/ video-over-on-st-106562895 
Trudeau says he hears Canadians' 'concerns and frustrations' after dramatic byelection loss
Conservatives won the longtime Liberal stronghold of Toronto-St. Paul's
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he hears Canadians' "concerns and frustrations" as questions mount about his future as Liberal leader following his party's stunning byelection loss.
Conservative Don Stewart won the longtime federal Liberal stronghold of Toronto-St. Paul's in the early hours of Tuesday in a dramatic win, ending a race that was largely viewed as referendum on Trudeau's leadership.
"This was obviously not the result we wanted, but I want to be clear that I hear your concerns and frustrations," Trudeau said in a media statement. He did not take questions from reporters.
"These are not easy times. And it is clear, I and my entire team, have much more hard work to do to deliver tangible, real progress that Canadians can see and feel."
Conservative candidate Don Stewart hugs a supporter as the results come in during the Toronto-St. Paul's federal byelection. (Patrick Morrell/CBC)
Before Monday's close vote, a Conservative candidate hadn't been competitive in Toronto-St. Paul's since the 1980s. The party hadn't won a seat in urban Toronto since the 2011 federal election.
Éric Grenier, a polling analyst who runs thewrit.ca, said that while the polls suggested the byelection would be close, even the Conservatives likely were surprised by the win.
"Could it get much worse for the Liberals? This is perhaps one of the worst results that they could have had right now because they're going into the summer, there's been lots of questions about Justin Trudeau's leadership," he said.
"This is a big loss for the Liberals and it's a symbolic loss. I think there are going to be a lot of questions that are going to start being asked over the next few weeks."
The outgoing Liberal MP for the riding, Carolyn Bennett, beat her Conservative opponent by about 24 points in 2021. This time around, Liberal candidate Leslie Church lost by about two points.
Stewart's win broke the Liberals' grip on urban Toronto and raises questions for Liberal MPs who thought their seats were safe.
Roughly 55 Liberal MPs won their Ontario ridings by margins smaller than the one Bennett posted in Toronto–St. Paul's in the last general election, according to a CBC News analysis of past election data.
"Will there be a lot of Liberal MPs who are going to look at these results in Toronto-St. Paul's and think to themselves, 'I won my riding by a margin that was a lot smaller than 24 points, what are my chances of being re-elected?'" said Grenier.
MPs muse privately about a shakeup
The Liberals have been dogged by dismal poll numbers for a year.
A recent Abacus survey gave the Conservatives a 20-point lead over the Liberals.
Trudeau's own approval rating hasn't fared much better. The same Abacus poll found that 59 per cent of those surveyed had a negative opinion of the prime minister, while 33 per cent have a positive view of him.
Trudeau has repeatedly told journalists he plans to stay on as leader of the party and has down played the poll numbers. Last week, he told CBC's Power & Politics Canadians aren't in "decision mode" yet.
"We will never stop working and fighting to make sure you have what you need to get through these tough times. My focus is on your success and that's where it's going to stay," he said Tuesday.
Liberal
Party candidate Leslie Church greets supporters before the final count
came in for the Toronto-St.Paul's federal byelection on Monday, June 24,
2024. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)
Already, some Liberal MPs are musing behind the scenes about a shakeup.
"I think he has to go or there has to be a dramatic change," one Liberal MP told CBC News Tuesday, speaking on the condition they not be named.
Another Liberal MP, also speaking on the condition they not be named, said major changes are needed.
"Does he have to go? I think it's difficult to see other options," they said.
A third Liberal MP, speaking on the condition they not be named, told CBC News they feel their party's actions over the past year have been "tone-deaf."
"I think the prime minister, just to safeguard his own legacy, has to step down," they said.
Other Liberals stand by Trudeau — in public
Another Liberal source attributed MPs' complaints to a need to vent.
"I don't think you're going to see a phalanx of 25 caucus members coming to the mic saying it's time to go," they said.
Liberals MPs who spoke publicly Tuesday backed the prime minister.
"The prime minister is committed to leading us into the next election and he has our support," said Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland.
"This is a disappointing result. We take it seriously."
Minister of Northern Affairs Dan Vandal said he supports Trudeau "100 per cent."
"I think the real question Canadians are going to ask themselves is, what sort of Canada do you want to live in?" he said during a news conference.
"Do you want to live in a Canada where a government invests in its people, in health care, dental care, child care and a whole bunch of other initiatives? Or do you want a Canada where everything is gradually cut back, which a Poilievre government is sure to do."
Liberal MP for Whitby MP Ryan Turnbull said Trudeau will have to re-evaluate and reflect after the byelection result.
"But that's up to him," he said.
Liberal backbencher Marcus Powlowski, who represents Thunder Bay—Rainy River, said Trudeau has earned the right to make his own decision.
"Nobody's going to last forever as a politician, but that calculus, that walk in the snow, is for him to make, not for me to push him over in the snowbank, " he said referring to Trudeau's father's famous resignation line.
"I let him walk his walk."
Liberals don't have a leadership review mechanism
The Liberal Party doesn't have a leadership review mechanism built into its constitution. It does allow for "leadership endorsement" ballots, which permit registered Liberals to vote on whether they still support the current leader.
The endorsement ballot is conducted by each riding association and each riding is weighted equally, with 100 points. A leader needs 50 per cent of the points nationally to stay on.
But such a vote occurs only after the party loses a general election.
In 2015, Parliament adopted legislation meant to make party leaders more accountable to their caucus members.
The Reform Act — put forward by Conservative MP Michael Chong — allows MPs to review and remove their party leader. Under the Reform Act, if 20 per cent of a caucus signs a petition calling for a leadership review, a vote is triggered. If a majority of the MPs vote against the leader, the leader is forced to step down.
But the Reform Act states that parties must vote on whether to adopt any of its measures after each general election. The Conservative Party is the only one that has done so; the party used the Reform Act to oust Erin O'Toole from the leadership in 2022.
Celebrating his party's win Tuesday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre urged the prime minister to call an early election.
"Here is the verdict: Trudeau can't go on like this," he posted on social media. "He must call a carbon tax election now."
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who has been supporting the Liberal minority government through a confidence-and-supply agreement, said the byelection results show people are frustrated.
"People are really angry at the Liberals," he said. "People want change, so now it's a matter of what change people want."
He told reporters his party will continue to use its leverage with the minority government to push for its priorities.
Liberal Party spokesperson Parker Lund said the Liberals know there's hard work ahead of them
"We knew this would be a tough race, with byelections not often favouring the governing party," he said in a media statement.
"Our Liberal team is ready to keep working to reach Canadians."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Catherine Cullen, J.P. Tasker and Darren Major
After St. Paul's, is there anything Trudeau can say or do to save his leadership?
Maybe Trudeau's right when he says voters aren't in 'decision mode' now — or maybe they're tuning him out
At some point before Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet decided to finally abandon his promise of electoral reform, he had an idea.
