Mike Duffy is suing the Senate, federal government for $8M
Senator is suing for punitive damages related to the Senate expenses scandal
By John Paul Tasker, CBC News
Posted: Aug 24, 2017 11:59 AM ET
2390 Comments Commenting is now closed for this story.
My two bits worth
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/for-public-record-i-just-lawrence.htmlThursday, 24 August 2017
For the PUBLIC Record I just called Lawrence Greenspon, Duffy's lawyer and reminded him of my lawsuit and his assistant asked for the same email again so you get it too
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-softwood-lumber-court-1.4260903
Canada: Litigation looming if there's no softwood deal with the U.S.
263 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Ray G. Moss
We could use excess wood to build a fence at the border.
@Ray G. Moss Or to renovate 24 Sussex
@Ray G. Moss Some folks take this matter rather seriously
@Ray G. Moss
who makes stupid comments???
who makes stupid comments???
@Ray G. Moss
And send the bill to Donald Trump.
And send the bill to Donald Trump.
@Ray G. Moss We could stop
clear cutting and planting tree farms robbing the environment of it
natural diversity and drying wild life into the streets litterally
David Raymond Amos
@William Roberts I agree
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos Yea I am talking to myself because it appears most folks don't bother to read anyway. A few years ago it was rather enlightening thing for a political animal such as I to notice a certain trend within CBC's comment section. Today are two examples that I commented within which I deem are worthy of note to publish in my blog about ongoing litigation against the Crown.
Obviously one is this comment section and the other one is about a lawyer's big announcement.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mike-duffy-lawyer-announcement-1.4260510
It is clear that the news of Duffy filing a lawsuit generates ten times the comments within CBC than a far more important issue about the future of the lively-hood of so many ordinary Canadians.
Even though it involves great deal more money the top comment thread is still just a joke even though I questioned it out of the gate?
Go Figure why I truly believe we get the governments we deserve?
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos Just in case folks think I was joking
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/can-anvbody-tell-what-people-commented.html
dale mcrobie
Methinks a lot of mindless politicians will be reminded of the Golden Rule after the next stock market crash N'esy Pas?
Maryjane Smith
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/can-anvbody-tell-what-people-commented.html
dale mcrobie
Canada should have gone hard
from the outset and launched the suit, and we should not blink on
chapter 19. If you can't get a good deal, don't do a deal!
William Roberts
@dale mcrobie Not everyone is suffering the Same. JDI has a sweet deal.
3%? then again they are one of the largest land owners in the US now and the largest in Maine. Not bad for owning NB the child poverty capital of Canada.
3%? then again they are one of the largest land owners in the US now and the largest in Maine. Not bad for owning NB the child poverty capital of Canada.
David Raymond Amos
@dale mcrobie "we should not blink on chapter 19" YUP
David Raymond Amos
@William Roberts Ever get the feeling that you are preaching simple truths to folks who quite simply don't give a damn?
Jana Alaya
Funny how Russia has benefited from the softwood lumber dispute, considering the sanctions that are imposed on them.
Erika Blair
@Jana Alaya
"Supposed" sanctions.
"Supposed" sanctions.
David Raymond Amos
@Erika Blair I say there is no "Supposeds" about it. Everybody knows the Russians ain't dumb and i have no doubt they know what the Golden Rule truly is "He with the gold makes the rules" Hence they have been trading Yankee petrodollars for pure gold by the ton for years. Furthermore so have the Chinese. The Bankers conned Obama and Harper et al into getting rid of Colonel Gaddafi and his plan for gold based currency but good luck doing the same to the big players.
@Erika Blair I say there is no "Supposeds" about it. Everybody knows the Russians ain't dumb and i have no doubt they know what the Golden Rule truly is "He with the gold makes the rules" Hence they have been trading Yankee petrodollars for pure gold by the ton for years. Furthermore so have the Chinese. The Bankers conned Obama and Harper et al into getting rid of Colonel Gaddafi and his plan for gold based currency but good luck doing the same to the big players.
