney
> General for Canada. It is always refreshing to see a new face and our
> expectation of common human decency, justice and fair and equitable
> treatment from our fellow human beings is ever present nothwithstanding the
> sinister, devilish, and corrupt record of Canadian and British Columbia
> Government employees to date.
>
> In 1991, Myles Kirvan began his Public Service career in the Department of
> Justice as General Counsel, Federal-Provincial Relations Office. He went on
> to serve in the Department of Justice in various capacities including Senior
> Advisor to the Associate Deputy Minister, Public Law; General Counsel,
> Dispute Resolution Services; Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Health
> Canada; and from 2003-2007, Assistant Deputy Minister, Business and
> Regulatory Law.
>
> Prior to joining the Public Service of Canada, Myles Kirvan served as an
> advisor to Ministers. He has served as Legislative Assistant to the
> Solicitor General of Canada; Senior Policy Advisor to the Minister of
> National Revenue; Judicial Affairs Advisor and then Chief of Staff for the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General. In 1993 Myles Kirvan served as
> Deputy Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister.
>
> Myles Kirvan is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada a.k.a. the
> Province of Ontario. He holds a B.A. from Carleton University and an LL.B.
> from the University of Ottawa.
>
> We will be watching Mr. Kirvan VERY closely and keep out readers posted on
> the conduct of Canada's Ministry of Justice under Deputy Attorney
> General, Myles Kirvan.
>
>
> Did Deputy Minister of Justice John Sims Commit Fraud?
> Was He Fired??
>
> John Sims, Q.C.
>
>
> John Sims is Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice. He and his subordinates
> are supposed to tell the truth in Court proceedings but they do not.
>
> Mr. Sims has falsely, recklessly, argued in the Federal Court, that
> the lawsuit filed in the Federal Court under Action T-95-09, by Ms. Gibbs
> and Mr. Carten, as joint plaintiffs, is a re-litigation of
> an application, filed by Mr. Carten, acting alone, in Octrober, 2007, in the
> Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, Action No. 77000.
>
> This argument by Mr. John Sims is nonsense and we think it is a deliberate
> fraud.
>
> The two claims are entirely different.
>
> The claim filed in Kelowna was an application for an injunction to restrain
> the Provincial Court judges in British Columbia from the dealing with the
> matter of the enforcement of the accumulated arrears of child support that
> now total close to $400,000 that Mr. Carten supposedly owes to his ex-wife
> as a result of the deliberately excessive child support payment order made
> against him by former BC Deupty Attorney General Robert Edwards. The
> Provincial Court Judges will not permit Mr. Carten to call necessary or
> useful witnesses and have been trying to railroad him.
>
> By contrast, the claim in the Federal Court is a claim seeking compensatory
> damages against the Government of Canada and the Government of British
> Colubmia and several others for conspiriing to cause harm to Mr. Carten and
> Ms. Gibbs because they were connected to Sun Belt Water Inc. and deemed to
> be assisting Sun Belt Water Inc. on a path that would reveal who the
> criminals behind the WaterWarCrimes were.
>
> We have accused John Sims, Q.C., the Deputy Attorney General for Canada of
> intentionally misleading the Court and he has not responded to our
> allegation.
>
> Silence is agreement.
>
> We sent our allegation to every member of the House of Commons and Senate of
> Canada, by e-mail on December 25, 2009, and on December 30, 2009, before the
> members returned to their offices, Prime Minister Harper suspended
> (prorogued) Parliament. Is this just another one of those strange
> co-incidences like the nine dead judges?
>
>
> John Sims Deputy Minister of Justice - Professional Background
>
> John Sims
>
> In 2009 the Government of Canada awarded Mr. Sims The Outstanding
> Achievement Award. The award is considered to be the most prestigious award
> in the Public Service, this award is presented to senior public service
> employees who have distinguished themselves by a sustained commitment to
> excellence.
>
> The Government of Canada made the following comments about Mr. Sims at the
> time of his receiving the award.
>
> "Mr. Sims received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in History and Economics and
> a Bachelor of Laws from Queen's University. He was called to the Ontario Bar
> in 1973 and joined the Public Service of Canada in 1977 as legal counsel to
> Transport Canada.
>
> As a lawyer, Mr. Sims has provided high-quality legal advice to ministers
> and the Government of Canada on some of the most complex and sensitive
> policy and operational priorities of the government, such as aviation
> safety, war crimes, labour relations and national security (including as the
> first head of legal services at the Canadian Security Intelligence
> Service). His advice has always reflected the highest standards of
> integrity and ethical behaviour and has been informed by the broader context
> and potential implications".
>
> For the full text of the remarks about Mr. Sims go to
> http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/arp/
>
> We ask the reader:
>
> If Mr. Sims has a high reputation for integrity why did he mislead the
> Federal Court?
>
>
> It Sure Looks Like John Sims Was Fired?
>
>
>
> Referring to whether a high level Ottawa minister will resign or be
> fired, CTV Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife recently stated:
>
> “In this town nobody voluntarily resigns,” Mr. Fife said. “They’ve got a
> limo, and a staff, and they love this sort of stuff. She’s not going to give
> it up.”
>
> Link to the Fife quote:
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> Based on Robert Fife's reputation for logical thinking and other factors
> outlined above, we think that John Sims was fired.
>
> This web site and our Chronology of events at
> http://waterwarcrimes.
> Sims and how he misled Prothonotary Lafreniere of Canada's Federal Court in
> February 2010. Then, in the last week of February and the first week of
> March 2010, the story of the corruption by John Sims begain circulating
> around the planet courtesy of some prominent internationally recognized
> whistle blowers, such as Jeff Rense, Paul Drockton, David Icke and many
> others who helped get the truth out along with John Sims.
>
> On March 15, 2010, John Sims, Q.C., Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice and
> Deputy Attorney General tendered his resigntion effective April 1, 2010.
>
>
> Sean Bruyea
> Sean lives in the Ottawa area and can be reached at the following telephone
> number and email address:
> Telephone Number: (613) 825-8002
> Email: seankis@rogers.com
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/wp-
>
> http://champlaw.ca/8801/19601.
>
> Champ & Associates
> 43 Florence Street
> Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
> Phone: (613) 237-4740
> Fax: (613) 232-2680
> info@champlaw.ca
> --- On Mon, 9/27/10, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Here is some more info for the PC wannabe MLAs to chew on EH Wally
> Stiles?
> To: carl@carlkillen.ca, info@craigleonard.ca, sherry38@nbnet.nb.ca,
> vote@mcblais.ca, fredalbertpc@hotmail.com, yvonbon@ca.inter.net,
> wm@aibn.com, martinecoulombe55@hotmail.com, danfour@myginch.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbpolitico@gmail.com, spinks08@hotmail.com,
> nb.premier@gmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, info@philipchiasson.com,
> janice.brun@rogers.com, dfortunat@yahoo.com, brucehickey1@hotmail.com,
> elijos@bellaliant.net, dmaltais@rogers.com, bathurst@nancymckay.ca,
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, shawn.graham@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Brian.kenny@gnb.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca,
> rick.brewer@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca,
> wally.stiles@gnb.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
> dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Received: Monday, September 27, 2010, 2:47 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:30:01 -0300
> Subject: RE: Email from the BHP Billiton Chairman
> To: David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, atlbf@nb.aibn.com, akapoor@globeandmail.com,
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com, vepp@globeandmail.com
> Cc: fpletters@nationalpost.com, jlsteve@ucalgary.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, "shawn. graham"
> <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>, "jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>,
> "Jack.Keir2" <Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>
> Here is something for some students out west to ponder ASAP EH David
> Alward?
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
> James Stevenson
> Senior Communications Manager
> External Relations
> 403-210-6308
> jlsteve@ucalgary.ca
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
> http://www.haskayne.com/bio.
> http://opinion.financialpost.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
> ladies?
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM
>
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
> Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
> held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
> previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
> including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
> and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
> working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
> Chartered Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
>
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.corridor.ca/media/
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.robmooremp.com/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.
>
> http://www.
>
> http://www.elements.nb.ca/
>
> http://www.nbmediacoop.org/
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
> should read something from years ago
> To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
> markwright4mp@politician.com
> Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
> Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
>
>
> First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
> can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
> are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
> shut me up yet.
>
> Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
> stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
> and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
> way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
> that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
> Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
> to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
> with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
> effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
> very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
> times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
>
> Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
> should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
> scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
> little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
> 2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
> all the money being passed out right now.
>
> I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
> that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
> earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
> back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
> answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
> EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
> won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
> the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
> filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
> cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
> was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
> and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
> about it all on the web all the same.
>
> Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
> Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
> be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
> your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
> and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
> for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
> Dougy and Joey do.
>
> Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
> and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
> what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
>
> For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
> trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
> to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
> you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
> don't like you not even a little bit?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
> gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
> considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
> and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
> Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
> start listening to me.
>
>
> FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
> view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
> follow as my time allows.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/people/
>
> This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgeral who is studying for his PHD in
> Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
> integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
> return I left his school out of my battles.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
> careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
> like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
> fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
> of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
> hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
> a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
> apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
>
> Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
>
> Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
>
> 98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
> provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
> local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
> resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
> corporation choke on huge profits.
>
> 99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
> gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
>
> My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
> of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
> of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
>
> The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
> pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
> Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
> tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
> of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
> Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
>
> For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
> all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
> must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
> it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
>
> Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
> to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
>
> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> The following email can be found here
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
>
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> federal
> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>
> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
> photo
> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>
>
> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: henrybanta <henrybanta@aol.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
>> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
>> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
>> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
>> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David
>> >
>> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
>> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
>> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
>> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
>> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
>> > necessary information.
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
>> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Angela Stainton-James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
>> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
>> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
>> > rogerduguay21
>> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
>> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
>> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
>> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
>> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
>> >
>> > http://www.facebook.com/group.
>> > Richard Coughlan
>> > Faversham, United Kingdom
>> > email RHar100@aol.com
>> > Website:http://youtube.com/
>> > Phone 07935333407
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
>> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
>> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
>> > 2578 for a couple of days
>> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>> >
>> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
>> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
>> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
>> > was in Canada
>> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
>> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
>> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
>> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
>> >
>> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
>> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
>> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
>> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
>> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>> >
>> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>> >
>> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
>> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
>> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
>> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>> >
>> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
>> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >
>> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
>> > "Nobody will say my name"
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > Wendy Olsen
>> > Victim Witness Coordinator
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Ms Olsen
>> >
>> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
>> >
>> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
>> > of Law within a purported democracy.
>> >
>> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
>> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
>> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>> >
>> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
>> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
>> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
>> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
>> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
>> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>> > beginning over seven years ago..
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 506 756 8687
>> >
>> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
>> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
>> > night.
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
>> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>> >
>> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
>> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>> >
>> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
>> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
>> > Putnam insiders.
>> >
>> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
>> > is in hot water again.
>> >
>> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
>> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
>> > <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
>> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
>> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>> >
>> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.
>> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
>> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>> > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>> > <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
>> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>> >
>> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>> >
>> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>> >
>> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> >
>> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Chief Dave Peck
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
>> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>> >
>> > This includes your email to the Government.
>> >
>> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
>> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
>> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
>> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
>> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
>> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
>> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
>> > or other reasons.
>> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
>> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>> > can. Thank you.
>> >
>> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
>> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>> > chickenshits.