He would tour the country to promote and explain the ranked ballot, his preferred option for reform. He said he believed that with enough time and effort, he could convince people of the logic and wisdom of what he was proposing.
He was ultimately convinced that there were other issues more in need of his attention and time. But years later, it's possible to see that same impulse — that same belief in his ability to make the case — in the flurry of podcasts and interviews Trudeau has done in recent weeks. With his party staring at defeat in the next election, the prime minister has put himself out there — perhaps in the hope that, with enough time and effort, he can once again persuade enough voters that his party is still the right choice.
But in the wake of the Liberals' shock loss in a previously safe riding in Toronto, it's fair to ask if there's anything Trudeau could possibly say at this point that would get a hearing — or if too many Canadians have simply decided they're done listening to him.
Trudeau's stated theory about his current situation rests on a belief that voters will feel differently by the time the next election arrives, or that they'll change their minds when it comes time to make a real choice.
"Canadians are not in a decision mode right now," he told CBC's Power & Politics during an interview last week. "What you tell a pollster — if they ever manage to reach you — is very different from the choice Canadians end up making in an election campaign."
There's some logic to that argument, at least for an incumbent government. Every election is ultimately a choice, not merely a referendum ("a choice, not a referendum" was a motto the Liberals repeated to themselves when they sought re-election in 2019).
Sooner or later, the other parties contending for power have to explain what they would do differently. Attention and scrutiny will come to bear on the other candidates for prime minister. And even if the electorate is unhappy with the current government, it still has to settle on an alternative.
Trudeau might be particularly tempted to think that things could look different in October 2025. Inflation might continue to cool. Housing construction might pick up. The vibes might improve.
A global wave of democratic discontent
It's also worth noting that the phenomenon of unhappy voters does not seem to be a uniquely Canadian one. Public frustration was a topic of conversation among the heads of government who gathered in Europe for two summits earlier this month, Trudeau said.
According to Morning Consult, every G7 leader currently has the approval of less than half of their country's electorate. At 30 per cent, Trudeau actually ranks third among that group. Such widespread dissatisfaction suggests larger forces are at play — the lingering trauma of a pandemic, the strain and uncertainty caused by inflation, the corrosive influence of social media, a divisive war in the Middle East.
"People everywhere are facing a certain amount of frustration," Trudeau said on Power & Politics. "And I truly believe that, as we choose to step up on solving those challenges — to contrast with a political vision that so far consists from the Conservatives of just making people more angry and saying everything is broken — I know Canadians are pragmatic people who focus on solutions. And that's exactly what we're going to be doing."
How do Canadians really feel about Trudeau?
While Liberal support has evaporated over the last year and a half, that drop does not seem to be a wholesale repudiation of the Liberal agenda.
When Abacus Data surveyed Canadians in May about what a government led by Pierre Poilievre should or shouldn't do, just 28 per cent of respondents said it should "definitely" or "probably" repeal the Liberal government's national childcare program. The same number said a Conservative government should repeal the national dental care program.
Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a rally in Ottawa on Sunday, March 24, 2024. (Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press)
Sixty-three per cent of respondents did say a Poilievre government should eliminate the federal carbon tax. But 80 per cent said Poilievre's Conservatives should take climate change seriously — an expectation that could challenge the Conservatives whenever they're finally compelled to explain how they would reduce Canada's greenhouse gas emissions.
A different survey released in May, though, asked respondents what attributes they would ascribe to Trudeau personally. The top results were overwhelmingly negative — 49 per cent said the prime minister exhibits "poor judgment," while 44 per cent called him "arrogant."
Somewhat inexplicably, 25 per cent said he was "inexperienced." And more respondents said Trudeau was "dangerous" (32 per cent) than said the same of Poilievre (22 per cent). Just 19 per cent said Trudeau was "well intentioned."
"There's no gentle way to say it. This opinion environment is brutal for Trudeau," concluded Kyla Ronellenfitsch, a former Ontario Liberal pollster.
That's just one survey. And Toronto-St. Paul's is just one riding out of 338. But both present serious challenges to Trudeau's theory that things will turn in his favour once Canadians switch into "decision mode." (By one estimate, if the vote swing from 2021 to 2024 in St. Paul's was replicated across Ontario, the Liberals would lose 55 ridings in the province that they currently hold.)
Time for a change?
History would suggest that changing leaders doesn't necessarily solve anything for the party in power. Pierre Trudeau departed in 1984 and the Liberals were trounced under John Turner a few months later. Brian Mulroney stepped down in 1993 and the Progressive Conservatives were wiped out under Kim Campbell. Jean Chretien handed off to Paul Martin in 2003 and the Liberals were reduced to a minority in 2004 — before losing power entirely in 2006.
Prime Minister designate Kim Campbell waves as she meets with Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in Ottawa on Monday, June 14, 1993. (Tom Hanson/The Canadian Press)
But the argument that someone else might do worse becomes harder to sustain in the wake of St. Paul's — a riding the Liberals still won by eight points when they were reduced to just 34 seats in 2011, the worst national result in party history.
In his own defence, Trudeau might point to his own record of defying predictions and rallying after setbacks. He took over a Liberal Party that was in third place and led it to 184 seats in 2015. The Liberals then came from behind in 2019 and 2021 to win the most seats.
Trudeau himself has rebounded from scandals and withstood embarrassments, not least the blackface pictures that emerged in the middle of the 2019 campaign. Barring a very sudden change in leadership, he will likely pass Robert Borden and Mulroney later this summer to become the seventh-longest serving prime minister in Canadian history.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau talks with children during a Fête nationale event in Montreal on Sunday, June 23, 2024. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press)
But perhaps no politician can defy gravity forever.
It also remains to be seen how ugly things might get within the Liberal Party if he insists on staying. If even a handful of Liberal MPs start worrying aloud about their own chances of re-election, Trudeau could soon be facing questions about desertions and revolt.
"This was obviously not the result we wanted," Trudeau said on Tuesday. "But I want to be clear that I hear people's concerns and frustrations. These are not easy times and it's clear that I and my entire Liberal team have much more work to do to deliver tangible real progress that Canadians across the country can see and feel."
An election might still be 16 months away. A great many things could happen between now and then. But is it possible there's nothing Trudeau could say or do now that would make Canadians feel better about a government led by him?
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Conservatives win longtime Liberal stronghold Toronto-St. Paul's in shock byelection result
Stunning result raises questions about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's future
Conservative candidate Don Stewart has won the longtime federal Liberal stronghold of Toronto-St. Paul's, a stunning result that raises questions about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's future.
Stewart's victory is shocking because the seat has been held by the Liberals for more than 30 years — even through the party's past low points, such as the 2011 federal election that returned just 34 Liberal MPs to Parliament.
Before Monday's vote, a Conservative candidate hadn't been competitive in Toronto-St. Paul's since the 1980s. The party hadn't won a seat in urban Toronto since the 2011 federal election.