Methinks a lot of mindless politicians will be reminded of the Golden Rule after the next stock market crash N'esy Pas?
alfie mannion
yanks do not like it when we can produce lumber for a cheaper price
William Roberts
@alfie mannion We can't. It
is highly subsidized by the tax payers. The stumpage fees on crown land
does not come close to covering the cost of maintaining access. IN NB
JDI monopolizes the industry and is now using the court to tight their
grip knowing the marketing board cannot launch a legal defense. And that
folks is how they do it.
David Raymond Amos
@alfie mannion Trump proves on a daily basis that Yankees don't like anything that is unamerican
Frank Slyde
So Justin, how dd the parade go? Awesome... got a lot done.
Rob Munson
@Frank Slyde
I'm sure he has set a record for "parade" appearances.
I'm sure he has set a record for "parade" appearances.
Andrew Hurrie
@Rob Munson
He is doing what he was chosen as party leader to do.
Nothing...other than baffle the voting public and take the attention off the party demi-gods and the old boys club.
Justin is a figurehead...not a real Prime Minister.
If he was, he would have put a stop to the border jumpers by now.
He is doing what someone is telling him to do.
So who is pulling his strings...at Canadian taxpayers expense?
What's more...why are Canadians putting up with it?
He is doing what he was chosen as party leader to do.
Nothing...other than baffle the voting public and take the attention off the party demi-gods and the old boys club.
Justin is a figurehead...not a real Prime Minister.
If he was, he would have put a stop to the border jumpers by now.
He is doing what someone is telling him to do.
So who is pulling his strings...at Canadian taxpayers expense?
What's more...why are Canadians putting up with it?
David Raymond Amos
@Rob Munson Sad and funny too but no doubt true
David Raymond Amos
@Andrew Hurrie My answers to your queries
"So who is pulling his strings...at Canadian taxpayers expense?"
George Soros
"What's more...why are Canadians putting up with it?"
Most folks don't care
"So who is pulling his strings...at Canadian taxpayers expense?"
George Soros
"What's more...why are Canadians putting up with it?"
Most folks don't care
Maryjane Smith
Just walk away, we don't need a deal with the US until they are willing to pay market price.
Supply and demand.
Supply and demand.
Michael Gnit
@Jerry Raymond There are
several ways to tackle that problem. Process the wood here and create
market's for finished wood products (flooring, wood finishing, prefab
industrial applications ready made out of the box concept's). Grow non
THC hemp in large amounts and process the high fiber pulp (cheaper and
easier) into all kings of products from paper to clothing ready fiber.
My point is in five minutes in front of my computer I thought of this. If we wanted solutions we'd find them.
Two uncomfortable examples of countries who have and are using sanctions against them to improve internal solutions to external problems are Iran and Russia. I'm not advocating anything merely stating the researched facts about the speedy growth of the export agricultural industry in Russia and Iran's investment's in their own science and technology industries to solve and create solutions that had been bought outside the country previously.
Might be time to help ourselves. Not close the border's. Two very different things.
Two uncomfortable examples of countries who have and are using sanctions against them to improve internal solutions to external problems are Iran and Russia. I'm not advocating anything merely stating the researched facts about the speedy growth of the export agricultural industry in Russia and Iran's investment's in their own science and technology industries to solve and create solutions that had been bought outside the country previously.
Might be time to help ourselves. Not close the border's. Two very different things.
David Raymond Amos
@Maryjane Smith I agree with your reasoning about Supply and demand.
David Raymond Amos
@Michael Gnit Very well put sir
Brent Grywinski
If we can't get a reasonable
deal on softwood lumber with the Americans after all these years, why
would Canada get a reasonable deal on NAFTA? Walking away from NAFTA
seems to be a logical next step. You can't reason with a hard-headed
bully (Trump) who wants everything his way like a six-year-old.