>> >
>> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>> >
>> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
>> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
>> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
>> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>> >
>> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
>> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>> >
>> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
>> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>> > proceeding.
>> >
>> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>> > Southern District of New York:
>> >
>> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Cc: oig
>> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
>> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
>> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
>> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>> >
>> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Thomas J. Sartory
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>> > reed@hbsslaw.com
>> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> >
>> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>> >
>> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
>> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
>> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
>> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
>> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "R Hide (MIN)" <R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz>
>> > To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> >
>> > On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
>> > to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>> >
>> > Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Sandy Grove
>> > Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
>> > Office of Hon Rodney Hide
>> > WELLINGTON
>> > Ph 04 817 6630
>> > Email: sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
>> >
>> > The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
>> > the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
>> > communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
>> > privileged material and/or confidential information.
>> >
>> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
>> > copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
>> > have received this email in error, please notify the sender
>> > immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
>> > scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
>> > viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
>> > liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
>> > this email or its attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
>> > To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
>> > anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
>> > Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
>> > Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
>> > chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
>> > Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
>> > Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
>> > labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
>> > (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz; Steve Chadwick; Charles
>> > Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
>> > office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
>> > claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.
>> > dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.
>> > Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
>> > (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
>> > English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
>> > office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
>> > Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
>> > Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
>> > Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
>> > Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
>> > national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz; national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz; Kevin
>> > Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
>> > Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
>> > rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
>> > Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
>> > A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
>> > colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.
>> > mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
>> > Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.
>> > greenmps.auckland@greens.org.
>> > peseta.sam.lotuiiga@
>> > moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
>> > tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
>> > petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
>> > murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
>> > Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
>> > simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz; simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz; Rajen
>> > Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz; Chris Hipkins;
>> > marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
>> > Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
>> > ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
>> > Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
>> > rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
>> > Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
>> > Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz; N Smith (MIN);
>> > nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
>> > tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
>> > chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.
>> > Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz; T Turia (MIN);
>> > Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
>> > Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
>> > Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz; P Wong (MIN);
>> > pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
>> > phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
>> > mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.
>> > tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
>> > John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
>> > nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
>> > easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
>> > christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
>> > johan.niklasson@evolution-
>> > saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
>> > irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
>> > vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
>> > scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
>> > who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
>> > acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
>> > tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
>> > marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
>> > madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
>> > annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
>> > grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
>> > melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
>> > tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
>> > eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
>> > mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
>> > Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> > From: National Kapiti Electorate Office <national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz>
>> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
>> > Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
>> > EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Dear Mr Amos
>> > Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister
>> > Tony
>> > Ryall. This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
>> > P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
>> > Paraparaumu,
>> > Kapiti Coast 5032
>> > www.nathanguy.co.nz
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Jan 3rd, 2004
>> >
>> > Mr. David R. Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Avenue
>> > Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos
>> >
>> > Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> > my predecessor,
>> > the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
>> > delay in responding.
>> >
>> > If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> > suggest that you contact
>> > the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
>> > criminal activity should be brought
>> > to their attention since the police are in the best position to
>> > evaluate the information and take
>> > action as deemed appropriate.
>> >
>> > I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely
>> > A. Anne McLellan”
>> >
>> > September 11th, 2004
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> > Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
>> > CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
>> > other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
>> > New Brunswick.
>> >
>> > I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
>> > intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> > and courts of
>> > Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> > authorities
>> > regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely.
>> >
>> > Renee Blanchet
>> > Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:12:44 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: We just talked
>> To: scott.white@thecanadianpress.
>> editor@policeprofessional.com
>> Cc: IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>,
>> jemma@policeprofessional.com, hiddenfromhistory
>> <hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> Need i say i was not surprised when Askari and his boss Kevin Page
>> formerly of the PCO office did not respond to my phone calls or email
>> yesterday?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:39:54 -0300
>> Subject: We just talked
>> To: askarm@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Mostafa Askari
>> Director General
>> Library of Parliament
>> Economic and Fiscal Analysis
>> Parliament Buildings
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9
>> Canada
>>
>> Telephone : 613-992-8045
>>
>>
http://thedavidamosrant.
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:07:59 -0300
>> > Subject: You Cato dudes played dumb again about your missing blog and
>> > the documents I sent ya but lets see if one of your Directors is a
>> > dumb as you and the Feds pretend to be
>> > To: barnold@cato.org, kcouchman@cato.org, ckennedy@cato.org,
>> > amast@cato.org
>> > Cc: "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"
>> > < Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> >
>> > The text of the blog of Tom Palmer's that Cato denies existed can be
>> > found within my blog and many other places as well as this email
>> >
>> > http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> > March 24, 2005
>> > Crazy as a Loon, but Free
>> >
>> > Off to Iceland!
>> >
>> > Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
>> > can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
>> > Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha'ts almost certain, if
>> > you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
>> > he's not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
>> > refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
>> > utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
>> > right thing by offering him refuge.
>> >
>> > NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
>> > messages on this site. Whatever.
>> >
>> > Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
>> >
>> > Comments
>> > Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
>> > this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
>> > it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
>> > did, it is not like he'd be back at the top.
>> > Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
>> > Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
>> > linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
>> > I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
>> > inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
>> > loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
>> > The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
>> > Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
>> > criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
>> > that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
>> > Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
>> > TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha'ts almost certain, if you
>> > consider his anti-Semitism "
>> >
>> > I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
>> > casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
>> > because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
>> > perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
>> > result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
>> > part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
>> > with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
>> >
>> > Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
>> > Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
>> > Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
>> > radical form of bigotry.
>> >
>> > I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's
>> > comment.
>> >
>> > Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
>> > Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
>> > And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
>> > to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
>> > Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
>> > crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
>> > error.
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> > Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
>> > Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
>> > "crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
>> > Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
>> > "lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
>> >
>> > The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
>> > be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
>> > International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
>> > of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
>> > sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
>> > immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
>> > state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
>> > get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
>> > such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
>> > Subject: This is going to get interesting
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Richard
>> >
>> > Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
>> > 617 698-6549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 617 698-6549
>> > end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I will be hitting the road shortly
>> > and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to
>> > Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP.
>> > I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all
>> > know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have
>> > evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my
>> > phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain
>> > Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts
>> > you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards
>> > would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you.
>> > Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the
>> > following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to
>> > see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the
>> > past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned
>> > me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they
>> > have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
>> >
>> > The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
>> > allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
>> > what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
>> > will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
>> > not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
>> > better and are free.
>> >
>> > From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
>> >
>> > In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
>> > like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
>> > particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
>> > thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
>> > examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
>> > to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
>> > privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
>> > action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
>> > advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
>> > simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
>> > mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
>> > plays chess so very well.
>> >
>> > I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
>> > you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
>> > ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
>> > the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
>> > with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
>> > scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
>> > not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
>> > understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
>> > would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
>> > Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
>> >
>> > I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
>> > nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
>> > of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
>> > the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
>> > his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
>> > present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
>> > jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
>> > without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
>> > glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
>> > against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
>> > arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
>> > media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
>> > courts to act properly in the public interest.
>> >
>> > Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
>> > time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
>> > the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
>> > charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
>> > one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
>> > very soon. I will have lots to say.
>> >
>> > It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
>> > men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
>> > Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
>> > However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
>> > crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
>> > I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
>> > public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
>> > It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
>> > compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
>> > own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
>> > we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
>> > a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
>> > applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
>> > we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
>> > of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
>> > out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
>> > could happen to you next. Get it?
>> >
>> > If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
>> > message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
>> > I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
>> > down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
>> > true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
>> > helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
>> > than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
>> > Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
>> > much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
>> > just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
>> > game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
>> > my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
>> > a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
>> > his attorney a trick or two of mine.
>> >
>> > If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379
>> > begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 506 434-1379
>> > end_of_the_skype_highlighting Feel free to argue me and stress test my
>> > ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am
>> > protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I
>> > speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a
>> > mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his
>> > cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their
>> > masks of virtue.
>> >
>> > Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
>> > Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
>> > others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
>> > me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
>> > happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
>> > got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
>> > to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
>> > and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
>> > chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
>> > game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
>> > others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
>> > need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
>> > busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
>> >
>> > Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public
>> > servants?"
>> >
>> > Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
>> > fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
>> > you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
>> >
>> > My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
>> > General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
>> > Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
>> > because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
>> > now out of the job.
>> >
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
>> > December 7th, 2003
>> >
>> > Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
>> > 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
>> > Washington D.C. 20001-5403
>> > Phone (202) 842-0200 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> > (202) 842-0200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> > Fax (202) 842-3490
>> > RE: Corruption
>> > Sir,
>> > Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
>> > recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
>> > directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
>> > should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
>> > them available for their review.
>> > I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
>> > many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
>> > the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
>> > writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
>> > website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
>> > letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
>> > court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
>> > officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
>> > numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
>> > court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
>> > investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
>> > authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone's
>> > Fourth Amendment Rights.
>> > As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
>> > made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
>> > following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
>> > Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
>> > Best Regards
>> > David R.Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Ave.
>> > Milton MA. 02186
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
>> > Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well,
>> > "different."
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
>> > Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
>> > were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
>> > they are?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
>> > dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
>> > wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
>> > jotodd@toddweld.com
>> > Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
>> > howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
>> > barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
>> > ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
>> > editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
>> > newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
>> > letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
>> > dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
>> > dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
>> > nightline@abcnews.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey
>> >
>> > It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
>> > if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
>> > see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
>> > the benefit of all.
>> >
>> > Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
>> > (UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
>> > Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
>> > Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
>> > I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
>> > dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
>> > about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
>> > Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
>> >
>> > Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
>> > investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
>> > Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
>> > Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
>> > secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
>> > trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
>> > him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
>> > Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
>> > soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
>> > cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
>> > dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
>> > dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
>> > None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
>> > must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
>> > problem and everybody knows its me.
>> >
>> > I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
>> > that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
>> > claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
>> > associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
>> > settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
>> > held accountable and so should all their friends.
>> >
>> > I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
>> > wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
>> > wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
>> > insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
>> > the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
>> > for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
>> > therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
>> > Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
>> > measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
>> > hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
>> > crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
>> > advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
>> >
>> > The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
>> > be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
>> > right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
>> > that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
>> > in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
>> > There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
>> > to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
>> > longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
>> > a man to teach the students. What say you now?
>> >
>> > Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
>> > will be more fun if ya didn't.
>> >
>> > "The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
>> > District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
>> > justice of the state's Superior Court. Prior positions include special
>> > assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
>> > for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
>> > Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
>> > pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
>> > including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
>> > Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
>> > Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: jb95@bu.edu
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
>> > Subject: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.
>> > pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.
>> > clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
>> > Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
>> > maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
>> > ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
>> > david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> > cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
>> > INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
>> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> > Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
>> > Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
>> > Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Fellas
>> > I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
>> > sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
>> > in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
>> > his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
>> > from his job right after the last Yankee election.
>> > Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
>> > for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
>> > merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
>> > concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
>> > nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
>> > embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
>> > claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
>> > you?
>> > Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
>> > likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
>> > falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
>> > pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
>> > interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
>> > David R. Amos
>> >
>> >
>> > "Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
>> > including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
>> > those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
>> > manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
>> > Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
>> > University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
>> > American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
>> > Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
>> > Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
>> > He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
>> > practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
>> > and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
>> > healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
>> > especially in the arts."