Monday's result was a nail-biter to the very end.
For more than seven hours of counting, Liberal candidate Leslie Church was in the lead. But with 189 of 192 polls reporting, the lead flipped to Stewart.
The final batch of votes posted around 4:30 a.m. ET delivered the seat to Stewart and a major breakthrough to Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.
In the end, Stewart, a consultant, claimed victory with about 42 per cent of the vote against Church, a former Parliament Hill staffer and lawyer, who took roughly 40 per cent of the ballots cast.
The Liberals' poor showing in a stronghold like this could prompt some soul-searching for Trudeau, who has seen his popularity plummet as inflation, the cost of living crisis, high home prices and surging immigration levels drive voter discontent.
This Conservative upset is likely to lead to some anxiety in the Liberal caucus because such a dramatic vote swing could put other supposedly "safe" seats in play for the Conservatives in the next general election.
The outgoing Liberal MP, Carolyn Bennett, beat her Conservative opponent by some 24 points in this riding in 2021. Church lost by about two points.
If that same sort of vote swing was applied to other ridings in the province, dozens of Liberal MPs could lose their seats at the next election.
Roughly 55 Liberal MPs won their Ontario ridings by a smaller margin than what Bennett posted here in Toronto-St. Paul's in the last general election, according to a CBC News analysis of past election data.
Bennett, a popular figure in the party with a strong local following, resigned last year after 26 years in Parliament to become Canada's ambassador to Denmark.
The Liberal Party deployed heavy hitters like deputy prime minister Chrystia Freeland and a dozen other cabinet ministers to the riding to shore up Church's support but, in the end, it wasn't enough.
Voters in the riding told CBC News throughout the campaign that the government's handling of the housing crisis, inflation and the Israel-Hamas conflict were sore spots.
But it wasn't just about the issues — a number of voters expressed a desire for change and fatigue with Trudeau.
Even past and present Liberal supporters told CBC News Trudeau should resign as leader if the party loses this one-time ruby red Liberal seat.
Trudeau has given no indication he's stepping down.
In fact, he's repeatedly said he will lead the party into the federal election that's expected sometime next year.
Before Monday's result, many pollsters and pundits said a Conservative victory will put pressure on Trudeau to step down as Liberal leader.
"If we do end up on Monday night with a two, three, four, five-point win for the Liberals, the Liberals will be happy to have a win, but that still means that the country is going toward a big majority government for Pierre Poilievre," polls analyst Éric Grenier, who runs thewrit.ca, said in an interview on Rosemary Barton Live.
David Coletto, chair and CEO of Abacus Data, said he believes the Liberals need to win by 10 points or more to give Trudeau a credible path forward.
"I think then the prime minister can probably say, 'Look, we can come back from this. We can convince people, persuade people to vote Liberal,' " Coletto said on Rosemary Barton Live. "If it is much closer, then I think there's going to be a lot more doubt about whether he and the current team are able to achieve some of those things."
Jenni Byrne, a senior adviser to Poilievre, had said the party was expecting a loss in the riding.
Speaking to CBC News from Stewart's election night party before any results were released, Byrne said Toronto-St. Paul's "will probably stay on the Liberal side of things."
But she said the Conservatives are "going to see we've done better than we have in the past."
Byrne said there are questions for the Liberal team if Church's results are much less than what Bennett posted in the last election.
A strong Conservative performance suggests some other supposedly safe Liberal seats like neighbouring Eglinton-Lawrence and Willowdale, and seats in Etobicoke and North York could be in play, Byrne said.
The NDP candidate, Amrit Parhar, struggled to make much of a mark with about 11 per cent of the vote in Toronto-St. Paul's — a worse performance than what the party achieved in the last general election.
The NDP could have been a contender in this race — the party currently holds the seat provincially. NDP MPP Jill Andrew has won the riding in the last two provincial elections.
The
Toronto-St. Paul's byelection was seen as a two-horse race between
Conservative candidate Don Stewart, right, and his Liberal opponent,
Leslie Church, left. (Evan Mitsui/CBC, Patrick Morrell/CBC)
The Green candidate, Christian Cullis, drew about three per cent of the vote while the People's Party candidate barely registered with less than one per cent of all ballots cast.
It took hours for Elections Canada workers to count all the ballots.
While polls closed at 8:30 p.m. ET, the final results weren't known until about 4:30 a.m. — an inordinately long time to count the results in a single riding.
The agency said it was bogged down because there were dozens of candidates on the unwieldy, nearly metre-long ballot — some of whom are proportional-representation activists running as a protest to the country's first-past-the-post voting system.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Toronto–St. Paul's Byelection Results Livestream
133,604 views Streamed live Join me and Philippe J. Fournier for some live analysis of the results of the federal byelection in the Ontario riding of Toronto–St. Paul's. As support slides for Justin Trudeau's Liberals, can Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives win a seat that they haven't held since the 1980s?Cabinet ministers flock to Liberal stronghold ahead of Toronto byelection
Byelection will feature longest-ever federal ballot, with 84 candidates
Cabinet ministers are spending a lot of time in a key Toronto riding ahead of a byelection later this month — part of an attempt by the Liberals to hang on to a party stronghold as the Conservative Party rides high in the polls.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and at least 13 of his ministers have dropped into Toronto-St. Paul's to campaign on behalf of Liberal candidate Leslie Church, a former political staffer, ahead of the June 24 vote.
Those ministers include Greater Toronto Area representatives like Chrystia Freeland and Anita Anand, along with ministers from more far-flung ridings such as Harjit Sajjan and François-Philippe Champagne.
Toronto-St. Paul's was once considered a bellwether riding but has been a Liberal stronghold since the 1990s. Former cabinet minister (and current ambassador to Denmark) Carolyn Bennett held the riding from 1997 to 2024; she won by roughly eight percentage points in the 2011 election, when the federal Liberals were relegated to the third party in the House of Commons with just 34 seats.
Don Stewart is challenging the seat for the Conservatives. The NDP has nominated Amrit Parhar, Christian Cullis is the Green candidate and the People's Party of Canada candidate is Dennis Wilson.
Polling expert Philippe Fournier of 338Canada told CBC's Power & Politics last week that despite the Liberals' strong results in 2021 — when Bennett won over half of the vote — they risk losing the riding in this byelection.
"We should consider this riding as a tossup, with a slight lean to the Liberals," he said. "Of course there's some uncertainty in the numbers, but we expect the Liberals to win by a margin of between four and eight points."
Fournier warned that those assumptions depend on the Liberals being able to turn out their vote, which could be a challenge in a summer byelection campaign. He said the recent Mississauga-Lakeshore byelection, in which less than 30 per cent of eligible voters took part, might suggest the likely turnout in Toronto-St. Paul's.
The Liberals have won all 25 ridings in Toronto in last three general elections. Fournier said a loss in Toronto-St. Paul's would be significant.