Rick James
@Phil Major say what you may
about justin, I certainly don't support or agree with everything he's
done, but I believe he's done a very good job of stick-handling trump
given they are polar oposites. At least pubicly Trump seems to not mind
him. I'm sure justin was playing the long game from the start. He's been
openly very supportive of teh Trump administration.
David Raymond Amos
@Brent Grywinski I have been advocating against NAFTA since before Mulroney's ink was dry on the wicked deal
David Raymond Amos
@Rick James What did Trudeau The Younger's daddy once say? Oh Yea I found it
Trudeau The Elder's Washington Press Club speech regarding Canadian policy and the United States, comparing the situation to "sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly or even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."
Trudeau The Elder's Washington Press Club speech regarding Canadian policy and the United States, comparing the situation to "sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly or even-tempered is the beast, if I can call it that, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."
donna gregoire
....Harper managed to get
$500m in duty back from the US and keep the lumber flowing....Justin now
has allowed the lumber to stall and Russia, Germany and Sweden are
increasing their share of the US market...will Canada be able to get
that share back in 2020 when we've turfed these incompetent Liberals?...
Kevin Bell
@donna gregoire
Outright fabrication from the ReformaCons. The Harpo deal actually cost our producers over $1 billion, but don't let the truth slow you down.
Outright fabrication from the ReformaCons. The Harpo deal actually cost our producers over $1 billion, but don't let the truth slow you down.
David Raymond Amos
@donna gregoire "Harper managed to get $500m in duty back from the US" NOPE
Everybody in the know knows Emerson had the deal already cooked before Martin called the snap election for the 39th Parliament. Before the dust settled on that election in which Emerson was elected as a liberal he quickly turned coat got sworn in as Conservative Cabinet Minister then promptly made his new bass Harper look like a hero. Everybody knows that.
Now David Emerson is back on CBC telling us this problem is going to keep coming back??? Methinks Emerson is a big part of the problem of why things keep coming back. Tear up NAFTA then the problem is solved.
Everybody in the know knows Emerson had the deal already cooked before Martin called the snap election for the 39th Parliament. Before the dust settled on that election in which Emerson was elected as a liberal he quickly turned coat got sworn in as Conservative Cabinet Minister then promptly made his new bass Harper look like a hero. Everybody knows that.
Now David Emerson is back on CBC telling us this problem is going to keep coming back??? Methinks Emerson is a big part of the problem of why things keep coming back. Tear up NAFTA then the problem is solved.
David Raymond Amos
@Kevin Bell I know the
lawyers charged a hell of a lot to argue the nonsense and in the end the
settlement held back half a billion bucks for future litigation
Milloy Johnson
CBC why are you hiding the story on the government handing out checks to illegal immigrants??
Lawrence Aaluuluuq (RedWhite)
@Milloy Johnson
Because the frothing bigots gnash their teeth because that's the only thing they can think about, despite FAR more important issues at hand.
Now, you can either stay on topic and join the conversation, or you can let the adults talk.
Because the frothing bigots gnash their teeth because that's the only thing they can think about, despite FAR more important issues at hand.
Now, you can either stay on topic and join the conversation, or you can let the adults talk.
David Raymond Amos
@Milloy Johnson Better yet.
Why did CBC not report the story about the government denying one
Canadian in particular his CPP and Old Age Pension?
David Raymond Amos
@Lawrence Aaluuluuq
(RedWhite) Do I qualify as a adult once I made the government buckle and
give me my pension before I sued it?
Mark Giesbrecht
When the Lowes and Home Depots try peddling the sticks the USA has left to offer then Americans will really grate again.
Why wouldn't Americans be willing to pay a lot more for a new home so Trump can have an Ego Boost, right?
Ship them nothing and see who lasts longer. BC has ports and China is just days away.
Why wouldn't Americans be willing to pay a lot more for a new home so Trump can have an Ego Boost, right?
Ship them nothing and see who lasts longer. BC has ports and China is just days away.
David Raymond Amos
@Mark Giesbrecht I agree
David Raymond Amos
@Mark Giesbrecht Howcome we can't make kitchen cupboards etc cheaper than Sweden and sell them to ourselves?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ikea-halifax-store-business-announcement-1.3411588
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ikea-halifax-store-business-announcement-1.3411588
Canada: Litigation looming if there's no softwood deal with the U.S.
David Emerson: This problem is going to keep coming back. It's going to keep creating instability
By Alexander Panetta, CBC News
Posted: Aug 24, 2017 3:00 PM ET
As softwood negotiations with the United States languish, the
Canadian government says it's readying itself for the next phase of the
lumber fight, which has historically been a necessary step in resolving
this recurring dispute: litigation.
Canada's ambassador to Washington says the two governments have been working hard to get a deal and will continue to do so, but, with the U.S. industry resistant to an agreement, he says the Canadian side is prepared to fight in court.
"We're going to try really hard in the next little while to get a fair and balanced agreement with the United States," David MacNaughton said Thursday at an event attended by provincial representatives.
"If that is not possible, we have all agreed that we will take all necessary steps to litigate this matter until we get a fair arrangement as we have in the past."
It wouldn't be the first time. The issue has regularly gone to court over the decades. The irony this time is that the fight would likely be playing out in dispute-resolution panels under NAFTA's Chapter 19 — at the very moment U.S. negotiators are asking Canada to end Chapter 19.
That's one reason both countries worked to get a softwood deal before NAFTA talks began this month — but ultimately failed.
MacNaughton laid blame upon the American lumber industry, which he accused of spreading false information and stymying an agreement. The industry is a player in these talks: part of any deal would require it to forsake trade actions for the duration of the agreement.
The historical pattern of the softwood dispute involves the U.S. industry launching complaints over what it calls unfair subsidies, the U.S. authorities imposing tariffs and the issue dragging out for years, through court fights.
MacNaughton said the American lumber lobby is falsely telling people two things: that Canada hasn't agreed on a cap; and that the provinces are split on the details of a deal.
"That's simply not true," the ambassador said.
He has already told The Canadian Press that Canada has agreed to cap its exports to about 30 per cent of the U.S. market. He says the only thing Canada is asking for is the ability to expand that cap when the market is so hot the U.S. cannot supply the other 70 per cent.
He said it's unfair to punish Canadian companies — then increase imports from Russia. In fact, in the first half of this year, U.S. imports of softwood from Germany have grown tenfold as import duties have increased the cost of Canadian wood.
As for supposed provincial disunity, he pointed to the people around him. They included two former Canadian ambassadors to the U.S. — Gary Doer representing Alberta and Raymond Chretien from Quebec — and David Wilkins, former U.S. ambassador to Canada, representing New Brunswick.
There were several jokes from the veteran diplomats about how long this has dragged on. Wilkins told a story of a Canadian envoy who was in Gettysburg for Lincoln's famous address in 1863 — Wilkins said he was there to discuss a lumber dispute with the president.
Chretien said he'd never have believed when he began dealing with the issue as ambassador in 1994 that he'd still be dealing with it 23 years later.
He said the issue has in the past required leadership from American politicians. He said Democratic and Republican administrations have pushed their side toward a deal: "You need political will and political muscle to do that," Doer said.
He said it would be ideal to avoid lawsuits and just get an agreement that keeps lumber mills running. "We would rather hire hard-hats than lawyers."
Representing B.C. was David Emerson, who has grappled with this irritant for years, as a lumber executive and also as a one-time federal cabinet minister. He said he's realized over time that the U.S. lumber industry talks about the need for reform in Canada, but doesn't really care about that.
He suggested they have an interest in prolonging these disputes — not only do tariffs drive up the price of lumber, but U.S. companies have also cashed in by collecting hundreds of millions from the duties imposed.
"This problem is going to keep coming back. It's going to keep creating instability," Emerson said. "Maybe it's time we took on the coalition and tried to create a framework that would put the issue to rest."
He said he's not worried about litigation: "We've been down that route before. It does take a long time. But in the end we have prevailed."
He added: "It's not our preferred route."
Canada's ambassador to Washington says the two governments have been working hard to get a deal and will continue to do so, but, with the U.S. industry resistant to an agreement, he says the Canadian side is prepared to fight in court.
"We're going to try really hard in the next little while to get a fair and balanced agreement with the United States," David MacNaughton said Thursday at an event attended by provincial representatives.
"If that is not possible, we have all agreed that we will take all necessary steps to litigate this matter until we get a fair arrangement as we have in the past."
It wouldn't be the first time. The issue has regularly gone to court over the decades. The irony this time is that the fight would likely be playing out in dispute-resolution panels under NAFTA's Chapter 19 — at the very moment U.S. negotiators are asking Canada to end Chapter 19.
That's one reason both countries worked to get a softwood deal before NAFTA talks began this month — but ultimately failed.
- The big holdup in a Canada-U.S. lumber deal? Russian, German, Brazilian wood
- Trudeau government promises to defend lumber industry in face of new U.S. duties
- Ottawa announces $867M in financial assistance for softwood lumber industry
MacNaughton laid blame upon the American lumber industry, which he accused of spreading false information and stymying an agreement. The industry is a player in these talks: part of any deal would require it to forsake trade actions for the duration of the agreement.
The historical pattern of the softwood dispute involves the U.S. industry launching complaints over what it calls unfair subsidies, the U.S. authorities imposing tariffs and the issue dragging out for years, through court fights.
MacNaughton said the American lumber lobby is falsely telling people two things: that Canada hasn't agreed on a cap; and that the provinces are split on the details of a deal.
"That's simply not true," the ambassador said.
A historical dispute
He has already told The Canadian Press that Canada has agreed to cap its exports to about 30 per cent of the U.S. market. He says the only thing Canada is asking for is the ability to expand that cap when the market is so hot the U.S. cannot supply the other 70 per cent.
He said it's unfair to punish Canadian companies — then increase imports from Russia. In fact, in the first half of this year, U.S. imports of softwood from Germany have grown tenfold as import duties have increased the cost of Canadian wood.
As for supposed provincial disunity, he pointed to the people around him. They included two former Canadian ambassadors to the U.S. — Gary Doer representing Alberta and Raymond Chretien from Quebec — and David Wilkins, former U.S. ambassador to Canada, representing New Brunswick.
There were several jokes from the veteran diplomats about how long this has dragged on. Wilkins told a story of a Canadian envoy who was in Gettysburg for Lincoln's famous address in 1863 — Wilkins said he was there to discuss a lumber dispute with the president.
Chretien said he'd never have believed when he began dealing with the issue as ambassador in 1994 that he'd still be dealing with it 23 years later.
Taking on the coalition
Doer said it's unfair for the U.S. lumber lobby to get a veto on a deal.He said the issue has in the past required leadership from American politicians. He said Democratic and Republican administrations have pushed their side toward a deal: "You need political will and political muscle to do that," Doer said.
He said it would be ideal to avoid lawsuits and just get an agreement that keeps lumber mills running. "We would rather hire hard-hats than lawyers."
Representing B.C. was David Emerson, who has grappled with this irritant for years, as a lumber executive and also as a one-time federal cabinet minister. He said he's realized over time that the U.S. lumber industry talks about the need for reform in Canada, but doesn't really care about that.
He suggested they have an interest in prolonging these disputes — not only do tariffs drive up the price of lumber, but U.S. companies have also cashed in by collecting hundreds of millions from the duties imposed.
"This problem is going to keep coming back. It's going to keep creating instability," Emerson said. "Maybe it's time we took on the coalition and tried to create a framework that would put the issue to rest."
He said he's not worried about litigation: "We've been down that route before. It does take a long time. But in the end we have prevailed."
He added: "It's not our preferred route."
No comments:
Post a Comment