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: backtalk@motherjones.com
>> > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
>> > dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
>> > ; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
>> > ecrane@cato.org
>> > Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@
>> > ; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
>> > brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
>> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
>> > Subject: Cya in court Cato
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Tommy Boy
>> > You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
>> > line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
>> > agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
>> > talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
>> > proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
>> > My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
>> > you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
>> > people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
>> > they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
>> > am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
>> > to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
>> > integrity of the people you joke about within your following
>> > invitation. You are joking. I am not.
>> > Dear Friend,
>> >
>> > Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
>> > of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
>> > international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
>> > environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
>> > explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
>> > to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
>> >
>> > If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
>> > seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
>> > Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
>> > includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
>> > the Cato Institute.
>> >
>> > The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
>> > Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
>> > of George Washington.
>> >
>> > Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
>> > turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
>> > tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
>> > Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
>> > of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
>> > people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
>> > (minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
>> > incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
>> > warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
>> > to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
>> >
>> > You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
>> > You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
>> > friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
>> > all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
>> >
>> > You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
>> > three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
>> > (The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
>> > persuasion.)
>> >
>> > Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
>> > secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
>> >
>> > Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
>> >
>> > I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
>> >
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:26:46 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Attached document ATTN Kristina Persson, Hans
Dahlgren and Erik Nises I just called Prime Minister Stefan Löfven's
office again from 902 800 0369
To: talmannen@riksdagen.se, "speakers.office"
< speakers.office@parliament.
socialdemokraterna@riksdagen.
info@centerpartiet.se, info@vansterpartiet.se, info@liberalerna.se,
info@kristdemokraterna.se, geoff@geoffregan.ca, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca,
"heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca,
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca,
cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca,
rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca, david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
< gopublic@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
< Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Erin.Weir" <Erin.Weir@parl.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>
The Riksdag Administration
Johanna Blomqvist, Press Secretary
Telephone: +46 8-786 47 34, +46 72-728 37 33
E-mail: johanna.blomqvist@riksdagen.se
March 24, 2005
Crazy as a Loon, but Free
Off to Iceland!
Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if
you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
he’s not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
right thing by offering him refuge.
NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
messages on this site. Whatever.
Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
Comments
Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
did, it is not like he’d be back at the top.
Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if you
consider his anti-Semitism "
I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
radical form of bigotry.
I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's comment.
Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
error.
Ross
Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
"crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
"lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting
Hey Richard
Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending
out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However
there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against
the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for
keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in
order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I
have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The
fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If
you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone.
If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened
before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some
contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through
AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard
from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was
about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running
scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
better and are free.
From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
plays chess so very well.
I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
courts to act properly in the public interest.
Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
very soon. I will have lots to say.
It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
could happen to you next. Get it?
If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
his attorney a trick or two of mine.
If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel
free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your
freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the
right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my
identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men
like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men
who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.
Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"
Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
now out of the job.
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
December 7th, 2003
Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20001-5403
Phone (202) 842-0200
Fax (202) 842-3490
RE: Corruption
Sir,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
them available for their review.
I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone’s
Fourth Amendment Rights.
As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
Best Regards
David R.Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well, "different."
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
they are?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
jotodd@toddweld.com
Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
nightline@abcnews.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
Hey
It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
the benefit of all.
Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
(UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
problem and everybody knows its me.
I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
held accountable and so should all their friends.
I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
a man to teach the students. What say you now?
Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
will be more fun if ya didn't.
"The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
justice of the state’s Superior Court. Prior positions include special
assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jb95@bu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.
pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.
clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
Hey Fellas
I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
from his job right after the last Yankee election.
Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
you?
Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
David R. Amos
"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
especially in the arts."
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
ecrane@cato.org
Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@
; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
Subject: Cya in court Cato
Hey Tommy Boy
You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
integrity of the people you joke about within your following
invitation. You are joking. I am not.
Dear Friend,
Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
the Cato Institute.
The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
of George Washington.
Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
(minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
(The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
persuasion.)
Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
Cordially,
and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
In order not to be somehow overlooked, I just called you cell phone to
cell phone so that I would have a record of contact to let you know we
had a problem to discuss. You were to busy to talk so you missed your
chance. Methinks you are a fine example of the reason your buddy Gene
Healy and his ilk ignored me. I read enough of your work to think you
are a very snotty tall talking whore for the Global Corps. I wanted to
hear your voice to be certain my feelings were correct. You did not
dissappoint me. If you don't like my opinion of you, sue me and bring
all these emails to court. I promise I will not file a motion to
dismiss. In fact I can't wait to meet your lawyers. I thought what you
said about Bobby Fischer was far more offensive and as you can see I
blogged in his defense. Many people call me crazy too. That seem to be
the label bad actors put on someone when they are cornered. I wanted
you to hear my voice so that you would understand that I am not nuts
but very sincere. when you shunned my last words were see you in
court. Ignore me some more and you certainly will. Check my work
before you laugh and call me crazy too.
In order to prove you all I am serious I will send Roger Pilon, Vice
President for Legal Affairs at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20001-5403 hard copy of exactly the same material I
sent to two Solicitor Generals last year just before I ran for
Parliament. Teddy Olson quit and went into private practice as soon as
Stephen Harper opened his mouth about the Arar Inquiry but thus far
Landslide Annie has hung onto hers. Now if you have any questions of
me before we meet, ask them to New Canadian Ambassador Franky Boy
McKenna. He knows exactly who I am and what has happened in the year
since. If you want a Yankee perspective ask John Ashcroft, John
Edwards. Tom Ridge, Clark Kent Ervin, Theodore Olson or David
Aufhauser to name a few. They all are now free agents and in the same
hot water as your buddy and now you.
I emailed ya, blogged ya, called ya and am now telling some your
friends plus a few of mine for good measure. Under Title 18 of the
federal code you are all as guilty as everyone else if you don't get
honest real fast. Ask Frank Quatronne and Martha Stewart about email
evidence in federal court
In light of the reasons I was falsely imprisoned and what I had sent
you dudes the year before it makes Cato's work in "Go Directly to
Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything." a total bullshit
piece of work. It is my job to properly shame you bastards so that
nobody will take you seriously ever again.
"At one time, the sanction of the criminal law was reserved for
serious, morally culpable offenders. But during the past 40 years, an
unholy alliance of tough-on-crime conservatives and anti-big-business
liberals has utterly transformed the criminal law. Today, while
violent crime often goes unpunished, Congress continues to add new,
trivial offenses to the federal criminal code. With more than 4,000
federal offenses on the statute books, and thousands more buried in
the Code of Federal Regulations, it is now frighteningly easy for
American citizens to be hauled off to jail for actions that no
reasonable person would regard as crimes. At the same time, rampant
federalization and mandatory minimum sentencing are making America’s
criminal justice system ever more centralized and punitive. The result
is a labyrinthine criminal code, a burgeoning prison population, and
often real injustice. Go Directly to Jail examines those alarming
trends and proposes reforms that could rein in a criminal justice
apparatus at war with fairness and common sense."
If you dudes do not want me to turn up after being invited please let
me know why in writing and introduce me to the lawyer I will be
arguing someday in court.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:20 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:04 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: lsewell@canadians.org
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jeffryhouse@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:03 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ;
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey
I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda
is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I
were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other
rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could
never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will
likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just
appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on
and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in
their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to
turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think
the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely
pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company
for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a
couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born
there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly
upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The
sooner the better so that they don't suck the sap out of the good
ones.
Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than
the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse
in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head
for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick
your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun.
Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to
call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be a case of the pot trying
to call the kettle black.
"The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader
Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good
Maritime phrase."
Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:14:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Don Amos
To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca
As I stated within an earlier email, Scott Daruty finally called me
back and pissed me off. He picked the wrong guy to try and toy with. I
will take up my concerns with Magna byway of Daruty and Cellucci down
here in the Yankee courts. I have much proof of what I sent Belinda
Stronach long before she ever became a Member of Parliament up home. I
will deal with her in a political fashion first to see if she is
interested in up holding the public trust while protecting her
interests in Magna. Good luck with your conscience as a lawyer named
Amos as you check my work. Here is my phone number 506 434-1379 if you
have any questions before deciding whether or not to uphold the law
and protect the investor's interests in Magna from my necessary civil
actions. I gave my material to Argeo P. Cellucci in Canada in July of
2002 before I sent the Sheriffs out with my first complaints. I know
by the fax numbers at the top of my first complaint that it was
Ashcroft and Cellucci that directed the US Attorney to try to make my
complaints evaporate. Now that Cellucci speaks for Magna and Belinda
speaks for Canadians there is a couple of Amos boys that should have
along talk about many things. But forget trying to label me as your
brother until I am assured of your integrity. I have a high contempt
towards lawyers and their sense of ethics for very justifiable
reasons.
Note: forwarded message attached.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
MEC.investors@magnaent.com
Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: Shame on you Della
At least I am a man of my word. I called you personally as I stated I
would. I have the record of the call that I was directed to do by your
boss, Stevey Boy May. Too bad you would not speak to me to protect
your own interests. At least I have your signature because no word
from you is worthless to me. You can never claim ignorance of my
concerns after directing me to your lawyer. I stuck my hand out to you
as a layman but you had picked your friends the lawyers and had
enlisted them to bite it? Do you really Think I am afraid of dealing
with the likes of Johnny Crosbie and Stevey Boy May when I am
preparing a lawsuit against the likes of John Edwards, John Ashcroft
and Theodore Olson to name a few? Plus there is the irrefutable fact
that you and the law firm you work for have already admitted that you
are aware of the crimes practiced against me. You have done nothing to
uphold the law and have already filed the evidence of that fact in the
Newfoundland Supreme Court. Lady, either I or my estate will bankrupt
you and your firm with its own sworn testimony that you witnessed. You
can take that to the bank. The first question I must ask you Della
what did your law fir do with its copy of the police surveillance tape
# 139 and did you listen to it? You should not have because you are
not an officer of the court nor are you employed by law enforcement.
The Lieutenant Governor Roberts notified me that he had given his
copies of the material to Tommy Marshall to be investigated but I have
received no word from your law firm as to what the hell they did with
their copies. Have your lawyers explain their integrity to you because
you and I will never come to an understanding of ethical behavior
after your treatment of me today. I often sing the praises of Newfys
because they are amongst the nicest folks on the planet excepting of
course their lawyers and their cohorts such as you Della. By the way I
heard about the clerks in Supreme Court having a little wager over who
buys lunch if I managed to do what I said I would do. I would like to
meet the lady who felt I was as serious as a heart attack and willing
to buy lunch if I was not a man of my word. I would love to buy her
lunch some time because the courts need more folks like her in their
employment. She clearly did not disregard the word of a common man.
On the other hand after our exchange of the mere few words today it
would not be wise for me to trust your word or typing if I had left
the voicemail you desired. I have much evidence of many edited
transcripts of things I have said in the past. You and I will argue
them some day no doubt byway of your lawyer friends because I think
you don't speak pro se very well in order to protect your personal
interests. I just got off the phone with one of Frank Stronach's
Yankee lawyers Scott Daruty. He did me the service of really pissing
me off today by finally calling me back after I had torn a piece off
of Magna in Canada about his neglect of duty on their behalf. He
thought he was funny by joking that the Canadian lawyer, Don Amos was
my brother. No lawyer is a brother of mine. He thought I was joking
when I told him I would sue him personally if he did not uphold the
law and rat out Magna's brand new Vice President his brother, Argeo P.