"If they are now not able to hold on to the 416 base, it could spell a lot of trouble for the leadership of the Liberals and it would be very difficult to see Mr. Trudeau be able to stay on as leader if they lose Toronto," he said.
84 candidates on the ballot, a federal record
Beyond the political messages being pushed out by the campaigns, voters in Toronto-St. Paul's will also have to contend with what Elections Canada has confirmed is the longest ballot in the history of federal politics.
Elections Canada is using a two-column ballot to accommodate all 84 candidates contesting the byelection.
The massive candidate list is the result of an organized campaign by the group Longest Ballot Committee, which organizes candidates to flood elections as a way of raising awareness about electoral reform.
"Voters in the Toronto-St. Paul's byelection are in for a good chuckle at the polling booth, and perhaps a moment to reflect on how our democracy and MPs could be made to better serve all Canadians," said Kieran and Tomas Szuchewycz, organizers with the group, in a press release.
Glen MacDonald, one of the candidates on the ballot affiliated with Longest Ballot Committee, told CBC News that the ballot would be "impossible to ignore."
"It's important to understand that it's not just a couple of guys poking around and having fun with the voting system. This is a serious protest happening," he said. The aim is to raise awareness and spark a broader national conversation about electoral reform, he said.
The Toronto-St. Paul's byelection represents the second time MacDonald has been on a ballot as part of the Longest Ballot campaign. The first occasion was in Winnipeg South Centre last year, which previously held the record for longest federal ballot.
MacDonald said he joined the ballot initiative because he realized that "we need to do something different."
"The issue of electoral reform has been talked about and debated and studied for decades in Canada, and we're not making any progress," he said.
MacDonald said both the Conservatives and Liberals have been hypocrites on electoral reform and the way forward is an empowered citizens assembly.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Toronto-St. Paul's has been a Liberal riding since 1993. Will that winning streak end on Monday?
Rebel News 117 Comments
Will Toronto-St. Paul's still be a Liberal stronghold after byelection? | Sunday Scrum
Federal byelection in Toronto has Liberals watching closely
Liberal Party of Canada announces Leslie Church as Team Trudeau candidate for Toronto–St. Paul’s
May 1, 2024
Toronto, ON — The Liberal Party of Canada has announced that Leslie Church, an accomplished community leader, will be the Team Trudeau candidate for Toronto–St. Paul’s in the upcoming federal by-election.
“Leslie is a passionate community leader who is ready to roll up her sleeves and get to work building a stronger Toronto St–Paul’s,” said Sachit Mehra, President of the Liberal Party of Canada. “In this important by-election, the people of Toronto–St. Paul’s have a clear choice: elect Leslie to deliver our Liberal plan that makes the ultra-wealthy pay a bit more so every generation has a fair shot at success, or let Pierre Poilievre and his Conservatives make cuts to programs that help the middle class.”
Leslie has deep roots in Toronto–St. Paul’s, and has spent much of her career serving her community, advising governments, and working with local organizations in Toronto and across the country to build a better future for everyone. Most recently, she served as a senior advisor and Chief of Staff in the federal government, where her work and leadership contributed to the development of $10-a-day child care, initiatives to build more affordable homes, and increased investments to reduce health care waitlists.
“Toronto– St. Paul’s needs a local champion who understands the challenges and opportunities of our community and families,” said Leslie Church. “I am ready to work with the Liberal team to build more homes, strengthen public health care, and lower the cost of living – so everyone in our community has a fair chance to succeed.”
Leslie Church
Experience
-
-
Google Jun 2012 to Dec 2015 · 3 yrs 7 mos Toronto, Ontario, CanadaHead of Communications & Public Affairs, Google Canada
-
Temerty Faculty of Medicine , University of Toronto Dec 2011 to Jun 2012 · 7 mos TorontoExecutive Director, Office of Strategy, Communications & External Relations
-
Michael Ignatieff Liberal Leadership Campaign Apr 2006 to Dec 2006 · 9 mos TorontoDirector, Communications
-
Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance Dec 2002 to Sep 2003 · 10 mos TorontoExecutive Director
-
Western Economic Diversification Canada May 2001 to Oct 2001 · 6 mosPolicy Analyst and Project Lead
Education
-
-
-
Gordon Cressy Leadership Award; James Jefferson Prize for Health Law; Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Prize for Excellence in Legal Writing; Students’ Law Society Public Interest Summer Fellowship
-
-
-
-
-
-
Specialization in international political economy and global economic governance.
-
-
-
-
-
Activities and societies: President, University of Alberta Students' Union (2000-2001)
-
-
Faculty of Arts Achievement Award; Lou Hyndman Leadership Scholarship
-
-
-
Meet Don
Don Stewart and his two daughters have been proud to call St. Paul’s their home since 2016. His roots in the riding stretch back more than 100 years.
Don grew up in Oshawa and attended Queen’s University, earning both Engineering and Business degrees. He began his career selling construction products for a small business where he learned about fiscal accountability and that every dollar counts. Later, he worked on Bay St. and spent time at both BMO and Morgan Stanley, gaining a global perspective on money flows.
Don currently works for the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) helping to keep our capital markets safe, fair, and efficient.
His professional experiences have taught him that hard work combined with sound fiscal and economic policy are keys to innovation and success.
Don has lent his time and energy to various community efforts including the Lakeridge Hospital Foundation, junior golf committees, and the Canadian Armed Forces. He is a past-President and is now Treasurer of the 2 Intelligence Company Senate. Don has been a licensed Professional Engineer and is a CFA Charterholder.
Dennis Wilson
Dennis Wilson was born and raised in Alberta. He received a BSc from the University of Alberta with major coursework in biology and sociology, as well as a specialization in psychology.
While living in Edmonton, Dennis worked with the CIBC, Ducks Unlimited and also started his own consulting, bookkeeping and personal income tax business.
In 1987, Dennis moved to Hamilton to attend McMaster University, and he received his MBA in Management Science and Information Systems in 1990. Dennis worked as a contract employee and consultant for the City of Hamilton, where he assisted in implementing a new property tax system.
Dennis moved to Texas in 1995, where he worked in software and database development for Nortel. While working with Nortel, Dennis received his PhD in Organization and Management from Capella University.
Dennis returned to Canada in 2007 and returned to his consulting business in 2009. During this time, Dennis wrote and published the book "Human Psychology for Business". In 2016, Dennis, with his wife, purchased and opened the Lighthouse Restaurant on the Parkway. The restaurant was sold in 2021 and Dennis and his wife took up raising chickens, and growing garlic and other vegetables on their hobby farm.
Dennis is a systems expert with strong financial acumen, a people and organizational expert, and an author. Dennis is dedicated to helping make life more livable for Canadians.
List of candidates
Toronto--St. Paul's (Ontario)
This list of confirmed candidates was issued on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.
| Candidate name | Status | Party name | Office phone number | Candidate's website * | Name of official agent | Name of auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mélodie Anderson | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| MarthaLee Aykroyd | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Alex Banks | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Myriam Beaulieu | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Michael Bednarski | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Line Bélanger | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Maxime Boivin | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewyc |
|
| Mylène Bonneau | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Jean-Denis Parent Boudreault | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Alain Bourgault | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Erle Stanley Bowman | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Sean Carson | Confirmed | Parti Rhinocéros Party |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Jaël Champagne Gareau | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Leslie Church | Confirmed | Liberal Party of Canada | (416) 623-6529 | Website Leslie Church | Fern Gordon | Harry Mortimer |
| Sébastien CoRhino | Confirmed | Independent |
|
Website Sébastien CoRhino | Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Léthycia-Félix Corriveau | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Christian Cullis | Confirmed | Green Party of Canada | (437) 297-9473 |
|
Adam Deutsch |
|
| Charles Currie | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| John Dale | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Stephen Davis | Confirmed | No Affiliation |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Mark Dejewski | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Kubera Desai | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Manon Marie Lili Desbiens | Confirmed | No Affiliation |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Cory Deville | Confirmed | Independent | (647) 391-4355 |
|
Marley Adams |
|
| Gerrit Dogger | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Samuel Ducharme | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Ysack Dupont | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Donovan Eckstrom | Confirmed | Independent |
|
Website Donovan Eckstrom | Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Alexandra Engering | Confirmed | Independent |
|
Website Alexandra Engering | Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Dji-Pé Frazer | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Guillaume Gagnier-Michel | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Daniel Gagnon | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Donald Gagnon | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Daniel Andrew Graham | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Pierre Granger | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Zornitsa Halacheva | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Anthony Hamel | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Felix-Antoine Hamel | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Blake Hamilton | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Loren Hicks | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szchewycz |
|
| Kerri Hildebrandt | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Martin Acetaria Caesar Jubinville | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Demetrios Karavas | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Kevin Krisa | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Krzysztof Krzywinski | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Alain Lamontagne | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Pierre Larochelle | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Marie-Hélène LeBel | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Danny Légaré | Confirmed | Marijuana Party |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Renée Lemieux | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Connie Lukawski | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Glen MacDonald | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Agnieszka Marszalek | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Matéo Martin | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Ali Mohiuddin | Confirmed | Centrist Party of Canada |
|
|
Umme Ismaeel |
|
| Thibaud Mony | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Yusuf Kadir Nasihi | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Winston Neutel | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Guillaume Paradis | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Amrit Parhar | Confirmed | New Democratic Party |
|
|
David Simon |
|
| Joshua Bram Hieu Pham | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Lorant Polya | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Danimal Preston | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Olivier Renaud | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Spencer Rocchi | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Wallace Richard Rowat | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Jacques Saintonge | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Jonathan Schachter | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Roger Sherwood | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Yogo Shimada | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Julie St-Amand | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Pascal St-Amand | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Don Stewart | Confirmed | Conservative Party of Canada | (647) 846-4663 | Website Don Stewart | Michael Konopaski | Clarissa Sidaway |
| Mário Stocco | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Patrick Strzalkowski | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Daniel Stuckless | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Benjamin Teichman | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Meñico Turcotte | Confirmed | Marxist-Leninist Party of Canada |
|
Website Meñico Turcotte | Hélène Héroux |
|
| Darcy Vanderwater | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Gavin Vanderwater | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Elliot Wand | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Michal Wieczorek | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
| Dennis Wilson | Confirmed | People's Party of Canada | (647) 272-9866 | Website Dennis Wilson | Danielle M. Metz |
|
| Jordan Wong | Confirmed | Independent |
|
|
Kieran Szuchewycz |
|
*Please note: Elections Canada does not operate, review, endorse or approve any external site listed here and is not responsible or liable for any damages arising from linking to or using those sites.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:31 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Carolyn Bennett can never
claim that she did not know N'esy Chucky Leblanc>
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:35 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
On behalf of The Honourable Brian Pallister, Premier of Manitoba, we
would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.
Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
earliest opportunity.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Manitoba
_______
Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, M. Brian Pallister, nous
accusons réception de votre courriel.
Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
Conseil exécutif
Gouvernement du Manitoba
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.
This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.
Warmest Regards,
Premier's Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:44:28 -0300
Subject: The Honourable Carolyn Bennett can never claim that she did
not know N'esy Chucky Leblanc>
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, RCAANC.media.CIRNAC@canada.ca,
logan.perley@cbc.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca,
jake.stewart@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca,
premier@gov.bc.ca, premier@gov.nt.ca, premier@gov.yk.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, markandcaroline@gmail.com,
COCMoncton@gmail.com, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com
Cc: Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscountyrecord.com,
dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com,
news@hilltimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:49 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting our office
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
Thank you very much for contacting our office. Your message has been
received and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
Please note that, due to the high volume of correspondence that we
receive, priority is given to inquiries from constituents of
Toronto-St. Paul's. If you have not done so already, please include
your full name, address, and postal code in your message.
If you are a constituent and this is a time-sensitive matter, please
also do not hesitate to contact our constituency office by phone at
416-952-3990. We are more than happy to assist!
If your message is regarding Crown-Indigenous Relations, it will be
forwarded to the department office. For all future correspondence
pertaining to Crown-Indigenous Relations, we request that you please
write directly to
aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
or call 819-997-0002.
Thank you once again for taking the time to contact our office. We
hope this information has been helpful, and look forward to connecting
with you again soon!
Sincerely,
Hon. Carolyn Bennett
Member of Parliament for Toronto-St. Paul's
--
Merci beaucoup d'avoir communiqué avec notre bureau. Votre message a
bien été reçu et il sera traité dès que possible.
Veuillez noter qu'en raison du volume élevé de correspondance que nous
recevons, la priorité est accordée aux demandes provenant d'habitants
de Toronto-St. Paul's. Si ce n'est pas encore fait, nous vous prions
d'inclure votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal dans
votre message.
S'il s'agit d'une question urgente et que vous êtes un électeur de la
circonscription susmentionnée, n'hésitez pas à communiquer avec notre
bureau de circonscription au 416-952-3990. Nous nous ferons un plaisir
de vous aider!
Si votre message porte sur les relations Couronne-Autochtones, il sera
acheminé au bureau du ministère approprié. Pour toute autre question
au sujet des relations Couronne-Autochtones, nous vous saurions gré
d'écrire directement au ministère à l'adresse
aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
ou de l'appeler au 819-997-0002.
Merci encore une fois d'avoir pris le temps de communiquer avec notre
bureau. Nous espérons que ces informations vous sont utiles, et nous
nous réjouissons à la perspective d'échanger avec vous de nouveau!
Cordialement,
L'honorable Carolyn Bennett
Députée de Toronto-St. Paul's
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Media (RCAANC/CIRNAC)" <RCAANC.Media.CIRNAC@canada.ca
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I called
Office of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett before she gives her big
speech in Fat Fred City today
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. You have contacted the Media Centre for
Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.
This is an automatic reply to confirm receipt of your e-mail. We will
respond as soon as possible.
Please note that this inbox and the Media Centre telephone line
(819-934-2302) are monitored Monday through Friday, from 9:00AM to
5:00PM EST, with the exception of holidays.
Media Enquiries
If you have submitted a media enquiry, we will aim to respond as
quickly as possible.
For media enquiries requiring an urgent response outside of regular
work hours, please contact Michelle Perron
(michelle.perron@canada.ca).
General Public Enquiries
Members of the public may direct their questions to our Public
Enquiries service:
Email: aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca
Phone: 1-800-567-9604
Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-866-553-0554
Fax: 1-866-817-3977
Mailing address:
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada
Public Enquiries Contact Centre
10 rue Wellington
Gatineau QC K1A 0H4
***
Merci pour votre courriel. Vous avez contact? le Centre des m?dias de
Relations Couronne-Autochtones et Affaires du Nord Canada.
Ceci est une r?ponse automatique pour confirmer r?ception de votre
courriel. Nous vous r?pondrons le plus t?t possible.
Veuillez noter que cette bo?te de r?ception et la ligne t?l?phonique
du Centre des m?dias (819-934-2302) sont surveill?es du lundi au
vendredi, de 9h00 ? 17h00 HNE, sauf les jours f?ri?s.
Requ?tes des m?dias
Si vous avez soumis une requ?te, nous tenterons d'y r?pondre le plus
rapidement possible.
Pour des requ?tes urgentes n?cessitant une r?ponse en dehors des
heures r?guli?res de travail, veuillez svp contacter Michelle Perron
(michelle.perron@canada.ca).
Requ?tes g?n?rales du public
Les membres du public peuvent adresser leurs questions ? notre service
de requ?tes g?n?rales :
Courriel : aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca
T?l?phone : 1-800-567-9604
T?l?imprimeur (ATS) : 1-866-553-0554
T?l?copieur : 1-866-817-3977
Adresse postale :
Affaires autochtones et du Nord Canada
Centre de contacts de renseignements du public
10, rue Wellington
Gatineau QC K1A 0H4
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:39:40 -0300
Subject: Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I called Office of the
Honourable Carolyn Bennett before she gives her big speech in Fat Fred
City today
To: RCAANC.media.CIRNAC@canada.ca, logan.perley@cbc.ca,
David.Coon@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
premier@gov.nt.ca, premier@gov.yk.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca, carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
markandcaroline@gmail.com, COCMoncton@gmail.com, tj@burkelaw.ca,
kelly@lamrockslaw.com
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, news@hilltimes.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
Latest Sisson Mine approval leaves First Nations, conservation groups uneasy
Tailings pond for proposed mine north of Fredericton requires damming
two fish-bearing brooks
Logan Perley · CBC News · Posted: Jul 22, 2019 7:41 PM AT
David Amos
I wonder if Carolyn Bennett study my file in the docket of Federal
Court while she is in Fat Fred City? Methinks many Chiefs and media
dudes and even Jake Stewart know why I ran against her predecessor
Andy Scott many moons ago N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
David Amos
Content disabled
"Content disabled" Yea Right
So much for free speech in CBC just before a Cabinet Minister gives a
big Speech in Fat Fred City a week after Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The
Younger changed her mandate before his attempt at a second mandate for
himself N'esy Pas?
https://www.canada.ca/en/crown
Transformation
On July 15, 2019, legislation dissolving Indigenous and Northern
Affairs Canada and formally establishing the mandates of 2 new
departments, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC)
and Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), came into effect. CIRNAC and ISC
will continue to work seamlessly together to ensure there are no
interruptions to inquiries, delivery of services or relationships with
partners. Contact names and numbers remain the same. The two websites
will be updated accordingly in the next few months.
David Amos
Content disabled
There are no coincidences Methinks Mr Perley wants to tease the
"Powers that Be" who are meeting in Fat Fred City for the next 3 days
N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
AFN annual assembly kicks off in Fredericton
New Brunswick capital hosts 3-day conference
CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2019 5:00 AM AT | Last Updated: an hour ago
LIVE
CBC News
The Assembly of First Nations hosts its 40th annual general assembly
in Fredericton LIVE
00:00 Live
Up to 2,000 delegates are expected to gather under the theme
Celebrating Successes and Giving Thanks. 0:00
The Assembly of First Nations will open its 40th annual general
assembly in the Fredericton region on Tuesday.
First Nation leaders from across Canada are in the New Brunswick
capital for the three-day event, a chance to discuss Indigenous issues
and the challenges facing Canada and its relationship with First
Nations.
Chief Elaine Johnston of Serpent River First Nation in Ontario was
among the droves of delegates who arrived and registered for the
conference Monday.
"It's an opportunity for all the First Nation leaders to network and
also talk about the future directions that we'd like to work on,"
Johnston said.
She said she's keen to discuss how newly passed federal legislation to
overhaul the Indigenous child welfare system, known as Bill C-92, will
affect her community.
An exchange of water ceremony took place early Tuesday morning in
Fredericton. (Catherine Harrop/CBC)
The oft-criticized legislation is listed among the issues for the
afternoon discussion and resolutions session. The assembly will also
discuss the environment and climate change; housing, water and
emergency management; and the new Indigenous languages legislation,
among other topics.
Indigenous people don't want to be excluded from snow crab
fishery, national chief says
A pipe ceremony at 6 a.m. AT on St. Mary's First Nation opened the
general assembly, followed by an exchange of water ceremony, where six
participants travelled by canoe along the St. John River to give
thanks to the body of water. About 60 people, including chiefs and
members of the public, were in attendance.
This week's annual general assembly of the Assembly of First Nations
in Fredericton was marked by a flag raising ceremony at city hall on
Monday. The flag for the traditional Wolastoqey territory was raised.
(Ed Hunter/CBC)
The opening ceremonies and official welcome will run from 9 to 11 a.m.
at the Fredericton Convention Centre, home to most of the proceedings.
Carolyn Bennett, minister of Crown-Indigenous relations and northern
affairs, will address the assembly at 1 p.m. before the discussion
session begins.
With files from Catherine Harrop
https://www.canada.ca/en/crown
On July 15, 2019, legislation dissolving Indigenous and Northern
Affairs Canada and formally establishing the mandates of 2 new
departments, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC)
and Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), came into effect. CIRNAC and ISC
will continue to work seamlessly together to ensure there are no
interruptions to inquiries, delivery of services or relationships with
partners. Contact names and numbers remain the same. The two websites
will be updated accordingly in the next few months.
https://www.canada.ca/en/crown
Minister Bennett to participate in the Assembly of First Nations' 40th
Annual General Assembly
From: Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
Media advisory
Fredericton, New Brunswick – Please be advised that the Honourable
Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, will deliver
remarks at the Assembly of First Nations' Annual General Assembly.
Date: July 23, 2019
Time: 1 p.m. (ADT)
Where:
Fredericton Convention Centre
670 Queen Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 1C2
Contacts
For more information:
Matthew Dillon-Leitch
Director of Communications
Office of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett
819-997-0002
CIRNAC Media Relations
819-934-2302
RCAANC.media.CIRNAC@canada.ca
Follow us on Twitter:
Minister Carolyn Bennett
GovCan — Indigenous
St. Mary's NB chief takes diversion route following sexual assault charg
Chief Alan “Chicky” Polchies is facing one count of sexual assault and
one count of assault
CBC News · Posted: Jul 22, 2019 9:37 PM AT
Chief Allan (Chicky) Polchies Jr. said in a statement Monday he
accepted the Crown's offer of enrolling the adult diversion program.
(Ed Hunter/CBC)
On the day before the Assembly of First Nations' annual general
assembly officially was set to begin in Fredericton, the chief of St.
Mary's First Nation was busy rallying support to keep his name on the
agenda amid a sexual-assault charge.
The lawyer for Chief Allan "Chicky" Polchies said his client was
removed from the opening ceremonies by the First Nations Assembly
executive council because of their zero tolerance policy toward sexual
assault allegations.
Polchies is facing one count of sexual assault and one count of
assault, both alleged to have taken place in Fredericton around March
2.
CBC News could not confirm whether Polchies's involvement in the
three-day event has been diminished in light of the charges. The
assembly did not respond to an interview request.
St. Mary's First Nation chief faces charges of assault, sexual assault
Polchies, who met with fellow chiefs from New Brunswick on Monday,
issued a statement saying he will go through the post-charge diversion
program. If completed, the diversion program allows charges to be
withdrawn.
"An allegation has been made against me by a member of our community
which I would normally take to court to prove my innocence due to my
belief of the lack of evidence required to obtain a conviction,"
Polchies said in the statement.
"However, the offer of post charge diversion was made to me by the
Crown Prosecutor's office which I have fully accepted."
The adult diversion program was designed as an alternative to the
court system "by holding eligible adults accountable for their actions
at the community level while also linking them with required
interventions to prevent future offending," states Public Safety
Canada.
The Assembly of First Nations annual general assembly begins Tuesday
with a pipe ceremony at St. Mary's First Nation, a reserve located
within the city of Fredericton.
With files from Catherine Harrop
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: TJ Burke <tj@burkelaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:44:57 -0700
Subject: Out of Office Reply Re: YO Carl Urquhart the RCMP, the Fat
Fred City Finest and everybody I have been arguing in Federal Court
know that your blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc knows exactly who Mikey
Comeau is N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your email.
I will be out of my office until April 29th, 2019.
During this time, I will have limited access to email but I will do my best
to respond to your message after hours.
*If your matter is of an urgent nature, or for direction on your file,
please contact our administration at 506-449-1200.
Yours truly.
Thomas J. Burke, Q.C.
Partner
*THE BURKE LAW GROUP*
Kchikhusis Commercial Centre
150 Cliffe St., First Floor, Suite R6
Fredericton, NB E3A 0A1
Email: *tj@burkelaw.ca *
Tel: 506.449.1200
Fax: 506.449.1225
The information contained in this email is solicitor communication and
privileged. It is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you
receive this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that the copying or distribution of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us.
--
*Thomas J. Burke, QC*
Barrister & Solicitor
*THE BURKE LAW GROUP*
150 Cliffe Street
Fredericton, NB E3A 0A1
P: 506.449.1200
F: 506.449.1225
www.burkelaw.ca
The information contained in this email is solicitor communication and
privileged. It is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you
receive this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that the copying or distribution of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:22:38 -0400
Subject: Methinks the Clerk of the Privy Council Ian Shugart and many
others can't play dumb N'esy Pas Catherine Blewett?
To: Catherine.Blewett@pco-bcp.gc.c
Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
harjit.sajjan@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca, tony.clement@parl.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, news@hilltimes.com,
david.eidt@gnb.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Shugart, Ian" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:06:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks everybody knows why I called the
Media Relations Department of National Defence (613-996-2353)
immediately after I read this news statement # 83 of my lawsuit said
enough N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Please note that Ian Shugart, Clerk of the Privy Council, will be out
of the office from July 8 to July 19 inclusively. During his absence,
you can contact Catherine Blewett at 613-957-5466.
All correspondence and various requests should be routed in the usual manner.
Thank you
******************************
Veuillez prendre note qu’Ian Shugart, Greffier du Conseil privé, sera
absent du bureau le 8 au 19 juillet, 2019. Pendant son absence, vous
pouvez communiquer avec Catherine Blewett au 613-957-5466.
Toute correspondance et autres demandes doivent être acheminées de
façon habituelle.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:05:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks everybody knows why I called the
Media Relations Department of National Defence (613-996-2353)
immediately after I read this news statement # 83 of my lawsuit said
enough N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (JAG/JPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:05:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks everybody knows why I called the
Media Relations Department of National Defence (613-996-2353)
immediately after I read this news statement # 83 of my lawsuit said
enough N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
I am out of the office until Tuesday afternoon, July 23. For
immediate assistance, please dial (506) 453-2222.
Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 23 Juillet. Si vous avez besoin de
l'assistance immediate svp appeler 453-2222.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:05:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks everybody knows why I called the
Media Relations Department of National Defence (613-996-2353)
immediately after I read this news statement # 83 of my lawsuit said
enough N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:05:51 -0400
Subject: Methinks everybody knows why I called the Media Relations
Department of National Defence (613-996-2353) immediately after I read
this news statement # 83 of my lawsuit said enough N'esy Pas?
To: Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, harjit.sajjan@parl.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca, jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca, tony.clement@parl.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com,
news@hilltimes.com, david.eidt@gnb.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Friday, 19 July 2019
Ottawa sets aside $900M to settle sexual misconduct lawsuits against
Canadian Armed Forces
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAm
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks everybody knows why I called the Media Relations Department
of National Defence (613-996-2353) immediately after I read this news
statement # 83 of my lawsuit said enough N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politi
Ottawa sets aside $900M to settle sexual misconduct lawsuits against
Canadian Armed Forces
Class members will be eligible for compensation between $5,000 and $55,000
Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Jul 18, 2019 5:05 PM ET
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:08:09 -0400
Subject: ATTN Madame Lablanc because of our talk earlier I am certain
TJ Burke and his cop clients can explain this email to you
To: communication@nbapc.org, tj <tj@tjharvey.ca>,
TJ.Harvey.a1@parl.gc.ca, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>,
alycia.bartlett@fredericton.ca
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
<sfine@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"Hunter.Tootoo" <Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>
https://nbapc.org/wp-content/u
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
theUS. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing
in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Say Hoka Hey to your snotty hubby the latest publisher of the Kings
County Record. wiil ya?
Perhaps he and you buddies in Kings county should review what
his/Irvings paper wrote about me four god damned years ago. You will
find that article within a blog of chucky Leblanc's that he had Goggle
delete. It is within an email that his editor sent to a reporter and I
in the USA before I ran for a seat in Parliament again. Never forget
my words are legally published int the USA according to its
Consitution. Scotty editor sent her email to me in the USA and to a
fellow reporter too. Whereas you are just a criminal lawer in New
Brunswick I doubt that you have a licence to argue civil lawsuits in
the USA. Perhaps you should find a lawyer now EH Ms. Menard? Why not
ask the Irving's new sorta son in law who replaced Paul Zed (the
lawyer in New York or whereever) to take me on?
Veritas vincit
David Raymond amos
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
First the Irving's Rags write this about the doings between T.J. Burke
and I last year. have my blog and emails killed then sing your praises
about your legal Bullshit next year? Have alook for yourself lady
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Who says they are ignoring me Chucky? Ask Barry McKnight why
the Yankees are researching him
To: news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
CC: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, whalen@fredericton.ca,
david.kelly@fredericton.ca, cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca
stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca, tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca,
scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca
walter.brown@fredericton.ca, norah.davidson@fredericton.ca,
mike.obrien@fredericton.ca, bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca,
dan.keenan@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
jlmockler@mpor.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca,
jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 1,013
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 206.15.101.# (NEWS CORPORATION)
ISP NEWS CORPORATION
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : New York
City : New York
Lat/Long : 40.7605, -73.9933 (Map)
Language English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System Microsoft Win2000
Browser Firefox 2.0
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3)
Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
Last Page View May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...%22barr
Search Engine google.com
Search Words fredericton police department "barry mcknight"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time May 23 2007 5:17:17 pm
Visit Number 1,013
charles leblanc oldmaison@yahoo.com wrote:
Where are ya living now???? Since the media seem to ignore ya? I'll
sit down for a debate with a recorder for the blog...Now? Don't get
all exicted and send this all over the world.....lol
----- Original Message ----
From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; whalen@fredericton.ca;
david.kelly@fredericton.ca; cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca
stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca; tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca;
scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca
walter.brown@fredericton.ca; norah.davidson@fredericton.ca;
mike.obrien@fredericton.ca; bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca;
dan.keenan@fredericton.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca;
mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
jlmockler@mpor.ca; scotta@parl.gc.ca; michael.bray@gnb.ca;
jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
Cc: news@dailygleaner.com; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net;
oldmaison@yahoo.com; advocacycollective@yahoo.com;
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca;
info@gg.ca; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; rchedore@mosherchedore.ca;
police@fredericton.ca; chebert@thestar.ca; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca;
Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com;
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca;
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:37:04 PM
Subject: I promised one of the Fat Fred City cop Randy Reilly that I
would try to make him famous
http://www.youtube.com/results
A man is only as good as his word EH? To bad priests, bankers,
politicians, lawyers and cops can't claim the same N'est Pas
http://actionlyme.org/FBI_WIRE
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop buddies
allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH
Chucky?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com,
kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
whalen@fredericton.ca, david.kelly@fredericton.ca,
cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca
tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca, scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca
marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca, walter.brown@fredericton.ca,
norah.davidson@fredericton.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca, dan.keenan@fredericton.ca,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc
scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-b
http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/
http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
http://maritimes.indymedia.org
Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas?
Scroll down Frenchie and go down?.
Threat against Burke taken seriously
By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
dgleg@nb.aibn.com
Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
Appeared on page A1
An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
recently.
Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
explain the nature of the threats.
"I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
Wednesday.
"The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
added protection and that added comfort."
The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security unit.
Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
been in recent weeks.
"When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
"But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
personal safety."
Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
pattern of activity.
"It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful nervous."
Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.
"(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
to my background and training.
"I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to happen."
Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.
"We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.
Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
security in New Brunswick has been
beefed up.
Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
visitors are screened.
The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
province's "top cop."
Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
prosecutes them.
"With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
threats since Day 1 in office."
Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.
"I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
their punishment or their sanction," he said.
Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?
"I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.
Reporters asked when the threat would be over.
"I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."
Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
complimentary."
"I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.
"They look at each and every situation."
Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
have extra security staff assigned on occasion.
He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the RCMP.
http://www.archive.org/details
Small World EH Chucky Leblanc?
"Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca wrote:
From: "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
To: "'motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com'" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
"Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
Subject: Fredericton Police Force
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
Dear Mr. Amos
My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the Fredericton
Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding files
that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have involvement
in.
Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a message and a
phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am not in my
office.
yours truly,
Cpl. Lou LaFleur
Fredericton Police Force
311 Queen St.
Fredericton, NB
506-460-2332
______________________________
This electronic mail, including any attachments, is confidential and
is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be privileged.
Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or review is
prohibited. Neither communication over the Internet nor disclosure to
anyone other than the intended recipient constitutes waiver of
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
notify the sender and then delete this communication and any
attachments from your computer system and records without saving or
forwarding it. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
French will follow
Thank you for your email.
For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.
For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.
All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
------------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel.
Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.
Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.
Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
Kevin Leahy
Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
T 613-996-5048
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
erreur et supprimez-le.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
(857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:55:57 -0400
Subject: Re the CBA, the RCMP, Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
Hearing before the Federal Court of Appeal on May 24th 2017
To: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.co
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Mordaith@gmail.com>, "leanne.murray"
<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.c
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "nick.moore"
<nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"
<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>
As I told the RCMP who called me last month the proper time and place
to discuss the CBA and your former partner Judge Richard Bell is the
Federal Court of Canada
Raymond G. Adlington Partner
McInnes Cooper
1300-1969 Upper Water St., Purdy's Wharf Tower II PO Box 730, Stn. Central
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2V1
Phone: (902) 444-8470
Fax: (902) 425-6350
E: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.co
http://www.mcinnescooper.com/n
Ray Adlington named to CBA Board of Directors
May 2, 2017
Halifax partner Ray Adlington was recently named to the CBA Board of Directors.
In their announcement yesterday the CBA advised that the board would
come into effect September 1st, 2017.
After collecting extensive input over the past two years, we know
that CBA members believe it’s important for the organization to have a
Board of Directors that reflects the diversity of the legal
profession, including a mix of practice types, experience, skills,
geography and more.
Our new Board of Directors exemplifies this principle.
The board is composed from one member from each province as well as
the CBA President.
Congratulations Ray on this well deserved appointment.
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
>>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I. Introduction
>>>
>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III. Issue
>>>
>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV. Analysis
>>>
>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V. Conclusion
>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>
From: Keean Bexte <contact@thecountersignal.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:22 PM
Subject: Maxime Bernier's Secret Tropical Villa
To: David Amos <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com>
|
No comments:
Post a Comment