Cellucci so I had to repeat myself so he would understand me in no
uncertain terms. I do make a lot of jokes about very serious business
however it would not be wise to underestimate my sincerity and attempt
to toy with me. I enjoy a good fight win or lose as long as I stand on
the right side of the battle. You just picked a fight with me lady on
a day when I ain't taking prisoners from lawyers or their cohorts. All
lawyers are liars and I have proven it. It is only laymen I will
settle with from now on and only if they tell the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth.
I don't care if your god helps you or not. We can all do it again in
hell for all I care.
From now on I must rely on hard copy of my own creation. For now I
will send you and Stevey Boy a bunch of emails that have been
forwarded to many other people first. I require the record of doing
so. Whereas I have no doubt Stevey Boy will wan to argue about the
emails I have already sent I figure why not be hung for a cow as a
calf? Since everything in heaven and hell is done in threes. I will
forward to Magna's lawyer, Don Amos, Stevey Boy and three large emails
that contain Tiff files. There is no need to be redundant with hard
copy already sent to Scott Daruty and Johnny Crosbie. You can tell the
folks at Patterson Palmer who directed you to offend me that the
emails contain exactly the same documents that Greg Byrne and Johnny
Crosbie received and that you should all prepare to argue every word
within in them. The first email contains a file called Big Day. It
contains every document I served upon Two Solicitors Generals Theodore
Olson and Anne McLellan before I ran for Parliament and Olson quit his
job on June 24th immediately after Johnny Crosbie told Stevey Harper
to shut up about the Arar Inquiry. the second file is called Big
Canada Add and it is a copy of the documents served upon my political
opponents while running for Parliament. Last but not least are what
was added to the first to pile of documents and then served upon
Patterson and Palmer by way of Greg Byrne.
Scott Daruty is receiving the documents within "Big Day" and other
interesting material that Magna should find quite interesting to say
the least. Magna really made my day when they appointed Cellucci and
their new VP. I is comical that he is going to lobby the government
about horse racing especially after listening to what is recorded on a
lot of the tapes and the fact that the top dog of the RCMP had to
teach that dumb Yankee how to ride a horse last summer so that he
would not make an ass out himself at the Calgary Stampede. This was
almost as rich as when Martin sent Franky McKenna to Washington after
he and I had a spit and chew about dogs and pork. At least I am clever
enough to realize when I am a lucky man and how to make the best out
of a golden opportunity to see that justice is served upon some very
nasty bastards. I am very pissed off but still having more fun than
ten men. I love cornering lawyers and listening to them stutter and
try to duck the issues. I will wager that you are having a bad day
too. EH Della? It looks good on you if you are. Why not get mad? I
hope you share your anger with the others at Patterson and Palmer and
start bitchin about me. Never forget all I want is the truth from you.
It will cost you nothing. Why do you want to stand with crooks and
liars for a days pay? I bet you have witnessed lots of dirty dealings.
I truly beleive that there is no honour in your work. To me working
for lawyers is like a lady being sent to a nunnery in Medieval times.
I share ol Shake's opinion of such a place. Times changes nothing
lawyers still work for Jesuits. Look around downtown St John's and
call me a liar. I dare ya. Even the name of the town says it all.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:33 AM
Subject: RE: Me versus Patterson and Palmer
Hey Della,
I see that Stevey Boy is on vacation and told me to contact you. I am
happy to hear that he is saving all of my emails in a special spot for
some apparent future litigation. I keep very good records as well and
look forward to his argument but I will wager that I sue him first.
I see by the following Affidavit you witnessed and Stevey Boy filed in
court that every lawyer within Patterson Palmer is a flat out liar. I
served Greg Byryne in Fredericton myself with witnesses before Byron
Prior served everyone else in Newfoundland. If Byrne did not share the
info with his buddy Johnny Crosbie, it is not my fault. Yet I suspect
that he did so out of the gate because he sent me an email in which it
appears that he was conferring with many others about me and my
concerns. It was too funny that Byrne clicked the wrong button and
forwarded his email to me as well.
I also sent many of your people the same emails that I sent to Byrne
and May as soon as I got out off jail last October and Stevey Boy
first contacted Byron Prior and I had called him. (Thank you for
making a transcript of my voicemail and filing it in court for me. It
is quite hard for me to make lawyers even admit that I exist) Some of
the aforesaid emails were responded to by other members of your law
firm byway of their computers like Stevey Boy's just did. At least
computers are far more honest than the lawyers that own them. I am
compelled to rely on the integrity of their machines and the ability
of their computers and mine to keep perfect records. (Never forget I
am being prosecuted for sending an email to a lawyer I have been
litigating against for years who even went as far to fraudulently
create a document bearing my signature) Because of the fact I can
prove contact with many members of the law firm you work for, they can
never say that they did not know of my concerns and allegations long
before Stevey complained of Byron Prior's actions on behalf of his
client Billy Matthews. He only went forward with his malicious threat
when he thought my goose was cooked down here. There is quite simply
no way you could have prepared his filing on January 21st and he had
Judge green sign it in the time between Byron had served it and the
Judge signed it without the Bastards reading our private emails and
listening to our phone calls. I sent the last email containing the
words to Byron's counterclaim just before I went to court that morning
and he only managed to see it filed by 3 PM Newfy time. You may be a
fast typists but the courts don't work that fast unless they are
covering up something big time. No know as well as I that is true
because the judge and Stevey Boy do not even want other lawyers to
view the public record. Small wonder he took a vacation. If Stevey Boy
has any semblance of a conscience he no doubt has trouble dealing with
himself. I can only wonder if he and Johnny Crosbie are singing for
more tequila right now.
As you no doubt know I am preparing to defend myself in a criminal
trial in the USA and filing some rather profound civil lawsuits in
Canada and the USA that will make the whining of Billy Matthews in
Newfoundland Supreme court seem rather comical. I will be filing
copies of the documents you no doubt helped create for Stevey Boy May
on behalf of your law firm in many courts.
If Greg Byrne, the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
New Brunswick had acted ethically last September while I was in Canada
and under Brad Green's jurisdiction I would not have been falsely
imprisoned in the USA the following month. I will be suing him, your
law firm and many others for personal injury and conspiracy to cover
up the many crimes practiced against my Clan and I. My question to
you, Della is why don't I sue you too? As you can see if you have read
my work my battle is with corrupt lawyers not layman. I would settle
with you in a heartbeat for costs if you would be honest about all
that you know to be true. If you decide to go against me I suggest
that you seek legal counsel outside of your law firm or in fact all of
Newfoundland. I am about to take on every damned lawyer within the
Newfoundland law Society. You would not be wise to doubt me before you
have a look at my work in the USA. I will deal with Newfys under the
heading of fun after I have embarrassed the Yankees.
I will give you a call as Stevey Boy suggests so that at least you can
understand that I am not an unreasonable person and not the sort of
person that lawyers claim that I am. I am just a simple, sincere and
serious man that refuses to play the wicked games lawyers play. I am
willing to die in order to expose the truth. No lawyer can say that.
they love money to much to be willing to miss the chance to spend it.
Judge me for yourself and your own best interests before you choose
whom to stand with.
Whether you believe me or not I am battling for your rights as well as
my own. I am forwarding this email to many ordinary people like you
and me. To Hell with the lawyers and politicians. They do what they do
for personal gain not public service. Their concerns are lucre not
justice and everybody knows it. All I did was go to great lengths to
prove it. There is no need for you and I to argue about simple truths.
As far as I am concerned up until the time you received this email all
you have done is type things and witness signatures. However you
cannot say that anymore.
My pending phone call to you is not harassment. I need the Yankee
phone bill record of my call to you in order to assist in the defence
of my freedom in the USA. Stevey Boy told me to call ya. Please be
nice. After today you can't say that you are not involved in my false
imprisonment in the USA. I am doing no more or less than Stevey Boy
and his malicious clients would do if the same thing had happened to
them. If Billy Matthews had been summoned to the USA while he was
running for his seat in Parliament to be presecuted by an unsigned
criminal complaint and then held without bail under the charges of
"other", he would be more pissed off than I am.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: "May, Steve"
To: "David Amos"
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:32 PM
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Dan and Tom Remember me
Mr. May is out of the office till 11 April 2005. He will not be
checking his e-mail. Please contact Della Hart at 709-570-5527 or
dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca if you require immediate assistance.
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or
Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed
relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of
the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety,
and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose
in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike
portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its
entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
as follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my
Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit “2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to
commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4"
to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’
claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as
Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
The Conservatives in Canada have very Punky Dory EH Tommy Boy?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:26 PM
The Cato dudes ain't got nothin on me when it comes to letter writing.
Here is where I am teasing abunch of dumb Yankees. The whole world
calls our Newfys dumb. So what does that say of Danny williams the
Premier? He is a Rhodes Scholar that works for free. Is he dumb or
evil? I will have to ask the Aspen Dudes have I attend Tommy's little
hoe down EH?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:38 PM
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/
HMMM no link we will try this way ok?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:40 PM
I'm very proud to have had such a person as David Amos, help us with
our fight and the legal work. I will never be able to repay him.Thank
you David.
Byron Prior
Posted by: Byron Prior at August 21, 2005 10:59 PM
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:44:47 -0400
Subject: Mr Champ I just called Does this old email ring any bells?
To: info@champlaw.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: seankis@rogers.com, thehouse@cbc.ca, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
For a consultation, please contact:
Champ & Associates
43 Florence Street
Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
Phone: 613-237-4740
Fax: 613-232-2680
info@champlaw.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Ottawa ditches mediation talks in $27M Abdelrazik lawsuit
Lawsuit personally names former foreign minister Lawrence Cannon, who
blocked Abdelrazik's return from Sudan
Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: Apr 17, 2018 4:00 AM E
"Lawyer Paul Champ says he detects political calculation in the
Trudeau government's decision to abandon mediation talks"
On 10/9/10, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> If not at least a former intelligence officer should know who these dudes
> are and why Petey Mackay is very nervous about what I am up to these days.
>
>
>
>
>
> Just Dave
> By Location > Visit Detail
> Visit 12,009
>
>
>
> [<<] [>>]
>
> Domain Name
>
> gc.ca ? (Canada)
>
> IP Address
>
> 131.137.245.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
>
> ISP
>
> Defense Research Establishment
>
> Location
>
>
>
>
>
> Continent
> :
> North America
>
> Country
> :
> Canada (Facts)
>
> State/Region
> :
> Ontario
>
> City
> :
> Ottawa
>
> Lat/Long
> :
> 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>
> Language
>
> English (Canada)
> en-ca
>
> Operating System
>
> Microsoft WinXP
>
> Browser
>
> Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
> InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>
> Javascript
>
> version 1.3
>
> Monitor
>
>
>
>
>
> Resolution
> :
> 1024 x 768
>
> Color Depth
> :
> 32 bits
>
> Time of Visit
>
> Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
>
> Last Page View
>
> Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
>
> Visit Length
>
> 0 seconds
>
> Page Views
>
> 1
>
> Referring URL
>
>
>
> Visit Entry Page
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Visit Exit Page
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Out Click
>
>
>
> Time Zone
>
> UTC-5:00
>
> Visitor's Time
>
> Sep 28 2010 11:48:22 am
>
> Visit Number
>
> 12,009
>
>
>
>
> BTW You pissed me off when you asked the same question bureaucrats ask three
> times
>
> In my humble opinion the better question for you to ask after you quit
> interupting with the same dumb question would how can I help you My number
> is 902 800 0369 perhaps your lawyer should check the pdf hereto attached and
> try to talk to a very serious whisteblower EH?
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/
>
> FYI check this lawyer's work about your Fed buddies
>
> http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/
>
> New Deputy Minister of Justice - Myles Kirvan
>
>
>
> Deputy Minister of Justice in a nation that is covering up a major
> international crime is a dangerous job. Astute observers are asking: How
> long will Canada's newest Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney
> General, Mr. Myles Kirvan last in his new job?
>
> Formerly Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, Mr. Kirvan becomes
> Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of Canada, effective
> April 6.
>
> Mr. Kirvan replaces outgoing Deputy Minister, John Sims, Q.C., who was
> caught making fraudulent submissions in the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit in
> Canada's Federal Court, who refused to retract the submission and who
> suddenly resigned, effective April 1, 2010, a few short weeks after his
> misconduct was broadcast internationally via several whistle blowing sites
> on the internet, such as Paul Drockton, Jeff Rense and David Icke. Canada's
> mainstream media ignored the story.
>
> As Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, (RCMP) from October 1, 2007
> to date, Mr. Kirvan would probably have been privy to the secret police
> files containing the identity of the Water War Criminals - a group that
> Canadian legal authorities have consistently refused to investigate and
> prosecute.
>
> We at the WaterWarCrimes crimes web site and blog welcome the appointment of
> Mr. Myles Kirvan to the position of Deputy Minister of Justice and Attorney
> General for Canada. It is always refreshing to see a new face and our
> expectation of common human decency, justice and fair and equitable
> treatment from our fellow human beings is ever present nothwithstanding the
> sinister, devilish, and corrupt record of Canadian and British Columbia
> Government employees to date.
>
> In 1991, Myles Kirvan began his Public Service career in the Department of
> Justice as General Counsel, Federal-Provincial Relations Office. He went on
> to serve in the Department of Justice in various capacities including Senior
> Advisor to the Associate Deputy Minister, Public Law; General Counsel,
> Dispute Resolution Services; Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Health
> Canada; and from 2003-2007, Assistant Deputy Minister, Business and
> Regulatory Law.
>
> Prior to joining the Public Service of Canada, Myles Kirvan served as an
> advisor to Ministers. He has served as Legislative Assistant to the
> Solicitor General of Canada; Senior Policy Advisor to the Minister of
> National Revenue; Judicial Affairs Advisor and then Chief of Staff for the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General. In 1993 Myles Kirvan served as
> Deputy Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister.
>
> Myles Kirvan is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada a.k.a. the
> Province of Ontario. He holds a B.A. from Carleton University and an LL.B.
> from the University of Ottawa.
>
> We will be watching Mr. Kirvan VERY closely and keep out readers posted on
> the conduct of Canada's Ministry of Justice under Deputy Attorney
> General, Myles Kirvan.
>
>
> Did Deputy Minister of Justice John Sims Commit Fraud?
> Was He Fired??
>
> John Sims, Q.C.
>
>
> John Sims is Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice. He and his subordinates
> are supposed to tell the truth in Court proceedings but they do not.
>
> Mr. Sims has falsely, recklessly, argued in the Federal Court, that
> the lawsuit filed in the Federal Court under Action T-95-09, by Ms. Gibbs
> and Mr. Carten, as joint plaintiffs, is a re-litigation of
> an application, filed by Mr. Carten, acting alone, in Octrober, 2007, in the
> Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, Action No. 77000.
>
> This argument by Mr. John Sims is nonsense and we think it is a deliberate
> fraud.
>
> The two claims are entirely different.
>
> The claim filed in Kelowna was an application for an injunction to restrain
> the Provincial Court judges in British Columbia from the dealing with the
> matter of the enforcement of the accumulated arrears of child support that
> now total close to $400,000 that Mr. Carten supposedly owes to his ex-wife
> as a result of the deliberately excessive child support payment order made
> against him by former BC Deupty Attorney General Robert Edwards. The
> Provincial Court Judges will not permit Mr. Carten to call necessary or
> useful witnesses and have been trying to railroad him.
>
> By contrast, the claim in the Federal Court is a claim seeking compensatory
> damages against the Government of Canada and the Government of British
> Colubmia and several others for conspiriing to cause harm to Mr. Carten and
> Ms. Gibbs because they were connected to Sun Belt Water Inc. and deemed to
> be assisting Sun Belt Water Inc. on a path that would reveal who the
> criminals behind the WaterWarCrimes were.
>
> We have accused John Sims, Q.C., the Deputy Attorney General for Canada of
> intentionally misleading the Court and he has not responded to our
> allegation.
>
> Silence is agreement.
>
> We sent our allegation to every member of the House of Commons and Senate of
> Canada, by e-mail on December 25, 2009, and on December 30, 2009, before the
> members returned to their offices, Prime Minister Harper suspended
> (prorogued) Parliament. Is this just another one of those strange
> co-incidences like the nine dead judges?
>
>
> John Sims Deputy Minister of Justice - Professional Background
>
> John Sims
>
> In 2009 the Government of Canada awarded Mr. Sims The Outstanding
> Achievement Award. The award is considered to be the most prestigious award
> in the Public Service, this award is presented to senior public service
> employees who have distinguished themselves by a sustained commitment to
> excellence.
>
> The Government of Canada made the following comments about Mr. Sims at the
> time of his receiving the award.
>
> "Mr. Sims received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in History and Economics and
> a Bachelor of Laws from Queen's University. He was called to the Ontario Bar
> in 1973 and joined the Public Service of Canada in 1977 as legal counsel to
> Transport Canada.
>
> As a lawyer, Mr. Sims has provided high-quality legal advice to ministers
> and the Government of Canada on some of the most complex and sensitive
> policy and operational priorities of the government, such as aviation
> safety, war crimes, labour relations and national security (including as the
> first head of legal services at the Canadian Security Intelligence
> Service). His advice has always reflected the highest standards of
> integrity and ethical behaviour and has been informed by the broader context
> and potential implications".
>
> For the full text of the remarks about Mr. Sims go to
> http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/arp/
>
> We ask the reader:
>
> If Mr. Sims has a high reputation for integrity why did he mislead the
> Federal Court?
>
>
> It Sure Looks Like John Sims Was Fired?
>
>
>
> Referring to whether a high level Ottawa minister will resign or be
> fired, CTV Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife recently stated:
>
> “In this town nobody voluntarily resigns,” Mr. Fife said. “They’ve got a
> limo, and a staff, and they love this sort of stuff. She’s not going to give
> it up.”
>
> Link to the Fife quote:
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> Based on Robert Fife's reputation for logical thinking and other factors
> outlined above, we think that John Sims was fired.
>
> This web site and our Chronology of events at
> http://waterwarcrimes.
> Sims and how he misled Prothonotary Lafreniere of Canada's Federal Court in
> February 2010. Then, in the last week of February and the first week of
> March 2010, the story of the corruption by John Sims begain circulating
> around the planet courtesy of some prominent internationally recognized
> whistle blowers, such as Jeff Rense, Paul Drockton, David Icke and many
> others who helped get the truth out along with John Sims.
>
> On March 15, 2010, John Sims, Q.C., Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice and
> Deputy Attorney General tendered his resigntion effective April 1, 2010.
>
>
> Sean Bruyea
> Sean lives in the Ottawa area and can be reached at the following telephone
> number and email address:
> Telephone Number: (613) 825-8002
> Email: seankis@rogers.com
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/wp-
>
> http://champlaw.ca/8801/19601.
>
> Champ & Associates
> 43 Florence Street
> Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
> Phone: (613) 237-4740
> Fax: (613) 232-2680
> info@champlaw.ca
> --- On Mon, 9/27/10, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Here is some more info for the PC wannabe MLAs to chew on EH Wally
> Stiles?
> To: carl@carlkillen.ca, info@craigleonard.ca, sherry38@nbnet.nb.ca,
> vote@mcblais.ca, fredalbertpc@hotmail.com, yvonbon@ca.inter.net,
> wm@aibn.com, martinecoulombe55@hotmail.com, danfour@myginch.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbpolitico@gmail.com, spinks08@hotmail.com,
> nb.premier@gmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, info@philipchiasson.com,
> janice.brun@rogers.com, dfortunat@yahoo.com, brucehickey1@hotmail.com,
> elijos@bellaliant.net, dmaltais@rogers.com, bathurst@nancymckay.ca,
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, shawn.graham@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Brian.kenny@gnb.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca,
> rick.brewer@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca,
> wally.stiles@gnb.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
> dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Received: Monday, September 27, 2010, 2:47 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:30:01 -0300
> Subject: RE: Email from the BHP Billiton Chairman
> To: David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, atlbf@nb.aibn.com, akapoor@globeandmail.com,
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com, vepp@globeandmail.com
> Cc: fpletters@nationalpost.com, jlsteve@ucalgary.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, "shawn. graham"
> <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>, "jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>,
> "Jack.Keir2" <Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>
> Here is something for some students out west to ponder ASAP EH David
> Alward?
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
> James Stevenson
> Senior Communications Manager
> External Relations
> 403-210-6308
> jlsteve@ucalgary.ca
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
> http://www.haskayne.com/bio.
> http://opinion.financialpost.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
> ladies?
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM
>
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
> Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
> held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
> previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
> including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
> and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
> working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
> Chartered Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
>
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.corridor.ca/media/
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.robmooremp.com/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.
>
> http://www.
>
> http://www.elements.nb.ca/
>
> http://www.nbmediacoop.org/
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
> should read something from years ago
> To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
> markwright4mp@politician.com
> Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
> Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
>
>
> First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
> can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
> are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
> shut me up yet.
>
> Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
> stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
> and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
> way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
> that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
> Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
> to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
> with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
> effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
> very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
> times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
>
> Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
> should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
> scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
> little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
> 2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
> all the money being passed out right now.
>
> I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
> that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
> earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
> back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
> answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
> EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
> won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
> the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
> filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
> cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
> was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
> and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
> about it all on the web all the same.
>
> Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
> Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
> be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
> your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
> and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
> for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
> Dougy and Joey do.
>
> Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
> and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
> what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
>
> For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
> trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
> to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
> you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
> don't like you not even a little bit?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
> gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
> considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
> and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
> Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
> start listening to me.
>
>
> FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
> view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
> follow as my time allows.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/people/
>
> This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgeral who is studying for his PHD in
> Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
> integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
> return I left his school out of my battles.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
> careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
> like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
> fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
> of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
> hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
> a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
> apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
>
> Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
>
> Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
>
> 98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
> provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
> local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
> resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
> corporation choke on huge profits.
>
> 99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
> gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
>
> My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
> of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
> of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
>
> The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
> pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
> Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
> tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
> of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
> Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
>
> For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
> all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
> must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
> it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
>
> Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
> to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
>
> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> The following email can be found here
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
>
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> federal
> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>
> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
> photo
> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>
>
> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: henrybanta <henrybanta@aol.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
>> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
>> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
>> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
>> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David
>> >
>> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
>> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
>> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
>> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
>> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
>> > necessary information.
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
>> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Angela Stainton-James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
>> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
>> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
>> > rogerduguay21
>> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
>> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
>> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
>> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
>> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
>> >
>> > http://www.facebook.com/group.
>> > Richard Coughlan
>> > Faversham, United Kingdom
>> > email RHar100@aol.com
>> > Website:http://youtube.com/
>> > Phone 07935333407
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
>> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
>> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
>> > 2578 for a couple of days
>> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>> >
>> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
>> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
>> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
>> > was in Canada
>> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
>> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
>> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
>> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
>> >
>> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
>> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
>> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
>> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
>> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>> >
>> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>> >
>> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
>> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
>> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
>> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>> >
>> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
>> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >
>> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
>> > "Nobody will say my name"
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > Wendy Olsen
>> > Victim Witness Coordinator
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Ms Olsen
>> >
>> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
>> >
>> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
>> > of Law within a purported democracy.
>> >
>> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
>> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
>> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>> >
>> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
>> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
>> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
>> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
>> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
>> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>> > beginning over seven years ago..
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 506 756 8687
>> >
>> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
>> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
>> > night.
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
>> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>> >
>> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
>> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>> >
>> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
>> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
>> > Putnam insiders.
>> >
>> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
>> > is in hot water again.
>> >
>> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
>> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
>> > <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
>> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
>> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>> >
>> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.
>> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
>> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>> > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>> > <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
>> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>> >
>> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>> >
>> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>> >
>> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> >
>> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Chief Dave Peck
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
>> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>> >
>> > This includes your email to the Government.
>> >
>> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
>> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
>> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
>> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
>> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
>> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
>> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
>> > or other reasons.
>> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
>> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>> > can. Thank you.
>> >
>> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
>> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>> > chickenshits.
>> >
>> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>> >
>> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
>> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
>> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
>> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>> >
>> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
>> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>> >
>> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
>> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>> > proceeding.
>> >
>> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>> > Southern District of New York:
>> >
>> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Cc: oig
>> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
>> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
>> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
>> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>> >
>> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Thomas J. Sartory
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>> > reed@hbsslaw.com
>> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> >
>> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>> >
>> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
>> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
>> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
>> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
>> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "R Hide (MIN)" <R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz>
>> > To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> >
>> > On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
>> > to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>> >
>> > Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Sandy Grove
>> > Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
>> > Office of Hon Rodney Hide
>> > WELLINGTON
>> > Ph 04 817 6630
>> > Email: sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
>> >
>> > The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
>> > the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
>> > communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
>> > privileged material and/or confidential information.
>> >
>> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
>> > copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
>> > have received this email in error, please notify the sender
>> > immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
>> > scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
>> > viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
>> > liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
>> > this email or its attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
>> > To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
>> > anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
>> > Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
>> > Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
>> > chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
>> > Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
>> > Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
>> > labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
>> > (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz; Steve Chadwick; Charles
>> > Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
>> > office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
>> > claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.
>> > dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.
>> > Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
>> > (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
>> > English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
>> > office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
>> > Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
>> > Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
>> > Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
>> > Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
>> > national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz; national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz; Kevin
>> > Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
>> > Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
>> > rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
>> > Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
>> > A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
>> > colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.
>> > mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
>> > Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.
>> > greenmps.auckland@greens.org.
>> > peseta.sam.lotuiiga@
>> > moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
>> > tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
>> > petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
>> > murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
>> > Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
>> > simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz; simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz; Rajen
>> > Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz; Chris Hipkins;
>> > marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
>> > Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
>> > ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
>> > Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
>> > rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
>> > Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
>> > Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz; N Smith (MIN);
>> > nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
>> > tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
>> > chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.
>> > Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz; T Turia (MIN);
>> > Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
>> > Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
>> > Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz; P Wong (MIN);
>> > pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
>> > phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
>> > mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.
>> > tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
>> > John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
>> > nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
>> > easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
>> > christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
>> > johan.niklasson@evolution-
>> > saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
>> > irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
>> > vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
>> > scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
>> > who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
>> > acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
>> > tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
>> > marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
>> > madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
>> > annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
>> > grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
>> > melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
>> > tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
>> > eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
>> > mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
>> > Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> > From: National Kapiti Electorate Office <national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz>
>> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
>> > Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
>> > EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Dear Mr Amos
>> > Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister
>> > Tony
>> > Ryall. This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
>> > P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
>> > Paraparaumu,
>> > Kapiti Coast 5032
>> > www.nathanguy.co.nz
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Jan 3rd, 2004
>> >
>> > Mr. David R. Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Avenue
>> > Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos
>> >
>> > Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> > my predecessor,
>> > the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
>> > delay in responding.
>> >
>> > If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> > suggest that you contact
>> > the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
>> > criminal activity should be brought
>> > to their attention since the police are in the best position to
>> > evaluate the information and take
>> > action as deemed appropriate.
>> >
>> > I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely
>> > A. Anne McLellan”
>> >
>> > September 11th, 2004
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> > Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
>> > CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
>> > other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
>> > New Brunswick.
>> >
>> > I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
>> > intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> > and courts of
>> > Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> > authorities
>> > regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely.
>> >
>> > Renee Blanchet
>> > Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:12:44 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: We just talked
>> To: scott.white@thecanadianpress.
>> editor@policeprofessional.com
>> Cc: IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>,
>> jemma@policeprofessional.com, hiddenfromhistory
>> <hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> Need i say i was not surprised when Askari and his boss Kevin Page
>> formerly of the PCO office did not respond to my phone calls or email
>> yesterday?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:39:54 -0300
>> Subject: We just talked
>> To: askarm@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Mostafa Askari
>> Director General
>> Library of Parliament
>> Economic and Fiscal Analysis
>> Parliament Buildings
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9
>> Canada
>>
>> Telephone : 613-992-8045
>>
>>
http://thedavidamosrant.
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:07:59 -0300
>> > Subject: You Cato dudes played dumb again about your missing blog and
>> > the documents I sent ya but lets see if one of your Directors is a
>> > dumb as you and the Feds pretend to be
>> > To: barnold@cato.org, kcouchman@cato.org, ckennedy@cato.org,
>> > amast@cato.org
>> > Cc: "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"
>> > < Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> >
>> > The text of the blog of Tom Palmer's that Cato denies existed can be
>> > found within my blog and many other places as well as this email
>> >
>> > http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> > March 24, 2005
>> > Crazy as a Loon, but Free
>> >
>> > Off to Iceland!
>> >
>> > Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
>> > can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
>> > Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha'ts almost certain, if
>> > you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
>> > he's not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
>> > refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
>> > utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
>> > right thing by offering him refuge.
>> >
>> > NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
>> > messages on this site. Whatever.
>> >
>> > Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
>> >
>> > Comments
>> > Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
>> > this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
>> > it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
>> > did, it is not like he'd be back at the top.
>> > Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
>> > Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
>> > linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
>> > I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
>> > inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
>> > loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
>> > The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
>> > Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
>> > criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
>> > that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
>> > Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
>> > TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha'ts almost certain, if you
>> > consider his anti-Semitism "
>> >
>> > I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
>> > casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
>> > because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
>> > perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
>> > result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
>> > part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
>> > with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
>> >
>> > Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
>> > Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
>> > Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
>> > radical form of bigotry.
>> >
>> > I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's
>> > comment.
>> >
>> > Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
>> > Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
>> > And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
>> > to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
>> > Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
>> > crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
>> > error.
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> > Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
>> > Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
>> > "crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
>> > Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
>> > "lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
>> >
>> > The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
>> > be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
>> > International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
>> > of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
>> > sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
>> > immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
>> > state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
>> > get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
>> > such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
>> > Subject: This is going to get interesting
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Richard
>> >
>> > Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
>> > 617 698-6549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 617 698-6549
>> > end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I will be hitting the road shortly
>> > and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to
>> > Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP.
>> > I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all
>> > know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have
>> > evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my
>> > phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain
>> > Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts
>> > you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards
>> > would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you.
>> > Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the
>> > following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to
>> > see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the
>> > past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned
>> > me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they
>> > have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
>> >
>> > The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
>> > allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
>> > what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
>> > will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
>> > not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
>> > better and are free.
>> >
>> > From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
>> >
>> > In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
>> > like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
>> > particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
>> > thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
>> > examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
>> > to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
>> > privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
>> > action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
>> > advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
>> > simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
>> > mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
>> > plays chess so very well.
>> >
>> > I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
>> > you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
>> > ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
>> > the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
>> > with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
>> > scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
>> > not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
>> > understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
>> > would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
>> > Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
>> >
>> > I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
>> > nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
>> > of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
>> > the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
>> > his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
>> > present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
>> > jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
>> > without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
>> > glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
>> > against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
>> > arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
>> > media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
>> > courts to act properly in the public interest.
>> >
>> > Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
>> > time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
>> > the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
>> > charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
>> > one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
>> > very soon. I will have lots to say.
>> >
>> > It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
>> > men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
>> > Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
>> > However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
>> > crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
>> > I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
>> > public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
>> > It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
>> > compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
>> > own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
>> > we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
>> > a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
>> > applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
>> > we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
>> > of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
>> > out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
>> > could happen to you next. Get it?
>> >
>> > If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
>> > message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
>> > I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
>> > down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
>> > true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
>> > helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
>> > than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
>> > Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
>> > much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
>> > just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
>> > game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
>> > my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
>> > a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
>> > his attorney a trick or two of mine.
>> >
>> > If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379
>> > begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 506 434-1379
>> > end_of_the_skype_highlighting Feel free to argue me and stress test my
>> > ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am
>> > protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I
>> > speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a
>> > mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his
>> > cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their
>> > masks of virtue.
>> >
>> > Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
>> > Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
>> > others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
>> > me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
>> > happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
>> > got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
>> > to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
>> > and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
>> > chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
>> > game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
>> > others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
>> > need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
>> > busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
>> >
>> > Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public
>> > servants?"
>> >
>> > Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
>> > fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
>> > you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
>> >
>> > My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
>> > General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
>> > Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
>> > because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
>> > now out of the job.
>> >
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
>> > December 7th, 2003
>> >
>> > Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
>> > 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
>> > Washington D.C. 20001-5403
>> > Phone (202) 842-0200 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> > (202) 842-0200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> > Fax (202) 842-3490
>> > RE: Corruption
>> > Sir,
>> > Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
>> > recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
>> > directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
>> > should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
>> > them available for their review.
>> > I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
>> > many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
>> > the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
>> > writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
>> > website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
>> > letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
>> > court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
>> > officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
>> > numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
>> > court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
>> > investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
>> > authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone's
>> > Fourth Amendment Rights.
>> > As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
>> > made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
>> > following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
>> > Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
>> > Best Regards
>> > David R.Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Ave.
>> > Milton MA. 02186
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
>> > Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well,
>> > "different."
>> >
>> > Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
>> > Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
>> > were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
>> > they are?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
>> > dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
>> > wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
>> > jotodd@toddweld.com
>> > Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
>> > howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
>> > barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
>> > ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
>> > editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
>> > newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
>> > letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
>> > dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
>> > dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
>> > nightline@abcnews.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey
>> >
>> > It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
>> > if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
>> > see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
>> > the benefit of all.
>> >
>> > Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
>> > (UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
>> > Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
>> > Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
>> > I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
>> > dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
>> > about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
>> > Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
>> >
>> > Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
>> > investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
>> > Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
>> > Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
>> > secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
>> > trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
>> > him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
>> > Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
>> > soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
>> > cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
>> > dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
>> > dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
>> > None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
>> > must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
>> > problem and everybody knows its me.
>> >
>> > I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
>> > that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
>> > claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
>> > associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
>> > settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
>> > held accountable and so should all their friends.
>> >
>> > I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
>> > wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
>> > wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
>> > insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
>> > the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
>> > for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
>> > therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
>> > Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
>> > measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
>> > hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
>> > crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
>> > advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
>> >
>> > The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
>> > be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
>> > right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
>> > that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
>> > in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
>> > There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
>> > to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
>> > longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
>> > a man to teach the students. What say you now?
>> >
>> > Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
>> > will be more fun if ya didn't.
>> >
>> > "The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
>> > District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
>> > justice of the state's Superior Court. Prior positions include special
>> > assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
>> > for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
>> > Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
>> > pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
>> > including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
>> > Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
>> > Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: jb95@bu.edu
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
>> > Subject: I just called I am not kidding
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.
>> > pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.
>> > clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
>> > Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
>> > maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
>> > ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
>> > david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> > cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
>> > INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
>> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> > Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
>> > Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
>> > Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Fellas
>> > I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
>> > sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
>> > in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
>> > his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
>> > from his job right after the last Yankee election.
>> > Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
>> > for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
>> > merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
>> > concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
>> > nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
>> > embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
>> > claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
>> > you?
>> > Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
>> > likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
>> > falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
>> > pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
>> > interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
>> > David R. Amos
>> >
>> >
>> > "Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
>> > including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
>> > those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
>> > manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
>> > Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
>> > University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
>> > American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
>> > Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
>> > Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
>> > He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
>> > practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
>> > and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
>> > healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
>> > especially in the arts."
>> >
>> >
>> > Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: backtalk@motherjones.com
>> > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
>> > Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: David Amos
>> > To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
>> > dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
>> > ; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
>> > ecrane@cato.org
>> > Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@
>> > ; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
>> > brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
>> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
>> > Subject: Cya in court Cato
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hey Tommy Boy
>> > You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
>> > line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
>> > agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
>> > talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
>> > proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
>> > My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
>> > you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
>> > people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
>> > they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
>> > am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
>> > to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
>> > integrity of the people you joke about within your following
>> > invitation. You are joking. I am not.
>> > Dear Friend,
>> >
>> > Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
>> > of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
>> > international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
>> > environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
>> > explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
>> > to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
>> >
>> > If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
>> > seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
>> > Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
>> > includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
>> > the Cato Institute.
>> >
>> > The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
>> > Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
>> > of George Washington.
>> >
>> > Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
>> > turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
>> > tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
>> > Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
>> > of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
>> > people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
>> > (minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
>> > incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
>> > warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
>> > to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
>> >
>> > You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
>> > You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
>> > friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
>> > all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
>> >
>> > You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
>> > three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
>> > (The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
>> > persuasion.)
>> >
>> > Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
>> > secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
>> >
>> > Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
>> >
>> > I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
>> >
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:26:46 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Attached document ATTN Kristina Persson, Hans
Dahlgren and Erik Nises I just called Prime Minister Stefan Löfven's
office again from 902 800 0369
To: talmannen@riksdagen.se, "speakers.office"
< speakers.office@parliament.
socialdemokraterna@riksdagen.
info@centerpartiet.se, info@vansterpartiet.se, info@liberalerna.se,
info@kristdemokraterna.se, geoff@geoffregan.ca, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca,
"heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca,
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca,
cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca,
rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca, david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
< gopublic@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
< Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Erin.Weir" <Erin.Weir@parl.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>
The Riksdag Administration
Johanna Blomqvist, Press Secretary
Telephone: +46 8-786 47 34, +46 72-728 37 33
E-mail: johanna.blomqvist@riksdagen.se
March 24, 2005
Crazy as a Loon, but Free
Off to Iceland!
Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if
you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
he’s not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
right thing by offering him refuge.
NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
messages on this site. Whatever.
Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
Comments
Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
did, it is not like he’d be back at the top.
Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if you
consider his anti-Semitism "
I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
radical form of bigotry.
I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's comment.
Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
error.
Ross
Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
"crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
"lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting
Hey Richard
Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending
out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However
there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against
the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for
keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in
order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I
have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The
fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If
you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone.
If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened
before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some
contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through
AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard
from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was
about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running
scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
better and are free.
From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
plays chess so very well.
I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
courts to act properly in the public interest.
Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
very soon. I will have lots to say.
It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
could happen to you next. Get it?
If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
his attorney a trick or two of mine.
If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel
free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your
freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the
right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my
identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men
like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men
who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.
Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"
Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
now out of the job.
David Raymond Amos
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
December 7th, 2003
Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20001-5403
Phone (202) 842-0200
Fax (202) 842-3490
RE: Corruption
Sir,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
them available for their review.
I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone’s
Fourth Amendment Rights.
As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
Best Regards
David R.Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well, "different."
Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
they are?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
jotodd@toddweld.com
Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
nightline@abcnews.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
Hey
It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
the benefit of all.
Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
(UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
problem and everybody knows its me.
I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
held accountable and so should all their friends.
I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
a man to teach the students. What say you now?
Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
will be more fun if ya didn't.
"The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
justice of the state’s Superior Court. Prior positions include special
assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jb95@bu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: I just called I am not kidding
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.
pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.
clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
Hey Fellas
I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
from his job right after the last Yankee election.
Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
you?
Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
David R. Amos
"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
especially in the arts."
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
ecrane@cato.org
Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@
; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
Subject: Cya in court Cato
Hey Tommy Boy
You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
integrity of the people you joke about within your following
invitation. You are joking. I am not.
Dear Friend,
Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
the Cato Institute.
The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
of George Washington.
Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
(minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
(The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
persuasion.)
Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
Cordially,
and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
In order not to be somehow overlooked, I just called you cell phone to
cell phone so that I would have a record of contact to let you know we
had a problem to discuss. You were to busy to talk so you missed your
chance. Methinks you are a fine example of the reason your buddy Gene
Healy and his ilk ignored me. I read enough of your work to think you
are a very snotty tall talking whore for the Global Corps. I wanted to
hear your voice to be certain my feelings were correct. You did not
dissappoint me. If you don't like my opinion of you, sue me and bring
all these emails to court. I promise I will not file a motion to
dismiss. In fact I can't wait to meet your lawyers. I thought what you
said about Bobby Fischer was far more offensive and as you can see I
blogged in his defense. Many people call me crazy too. That seem to be
the label bad actors put on someone when they are cornered. I wanted
you to hear my voice so that you would understand that I am not nuts
but very sincere. when you shunned my last words were see you in
court. Ignore me some more and you certainly will. Check my work
before you laugh and call me crazy too.
In order to prove you all I am serious I will send Roger Pilon, Vice
President for Legal Affairs at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20001-5403 hard copy of exactly the same material I
sent to two Solicitor Generals last year just before I ran for
Parliament. Teddy Olson quit and went into private practice as soon as
Stephen Harper opened his mouth about the Arar Inquiry but thus far
Landslide Annie has hung onto hers. Now if you have any questions of
me before we meet, ask them to New Canadian Ambassador Franky Boy
McKenna. He knows exactly who I am and what has happened in the year
since. If you want a Yankee perspective ask John Ashcroft, John
Edwards. Tom Ridge, Clark Kent Ervin, Theodore Olson or David
Aufhauser to name a few. They all are now free agents and in the same
hot water as your buddy and now you.
I emailed ya, blogged ya, called ya and am now telling some your
friends plus a few of mine for good measure. Under Title 18 of the
federal code you are all as guilty as everyone else if you don't get
honest real fast. Ask Frank Quatronne and Martha Stewart about email
evidence in federal court
In light of the reasons I was falsely imprisoned and what I had sent
you dudes the year before it makes Cato's work in "Go Directly to
Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything." a total bullshit
piece of work. It is my job to properly shame you bastards so that
nobody will take you seriously ever again.
"At one time, the sanction of the criminal law was reserved for
serious, morally culpable offenders. But during the past 40 years, an
unholy alliance of tough-on-crime conservatives and anti-big-business
liberals has utterly transformed the criminal law. Today, while
violent crime often goes unpunished, Congress continues to add new,
trivial offenses to the federal criminal code. With more than 4,000
federal offenses on the statute books, and thousands more buried in
the Code of Federal Regulations, it is now frighteningly easy for
American citizens to be hauled off to jail for actions that no
reasonable person would regard as crimes. At the same time, rampant
federalization and mandatory minimum sentencing are making America’s
criminal justice system ever more centralized and punitive. The result
is a labyrinthine criminal code, a burgeoning prison population, and
often real injustice. Go Directly to Jail examines those alarming
trends and proposes reforms that could rein in a criminal justice
apparatus at war with fairness and common sense."
If you dudes do not want me to turn up after being invited please let
me know why in writing and introduce me to the lawyer I will be
arguing someday in court.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:20 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:04 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: lsewell@canadians.org
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jeffryhouse@hotmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:03 AM
Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ;
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey
I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda
is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I
were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other
rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could
never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will
likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just
appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on
and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in
their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to
turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think
the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely
pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company
for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a
couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born
there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly
upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The
sooner the better so that they don't suck the sap out of the good
ones.
Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than
the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse
in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head
for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick
your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun.
Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to
call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be a case of the pot trying
to call the kettle black.
"The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader
Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good
Maritime phrase."
Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:14:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Don Amos
To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca
As I stated within an earlier email, Scott Daruty finally called me
back and pissed me off. He picked the wrong guy to try and toy with. I
will take up my concerns with Magna byway of Daruty and Cellucci down
here in the Yankee courts. I have much proof of what I sent Belinda
Stronach long before she ever became a Member of Parliament up home. I
will deal with her in a political fashion first to see if she is
interested in up holding the public trust while protecting her
interests in Magna. Good luck with your conscience as a lawyer named
Amos as you check my work. Here is my phone number 506 434-1379 if you
have any questions before deciding whether or not to uphold the law
and protect the investor's interests in Magna from my necessary civil
actions. I gave my material to Argeo P. Cellucci in Canada in July of
2002 before I sent the Sheriffs out with my first complaints. I know
by the fax numbers at the top of my first complaint that it was
Ashcroft and Cellucci that directed the US Attorney to try to make my
complaints evaporate. Now that Cellucci speaks for Magna and Belinda
speaks for Canadians there is a couple of Amos boys that should have
along talk about many things. But forget trying to label me as your
brother until I am assured of your integrity. I have a high contempt
towards lawyers and their sense of ethics for very justifiable
reasons.
Note: forwarded message attached.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
MEC.investors@magnaent.com
Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: Shame on you Della
At least I am a man of my word. I called you personally as I stated I
would. I have the record of the call that I was directed to do by your
boss, Stevey Boy May. Too bad you would not speak to me to protect
your own interests. At least I have your signature because no word
from you is worthless to me. You can never claim ignorance of my
concerns after directing me to your lawyer. I stuck my hand out to you
as a layman but you had picked your friends the lawyers and had
enlisted them to bite it? Do you really Think I am afraid of dealing
with the likes of Johnny Crosbie and Stevey Boy May when I am
preparing a lawsuit against the likes of John Edwards, John Ashcroft
and Theodore Olson to name a few? Plus there is the irrefutable fact
that you and the law firm you work for have already admitted that you
are aware of the crimes practiced against me. You have done nothing to
uphold the law and have already filed the evidence of that fact in the
Newfoundland Supreme Court. Lady, either I or my estate will bankrupt
you and your firm with its own sworn testimony that you witnessed. You
can take that to the bank. The first question I must ask you Della
what did your law fir do with its copy of the police surveillance tape
# 139 and did you listen to it? You should not have because you are
not an officer of the court nor are you employed by law enforcement.
The Lieutenant Governor Roberts notified me that he had given his
copies of the material to Tommy Marshall to be investigated but I have
received no word from your law firm as to what the hell they did with
their copies. Have your lawyers explain their integrity to you because
you and I will never come to an understanding of ethical behavior
after your treatment of me today. I often sing the praises of Newfys
because they are amongst the nicest folks on the planet excepting of
course their lawyers and their cohorts such as you Della. By the way I
heard about the clerks in Supreme Court having a little wager over who
buys lunch if I managed to do what I said I would do. I would like to
meet the lady who felt I was as serious as a heart attack and willing
to buy lunch if I was not a man of my word. I would love to buy her
lunch some time because the courts need more folks like her in their
employment. She clearly did not disregard the word of a common man.
On the other hand after our exchange of the mere few words today it
would not be wise for me to trust your word or typing if I had left
the voicemail you desired. I have much evidence of many edited
transcripts of things I have said in the past. You and I will argue
them some day no doubt byway of your lawyer friends because I think
you don't speak pro se very well in order to protect your personal
interests. I just got off the phone with one of Frank Stronach's
Yankee lawyers Scott Daruty. He did me the service of really pissing
me off today by finally calling me back after I had torn a piece off
of Magna in Canada about his neglect of duty on their behalf. He
thought he was funny by joking that the Canadian lawyer, Don Amos was
my brother. No lawyer is a brother of mine. He thought I was joking
when I told him I would sue him personally if he did not uphold the
law and rat out Magna's brand new Vice President his brother, Argeo P.
Cellucci so I had to repeat myself so he would understand me in no
uncertain terms. I do make a lot of jokes about very serious business
however it would not be wise to underestimate my sincerity and attempt
to toy with me. I enjoy a good fight win or lose as long as I stand on
the right side of the battle. You just picked a fight with me lady on
a day when I ain't taking prisoners from lawyers or their cohorts. All
lawyers are liars and I have proven it. It is only laymen I will
settle with from now on and only if they tell the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth.
I don't care if your god helps you or not. We can all do it again in
hell for all I care.
From now on I must rely on hard copy of my own creation. For now I
will send you and Stevey Boy a bunch of emails that have been
forwarded to many other people first. I require the record of doing
so. Whereas I have no doubt Stevey Boy will wan to argue about the
emails I have already sent I figure why not be hung for a cow as a
calf? Since everything in heaven and hell is done in threes. I will
forward to Magna's lawyer, Don Amos, Stevey Boy and three large emails
that contain Tiff files. There is no need to be redundant with hard
copy already sent to Scott Daruty and Johnny Crosbie. You can tell the
folks at Patterson Palmer who directed you to offend me that the
emails contain exactly the same documents that Greg Byrne and Johnny
Crosbie received and that you should all prepare to argue every word
within in them. The first email contains a file called Big Day. It
contains every document I served upon Two Solicitors Generals Theodore
Olson and Anne McLellan before I ran for Parliament and Olson quit his
job on June 24th immediately after Johnny Crosbie told Stevey Harper
to shut up about the Arar Inquiry. the second file is called Big
Canada Add and it is a copy of the documents served upon my political
opponents while running for Parliament. Last but not least are what
was added to the first to pile of documents and then served upon
Patterson and Palmer by way of Greg Byrne.
Scott Daruty is receiving the documents within "Big Day" and other
interesting material that Magna should find quite interesting to say
the least. Magna really made my day when they appointed Cellucci and
their new VP. I is comical that he is going to lobby the government
about horse racing especially after listening to what is recorded on a
lot of the tapes and the fact that the top dog of the RCMP had to
teach that dumb Yankee how to ride a horse last summer so that he
would not make an ass out himself at the Calgary Stampede. This was
almost as rich as when Martin sent Franky McKenna to Washington after
he and I had a spit and chew about dogs and pork. At least I am clever
enough to realize when I am a lucky man and how to make the best out
of a golden opportunity to see that justice is served upon some very
nasty bastards. I am very pissed off but still having more fun than
ten men. I love cornering lawyers and listening to them stutter and
try to duck the issues. I will wager that you are having a bad day
too. EH Della? It looks good on you if you are. Why not get mad? I
hope you share your anger with the others at Patterson and Palmer and
start bitchin about me. Never forget all I want is the truth from you.
It will cost you nothing. Why do you want to stand with crooks and
liars for a days pay? I bet you have witnessed lots of dirty dealings.
I truly beleive that there is no honour in your work. To me working
for lawyers is like a lady being sent to a nunnery in Medieval times.
I share ol Shake's opinion of such a place. Times changes nothing
lawyers still work for Jesuits. Look around downtown St John's and
call me a liar. I dare ya. Even the name of the town says it all.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:33 AM
Subject: RE: Me versus Patterson and Palmer
Hey Della,
I see that Stevey Boy is on vacation and told me to contact you. I am
happy to hear that he is saving all of my emails in a special spot for
some apparent future litigation. I keep very good records as well and
look forward to his argument but I will wager that I sue him first.
I see by the following Affidavit you witnessed and Stevey Boy filed in
court that every lawyer within Patterson Palmer is a flat out liar. I
served Greg Byryne in Fredericton myself with witnesses before Byron
Prior served everyone else in Newfoundland. If Byrne did not share the
info with his buddy Johnny Crosbie, it is not my fault. Yet I suspect
that he did so out of the gate because he sent me an email in which it
appears that he was conferring with many others about me and my
concerns. It was too funny that Byrne clicked the wrong button and
forwarded his email to me as well.
I also sent many of your people the same emails that I sent to Byrne
and May as soon as I got out off jail last October and Stevey Boy
first contacted Byron Prior and I had called him. (Thank you for
making a transcript of my voicemail and filing it in court for me. It
is quite hard for me to make lawyers even admit that I exist) Some of
the aforesaid emails were responded to by other members of your law
firm byway of their computers like Stevey Boy's just did. At least
computers are far more honest than the lawyers that own them. I am
compelled to rely on the integrity of their machines and the ability
of their computers and mine to keep perfect records. (Never forget I
am being prosecuted for sending an email to a lawyer I have been
litigating against for years who even went as far to fraudulently
create a document bearing my signature) Because of the fact I can
prove contact with many members of the law firm you work for, they can
never say that they did not know of my concerns and allegations long
before Stevey complained of Byron Prior's actions on behalf of his
client Billy Matthews. He only went forward with his malicious threat
when he thought my goose was cooked down here. There is quite simply
no way you could have prepared his filing on January 21st and he had
Judge green sign it in the time between Byron had served it and the
Judge signed it without the Bastards reading our private emails and
listening to our phone calls. I sent the last email containing the
words to Byron's counterclaim just before I went to court that morning
and he only managed to see it filed by 3 PM Newfy time. You may be a
fast typists but the courts don't work that fast unless they are
covering up something big time. No know as well as I that is true
because the judge and Stevey Boy do not even want other lawyers to
view the public record. Small wonder he took a vacation. If Stevey Boy
has any semblance of a conscience he no doubt has trouble dealing with
himself. I can only wonder if he and Johnny Crosbie are singing for
more tequila right now.
As you no doubt know I am preparing to defend myself in a criminal
trial in the USA and filing some rather profound civil lawsuits in
Canada and the USA that will make the whining of Billy Matthews in
Newfoundland Supreme court seem rather comical. I will be filing
copies of the documents you no doubt helped create for Stevey Boy May
on behalf of your law firm in many courts.
If Greg Byrne, the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
New Brunswick had acted ethically last September while I was in Canada
and under Brad Green's jurisdiction I would not have been falsely
imprisoned in the USA the following month. I will be suing him, your
law firm and many others for personal injury and conspiracy to cover
up the many crimes practiced against my Clan and I. My question to
you, Della is why don't I sue you too? As you can see if you have read
my work my battle is with corrupt lawyers not layman. I would settle
with you in a heartbeat for costs if you would be honest about all
that you know to be true. If you decide to go against me I suggest
that you seek legal counsel outside of your law firm or in fact all of
Newfoundland. I am about to take on every damned lawyer within the
Newfoundland law Society. You would not be wise to doubt me before you
have a look at my work in the USA. I will deal with Newfys under the
heading of fun after I have embarrassed the Yankees.
I will give you a call as Stevey Boy suggests so that at least you can
understand that I am not an unreasonable person and not the sort of
person that lawyers claim that I am. I am just a simple, sincere and
serious man that refuses to play the wicked games lawyers play. I am
willing to die in order to expose the truth. No lawyer can say that.
they love money to much to be willing to miss the chance to spend it.
Judge me for yourself and your own best interests before you choose
whom to stand with.
Whether you believe me or not I am battling for your rights as well as
my own. I am forwarding this email to many ordinary people like you
and me. To Hell with the lawyers and politicians. They do what they do
for personal gain not public service. Their concerns are lucre not
justice and everybody knows it. All I did was go to great lengths to
prove it. There is no need for you and I to argue about simple truths.
As far as I am concerned up until the time you received this email all
you have done is type things and witness signatures. However you
cannot say that anymore.
My pending phone call to you is not harassment. I need the Yankee
phone bill record of my call to you in order to assist in the defence
of my freedom in the USA. Stevey Boy told me to call ya. Please be
nice. After today you can't say that you are not involved in my false
imprisonment in the USA. I am doing no more or less than Stevey Boy
and his malicious clients would do if the same thing had happened to
them. If Billy Matthews had been summoned to the USA while he was
running for his seat in Parliament to be presecuted by an unsigned
criminal complaint and then held without bail under the charges of
"other", he would be more pissed off than I am.
Cya'll in Court:)
David R. Amos
----- Original Message -----
From: "May, Steve"
To: "David Amos"
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:32 PM
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Dan and Tom Remember me
Mr. May is out of the office till 11 April 2005. He will not be
checking his e-mail. Please contact Della Hart at 709-570-5527 or
dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca if you require immediate assistance.
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or
Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed
relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of
the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety,
and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose
in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike
portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its
entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
as follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my
Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit “2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to
commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4"
to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’
claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as
Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
The Conservatives in Canada have very Punky Dory EH Tommy Boy?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:26 PM
The Cato dudes ain't got nothin on me when it comes to letter writing.
Here is where I am teasing abunch of dumb Yankees. The whole world
calls our Newfys dumb. So what does that say of Danny williams the
Premier? He is a Rhodes Scholar that works for free. Is he dumb or
evil? I will have to ask the Aspen Dudes have I attend Tommy's little
hoe down EH?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:38 PM
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/
HMMM no link we will try this way ok?
Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:40 PM
I'm very proud to have had such a person as David Amos, help us with
our fight and the legal work. I will never be able to repay him.Thank
you David.
Byron Prior
Posted by: Byron Prior at August 21, 2005 10:59 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment