---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 04:32:44 -0400
Subject: For the public record after I ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament poitical pundits kept accusing me of being a supporter of Ernst Zundel before I even knew who the hell he was
To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu, brian@brianruhe.ca, paul@paulfromm.com, littlefarm1@windstream.net, monika_schaefer@hotmail.com, deanrogerray@hotmail.com, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bert.hudon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Richard Harris injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, danadurnford@hotmail.com, cd1@connectingdots1.com>
Cc: philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, luc.labonte@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@gov.nl.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, justice justice@mail.gov.nl.ca, brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca, derek.fildebrandt@assembly.ab.ca, pat.sawyer@civilenforcement.com, patrick_doran1 patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps@calgarypolice.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre andre@jafaust.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bluelightning_03@hotmail.com, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Caitlyn.fisher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, salexander42@hotmail.com, briangallant10@gmail.com, sodonnell@postmedia.com, nbergot@postmedia.com, cjerema@postmedia.com, pbacon@postmedia.com, cclancy@postmedia.com, jfrench@postmedia.com, kgerein@postmedia.com, jgraney@postmedia.com, bmah@postmedia.com
Years later I figured out why when I heard Zundell talking to the very
sneaky Yankee some folks call Uncle Fester after he got out of jail I
finally understood what the LIEbranos were up to.
Please enjoy I know Uncle Fester will like listening to himself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nW7oNLo2f0&t=125s
Candidate Number 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tseou9fKrkM
Candidate Number 7 Pt 2
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:40:49 -0700
Subject: A little Deja Vu for the Yankee Jimmy Fetzer, Arty Topham and
their many friends in BC
To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu, radical@radicalpress.com, t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: monika_schaefer@hotmail.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Pete@thepetesantillishow.com, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ernst-zundel-dead-1.4237598
Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel dead at 78: wife
Zundel lived in Canada for decades before being extradited to Germany in 2005
CBC News Posted: Aug 06, 2017 9:45 PM ET
A notorious Holocaust denier who lived in Canada for decades before
being deported to Germany to face prosecution has died, according to a
statement from his wife Ingrid Zundel.
Ernst Zundel died Sunday at home in Germany after he was found
unconscious by his sister Sigrid, the statement says.
Zundel was born in Germany, but later moved to Canada, where he
operated a business and published Nazi propaganda before being
convicted of "spreading false news" in 1985.
Memorial for lawyer who represented Holocaust deniers creates
controversy for Toronto library
That conviction was overturned seven years later when the Supreme
Court of Canada argued the charge violated Zundel's Charter right to
freedom of expression.
Zundel would go on to live in Toronto's Cabbagetown neighbourhood for
several years before a Federal Court ruled in 2005 that he was
national security threat, citing his connection with white supremacist
and neo-Nazi groups. The move paved the way to his extradition.
In 2007, he was convicted in Germany of 14 counts of incitement of
racial hatred and received a five-year sentence, the maximum allowable
under the law. Having received credit for time served before trial,
Zundel was freed in 2010.
Sunday's statement said Zundel reportedly died of a heart attack at
the home where he was born in Germany's mountainous Black Forest
region.
As news of the death broke, Bernie Farber, former chief executive
officer of the Canadian Jewish Congress, told CBC News that Zundel had
denied the genocide of "six million Jewish men, women and children."
"He brought terrible anguish to those few who survived the evil of the
Shoah," Farber said, referring to the Holocaust. "Jewish tradition
demands that we do not defame the dead."
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/in-2009-i-had-no-idea-what-protocols-of.html
Sunday, 25 August 2013
In 2009 I had no idea what the Protocols of the Elders of Zion were as
this Zionist/RCMP dude bragged in one of his many YouTube channels why
they were cyberstalking my familly nor do I care today I battle all
evil people who supported the abuse my family
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:19:57 -0300
Subject: In 2009 I had no idea what the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion were as this Zionist/RCMP dude bragged in one of his many YouTube
channels why they were cyberstalking my familly nor do I care today I
battle all evil people who supported the abuse my family
To: Mark.Potok@splcenter.org, ddelaquis@cldglaw.com, "marc.chiasson"
marc.chiasson@mcinnescooper.com, t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com, Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, xtofury@gmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, hjk@quesnelbc.com, jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca, abromberg@bnaibrith.ca,
rmarceau@cija.ca>, michael.coren@sunmedia.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pol7163@calgarypolice.ca, maryann4peace@gmail.com
David Raymond Amos: Are All Maritimers as Funny as You?
7:00
Added: 7 hours ago
From: AmosIsGullible
Views: 243
All Comments (152 total
DavidRaymondAmos (5 hours ago)
How dumb are you I must ask? It is the CROWN who must answer for its
support of your actions FYI I am not one bit angry I have NEVER lost
my temper in my life pussy. I am obviously saving everything and
forwarding it to the RCMP/GRC in order to record the evidence for
Federal Court in Fat Fred City.
Please do go on and on and on. As I said last night you can't fool me
because i am too stupid. Like "Forest Gump" I believe that Stupid Is
As Stupid Does and you are proving it in spades EH pussy?
AmosIsGullible (5 hours ago)
I have heard you lose your temper as well as seen evidence in your
YouTube comments. Alas, I am growing t accept that telling lies and
misrepresenting yourself is pathological with you.
The only one proving his stupidity in his statements (aside from the
very retarded friend of yours Dean Roger Ray) herein is David Raymond
Amos.
Kids, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON'T ATTEND UNIVERSITY!!! If you
don't want to be a homeless liar STAY IN SCHOOL!!!
DavidRaymondAmos (5 hours ago)
Who says I didn't go to university YOU?
AmosIsGullible (5 hours ago)
Actually you made the statement about being proud of the fact that you
never attended Univeristy in comments on one of your earlier
YouTubes.
DavidRaymondAmos (4 hours ago)
Wrong I refused to got the St Jean Quebec for a FREE military
education in 1970 because I wasn't allowed to become a pilot too like
my uncle did before me Plus I didn't like the kind of dudes who
interviewed me thus i did not wish to turn out like Mr Baconfat who
could be you for all I know right now. For the PUBLIC RECORD I opted
for UNB on my dime for two years and quit both times mid year to
continue on with my first love which the CROWN acknowledged I was
expert of about ten years later.
AmosIsGullible (4 hours ago)
If that IS true it is inconsistant from your previous statements in
your YouTube comments. Which is the truth and which is the lie Amos?
I wonder. There are some people out there who tell stories for effect
rather than accuracy. Is this your MO or are you truly a pathological
liar?
Still, however, even if the current revelation is accurate it still
proves my point: KIDS STAY IN SCHOOL OR YOU WILL BE HOMELESS AND
DEPENDANT ON OTHERS LIKE AMOS!!!
AmosIsGullible (4 hours ago)
Speaking of your "first love", how come you don't get a job doing it
if you are so good at it? Do you just not want to work or is there
some other reason?
DavidRaymondAmos (4 hours ago)
Clearly you don't know me at all. However who has the time to study
another man so intensly in order to play games in Youtube and the
blogs? You are a liar. You have never heard me lose my temper not only
because i haven't it is because we have never spoken or met. You claim
to do many things yet deny the obvious published crimes practiced
against many people not just me You are a spin doctor trying hard to
impeach my character because of many recent events related to my
actions in the past EH?
AmosIsGullible (4 hours ago)
Wrong on all counts. I'm actually someone who got a big kick out of
pissing you off all this time. However, I am disturbed by people like
you and Dean Roger Ray, the low rent Alex Jones/Bill Cooper wannabes
that you are. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion warped uneducated
minds because the intellectuals of the day refused to "lower
themselves to refute them". As a result of the influence of that sort
of stupidity, millions would go on to die in the worst conflict in
recorded history.
AmosIsGullible (4 hours ago)
In essence, it is the responsibility of individuals such as myself to
refute your bullshit BEFORE it spreads to the degree that Alex
Jones's and Bill Cooper's have, and worse yet to the level that the
Protocols did.
DavidRaymondAmos (2 hours ago)
My my what a telling thing here is another from you in mid July
Hey
I have some more stuff up on the Just Davey blog. Although I moderate
comments, I will allow anything you post to go through. The only
reason I do that is to keep Dana Durnford out. He posted your
daughter's phone number and address on my YouTube channel the other
day. I deleted it though. But you can see why I have to moderate.
Anyway, let me know what you think, or if there is anything you want
to talk about.
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
I was keeping up the charade that it was Dana who was talking shit to
you in YouTube. It obviously worked better than I could have ever
hoped for, based on your current raving.
DavidRaymondAmos (2 hours ago)
its your raving
War Between the Super Trolls
I am considering making either a series of videos or a blog site
dedicated to what the League of Reason has now dubbed the "War Between
the Super Trolls" aka David Raymond Amos vs Dana Durnford. Anyone with
any information, including David and Dana, feel free to respond. I
want to list their individual grievances as well as give a timeline of
events. If you know of anyone else who could provide information send
them my way as well. Thanks. Toby
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
Yep, that's my work. Designed to make both of you butthurt. Dana
never bit on it though. I guess as dumb as he is with all that Alex
Jones and Constable Gilmore bullshit Mr. Amos is even dumber....
DavidRaymondAmos (2 hours ago)
On my birthday you invited me to introduce you to Staff Sgt Moe Comeau
so i did and your silly little blog went "Poof"
Re: Re: Re: For the Public Record
I have seen reference to this Moe Comeau in your videos. Would you
mind telling me what his significance is? Also, how are the comments
on my page "evidence to use against the Crown"? Once again, if you
have any information relating to the subject I am studying (the war
between you and Durnford), please send it my way.
Toby
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
I was trying to make you think that Dana paid the Phonelosers to hack
his blog, in turn making you paranoid that you would be next.
DavidRaymondAmos (2 hours ago)
DUUHHH Do I seem paranoid. I am the guy with a face and a name.
Perhaps you should check youself in for some more meds Consider what
you commented then explain this
FuckTobiasBeecher i,m gonna kill that fuckface i,m gonna kill that fuckface
amos,,,have u seen that bullshit,,,now ur friend is attacking
me,,,mark my words this tobias beecher of halifax ns if that is even
his real name is a dead man when i get near him,,,don,t even try to
claim dibs monkey he,s mine,,,bang bang mark my words
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
You are VERY paranoid in my opinion. You claimed in your YouTube about
that Robin Reid woman (as well as many net talk shows) that you have
to move around from place to place and can't say where. That
constitutes paranoia to me.
You know that "Dana" the character (as well as the real Dana) is a
shit-talker who goes haywire when he gets angry. That statement fits
the persona. Dana hasn't got balls enough to face anyone, but it
would be up his alley to hire a hacker.
DavidRaymondAmos1 (2 hours ago) (Obviously one Dirty Dicky Dean's many
sock accounts pretending to be mean old me)
You have no higher moral ground than Amos you are both Assassins Amos
killed 81 people you killed thousands! You planned 911. You set up the
Putt and calls for friends Robert L Thompsett now you are in we are
change!
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
Dean, let the adults talk for a moment ok?
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
You must admit, all this stuff I write looks like it could very well
have come from the real Dana.
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
Amos, here's the thing: DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!!!!
It really is that simple. Had you not responded, there would have
been no LULZ, and thus no reason to waste my time with you.
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
I'm nothing if not thorough Amos. :)
AmosIsGullible (2 hours ago)
Okay. It's obvious I've jerked you around so much that you don't know
right from left in these matters.
Suffice it to say that there will be no more trolling as "Dana" or
anyone else (I also pretended to be Dean Roger Ray once or twice).
However, I will make an exhaustive study of your scribd files on the
blog very soon.
On 6/5/13, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
> DUHH??? These are YOUR words not mine Perverts
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/the-confidential-warned-statement-of.html
>
> Lines 774 and 1668 and many inbetween were somewhat enlightening
>
> http://www.freedominion.ca/images/arthur/WarnedStatement.pdf
>
> https://vimeo.com/66878527
>
> https://vimeo.com/66877779
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW76Mgj5wQA
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irx0V7cdsdE
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1SH5lNMHlM
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jmLZSTp3SE
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBoVImTV2No
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zdg5CGpq2k
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcRB_-KGTuc
>
>
> From: BARRY WINTERS sunrayzulu@shaw.ca
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 19:23:48 -0600 (MDT)
> Subject: Re: The confidential "WARNED STATEMENT" of Cst Terry Wilson
> that Arty Baby Topham's Nazi pals published forever proved to me why
> the RCMP were backing Mr Baconfat's openly malicious actions
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Oh dear, if you don't like my blog, don't read it. No one cares what
> offends your insane sensiblities
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: James Fetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:19:49 -0600
Subject: Re: LINKS
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete@thepetesantillishow.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Surely you don't believe this rubbish? He was given the boot by AFN for
abusing his position. See "Lunatics 'R Us: The Santilli/Wood/Sunstein
Gambit" on Veterans Today,
http://thehill.com/video/in-
Now I get a lot of lunatic ravings about ancient history, of which your
emails seem to be an example. I have no interest in rehashing old
disputes. If you can summarize why any of this matters in few sentences, I
will read those and respond. I'm not going to read this.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:08 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://petersantilli.com/2013/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:51:45 -0400
> Subject: Re: A few suggestions from James H. Fetzer seven years ago
> To: Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
> policy.karenforcanada@gmail.
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> ron.lachapelle@forces.gc.ca, Shawn.Cooper2@forces.gc.ca,
> BARRY.SHAW@forces.gc.ca, jfetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>,
> "bernadine.chapman" <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.
> dpugliese@ottawacitizen.com, BillRobinsonCanada@yahoo.ca
> Cc: adamsj@queensu.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca, Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>,
> birgittaj@althingi.is
>
> Hey Jimmy Baby
>
> Remember the email and info exchange inserted below from seven long years
> ago?
>
> Did you ever read the entire text of my two responses to your snobby
> suggestions?
>
> Did you at least notice that when you sent your last very snide
> response you sent it
> with the entire text of one of my emails to two of your friends, four
> of my friends,
> a couple of reporters in Beantown, several Yankee poltiicans they know
> quite well,
> the BBC, a CROWN prosecutor and the RCMP as well? Ain't that rather
> special?
> A well mixed crowd even if I do say so myself.
>
> Try denying that you did not know exactly who I was long before I ran
> for public office
> three more times and over three years before the banksters caused the
> economy to
> tank and your hero Obama got elected in order to further support an
> attempt to bankrupt
> your good old US of A. If you wish to recall within one of the emails
> I explained why I knew
> your hero Obama was scum before he got elected to US Senator in 2004.
> You did not respond
> to that email about the corporate media so I only provided a portion
> of it to remind you of what I
> was saying about Obama right after I came screaming out of that Yankee
> jail in October 2004.
>
> In 2005 you found "my inferences absurd beyond belief". I must ask
> have you ever listened to
> yourself lately??? Recently you come to Canada and yap of thermate
> then mininukes and now
> PressTV, Mr Zundel and even his evil neo nazi fanboyz have captured
> your interest. You change
> your mind so much do you even know for sure what planet are you come
> from???
>
> Whereas you are a big fan of evil old Ron Paul and Jesse Ventura and
> ther laments about the
> Fed Bank etc, I must ask another obvious question. Howcome I have not
> heard any one of you
> Yankee big talkers mention the simple fact that the Fed Bank's Charter
> expires this Xmass?
> DUHHH? Don't alllow Congress to renew it without a long and open
> debate. Get it dummies???
>
> Please never forget you picked this fight with me in 2005. I am
> polishing it off tis all.
> Lets just say I am awful vindictive and have a very long memory as well.
>
> Lets call this email ROUND THREEE
>
> For the record I would have let you be but when I discovered recently
> that you had been
> sticking your nose into Canadian affairs and being very cozy with
> people who offend me
> greatly up here, I decided to inform many about how and why we crossed
> paths long ago
> and of what we thought of each other. Also for the record I have been
> well aware of your
> involvement in the "911 Truther" movement for years and always
> considered you to be a
> shill for the "Power That Be".
>
> Lets just say our prior contact supported it. I have not met a former
> officer in the Marines
> who considered studying to be a lawyer before becoming a professor who
> was not a crook.
> I had a hope in late 2004 that you would break the mold because of
> your work about the
> demise of Senator Wellstone. However I know what I told you on the
> phone and asked
> to check it to see for yourself as to whether it was true or false. In
> the seven years since
> not once have seen where you mention the news reports about Teddy
> Kennedy and his
> doings on that fateful day.
>
> I will call the three emails that I sent you and many others on Friday
> night ROUND TWO.
> They should have rung some bells for you. As you know I already
> published one of them within
> another sneaky dude's blog. Apparently you are remaining true to your
> word seven years ago
> and not answering the Bell to argue with me anymore. Perhaps that is
> wise for a crook to do
> but it does not stop me from sharing with you the world my opinion of
> you and your malicious
> nonsense. You do the very same thing against your foes on your
> talkshows etc. Turnabout is
> fair play CORRECT?
>
> Logically I will call our first spit and chew in 2005 ROUND ONE (Which
> I truly believe I won)
>
> If you see something inaccurate within in the email exchange I have
> inserted below or any other
> email I have sent ou or if you wish to dispute anything you think is
> unfair or untrue please feel free
> to sprout some balls and let me know
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:54 AM
> Subject: A few suggestions . . .
>
> David,
>
> If you want to have your story out in articles, I suggest
> you contact Michael Ruppert at editor@copvcia.com.
>
> If you want to have your story out in a book, I suggest
> you contact Sander Hicks at sander@voxpopnet.net.
>
> If you want people to take you seriously, I suggest you
> not hang up on them when they want to be helpful.
>
> Jim
>
> --
>
> Sander Hicks
> Chief Instigator
> VOX POP
> Books, Coffee, Democracy
>
> http://voxpopnet.net
> http://www.drenchkiss.com
>
> Drench Kiss Media Corporation
> 1022 Cortelyou Road
> Flatbush, Brooklyn 11218
>
> 718 940 2084
> 718 940 0346 (fax)
> 347 446 4461 (cell)
>
> "World Peace is ours, it comes from within."
> -Jeff Bullard, Taos, NM
>
> http://www.SanderHicks.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> To: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:59 AM
> Subject: Re: Please call me
>
> I just tried to call you but it may have been too early in the day for you.
> I am sorry about that but I wanted to try to contact you before I left the
> house today. Why I was trying to speak to you concerns the Wellstone people
> etc. I am not trying to sell anything. I am just trying to tell you some
> things I am certain that you don't know to protect my own butt. I will
> support everything I wish to tell you with Tiff files which are scans of
> legal documents etc. Some are rather large. and I would not send them to
> you
> without your permission and talking to you first..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 3:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Please call me
>
> David,
>
> I just tried to reach you without success. Try me
> at (608) 848-6632 on Sunday afternoon or on Monday.
>
> Jim
>
> Quoting David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>
>
> or send me your number my number is 617 698 6549
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <editor@copvcia.com>; <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>;
> <Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us>; <Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us>;
> <Jack.Hart@state.ma.us>; <Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> <Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
> <sander@voxpopnet.net>; <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>;
> <blynch@inspecthouse.com>; <brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca>;
> <lcampenella@ledger.com>; <dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> <cei@nbnet.nb.ca>; <kbar@nbnet.nb.ca>; <Ind80@aol.com>; "Byron Prior"
> <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: A few suggestions . . .
>
>
> David Amos,
>
> Egad, man! I called because I found an old email and could not remember
> if I
> had responded to it. That's all. Your inferences are absurd beyond
> belief.
> I thought your story was astounding and far beyond my pay grade, so I made
> a
> few suggestions for getting it out. I now regret having called again.
> But I
> do admire (what I understand of) your courage in confronting difficult
> issues.
>
> James H. Fetzer
>
> P.S. And, just for the record, I laughed about the kilt because I was just
> appreciating that it was your trademark in your campaign, which
> struck
> me as both clever and funny. Don't worry about hearing from me
> again.
>
> Quoting David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>
> > Hey Jimmy Boy
> > The key words you employ are "If You Want" I don't because I don't
> trust
> > you or the people you call friends. I already crossed paths with at
> least one
> > of them before I went home to run for Parliament and then went straight
> to
> > jail with out passing go. I am not selling anything like you and you
> buddies
> > are. I am telling you something you don't know. My work can be read for
> free
> > in the Public Record of many courts or I will email a lot of it to anyone
> > that asks. Unlike you and your friends there will be no charge.
> > I am sick of bullshitting dudes like you who talk the talk while I
> walk
> > the walk. Obviously I had caught you lying to me. Do you recall how many
> > times I asked you about the emails I sent you? Then there is the fact
> that
> > nobody saves voicemails for months. You can't fool me, I am too stupid.
> I do
> > recall you calling me and talking to me before. Why couldn't you? The
> proof
> > is the fact that you are a liar is that you have my email address. It
> seems
> > your recollection becomes much more precise when you are pissed off. EH?
> Now
> > you may understand why I could so clearly remember you before I hung up.
> You
> > pissed me off first. Why weren't you just honest with me?
> > You were certainly not being helpful when you laughed at my
> statement
> > about the bastards trying to kill me and being sent to jail in my kilt.
> I had
> > heard enough from you through the phone to be satisfied that you were not
> > sincere. Be glad that I just hung up on you. If you had laughed at me
> like
> > that in my presence I would have decked you in a heartbeat. Clearly you
> dumb
> > Yankee bastards will never understand simple, sincere and serious
> Maritimer.
> > If you had bothered to read anything I wrote, you would have noticed
> that I
> > was willing to pay a man to be my editor so that I could give a book
> away for
> > free byway of the world wide web.
> > When was the last time you refused to accept a judgement by default
> for 32
> > million bucks because you did not recognize the jurisdiction of a court?
> > Until you do, you have no right to advise me about profiting from my
> work.
> > The truth is not a commodity that should be bought and sold. I am
> comfortable
> > letting the fellas that write fiction go for the gold. Get it?
> > At least the dude from New Mexico was right about one thing. However
> I say
> > everything comes from within. My question is do you feel comfortable
> within
> > your own skin? I know I don't want to know you or your bullshitting
> friends
> > because when I talk to the likes of you I get uncomfortable and very
> pissed
> > off.
> > I truly believe that the only reason you called me back now was out of
> you
> > own sense of personal greed and not in pursuit of the simple truth. No
> doubt
> > you have discovered that I am starting to be blogged and or talked about
> by
> > my fellow common man and you just wanted to climb on the band wagon and
> make
> > yourself famous. As for me I want no such thing.
> > "If You Want" to know more read what I said to a local reporter the
> day
> > before you called me again then started bullshitting and asking
> questions.
> > Then read the emails following this one real slow real slow and do with
> them
> > what you will. I will tell anyone the truth I have no secrets about these
> > matters even from Bullshitters.
> > As you no doubt can tell I need to regain my sense of Ha Ha before my
> > Criminal Trial begins. I am heading out alone and having a little fun
> riding
> > my bike while avoiding nasty Yankees. If you wish to read simple truths
> from
> > another honest Maritimer that would make any other honest man cry. Go
> here
> > read his work, partake of the milk of human kindnes and help Byron by
> writing
> > about him.
> > http://maxpages.com/
> > David R. Amos
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > Cc: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us;
> > Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; press@citizensforethics.org ;
> > canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> info@electtomobrien.com ;
> > josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > You should also know that I have copyrighted all of my words and none
> should
> > be printed without my OK. I will forward to you all the emails that were
> sent
> > to the Dorchester Reporter that contain forwards of many scans in a Tiff
> > format. They will come in through Yahoo. The files are deep within the
> > forwards and are easily viewable in the old Kodak Imaging program found
> > within any Windows System 2000 and back.
> > Years ago your paper wanted my stuff in a PDF format and I just
> laughed
> > at them. Tiff is a far simpler type of file but harder to plagiarize
> from.
> > Cut and paste don't work with it and you can't buy my stuff from anyone
> but
> > me. Never forget it is me that has been investigating you and all the
> media
> > for years. The fact that you finally say you may investigate me today
> don't
> > amount to a hill of beans in Beantown to me. My story will no doubt break
> > first within the Blogs you joke about but not by me. I am too busy
> teaching
> > the snake to eat its tail while lawyers fall on their own sword. Besides
> > although I am a pretty big feeling bastard, the last thing I want to be
> is
> > famous. By the time my story breaks surface, I will be already long gone
> from
> > New England. People care more about the gossip factor of low people in
> high
> > places taking a fall rather than the whistleblower that started the
> fall. You
> > just proved that once more by your attitude towards me. Believe me the
> > Patriot Ledger is just a pawn to me in a big big game. Ask Franky
> McKenna or
> > Brian Mulroney.
> > Do you know what I find awful funny about Yankee newsmen? Most don't
> > know who Bill Clinton's girlfriend is. Type in his name and Belinda and
> surf
> > for yourself.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:53 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > David, well I don't know what to say. The big boys stick together. I
> > contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office to find out what the "other"
> charges are
> > against you. There aren't any. The only thing there are the civil suits
> you
> > have filed against everyone. If I had solid documentatation of
> malfeasance,
> > corruption and theft we would have no choice but publish. However,
> opinion is
> > a different story. If you have hard evidence I will be glad to look at
> it,
> > but newspaper stories from a myriad of different issues cannot be made
> into
> > an article. I appreciate your anger over many of these issues. Maybe you
> > should start a web blog? Lisa C.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:03 AM
> > To: David Amos; blynch@inspecthouse.com; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > Cc: jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; newsonline@bbc.co.uk;
> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us;
> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us
> > Subject: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > I truly beleive that bankers think that the golden rule is "He
> with
> > the gold makes the rules" Your new boss Kirk would never allow you to
> print a
> > word about me and everybody knows it. It would upset the banking bastards
> > that pull his strings. Your telling me that you would give me a chance is
> > simply too funny for words. If you had been listening I had told you I
> was
> > investigating who owns and controls the media and I found the following
> dudes
> > interesting. Particularly when Mitt Romney protects them.
> >
> > http://www.
> >
> > http://www.berensoncocom/
> >
> > From the August 13, 2004 print edition
> >
> > Beacon Hill shields VC investments from view
> > Edward Mason
> >
> > Journal Staff
> >
> > Massachusetts lawmakers have approved a sweeping plan to let the
> state
> > pension fund keep details of its private equity investments from the
> public.
> >
> > The law, which gives broad discretion to the Pension Reserves
> Investment
> > Management board to decide what data can be secret, was enacted recently
> over
> > the veto of Gov. Mitt Romney, himself a former private equity manager.
> As a
> > result, Massachusetts becomes just the third state to allow public
> pension
> > funds to restrict what they can divulge to the public.
> >
> > The new law comes amid growing pressure, here and across the country,
> > from interest groups, pensioners, the media and even businesses looking
> to
> > sell the data to use laws requiring public access to meetings and
> records to
> > get a so-far rare glimpse into the traditionally closely guarded world of
> > private equity investing.
> >
> > State Treasury officials, who oversee the pension fund and pushed
> for the
> > shield law, said it protects them from Freedom of Information Act
> requests to
> > release private equity funds' confidential data and therefore ensures
> the $32
> > billion Massachusetts pension fund access to the nation's best investment
> > opportunities.
> >
> > "Experience in other states shows that top-tier private equity funds
> are
> > less likely to take public pension money because of exposure to Freedom
> of
> > Information Act requests," said Karen Sharma, a Treasury spokeswoman.
> >
> > Maintaining access to private equity funds is important to the state
> > pension, which expects to pour $800 million into the investment class
> this
> > year.
> >
> > Private equity investors said the new state law also shields them
> from
> > having to reveal information potentially damaging to themselves and their
> > portfolio companies. The concern is that a portfolio company could lose
> value
> > if the data released by the pension fund is incomplete or misinterpreted,
> > investors say. Similarly, buyout and venture capital funds are invested
> over
> > a period of 10 years, and those funds' general partners say return data
> > disclosed earlier than that can provide an incomplete performance
> picture to
> > the public.
> >
> > "That information can be so widely misused or misunderstood," said
> Peter
> > Jeton, senior vice president at Heritage Partners Inc., a Boston buyout
> firm.
> >
> > The law covers any documents the pension fund says contain trade
> secrets
> > or commercial and financial information relating to a company in a
> private
> > equity investor's portfolio. The data's disclosure would be prohibited
> if it
> > would cause "substantial" harm to the people or entity from which it is
> > obtained, according to the law's language.
> >
> > The law also exempts the Pension Reserves Investment Management board
> > from the requirements of the state's open-meeting law, allowing it to
> deem
> > confidential discussions of private equity investments during its regular
> > public meetings.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > Cc: jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
> > Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:34 PM
> > Subject: The debate tonight
> >
> >
> > J. Bernard Lynch
> > March 1st, 2005
> >
> > 34 Milton Hill Road
> >
> > Milton MA
> >
> > RE:
> Public
> > Corruption
> >
> > Hey Bernie,
> >
> > I must say it was awful comical today when the Milton
> Record
> > and Transcript said they did not know who their editor, Dave Johnson was
> or
> > of the debate tonight. I tried every D. Johnson in the local phone book
> and
> > could not locate such a person, so I thought I would call you and ask of
> him.
> > I was merely trying to inform him of what I told you last week and of
> what
> > the other reporters and candidates at the debate tonight obviously
> already
> > know. Last week you had invited me to come and meet these people but I
> > explained to you why I was so dubious to do so. Since I am obviously back
> > from New Hampshire I figured that I would come if you could somehow
> assure me
> > that I would not be hassled by the cops. Need I say that I was not too
> > surprised by the fact that not long after calling you today the Milton
> cops
> > came down our dead end street and cruised by real slow? I have no doubt
> they
> > were looking to see if I was back in town. Now I am definitely not coming
> > tonight. After you review the enclosed documents you can easily see that
> my
> > paranoia is well justified and I have good reason not to trust the people
> > that you say are your friends. However I am very curious to say the
> least as
> > to what was said of me if you had brought up my name during the meeting
> last
> > week.
> >
> > I figured that whereas you are Master of Disaster of
> the
> > debate tonight you could give this material to David Johnson to keep
> > everybody on a somewhat level playing field. I called and talked to your
> wife
> > again and explained to her what I was up to before sending out my friends
> > with this material to give to you.. Please find enclosed exact copies of
> all
> > the documents given to Tom Finneran and the Solicitor Generals of both
> Canada
> > and the USA before I ran for Parliament last year. I have also enclosed
> > copies of letters sent to the Town Counsel for Milton and the reporters
> for
> > the Milton Times and the Dorchester Reporter as well as the recent
> letters to
> > the lawyers seeking Finneran's old seat. Trust that this is just the tip
> of
> > the iceberg and everybody knows it. I am about to do my level best to
> greatly
> > embarrass and bankrupt many people you may respect. If you doubt my
> sincerity
> > perhaps you should come to my home, look me in the eye and then view
> evidence
> > of many crimes. Before you stress test my ethics why not just show this
> stuff
> > to the candidates tonight and look into their eyes first? They are the
> ones
> > that want the people to believe that they are worthy of the Public
> Trust. I
> > must prove the truth of my words in front of a jury of my peers in order
> to
> > preserve my own freedom, my Clan's interests and all of our civil rights.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > Cc: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us;
> > Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; press@citizensforethics.org ;
> > canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> info@electtomobrien.com ;
> > josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > Hey Lisa
> > Your wish is my command. I do understand the Code of Ethics of
> > Journalists as the copy of the enclosed email attests. It was just sent
> to
> > other newsman who dicked with me last year after another one in New
> Hampshire
> > was dicking with me last week while I was up there serving the
> Commissioner
> > of Public Safety. It is the same materail I will send you and your boss,
> Kirk
> > A. Davis. It is exactly the same material that was served upon Davis
> > Aufhauser, Thedore Olson and Tom Finneran and many others before they
> quit
> > their jobs, plus a little more evidence of Securities Fraud I have yet to
> > serve upon the SEC. The copy of the wiretap tape numbered 139 is served
> upon
> > you in confidence under the First Amendment Rights of the Freedom of the
> > press to purse the truth and report it. However I demand that you not
> report
> > the names of the people recorded on it and turn it over to the FBI in
> order
> > to protect the Fourth Amendment Rights of the people illegally recorded.
> To
> > start you on your way to investigate my matter right now I will the text
> of
> > three motions and an affidavit in the dockets of Dorchester District
> Court
> > and the text of a Defence, a Counterclaim and an Affadavit in the Supreme
> > Court of Newfoundland.
> > As for right now perhaps, you should read the text of the answer of
> my
> > wife to the complaint against her by the Morgan Stanley crowd and
> following
> > letter given to Coven, Chief Justice of Quincy Distict Court and then
> go ask
> > the clerk Arthur Tobin and his son, Stevy Boy, your Rep some hard
> questions.
> > As you can see he is likely expecting your call. The dumb bastard's
> assistant
> > called me back last week and acknowledged receiving all my emails but
> refused
> > to say where or not they understood them.
> > THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
> >
> > THE TRIAL COURT
> >
> > QUINCY, SS.
> > DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
> >
> > DISCOVER BANK )
> >
> > Plaintiff )
> > CIVIL ACTION
> >
> > )
> > DOCKET NO. 0456 cv 2039
> >
> > v. )
> >
> > )
> >
> > DAVID R. AMOS )
> >
> > JEAN F. O'MEARA )
> >
> > Defendants )
> >
> > ANSWER OF THE DEFENDANT, JEAN F. O'MEARA
> >
> >
> > Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O'Meara and states that she does not
> accept
> > the jurisdiction of this court to hear this matter. The defendant
> asserts her
> > Federal Constitutional Right to a trial by judge and jury in the proper
> > jurisdiction and venue in order to make her counterclaims against the
> > DISCOVER BANK and many other corporations and people throughout the USA
> and
> > Canada that have assisted in the practice of crime against her and her
> > family. In support of her appearance to answer this malicious action
> NOVUS
> > Credit Service Inc. on behalf of Morgan Stanley and DISCOVER FINANCIAL
> > SEVIVES INC. the defendant states as follows:
> >
> > 1.. The defendant states that she is well aware that on April 1st,
> 2003 the
> > Quincy District Trial made false allegations of a presidential threat
> against
> > her husband, David R; Amos to the DHS and the Milton Police Dept. after
> he
> > had attempted to have restraining orders placed against her brothers.
> > 2.. The defendant further states that on April 2nd, 2003 she stood
> before
> > the Quincy Trial Court alone and pleaded that the court issue restraining
> > orders against her brothers and asked why the court had sent Agents of
> the
> > DHS and the police to her home. She Judge Sullivan did not respond to a
> very
> > legitimate question about a very malicious action. The court held over
> her
> > matters for hearings over three weeks later rather than issuing
> restraining
> > orders immediately. On Oct 25th First Justice Mark S. Coven refused to
> > discuss the DHS and denied the issue of restraining orders with no
> reason.
> > 3.. The defendant further states that on April 1st, 2003 she witnessed
> her
> > husband attempt to give the Secret Service Agents and the Milton Police
> > Officer at their door the evidence of many crimes practiced against her
> > family. The same law enforcement authorities that were willing to take
> her
> > husband away under false allegations refused to act within the scope of
> their
> > employment and accept true evidence of crimes. Some of the crimes
> involved
> > Bank Fraud, Tax Fraud and Securities Fraud, all under the federal code.
> Two
> > of the civil actions of Jean F. O'Meara involving crimes under the
> federal
> > code had been removed to federal court by the US Attorney Michael J.
> Sullivan
> > and had been dismissed without due process of law with the plaintiffs
> > illegally excluded Ex Parte. It is obvious that the DHS and the
> Massachusetts
> > Trial Court are deliberately assisting in crime.
> > 4.. The defendant further states that beginning September 8th, 2004 her
> > husband, David R. Amos notified law office of Howard Lee Schiff of his
> > interest in this matter and of his standing as a defendant. To date he
> has
> > not been served this complaint. This matter should not proceed in any
> court
> > in any jurisdiction until he is served or he makes his own appearance in
> this
> > matter.
> > 5.. The defendant further states that on October 1st, 2004 within less
> than
> > one day after her being served a copy of the complaint in this matter her
> > husband was sent directly to jail without bail in direct violation of his
> > Eight Amendment Rights in order that he may not assist her in this and
> other
> > legal matters.
> >
> > Wherefore the above stated reasons the Defendant Jean F. O'Mear demands
> the
> > following:
> >
> >
> > A. That the court order that all parties be served.
> >
> > B. That the Quincy District Court send this matter to the US District
> Court
> > for the District Court of
> >
> > Massachusetts for Trial.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Submitted by
> >
> > Dated October 20th, 2004
> > Jean F. O'Meara, Pro Se
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > 617 698-6549
> >
> >
> >
> > CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
> >
> > I, David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 20th, 2004, I
> served
> > upon Stephen A. Wiener an original copy of the attached Notice of
> Appearance
> > by confirmed US Mail to the law office of Howard Lee Schiff at 340 Main
> St.
> > Suite 959, Worcester, MA. 01608-1603
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > 617 698-6549
> >
> > Judge Mark S. Coven
> > February 25th, 2005
> >
> > c/o Arthur H. Tobin and Alice Paccioretti,
> >
> > Quincy District Court
> > One Dennis F. Ryan Parkway
> > Quincy, MA 02169
> >
> > RE: Quincy District Docket # 200456CV00239 and
> >
> > Dorchester District Court Docket #
> 0407CR004623
> >
> > Dear Judge Coven,
> >
> > This is a request for a continuance of the malicious action
> against
> > my family by Morgan Stanley's legal Counsel until the pending criminal
> trial
> > of my husband, David R. Amos is over. I am writing this letter to you
> because
> > various clerks in Quincy Court have demanded that I do so after trying to
> > argue my husband for months as to why he cannot speak in this matter. He
> has
> > freely admitted to Morgan Stanley's various lawyers that he is
> responsible
> > for our common debts under M.G.L. 209. The debts were incurred in
> support of
> > our family. In fact the funds were largely used to finance the defence
> of our
> > civil rights, our property and my interests in various inheritances. My
> > husband has his own Discover Card. It has had no problem harassing me at
> my
> > place of employment about my husband's debt to Discover Bank. It must
> also
> > recognize his common interest in mine. We also share other cards with
> various
> > other bankers associated with Morgan Stanley. Furthermore my husband had
> > tried to resolve our concerns with Morgan Stanley before we were unable
> to
> > continue to honour our debts and before he ran for Parliament. We do not
> > consider it a coincidence that a coworker of my brother served me this
> > complaint less than a day before my husband was falsely imprisoned
> >
> > For a period almost six months beginning on September 8th, 2004
> and
> > three weeks before he went to jail, my husband conferred with the people
> > acting on behalf of Morgan Stanley in the above stated matter and
> received a
> > response. After receiving my answer the lawyers within the law firm of
> Howard
> > Lee Schiff finally recognized my Durable Power of Attorney and the rights
> > within it yet have falsely claimed that my husband created some sort of
> > "cease and desist order" and refused to speak to him. However they demand
> > that I answer their questions without ever answering the ones we made to
> > their associates many months before they filed this malicious complaint.
> >
> > My husband plans to call several people employed within Quincy
> District
> > Court to testify in his defence during the course of his pending criminal
> > trial. I must remain silent in order to protect his freedom and the civil
> > rights and interests of my family. Some of the evidence he will employ
> in his
> > defence involves various lawyers employed by Morgan Stanley. We truly
> believe
> > that this action within this court is part of a criminal conspiracy
> against
> > us to stop our legal actions. Federal Law Enforcement Authorities wanted
> my
> > husband to keep things confidential for years. However once he was
> falsely
> > imprisoned without due process of law and held under the strange charges
> of
> > "other", my husband will employ all of his resources and civil rights to
> see
> > that justice is served.
> >
> > One of the people my husband plans to call to testify during the
> course
> > of his criminal trial is you, Judge Coven and the unnamed Assistant
> District
> > Attorney employed in Quincy District Court that received much evidence of
> > many crimes including some of the original Police Surveillance tapes that
> > will be argued during the course of his criminal trial. You have failed
> to
> > give my husband the simple courtesy of responding to the letter and
> material
> > he sent to you long ago by confirmed US Mail but at least you have not
> denied
> > his allegations. He has every right to call you and ask why you did not
> > uphold the law and the public trust. As a judge of a Massachusetts Trial
> > Court you should not have any sort of immunity from testifying in a man's
> > defence of his freedom brought on but an illegal complaint filed by a
> clerk
> > of another District Court. You above all others should understand the
> > following:
> >
> > Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the
> District
> > Court 439 Mass. 352(2003) "A clerk-magistrate has no authority to
> conduct a
> > show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of
> a
> > felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest."
> >
> > A copy of my husband's letter to you, my Durable Power of
> Attorney
> > and the only documentation we ever received from Quincy Court is hereto
> > attached for you to review. We have received copies of the recordings of
> all
> > our hearings before Quincy District Court in the past and my husband
> will use
> > them as evidence in his defence during the course of his pending trial.
> > Perhaps you should listen to them as well to refresh your memory of our
> > circumstances. After my husband's criminal trial in front of a jury of
> his
> > peers is over, he plans to do as he promised and sue you in federal
> court to
> > seek relief from personal injury. It was you Judge Coven that
> acknowledged
> > the rights within my Durable Power of Attorney and discussed our matters
> with
> > my husband on April of 2003. It was you who denied our very justifiable
> > requests for restraining orders against my three brothers William,
> Robert,
> > and Brian O'Meara for no stated reason whatsoever and we received
> nothing in
> > writing afterwards as to the reasons for your decision. Your judgement
> has
> > allowed my criminal brothers to continue to harass us to this very day.
> If
> > you had not been so willing to assist my brothers in their harassment,
> our
> > property would not have been stolen and destroyed and my husband
> definitely
> > would not have been sent to jail because of the false allegations made
> > against him by their lawyer. Furthermore I would not be compelled to
> send you
> > this letter.
> >
> > You, Judge Coven are an officer of the court who failed to act
> within
> > the scope of your employment to protect my person, my rights and my
> interests
> > and compelled my husband to do the best he could to defend us. It is my
> > brothers and their many lawyers who should be criminally prosecuted not
> my
> > husband and the entire Trial Court System and the politicians within
> > Statehouse of this Commonwealth know it. The reason for the malice is
> obvious
> > many state employees of this have an interest in the outcome of our
> matters
> > because of our evidence Bank Fraud against the Brookline Savings Bank
> and the
> > SEC cover up of the Securities Fraud of Putnam investments alone.
> >
> > Judge Coven if you do not insure that this matter is removed to
> > federal court you should at least continue the matter until after my
> > husband's criminal trial is over because of your personal interest in the
> > outcome of this matter and the charges against my husband were made
> while he
> > was in Canada running for Parliament. This was before the law firm of
> Howard
> > Lee Schiff became involved in my matters and this complaint was filed.
> All of
> > our matters now fall under the jurisdiction of federal courts in the USA
> and
> > Supreme Courts in Canada and under the related federal codes. Everybody
> knows
> > it within the federal governments of the USA and Canada and many other
> states
> > and provinces as well. My husband has made certain of it. It seems that
> the
> > RCMP, the SEC, the IRS, the DHS and the FBI all seem to forget that
> Canadians
> > buy and sell on the American stock markets as well. To put it simply my
> > husband is a political prisoner for the benefit of cross border public
> > corruption. He will do his level best to prove it in an ethical and legal
> > fashion in defence of his freedom and your own civil rights as well.
> >
> > I did not want to come to Quincy Court today as ordered by you
> > Judge Coven. I do not wish to speak to anyone as is my right for the very
> > same reason my husband first attempted to file restraining orders on my
> > behalf years ago. I have had enough of the Commonwealth's malice toward
> me
> > and my family. I am still suffering from the nervous breakdown caused by
> my
> > brothers and others years ago. Although I am back at work, I am still on
> the
> > same medication and refuse to speak or discuss my matter with anyone.
> That is
> > the reason we must employ my Durable Power of Attorney to protect my
> rights
> > and interests. The Norfolk Probate Court went further in their malice
> towards
> > us and denied my Conservatorship Petition because Judge Harms stated she
> did
> > not believe the sworn statements of my doctors. The appeal was
> maliciously
> > delayed for years and denied while my husband was jailed. I had to be
> the one
> > to come today because we suspect more foul play against my husband if he
> had
> > chosen to accompany me after all your clerks had warned him away.
> Whereas he
> > is merely out of jail on bail we cannot afford to take chances with his
> > freedom and subject him to further malice from the clerks in
> Massachusetts.
> > Therefore he wrote this letter. I proofread it, agree with it and signed
> it.
> > My husband also signed it pursuant to my Durable Power of Attorney and
> admits
> > to the common debt. Our friend delivered it upon your office and whatever
> > lawyer appears on behalf of Morgan Stanley. I witness this being done
> and say
> > nothing.
> >
> > If you have any questions about the statements within this letter
> > please confer with Attorney General Reilly, or the Suffolk County
> District
> > Attorney or Attorney General Gonzales or Deputy Prime Minister Anne
> McLellan.
> > Both my husband and I are asserting our Constitutional Rights to remain
> > silent and seek trials by juries of our peers. We do not wish to discuss
> our
> > matters with malicious lawyers when it is not properly recorded in the
> public
> > record. Anything we say we have no doubt will be used against us.
> >
> > Judge Coven, you should remember my husband and I. As you can see
> we
> > last met on April 25th. 2003 during a matter heard by you. I witnessed my
> > husband say many things to you on my behalf on the public record and he
> asked
> > you to question me and you declined because you apparently did not doubt
> what
> > he was telling you.
> >
> > The aforesaid hearing occurred three weeks after the Quincy
> District
> > Court had made false allegations against my husband to the Department of
> > Homeland Security on April 1st. It was I who answered the front door of
> my
> > home that night to find the Milton Police and the Secret Service willing
> to
> > take my husband away to Cuba because of the false charges of a
> presidential
> > threat that the Quincy District Court had made against him. I witnessed
> my
> > husband quickly resolve that issue with the law enforcement authorities
> at
> > our door. In response to the Courts malice I had went to Quincy Court
> myself
> > on April 2nd and filed my own requests for restraining orders and met
> with
> > Judge Sullivan. I asked why the court had sent the police and the Secret
> > Service to our door and she did not want to talk about it and deferred
> the
> > matter to you three weeks later. The Secret Service returned the
> following
> > day without the police and affirmed that my husband had done nothing
> wrong.
> > However the Secret Service also refused to take from my husband the
> evidence
> > of Bank Fraud, Tax Fraud and Securities Fraud which was well within the
> scope
> > of their employment to investigate. At the very same point in time, we
> were
> > involved in two lawsuits involving three Treasury Agents and many other
> > people that you work with for not upholding the law. The only reason the
> > police and the Secret Service etc. has harassed my husband for years is
> in
> > order to cover up the wrongs of many law enforcement authorities and your
> > fellow officers of the court. Everybody knows it is my husband's task to
> > prove it to protect our family and our rights and interests from the
> Malice
> > of such lawyers employed by Morgan Stanley assisted by such courts as
> Quincy
> > District Court.
> >
> > It is now two years later and you Judge Coven have ordered me to
> come
> > discuss with malicious lawyers Securities Fraud practiced with the very
> > estate that my brothers have harassed me over for years while they try to
> > liquidate the remaining assets of before my husband finds justice served
> in
> > my best interests. If you want to hear of my arguments take it up with my
> > husband in a timely fashion in the proper jurisdiction and venue. I have
> also
> > witnessed what my husband's friend has servered upon Morgan Stanley's
> lawyers
> > today and of my husbands many calls to many authorities in two countries
> > yesterday to protect us from harm.
> >
> > I demand that the Morgan Stanley lawyers study closely what has
> been
> > served upon them today. Then immediately conduct themselves in a
> professional
> > manner as befits their license to practice law and confer with the clerk
> as a
> > fellow officer of the court.
> >
> > If they were wise, they would drop this matter on their own accord
> and
> > try to settle with my husband before we file a counter complaint or sue
> > Morgan Stanley and their very own law firm in federal court. The latest
> > evidence of Securities Fraud involving Comcast, Cingular and AT&T is
> about to
> > be mailed to the General Counsel of the SEC.
> >
> > However after encountering the people employed within Quincy
> District
> > Court and witnessing what they and some many others have already done
> against
> > us, I have no illusions that anyone will suddenly act in good faith and
> in my
> > best interests. One of the big reasons I must remain silent is to
> contain my
> > own temper for the benefit of our minor children. They can ill afford to
> > suffer through having both their parents illegally prosecuted at the same
> > time.
> >
> > That said I demand that the Quincy District Court study the
> material
> > served upon the law office of Howard Lee Schiff and uphold the law.
> Someone
> > really should call the FBI and inform them of their irrefutable
> knowledge of
> > crime in order that my matters may finally be properly investigated and
> all
> > criminals properly prosecuted according to law. My husband has been
> telling
> > the federal authorities the truth for years and in return for his ethical
> > efforts his family has suffered greatly.
> >
> >
> > Submitted by
> > Jean F. O'Meara
> >
> > her husband under her
> >
> > Durable Power of Attorney
> >
> > pursuant to M.G.L. 201B
> David
> > R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > Phone 617 698-6549
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Certificate of Service
> >
> >
> > I, David A. Woodman of South Acworth, NH. February 25th, 2005
> served
> > the attached documents to the office of the Clerk of Quincy District
> Court
> > and a true copy was served upon Stephen A. Wiener or Harry J. Theodoss,
> of
> > the Law Office of Howard Lee Schiff, PC, 340 Main Street Suite 959,
> > Worcester, MA 01608 or whatever other lawyer appears in court today to
> > represent the interests of Morgan Stanley.
> >
> >
> > David A. Woodman
> >
> >
> > P.O. Box 2
> >
> >
> > South Acworth, NH. 03607
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: press@citizensforethics.org
> > Cc: canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> > info@electtomobrien.com ; josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:15 PM
> > Subject: Guess who is coming to Washington to have long talk with Franky
> > McKenna
> >
> >
> > The following are your fine and fancy Yankee words written by
> > newsmen Franky Boy about their own sense ethics. Then a few of mine and
> > Franky's. Time will tell the tale as to who is a liar and who is not EH?
> > Never forget Franky Boy will soon work for me and I deserve some service
> and
> > some very honest answers from all Canadians in Public Service that had
> > deliberately failed to act within the scope of their employment and
> protect
> > my freedom from Yankee malice in their support of public corruption in
> Canada
> > and the USA.
> >
> > Washington will likely never be the same once two men from the
> same
> > point on the map in the Maritimes but from opposite ends of the spectrum
> lock
> > horns in arguments about ethical conduct inside the Bush's Beltway.
> >
> > McKenna denies 'cozy' relationship with Washington
> > Last Updated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:01:05 EST
> >
> > CBC News
> > OTTAWA - Former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, who was officially
> named
> > to be Canada's new ambassador to the United States on Friday, refuted
> > critics' claims that he has strong ties to the White House and other
> > political and business leaders.
> >
> > "I think that my connections, if I can be totally candid here, have been
> > totally overblown."
> >
> > "Am I cozy with folks? I'm afraid I'm not."
> >
> > Some critics have questioned his links with a controversial Washington
> > D.C.-based investment firm, The Carlyle Group.
> >
> > The group's multimillion-dollar investors have included members of the
> family
> > of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. It owns companies that make
> equipment for
> > the American military, and has hired high-profile former politicians
> > including former U.S. president George H.W. Bush and former U.S.
> secretary of
> > state James Baker.
> >
> > But McKenna downplayed his level of involvement with Carlyle, saying he
> was
> > on the company's Canadian advisory board. He said the board eventually
> became
> > inactive and has since been dormant.
> >
> > "I must tell you, I have a relationship with a few members of the Bush
> > family. But it is not a very tight, strong relationship," he said.
> >
> > "I've met with Bush Sr. and Clinton. I know some of the people in some
> of the
> > parties. But I wouldn't pretend to call (the relationship) cozy. It's
> not."
> >
> > McKenna acknowledged that it's important to have political friendships
> and
> > that he does have some U.S. ties that will form "the basis of a good
> working
> > relationship."
> >
> > The appointment is effective March 1. It comes weeks after speculation
> that
> > Prime Minister Paul Martin would name McKenna to the post.
> >
> > McKenna warned that he's not going to be able to go into Washington and
> solve
> > long outstanding trade issues like softwood lumber and BSE.
> >
> > "It's just not going to happen," said McKenna.
> >
> > "There aren't miracle solutions to these issues."
> >
> > He said his biggest challenge is to raise Canada's profile.
> >
> > "Our greatest enemy in the United States is indifference."
> >
> > McKenna, 57, has been practising law and sitting on several corporate
> boards
> > since he left New Brunswick politics in 1997.
> >
> > He said he will be severing his ties with corporate positions, including
> his
> > job as chairman of the board of Can West Global Communications Corp.,
> which
> > publishes the National Post and several other large Canadian newspapers.
> >
> >
> > Elizabeth Beale, president of the Atlantic Provinces Economic Council,
> said
> > she believes McKenna will do well in Washington.
> >
> > "He's always been a kind of radical guy who's welcomed the input from the
> > little guy. And I think that's one of his strong assets that he has, that
> > creative side to his problem solving."
> >
> > University of Moncton professor Donald Savoie, who has written and
> consulted
> > extensively on federal politics and economics, calls his longtime friend
> a
> > good choice for the job.
> >
> > "I think Frank McKenna is an extremely bright man. He will figure out
> what he
> > needs to do to get the job done," Savoie told CBC Newsworld Friday.
> >
> > "The one thing that would worry me a bit is that there's a lot of
> > expectations out there because he's fairly dynamic ... There's a lot of
> > people who feel that in the first two weeks, he will solve softwood
> lumber,
> > he will solve mad-cow [disease] and so on."
> >
> >
> > McKenna has stayed active in partisan politics since leaving the
> premier's
> > office and has been seen as a possible federal Liberal leadership
> candidate
> > at some point down the road.
> >
> > Bilingual and well-known outside New Brunswick, he mulled running
> federally
> > in the June 2004 election, but decided against it.
> >
> > Journalistic Ethics
> >
> > The Center for Public Integrity subscribes to the Code of Ethics of the
> > Society of Professional journalists, reprinted here in full:
> >
> > Preamble
> > Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public
> > enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of
> democracy.
> > The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and
> > providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.
> > Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve
> the
> > public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the
> > cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a
> > dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the
> Society's
> > principles and standards of practice.
> >
> > Seek Truth and Report It
> > Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering,
> reporting and
> > interpreting information.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise
> care to
> > avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
> > b.. Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the
> > opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
> > c.. Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as
> much
> > information as possible on sources' reliability.
> > d.. Always question sources' motives before promising anonymity.
> Clarify
> > conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep
> > promises.
> > e.. Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material,
> > photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not
> > misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of
> > context.
> > f.. Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image
> enhancement
> > for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo
> > illustrations.
> > g.. Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If
> re-enactment
> > is necessary to tell a story, label it.
> > h.. Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering
> > information except when traditional open methods will not yield
> information
> > vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of
> the
> > story.
> > i.. Never plagiarize.
> > j.. Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human
> experience
> > boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.
> > k.. Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values
> on
> > others.
> > l.. Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity,
> > geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social
> > status.
> > m.. Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
> > n.. Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of
> > information can be equally valid.
> > o.. Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and
> > commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
> > p.. Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the
> lines
> > between the two.
> > q.. Recognize a special obligation to ensure that the public's
> business is
> > conducted in the open and that government records are open to inspection.
> > Minimize Harm
> > Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human
> beings
> > deserving of respect.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news
> > coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and
> > inexperienced sources or subjects.
> > b.. Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of
> those
> > affected by tragedy or grief.
> > c.. Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm
> or
> > discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
> > d.. Recognize that private people have a greater right to control
> > information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek
> > power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify
> > intrusion into anyone's privacy.
> > e.. Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
> >
> > f.. Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex
> > crimes.
> > g.. Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal
> filing of
> > charges.
> > h.. Balance a criminal suspect's fair trial rights with the public's
> right
> > to be informed.
> > Act Independently
> > Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the
> > public's right to know.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
> > b.. Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise
> > integrity or damage credibility.
> > c.. Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and
> shun
> > secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in
> > community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
> > d.. Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
> > e.. Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power
> accountable.
> > f.. Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and
> resist
> > their pressure to influence news coverage.
> > g.. Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid
> > bidding for news.
> > Be Accountable
> > Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each
> > other.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the
> public
> > over journalistic conduct.
> > b.. Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
> > c.. Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
> > d.. Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
> > e.. Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
> > Sigma Delta Chi's first Code of Ethics was borrowed from the American
> Society
> > of Newspaper Editors in 1926. In 1973, Sigma Delta Chi wrote its own
> code,
> > which was revised in 1984 and 1987. The present version of the Society of
> > Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics was adopted in September 1996.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > January 16, 2004
> >
> > Melanie Sloan, Executive
> > Director Neil Gordon
> >
> > Citizens for Responsibility
> > and Peter Newbatt Smith
> >
> > Ethics in Washington
> > The Center for Public Integrity
> >
> > 11 DuPont Circle, N.W.,
> > 2nd Floor 910 17th Street, NW, 7th Floor
> >
> > Washington, D.C. 20036
> > Washington, DC 20006
> >
> > Phone 202 588-5565
> > Phone 202 466-1300
> >
> > Fax 202 588-5020
> > Fax 202 466-1101
> >
> > RE: Corruption
> >
> > Madam and Sirs,
> >
> > I am sorry but after so many encounters with so many lawyers that
> > expound about the law and ethics and newsmen that lie like cheap rugs, I
> > simply don't believe any lawyer is worthy of the public trust and
> especially
> > not lawyer/politicians or the one's they appoint. I think even less of
> > newsmen because everybody knows lawyers are liars but they want to
> believe
> > the newsmen. The fact Ms. Sloan was once a US Attorney causes more
> doubt. I
> > must say the similar holds true for Charles Lewis. Feel free to prove me
> > wrong but trust that I ain't holding my breath waiting to see a fine
> display
> > of ethical behavior. I am proceeding alone. Whereas I have put your
> > organizations in the same boat as Taxpayers Against Fraud, I have sent
> you
> > the same documents etc. that were sent to them. They should assist Mr.
> Gordon
> > in his work on prosecutorial misconduct
> >
> > What may interest Ms. Sloan the most would be my attack on the
> > Medicare crows but that is just the tip of the iceberg. I have also
> included
> > some documents that should cause you to sit up and take notice of my
> doings
> > with the SEC. It was truly comical how quick the SEC settled with Putnam
> > Investments after their lawyers called me with a few questions. If I
> told you
> > how many lawyers, politicians, members of the press, who they are and how
> > long they have had the same documents that you now hold in your hand, I
> doubt
> > you would believe me. What is absolutely unbelievable is that only one
> lawyer
> > and only two reporters have ever made any sort of inquiry about them.
> After I
> > told them more, I heard from them no more. The copy of wiretap tape
> numbered
> > 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order
> that
> > it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you
> all
> > witnesses to my pursuit of justice. I will name you as such in my next
> > complaint. For now I will wait to witness what you do with your newfound
> > knowledge. I am sorry to have such a negative attitude towards lawyers
> and
> > newsman. Rest assured I came by it honestly. I am about to start a circus
> > down in Dixie. I am going to do my best to keep the public entertained
> and
> > therefore interested enough to become disgusted to reflect it in the next
> > election.
> >
> > Cya'll in CourtJ
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> PO
> > Box 2
> >
> >
> > South Acworth, NH 03607
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:53 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > David, well I don't know what to say. The big boys stick together. I
> > contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office to find out what the "other"
> charges are
> > against you. There aren't any. The only thing there are the civil suits
> you
> > have filed against everyone. If I had solid documentatation of
> malfeasance,
> > corruption and theft we would have no choice but publish. However,
> opinion is
> > a different story. If you have hard evidence I will be glad to look at
> it,
> > but newspaper stories from a myriad of different issues cannot be made
> into
> > an article. I appreciate your anger over many of these issues. Maybe you
> > should start a web blog? Lisa C.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> > To: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> > Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 11:54 PM
> > Subject: A few suggestions . . .
> >
> >
> > > David,
> > >
> > > If you want to have your story out in articles, I suggest
> > > you contact Michael Ruppert at editor@copvcia.com.
> > >
> > > If you want to have your story out in a book, I suggest
> > > you contact Sander Hicks at sander@voxpopnet.net.
> > >
> > > If you want people to take you seriously, I suggest you
> > > not hang up on them when they want to be helpful.
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Sander Hicks
> > > Chief Instigator
> > > VOX POP
> > > Books, Coffee, Democracy
> > >
> > > http://voxpopnet.net
> > > http://www.drenchkiss.com
> > >
> > > Drench Kiss Media Corporation
> > > 1022 Cortelyou Road
> > > Flatbush, Brooklyn 11218
> > >
> > > 718 940 2084
> > > 718 940 0346 (fax)
> > > 347 446 4461 (cell)
> > >
> > > "World Peace is ours, it comes from within."
> > > -Jeff Bullard, Taos, NM
> > >
> > > http://www.SanderHicks.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu ; editor@copvcia.com ; sander@voxpopnet.net
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:19 AM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:32 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: info@culturalrenewal.ca
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 4:28 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: martelj@bennettjones.ca
> Cc: nmiller@corridor.ns.ca ; tmartel@corridor.ns.ca ;
> phopkins@corridor.ns.ca ; pr@potashcorp.com ;
> mackinnonh@bennettjones.ca ; rileyb@bennettjones.ca ;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 2:17 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: investinfo@doj.nh.gov
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:34 AM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: investinfo@doj.state.nh.us
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:50 PM
> Subject: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: mbevis@nhpr.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:35 PM
> Subject: Fw: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or
> later
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: INFO7@elections.ca ; ombudsman@npr.org ; ombudsman@washpost.com
> Cc: info@cfif.org ; 2020@abc.com ; niteline@abc.com ;
> cnn.feedback@cnn.com ; info@cnbc.com ; comments@foxnews.com ;
> world@msnbc.com ; today@nbc.com ; dateline@nbc.com ; newshour@pbs.org
> ; atc@npr.org ; letters@latimes.com ; letters@nytimes.com ;
> editor@usatoday.com ; editors@interactive.wsj.com ;
> letters@newsweek.com ; letters@time.com ; letters@usnews.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:55 PM
> Subject: Fw: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or
> later
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com ; michel.lalande@bell.ca ;
> jean-francois.legault@bell.ca ; christopher.ginther@bell.ca ;
> atvnews@ctv.ca ; bcecomms@bce.ca ; info@obamaforillinois.com ; moto
> maniac ; frontline@wgbh.org ; drsutherland@earthlink.net ;
> programming@thirteen.org ; MarkNix13@aol.com ; info@nationaldesk.com ;
> newshour@pbs.org ; now@thirteen.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 6:16 PM
> Subject: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or later
>
>
> To explain this a little to the newsmen that get this next.
> Please notice that Brian Mulroney's buddies buried their heads in the
> sand and had shown me their arse once I had busted their boss in front
> of his friends. Meanwhile all the fellas under Bell Canada's wing are
> all still playing dumb, even though everybody knows Obama is scum.
> Just like his adversaries, Mulroney's chums. To top it all off
> Frontline knows absolutely every goddamned thing since the time I was
> running for Parliament. I am not smart enough to make this up and it
> is too funny not to share. But first I must give it to the French
> fellas at Quebecor byway of Bill Gates because that is the kind of guy
> that I am. Somebody has to make Mulroney pay for his sins. :)
>
> Message from yahoo.com.
> Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
>
> <lavoie.luc@quebecor.com>:
> Connected to 199.202.93.13 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 554 Mail from motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com rejected
> for policy reasons.
>
> --- Original message follows.
>
> Return-Path: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>
> The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K.
>
> Message-ID: <20041014220302.48007.qmail@
> Received: from [206.149.208.172] by web20025.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
> Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:03:02 PDT
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> jean-francois.legault@bell.ca, christopher.ginther@bell.ca,
> atvnews@ctv.ca,
> bcecomms@bce.ca, info@obamaforillinois.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1404269537-
>
> --0-1404269537-1097791382=:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="0-1581892408-
>
> --0-1581892408-1097791382=:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
> Brian Mulroney
> c/o Luc Lavoie
> Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs
> Quebecor Media Inc.
> (514) 380-1974
> (514) 236-8742 (cell)
>
> Hey,
>
> I just called Luc Lavoie's office and left a message but not my phone
> number. From now on I want hard copy. Lets just say Mulroney should have
> done the Right and Honourable thing a long time ago, particularly as soon
> as
> I notified the lawyers working at Cendant Corporation. I served them once
> in
> person and once by confiremd US Mail. Maybe Belinda should have had him
> call
> me when I contacted her. I know I am the reason he did not speak at the
> Conservative leadership convention. I also know Mulroney, Arthur Hamiliton
> and John Crosbie were likely some the lawyers who advised Harper to shut up
> about what he knew about the Arar Commission.
>
> I had a great laugh to see the spit and chew between Senator Kerry and
> Mulroney but I also know that Mulroney is the reason that Forbes and Sun
> Media has not reported my doings with the SEC in the USA or even my of run
> for Parliament. Ain't it funny how everyone said Fundy was a riding to
> watch
> but no one whispered my name. I know I do not have to be redundant and
> send the same documents and wiretap tape to you that I sent to Mulroney and
> his many associates long ago before I complain of all the various companies
> and lawyesr he is in bed with. Title 18 in the USA will make all the
> lawyers
> fall on their own sword. Hell even you guys claim the merits of the
> internet
> and email is just as efective as the US Mail in the litigation process. Ask
> Frank Quatronne or Martha Stewart about that before you disagree. Bill
> Gates' lawyer offered no comment so I sent that bastard US Mail just to rub
> it in. IF you think I am pissed off you are right. Brian Mulroney could
> have
> easily stopped the distruction of my Clan's beloved Beach House but he
> would
> rather have stood with his corrupt friends than me. Or is it simpler than
> that? Did Mulroney just want his peice of the action in the fraudulent Real
> Estate transaction by Coldwell Bankers because he thought I had no hope of
> stopping it myself? We all know how Mulroney loves money. Airplane deals
> proved that.
>
> What say you J. Serge Sasseville do you stand with your boss and his
> peers or me? I know Lavoie will hang with Mulroney until the bitter end.
> Perhaps you may wish to confer with Martine Turcotte or Robert C. Pozen,
> they have just received the most recent hard copy of material. Proof of my
> contact with Mulroney can be found within the stuff if perchance he tries
> to
> call me a liar. There is still time for you three folks to act in a ethical
> manner and uphold the law according to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
> After Sept 3rd your are too late. that is the day Massachusetts Trail Court
> tries to call me a criminal and I demand a jury of my peers.
>
> This is not an offer to settle before I file my complaints. That came
> along ago to Mulroney and his buddies. Now I look forward to arguing the
> bastard or any lawyer he chooses to send against me. I had offered to
> settle
> with BCE before I complained of them but the deal was off the instant they
> tried to puill a fast one in an effort to delay me in the hope no doubt
> that
> some bad acting Yankee might put a stop to me when I return to the USA.
> Their silence since has spoken volumes. Martine should have contacted me
> the
> instant ATV got the hard copy like i told her they would. I will forward
> you
> some of our email exhange so that we may all get to know each other quite
> well. these emails will be forwarded to many others but I ain't telling you
> who. My next emails come byway of Yahoo as a double check in case you
> choose
> to block me.
>
> Say hey to Mulroney for me and I will try to say hey to Kerry for you.
> Maybe Ms. Turcotte will share with you what she knows about Kerry and
> Mulroney will tell her what he knows about William Cohen and why he quit
> Cendant Corp so fast. Maybe Joe Day will tell you about Barack Obama and
> me.
> I am about to tell Obama about Day. Turn about is fair play. Obama used my
> stuff against Senators Edwards and Kerry to become a big wig in Beantown
> last month. I can use a Senator from Canada to take the wind out of his
> sails the following month. An Alliance dude once called Sun Media a bunch
> of
> scumbags. I would have to agree and laugh because it was a case of the pot
> calling the kettle black.
>
> Cya'll in Court :)
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave.
>
> Milton MA. 02186
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: moto maniac
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:00 PM
> Subject: Fw: Ron Show this to Joyce this is too funny
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Romina Sestito
> Cc: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ;
> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net ; davies.carl@nbpub.com ;
> news@timestranscript.com ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ; nbombud@gnb.ca ;
> advocacycollective@yahoo.com ; brad.green@gnb.ca ;
> dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca ; slevin@mail.house.gov ;
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Efford.J@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
> Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; scotta@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ;
> davidorchard@sasktel.net ; rosent@math.toronto.edu ;
> Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ;
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca ;
> randall.shafer@comcast.net ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ;
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; caomc@nb.aibn.com ;
> jeffrey.rudman@wilmerhale.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:56 PM
> Subject: Ron Show this to Joyce this is too funny
>
>
> Romina
>
> What are you trying to do sucker me? I am telling my own tale
> in court. I am suing your company, Bell Canada. Get it?
>
> May I suggest that you talk to your own lawyer, Martine Turcotte
> and decide what planet you all come from. I just got out of a jail
> after being put there by the bastards your lawyers assisted to cover
> up the crimes practiced against me. Discuss my troubles with Robert C,
> Pozen or Martine Turcotte not me.
>
> If you or any of your company wish to communicate with me,
> address your concerns to my attorney, Joyce Richardson. Turcotte
> should have her number.
>
> If Sunlife ain't figured it out yet as to why I am about to
> sue them. They had best check with Jeff Carp about the stuff I sent
> him at MFS and his prior association with Hale and Dorr. Jeff Rudman
> would be good fella to start with but defintely not the last within
> the aforesaid law firm.
>
> David R. Amos
>
From: James Fetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:19:49 -0600
Subject: Re: LINKS
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete@thepetesantillishow.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Surely you don't believe this rubbish? He was given the boot by AFN for
abusing his position. See "Lunatics 'R Us: The Santilli/Wood/Sunstein
Gambit" on Veterans Today,
http://thehill.com/video/in-
Now I get a lot of lunatic ravings about ancient history, of which your
emails seem to be an example. I have no interest in rehashing old
disputes. If you can summarize why any of this matters in few sentences, I
will read those and respond. I'm not going to read this.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:08 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://petersantilli.com/2013/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:51:45 -0400
> Subject: Re: A few suggestions from James H. Fetzer seven years ago
> To: Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
> policy.karenforcanada@gmail.
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> ron.lachapelle@forces.gc.ca, Shawn.Cooper2@forces.gc.ca,
> BARRY.SHAW@forces.gc.ca, jfetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>,
> "bernadine.chapman" <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.
> dpugliese@ottawacitizen.com, BillRobinsonCanada@yahoo.ca
> Cc: adamsj@queensu.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca, Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>,
> birgittaj@althingi.is
>
> Hey Jimmy Baby
>
> Remember the email and info exchange inserted below from seven long years
> ago?
>
> Did you ever read the entire text of my two responses to your snobby
> suggestions?
>
> Did you at least notice that when you sent your last very snide
> response you sent it
> with the entire text of one of my emails to two of your friends, four
> of my friends,
> a couple of reporters in Beantown, several Yankee poltiicans they know
> quite well,
> the BBC, a CROWN prosecutor and the RCMP as well? Ain't that rather
> special?
> A well mixed crowd even if I do say so myself.
>
> Try denying that you did not know exactly who I was long before I ran
> for public office
> three more times and over three years before the banksters caused the
> economy to
> tank and your hero Obama got elected in order to further support an
> attempt to bankrupt
> your good old US of A. If you wish to recall within one of the emails
> I explained why I knew
> your hero Obama was scum before he got elected to US Senator in 2004.
> You did not respond
> to that email about the corporate media so I only provided a portion
> of it to remind you of what I
> was saying about Obama right after I came screaming out of that Yankee
> jail in October 2004.
>
> In 2005 you found "my inferences absurd beyond belief". I must ask
> have you ever listened to
> yourself lately??? Recently you come to Canada and yap of thermate
> then mininukes and now
> PressTV, Mr Zundel and even his evil neo nazi fanboyz have captured
> your interest. You change
> your mind so much do you even know for sure what planet are you come
> from???
>
> Whereas you are a big fan of evil old Ron Paul and Jesse Ventura and
> ther laments about the
> Fed Bank etc, I must ask another obvious question. Howcome I have not
> heard any one of you
> Yankee big talkers mention the simple fact that the Fed Bank's Charter
> expires this Xmass?
> DUHHH? Don't alllow Congress to renew it without a long and open
> debate. Get it dummies???
>
> Please never forget you picked this fight with me in 2005. I am
> polishing it off tis all.
> Lets just say I am awful vindictive and have a very long memory as well.
>
> Lets call this email ROUND THREEE
>
> For the record I would have let you be but when I discovered recently
> that you had been
> sticking your nose into Canadian affairs and being very cozy with
> people who offend me
> greatly up here, I decided to inform many about how and why we crossed
> paths long ago
> and of what we thought of each other. Also for the record I have been
> well aware of your
> involvement in the "911 Truther" movement for years and always
> considered you to be a
> shill for the "Power That Be".
>
> Lets just say our prior contact supported it. I have not met a former
> officer in the Marines
> who considered studying to be a lawyer before becoming a professor who
> was not a crook.
> I had a hope in late 2004 that you would break the mold because of
> your work about the
> demise of Senator Wellstone. However I know what I told you on the
> phone and asked
> to check it to see for yourself as to whether it was true or false. In
> the seven years since
> not once have seen where you mention the news reports about Teddy
> Kennedy and his
> doings on that fateful day.
>
> I will call the three emails that I sent you and many others on Friday
> night ROUND TWO.
> They should have rung some bells for you. As you know I already
> published one of them within
> another sneaky dude's blog. Apparently you are remaining true to your
> word seven years ago
> and not answering the Bell to argue with me anymore. Perhaps that is
> wise for a crook to do
> but it does not stop me from sharing with you the world my opinion of
> you and your malicious
> nonsense. You do the very same thing against your foes on your
> talkshows etc. Turnabout is
> fair play CORRECT?
>
> Logically I will call our first spit and chew in 2005 ROUND ONE (Which
> I truly believe I won)
>
> If you see something inaccurate within in the email exchange I have
> inserted below or any other
> email I have sent ou or if you wish to dispute anything you think is
> unfair or untrue please feel free
> to sprout some balls and let me know
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:54 AM
> Subject: A few suggestions . . .
>
> David,
>
> If you want to have your story out in articles, I suggest
> you contact Michael Ruppert at editor@copvcia.com.
>
> If you want to have your story out in a book, I suggest
> you contact Sander Hicks at sander@voxpopnet.net.
>
> If you want people to take you seriously, I suggest you
> not hang up on them when they want to be helpful.
>
> Jim
>
> --
>
> Sander Hicks
> Chief Instigator
> VOX POP
> Books, Coffee, Democracy
>
> http://voxpopnet.net
> http://www.drenchkiss.com
>
> Drench Kiss Media Corporation
> 1022 Cortelyou Road
> Flatbush, Brooklyn 11218
>
> 718 940 2084
> 718 940 0346 (fax)
> 347 446 4461 (cell)
>
> "World Peace is ours, it comes from within."
> -Jeff Bullard, Taos, NM
>
> http://www.SanderHicks.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> To: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:59 AM
> Subject: Re: Please call me
>
> I just tried to call you but it may have been too early in the day for you.
> I am sorry about that but I wanted to try to contact you before I left the
> house today. Why I was trying to speak to you concerns the Wellstone people
> etc. I am not trying to sell anything. I am just trying to tell you some
> things I am certain that you don't know to protect my own butt. I will
> support everything I wish to tell you with Tiff files which are scans of
> legal documents etc. Some are rather large. and I would not send them to
> you
> without your permission and talking to you first..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 3:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Please call me
>
> David,
>
> I just tried to reach you without success. Try me
> at (608) 848-6632 on Sunday afternoon or on Monday.
>
> Jim
>
> Quoting David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>
>
> or send me your number my number is 617 698 6549
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <editor@copvcia.com>; <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>;
> <Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us>; <Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us>;
> <Jack.Hart@state.ma.us>; <Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> <Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
> <sander@voxpopnet.net>; <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>;
> <blynch@inspecthouse.com>; <brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca>;
> <lcampenella@ledger.com>; <dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> <cei@nbnet.nb.ca>; <kbar@nbnet.nb.ca>; <Ind80@aol.com>; "Byron Prior"
> <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: A few suggestions . . .
>
>
> David Amos,
>
> Egad, man! I called because I found an old email and could not remember
> if I
> had responded to it. That's all. Your inferences are absurd beyond
> belief.
> I thought your story was astounding and far beyond my pay grade, so I made
> a
> few suggestions for getting it out. I now regret having called again.
> But I
> do admire (what I understand of) your courage in confronting difficult
> issues.
>
> James H. Fetzer
>
> P.S. And, just for the record, I laughed about the kilt because I was just
> appreciating that it was your trademark in your campaign, which
> struck
> me as both clever and funny. Don't worry about hearing from me
> again.
>
> Quoting David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>
> > Hey Jimmy Boy
> > The key words you employ are "If You Want" I don't because I don't
> trust
> > you or the people you call friends. I already crossed paths with at
> least one
> > of them before I went home to run for Parliament and then went straight
> to
> > jail with out passing go. I am not selling anything like you and you
> buddies
> > are. I am telling you something you don't know. My work can be read for
> free
> > in the Public Record of many courts or I will email a lot of it to anyone
> > that asks. Unlike you and your friends there will be no charge.
> > I am sick of bullshitting dudes like you who talk the talk while I
> walk
> > the walk. Obviously I had caught you lying to me. Do you recall how many
> > times I asked you about the emails I sent you? Then there is the fact
> that
> > nobody saves voicemails for months. You can't fool me, I am too stupid.
> I do
> > recall you calling me and talking to me before. Why couldn't you? The
> proof
> > is the fact that you are a liar is that you have my email address. It
> seems
> > your recollection becomes much more precise when you are pissed off. EH?
> Now
> > you may understand why I could so clearly remember you before I hung up.
> You
> > pissed me off first. Why weren't you just honest with me?
> > You were certainly not being helpful when you laughed at my
> statement
> > about the bastards trying to kill me and being sent to jail in my kilt.
> I had
> > heard enough from you through the phone to be satisfied that you were not
> > sincere. Be glad that I just hung up on you. If you had laughed at me
> like
> > that in my presence I would have decked you in a heartbeat. Clearly you
> dumb
> > Yankee bastards will never understand simple, sincere and serious
> Maritimer.
> > If you had bothered to read anything I wrote, you would have noticed
> that I
> > was willing to pay a man to be my editor so that I could give a book
> away for
> > free byway of the world wide web.
> > When was the last time you refused to accept a judgement by default
> for 32
> > million bucks because you did not recognize the jurisdiction of a court?
> > Until you do, you have no right to advise me about profiting from my
> work.
> > The truth is not a commodity that should be bought and sold. I am
> comfortable
> > letting the fellas that write fiction go for the gold. Get it?
> > At least the dude from New Mexico was right about one thing. However
> I say
> > everything comes from within. My question is do you feel comfortable
> within
> > your own skin? I know I don't want to know you or your bullshitting
> friends
> > because when I talk to the likes of you I get uncomfortable and very
> pissed
> > off.
> > I truly believe that the only reason you called me back now was out of
> you
> > own sense of personal greed and not in pursuit of the simple truth. No
> doubt
> > you have discovered that I am starting to be blogged and or talked about
> by
> > my fellow common man and you just wanted to climb on the band wagon and
> make
> > yourself famous. As for me I want no such thing.
> > "If You Want" to know more read what I said to a local reporter the
> day
> > before you called me again then started bullshitting and asking
> questions.
> > Then read the emails following this one real slow real slow and do with
> them
> > what you will. I will tell anyone the truth I have no secrets about these
> > matters even from Bullshitters.
> > As you no doubt can tell I need to regain my sense of Ha Ha before my
> > Criminal Trial begins. I am heading out alone and having a little fun
> riding
> > my bike while avoiding nasty Yankees. If you wish to read simple truths
> from
> > another honest Maritimer that would make any other honest man cry. Go
> here
> > read his work, partake of the milk of human kindnes and help Byron by
> writing
> > about him.
> > http://maxpages.com/
> > David R. Amos
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > Cc: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us;
> > Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; press@citizensforethics.org ;
> > canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> info@electtomobrien.com ;
> > josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > You should also know that I have copyrighted all of my words and none
> should
> > be printed without my OK. I will forward to you all the emails that were
> sent
> > to the Dorchester Reporter that contain forwards of many scans in a Tiff
> > format. They will come in through Yahoo. The files are deep within the
> > forwards and are easily viewable in the old Kodak Imaging program found
> > within any Windows System 2000 and back.
> > Years ago your paper wanted my stuff in a PDF format and I just
> laughed
> > at them. Tiff is a far simpler type of file but harder to plagiarize
> from.
> > Cut and paste don't work with it and you can't buy my stuff from anyone
> but
> > me. Never forget it is me that has been investigating you and all the
> media
> > for years. The fact that you finally say you may investigate me today
> don't
> > amount to a hill of beans in Beantown to me. My story will no doubt break
> > first within the Blogs you joke about but not by me. I am too busy
> teaching
> > the snake to eat its tail while lawyers fall on their own sword. Besides
> > although I am a pretty big feeling bastard, the last thing I want to be
> is
> > famous. By the time my story breaks surface, I will be already long gone
> from
> > New England. People care more about the gossip factor of low people in
> high
> > places taking a fall rather than the whistleblower that started the
> fall. You
> > just proved that once more by your attitude towards me. Believe me the
> > Patriot Ledger is just a pawn to me in a big big game. Ask Franky
> McKenna or
> > Brian Mulroney.
> > Do you know what I find awful funny about Yankee newsmen? Most don't
> > know who Bill Clinton's girlfriend is. Type in his name and Belinda and
> surf
> > for yourself.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:53 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > David, well I don't know what to say. The big boys stick together. I
> > contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office to find out what the "other"
> charges are
> > against you. There aren't any. The only thing there are the civil suits
> you
> > have filed against everyone. If I had solid documentatation of
> malfeasance,
> > corruption and theft we would have no choice but publish. However,
> opinion is
> > a different story. If you have hard evidence I will be glad to look at
> it,
> > but newspaper stories from a myriad of different issues cannot be made
> into
> > an article. I appreciate your anger over many of these issues. Maybe you
> > should start a web blog? Lisa C.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:03 AM
> > To: David Amos; blynch@inspecthouse.com; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > Cc: jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; newsonline@bbc.co.uk;
> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us;
> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us
> > Subject: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > I truly beleive that bankers think that the golden rule is "He
> with
> > the gold makes the rules" Your new boss Kirk would never allow you to
> print a
> > word about me and everybody knows it. It would upset the banking bastards
> > that pull his strings. Your telling me that you would give me a chance is
> > simply too funny for words. If you had been listening I had told you I
> was
> > investigating who owns and controls the media and I found the following
> dudes
> > interesting. Particularly when Mitt Romney protects them.
> >
> > http://www.
> >
> > http://www.berensoncocom/
> >
> > From the August 13, 2004 print edition
> >
> > Beacon Hill shields VC investments from view
> > Edward Mason
> >
> > Journal Staff
> >
> > Massachusetts lawmakers have approved a sweeping plan to let the
> state
> > pension fund keep details of its private equity investments from the
> public.
> >
> > The law, which gives broad discretion to the Pension Reserves
> Investment
> > Management board to decide what data can be secret, was enacted recently
> over
> > the veto of Gov. Mitt Romney, himself a former private equity manager.
> As a
> > result, Massachusetts becomes just the third state to allow public
> pension
> > funds to restrict what they can divulge to the public.
> >
> > The new law comes amid growing pressure, here and across the country,
> > from interest groups, pensioners, the media and even businesses looking
> to
> > sell the data to use laws requiring public access to meetings and
> records to
> > get a so-far rare glimpse into the traditionally closely guarded world of
> > private equity investing.
> >
> > State Treasury officials, who oversee the pension fund and pushed
> for the
> > shield law, said it protects them from Freedom of Information Act
> requests to
> > release private equity funds' confidential data and therefore ensures
> the $32
> > billion Massachusetts pension fund access to the nation's best investment
> > opportunities.
> >
> > "Experience in other states shows that top-tier private equity funds
> are
> > less likely to take public pension money because of exposure to Freedom
> of
> > Information Act requests," said Karen Sharma, a Treasury spokeswoman.
> >
> > Maintaining access to private equity funds is important to the state
> > pension, which expects to pour $800 million into the investment class
> this
> > year.
> >
> > Private equity investors said the new state law also shields them
> from
> > having to reveal information potentially damaging to themselves and their
> > portfolio companies. The concern is that a portfolio company could lose
> value
> > if the data released by the pension fund is incomplete or misinterpreted,
> > investors say. Similarly, buyout and venture capital funds are invested
> over
> > a period of 10 years, and those funds' general partners say return data
> > disclosed earlier than that can provide an incomplete performance
> picture to
> > the public.
> >
> > "That information can be so widely misused or misunderstood," said
> Peter
> > Jeton, senior vice president at Heritage Partners Inc., a Boston buyout
> firm.
> >
> > The law covers any documents the pension fund says contain trade
> secrets
> > or commercial and financial information relating to a company in a
> private
> > equity investor's portfolio. The data's disclosure would be prohibited
> if it
> > would cause "substantial" harm to the people or entity from which it is
> > obtained, according to the law's language.
> >
> > The law also exempts the Pension Reserves Investment Management board
> > from the requirements of the state's open-meeting law, allowing it to
> deem
> > confidential discussions of private equity investments during its regular
> > public meetings.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > Cc: jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
> > Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
> > Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:34 PM
> > Subject: The debate tonight
> >
> >
> > J. Bernard Lynch
> > March 1st, 2005
> >
> > 34 Milton Hill Road
> >
> > Milton MA
> >
> > RE:
> Public
> > Corruption
> >
> > Hey Bernie,
> >
> > I must say it was awful comical today when the Milton
> Record
> > and Transcript said they did not know who their editor, Dave Johnson was
> or
> > of the debate tonight. I tried every D. Johnson in the local phone book
> and
> > could not locate such a person, so I thought I would call you and ask of
> him.
> > I was merely trying to inform him of what I told you last week and of
> what
> > the other reporters and candidates at the debate tonight obviously
> already
> > know. Last week you had invited me to come and meet these people but I
> > explained to you why I was so dubious to do so. Since I am obviously back
> > from New Hampshire I figured that I would come if you could somehow
> assure me
> > that I would not be hassled by the cops. Need I say that I was not too
> > surprised by the fact that not long after calling you today the Milton
> cops
> > came down our dead end street and cruised by real slow? I have no doubt
> they
> > were looking to see if I was back in town. Now I am definitely not coming
> > tonight. After you review the enclosed documents you can easily see that
> my
> > paranoia is well justified and I have good reason not to trust the people
> > that you say are your friends. However I am very curious to say the
> least as
> > to what was said of me if you had brought up my name during the meeting
> last
> > week.
> >
> > I figured that whereas you are Master of Disaster of
> the
> > debate tonight you could give this material to David Johnson to keep
> > everybody on a somewhat level playing field. I called and talked to your
> wife
> > again and explained to her what I was up to before sending out my friends
> > with this material to give to you.. Please find enclosed exact copies of
> all
> > the documents given to Tom Finneran and the Solicitor Generals of both
> Canada
> > and the USA before I ran for Parliament last year. I have also enclosed
> > copies of letters sent to the Town Counsel for Milton and the reporters
> for
> > the Milton Times and the Dorchester Reporter as well as the recent
> letters to
> > the lawyers seeking Finneran's old seat. Trust that this is just the tip
> of
> > the iceberg and everybody knows it. I am about to do my level best to
> greatly
> > embarrass and bankrupt many people you may respect. If you doubt my
> sincerity
> > perhaps you should come to my home, look me in the eye and then view
> evidence
> > of many crimes. Before you stress test my ethics why not just show this
> stuff
> > to the candidates tonight and look into their eyes first? They are the
> ones
> > that want the people to believe that they are worthy of the Public
> Trust. I
> > must prove the truth of my words in front of a jury of my peers in order
> to
> > preserve my own freedom, my Clan's interests and all of our civil rights.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > Cc: blynch@inspecthouse.com ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
> > lcampenella@ledger.com ; dotreporterombudsman@hotmail.
> > jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us;
> > Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ;
> > Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
> > Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ; press@citizensforethics.org ;
> > canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> info@electtomobrien.com ;
> > josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > Hey Lisa
> > Your wish is my command. I do understand the Code of Ethics of
> > Journalists as the copy of the enclosed email attests. It was just sent
> to
> > other newsman who dicked with me last year after another one in New
> Hampshire
> > was dicking with me last week while I was up there serving the
> Commissioner
> > of Public Safety. It is the same materail I will send you and your boss,
> Kirk
> > A. Davis. It is exactly the same material that was served upon Davis
> > Aufhauser, Thedore Olson and Tom Finneran and many others before they
> quit
> > their jobs, plus a little more evidence of Securities Fraud I have yet to
> > serve upon the SEC. The copy of the wiretap tape numbered 139 is served
> upon
> > you in confidence under the First Amendment Rights of the Freedom of the
> > press to purse the truth and report it. However I demand that you not
> report
> > the names of the people recorded on it and turn it over to the FBI in
> order
> > to protect the Fourth Amendment Rights of the people illegally recorded.
> To
> > start you on your way to investigate my matter right now I will the text
> of
> > three motions and an affidavit in the dockets of Dorchester District
> Court
> > and the text of a Defence, a Counterclaim and an Affadavit in the Supreme
> > Court of Newfoundland.
> > As for right now perhaps, you should read the text of the answer of
> my
> > wife to the complaint against her by the Morgan Stanley crowd and
> following
> > letter given to Coven, Chief Justice of Quincy Distict Court and then
> go ask
> > the clerk Arthur Tobin and his son, Stevy Boy, your Rep some hard
> questions.
> > As you can see he is likely expecting your call. The dumb bastard's
> assistant
> > called me back last week and acknowledged receiving all my emails but
> refused
> > to say where or not they understood them.
> > THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
> >
> > THE TRIAL COURT
> >
> > QUINCY, SS.
> > DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
> >
> > DISCOVER BANK )
> >
> > Plaintiff )
> > CIVIL ACTION
> >
> > )
> > DOCKET NO. 0456 cv 2039
> >
> > v. )
> >
> > )
> >
> > DAVID R. AMOS )
> >
> > JEAN F. O'MEARA )
> >
> > Defendants )
> >
> > ANSWER OF THE DEFENDANT, JEAN F. O'MEARA
> >
> >
> > Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O'Meara and states that she does not
> accept
> > the jurisdiction of this court to hear this matter. The defendant
> asserts her
> > Federal Constitutional Right to a trial by judge and jury in the proper
> > jurisdiction and venue in order to make her counterclaims against the
> > DISCOVER BANK and many other corporations and people throughout the USA
> and
> > Canada that have assisted in the practice of crime against her and her
> > family. In support of her appearance to answer this malicious action
> NOVUS
> > Credit Service Inc. on behalf of Morgan Stanley and DISCOVER FINANCIAL
> > SEVIVES INC. the defendant states as follows:
> >
> > 1.. The defendant states that she is well aware that on April 1st,
> 2003 the
> > Quincy District Trial made false allegations of a presidential threat
> against
> > her husband, David R; Amos to the DHS and the Milton Police Dept. after
> he
> > had attempted to have restraining orders placed against her brothers.
> > 2.. The defendant further states that on April 2nd, 2003 she stood
> before
> > the Quincy Trial Court alone and pleaded that the court issue restraining
> > orders against her brothers and asked why the court had sent Agents of
> the
> > DHS and the police to her home. She Judge Sullivan did not respond to a
> very
> > legitimate question about a very malicious action. The court held over
> her
> > matters for hearings over three weeks later rather than issuing
> restraining
> > orders immediately. On Oct 25th First Justice Mark S. Coven refused to
> > discuss the DHS and denied the issue of restraining orders with no
> reason.
> > 3.. The defendant further states that on April 1st, 2003 she witnessed
> her
> > husband attempt to give the Secret Service Agents and the Milton Police
> > Officer at their door the evidence of many crimes practiced against her
> > family. The same law enforcement authorities that were willing to take
> her
> > husband away under false allegations refused to act within the scope of
> their
> > employment and accept true evidence of crimes. Some of the crimes
> involved
> > Bank Fraud, Tax Fraud and Securities Fraud, all under the federal code.
> Two
> > of the civil actions of Jean F. O'Meara involving crimes under the
> federal
> > code had been removed to federal court by the US Attorney Michael J.
> Sullivan
> > and had been dismissed without due process of law with the plaintiffs
> > illegally excluded Ex Parte. It is obvious that the DHS and the
> Massachusetts
> > Trial Court are deliberately assisting in crime.
> > 4.. The defendant further states that beginning September 8th, 2004 her
> > husband, David R. Amos notified law office of Howard Lee Schiff of his
> > interest in this matter and of his standing as a defendant. To date he
> has
> > not been served this complaint. This matter should not proceed in any
> court
> > in any jurisdiction until he is served or he makes his own appearance in
> this
> > matter.
> > 5.. The defendant further states that on October 1st, 2004 within less
> than
> > one day after her being served a copy of the complaint in this matter her
> > husband was sent directly to jail without bail in direct violation of his
> > Eight Amendment Rights in order that he may not assist her in this and
> other
> > legal matters.
> >
> > Wherefore the above stated reasons the Defendant Jean F. O'Mear demands
> the
> > following:
> >
> >
> > A. That the court order that all parties be served.
> >
> > B. That the Quincy District Court send this matter to the US District
> Court
> > for the District Court of
> >
> > Massachusetts for Trial.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Submitted by
> >
> > Dated October 20th, 2004
> > Jean F. O'Meara, Pro Se
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > 617 698-6549
> >
> >
> >
> > CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
> >
> > I, David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 20th, 2004, I
> served
> > upon Stephen A. Wiener an original copy of the attached Notice of
> Appearance
> > by confirmed US Mail to the law office of Howard Lee Schiff at 340 Main
> St.
> > Suite 959, Worcester, MA. 01608-1603
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > 617 698-6549
> >
> > Judge Mark S. Coven
> > February 25th, 2005
> >
> > c/o Arthur H. Tobin and Alice Paccioretti,
> >
> > Quincy District Court
> > One Dennis F. Ryan Parkway
> > Quincy, MA 02169
> >
> > RE: Quincy District Docket # 200456CV00239 and
> >
> > Dorchester District Court Docket #
> 0407CR004623
> >
> > Dear Judge Coven,
> >
> > This is a request for a continuance of the malicious action
> against
> > my family by Morgan Stanley's legal Counsel until the pending criminal
> trial
> > of my husband, David R. Amos is over. I am writing this letter to you
> because
> > various clerks in Quincy Court have demanded that I do so after trying to
> > argue my husband for months as to why he cannot speak in this matter. He
> has
> > freely admitted to Morgan Stanley's various lawyers that he is
> responsible
> > for our common debts under M.G.L. 209. The debts were incurred in
> support of
> > our family. In fact the funds were largely used to finance the defence
> of our
> > civil rights, our property and my interests in various inheritances. My
> > husband has his own Discover Card. It has had no problem harassing me at
> my
> > place of employment about my husband's debt to Discover Bank. It must
> also
> > recognize his common interest in mine. We also share other cards with
> various
> > other bankers associated with Morgan Stanley. Furthermore my husband had
> > tried to resolve our concerns with Morgan Stanley before we were unable
> to
> > continue to honour our debts and before he ran for Parliament. We do not
> > consider it a coincidence that a coworker of my brother served me this
> > complaint less than a day before my husband was falsely imprisoned
> >
> > For a period almost six months beginning on September 8th, 2004
> and
> > three weeks before he went to jail, my husband conferred with the people
> > acting on behalf of Morgan Stanley in the above stated matter and
> received a
> > response. After receiving my answer the lawyers within the law firm of
> Howard
> > Lee Schiff finally recognized my Durable Power of Attorney and the rights
> > within it yet have falsely claimed that my husband created some sort of
> > "cease and desist order" and refused to speak to him. However they demand
> > that I answer their questions without ever answering the ones we made to
> > their associates many months before they filed this malicious complaint.
> >
> > My husband plans to call several people employed within Quincy
> District
> > Court to testify in his defence during the course of his pending criminal
> > trial. I must remain silent in order to protect his freedom and the civil
> > rights and interests of my family. Some of the evidence he will employ
> in his
> > defence involves various lawyers employed by Morgan Stanley. We truly
> believe
> > that this action within this court is part of a criminal conspiracy
> against
> > us to stop our legal actions. Federal Law Enforcement Authorities wanted
> my
> > husband to keep things confidential for years. However once he was
> falsely
> > imprisoned without due process of law and held under the strange charges
> of
> > "other", my husband will employ all of his resources and civil rights to
> see
> > that justice is served.
> >
> > One of the people my husband plans to call to testify during the
> course
> > of his criminal trial is you, Judge Coven and the unnamed Assistant
> District
> > Attorney employed in Quincy District Court that received much evidence of
> > many crimes including some of the original Police Surveillance tapes that
> > will be argued during the course of his criminal trial. You have failed
> to
> > give my husband the simple courtesy of responding to the letter and
> material
> > he sent to you long ago by confirmed US Mail but at least you have not
> denied
> > his allegations. He has every right to call you and ask why you did not
> > uphold the law and the public trust. As a judge of a Massachusetts Trial
> > Court you should not have any sort of immunity from testifying in a man's
> > defence of his freedom brought on but an illegal complaint filed by a
> clerk
> > of another District Court. You above all others should understand the
> > following:
> >
> > Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the
> District
> > Court 439 Mass. 352(2003) "A clerk-magistrate has no authority to
> conduct a
> > show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of
> a
> > felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest."
> >
> > A copy of my husband's letter to you, my Durable Power of
> Attorney
> > and the only documentation we ever received from Quincy Court is hereto
> > attached for you to review. We have received copies of the recordings of
> all
> > our hearings before Quincy District Court in the past and my husband
> will use
> > them as evidence in his defence during the course of his pending trial.
> > Perhaps you should listen to them as well to refresh your memory of our
> > circumstances. After my husband's criminal trial in front of a jury of
> his
> > peers is over, he plans to do as he promised and sue you in federal
> court to
> > seek relief from personal injury. It was you Judge Coven that
> acknowledged
> > the rights within my Durable Power of Attorney and discussed our matters
> with
> > my husband on April of 2003. It was you who denied our very justifiable
> > requests for restraining orders against my three brothers William,
> Robert,
> > and Brian O'Meara for no stated reason whatsoever and we received
> nothing in
> > writing afterwards as to the reasons for your decision. Your judgement
> has
> > allowed my criminal brothers to continue to harass us to this very day.
> If
> > you had not been so willing to assist my brothers in their harassment,
> our
> > property would not have been stolen and destroyed and my husband
> definitely
> > would not have been sent to jail because of the false allegations made
> > against him by their lawyer. Furthermore I would not be compelled to
> send you
> > this letter.
> >
> > You, Judge Coven are an officer of the court who failed to act
> within
> > the scope of your employment to protect my person, my rights and my
> interests
> > and compelled my husband to do the best he could to defend us. It is my
> > brothers and their many lawyers who should be criminally prosecuted not
> my
> > husband and the entire Trial Court System and the politicians within
> > Statehouse of this Commonwealth know it. The reason for the malice is
> obvious
> > many state employees of this have an interest in the outcome of our
> matters
> > because of our evidence Bank Fraud against the Brookline Savings Bank
> and the
> > SEC cover up of the Securities Fraud of Putnam investments alone.
> >
> > Judge Coven if you do not insure that this matter is removed to
> > federal court you should at least continue the matter until after my
> > husband's criminal trial is over because of your personal interest in the
> > outcome of this matter and the charges against my husband were made
> while he
> > was in Canada running for Parliament. This was before the law firm of
> Howard
> > Lee Schiff became involved in my matters and this complaint was filed.
> All of
> > our matters now fall under the jurisdiction of federal courts in the USA
> and
> > Supreme Courts in Canada and under the related federal codes. Everybody
> knows
> > it within the federal governments of the USA and Canada and many other
> states
> > and provinces as well. My husband has made certain of it. It seems that
> the
> > RCMP, the SEC, the IRS, the DHS and the FBI all seem to forget that
> Canadians
> > buy and sell on the American stock markets as well. To put it simply my
> > husband is a political prisoner for the benefit of cross border public
> > corruption. He will do his level best to prove it in an ethical and legal
> > fashion in defence of his freedom and your own civil rights as well.
> >
> > I did not want to come to Quincy Court today as ordered by you
> > Judge Coven. I do not wish to speak to anyone as is my right for the very
> > same reason my husband first attempted to file restraining orders on my
> > behalf years ago. I have had enough of the Commonwealth's malice toward
> me
> > and my family. I am still suffering from the nervous breakdown caused by
> my
> > brothers and others years ago. Although I am back at work, I am still on
> the
> > same medication and refuse to speak or discuss my matter with anyone.
> That is
> > the reason we must employ my Durable Power of Attorney to protect my
> rights
> > and interests. The Norfolk Probate Court went further in their malice
> towards
> > us and denied my Conservatorship Petition because Judge Harms stated she
> did
> > not believe the sworn statements of my doctors. The appeal was
> maliciously
> > delayed for years and denied while my husband was jailed. I had to be
> the one
> > to come today because we suspect more foul play against my husband if he
> had
> > chosen to accompany me after all your clerks had warned him away.
> Whereas he
> > is merely out of jail on bail we cannot afford to take chances with his
> > freedom and subject him to further malice from the clerks in
> Massachusetts.
> > Therefore he wrote this letter. I proofread it, agree with it and signed
> it.
> > My husband also signed it pursuant to my Durable Power of Attorney and
> admits
> > to the common debt. Our friend delivered it upon your office and whatever
> > lawyer appears on behalf of Morgan Stanley. I witness this being done
> and say
> > nothing.
> >
> > If you have any questions about the statements within this letter
> > please confer with Attorney General Reilly, or the Suffolk County
> District
> > Attorney or Attorney General Gonzales or Deputy Prime Minister Anne
> McLellan.
> > Both my husband and I are asserting our Constitutional Rights to remain
> > silent and seek trials by juries of our peers. We do not wish to discuss
> our
> > matters with malicious lawyers when it is not properly recorded in the
> public
> > record. Anything we say we have no doubt will be used against us.
> >
> > Judge Coven, you should remember my husband and I. As you can see
> we
> > last met on April 25th. 2003 during a matter heard by you. I witnessed my
> > husband say many things to you on my behalf on the public record and he
> asked
> > you to question me and you declined because you apparently did not doubt
> what
> > he was telling you.
> >
> > The aforesaid hearing occurred three weeks after the Quincy
> District
> > Court had made false allegations against my husband to the Department of
> > Homeland Security on April 1st. It was I who answered the front door of
> my
> > home that night to find the Milton Police and the Secret Service willing
> to
> > take my husband away to Cuba because of the false charges of a
> presidential
> > threat that the Quincy District Court had made against him. I witnessed
> my
> > husband quickly resolve that issue with the law enforcement authorities
> at
> > our door. In response to the Courts malice I had went to Quincy Court
> myself
> > on April 2nd and filed my own requests for restraining orders and met
> with
> > Judge Sullivan. I asked why the court had sent the police and the Secret
> > Service to our door and she did not want to talk about it and deferred
> the
> > matter to you three weeks later. The Secret Service returned the
> following
> > day without the police and affirmed that my husband had done nothing
> wrong.
> > However the Secret Service also refused to take from my husband the
> evidence
> > of Bank Fraud, Tax Fraud and Securities Fraud which was well within the
> scope
> > of their employment to investigate. At the very same point in time, we
> were
> > involved in two lawsuits involving three Treasury Agents and many other
> > people that you work with for not upholding the law. The only reason the
> > police and the Secret Service etc. has harassed my husband for years is
> in
> > order to cover up the wrongs of many law enforcement authorities and your
> > fellow officers of the court. Everybody knows it is my husband's task to
> > prove it to protect our family and our rights and interests from the
> Malice
> > of such lawyers employed by Morgan Stanley assisted by such courts as
> Quincy
> > District Court.
> >
> > It is now two years later and you Judge Coven have ordered me to
> come
> > discuss with malicious lawyers Securities Fraud practiced with the very
> > estate that my brothers have harassed me over for years while they try to
> > liquidate the remaining assets of before my husband finds justice served
> in
> > my best interests. If you want to hear of my arguments take it up with my
> > husband in a timely fashion in the proper jurisdiction and venue. I have
> also
> > witnessed what my husband's friend has servered upon Morgan Stanley's
> lawyers
> > today and of my husbands many calls to many authorities in two countries
> > yesterday to protect us from harm.
> >
> > I demand that the Morgan Stanley lawyers study closely what has
> been
> > served upon them today. Then immediately conduct themselves in a
> professional
> > manner as befits their license to practice law and confer with the clerk
> as a
> > fellow officer of the court.
> >
> > If they were wise, they would drop this matter on their own accord
> and
> > try to settle with my husband before we file a counter complaint or sue
> > Morgan Stanley and their very own law firm in federal court. The latest
> > evidence of Securities Fraud involving Comcast, Cingular and AT&T is
> about to
> > be mailed to the General Counsel of the SEC.
> >
> > However after encountering the people employed within Quincy
> District
> > Court and witnessing what they and some many others have already done
> against
> > us, I have no illusions that anyone will suddenly act in good faith and
> in my
> > best interests. One of the big reasons I must remain silent is to
> contain my
> > own temper for the benefit of our minor children. They can ill afford to
> > suffer through having both their parents illegally prosecuted at the same
> > time.
> >
> > That said I demand that the Quincy District Court study the
> material
> > served upon the law office of Howard Lee Schiff and uphold the law.
> Someone
> > really should call the FBI and inform them of their irrefutable
> knowledge of
> > crime in order that my matters may finally be properly investigated and
> all
> > criminals properly prosecuted according to law. My husband has been
> telling
> > the federal authorities the truth for years and in return for his ethical
> > efforts his family has suffered greatly.
> >
> >
> > Submitted by
> > Jean F. O'Meara
> >
> > her husband under her
> >
> > Durable Power of Attorney
> >
> > pursuant to M.G.L. 201B
> David
> > R. Amos
> >
> >
> > 153 Alvin Ave.
> >
> >
> > Milton MA. 02186
> >
> >
> > Phone 617 698-6549
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Certificate of Service
> >
> >
> > I, David A. Woodman of South Acworth, NH. February 25th, 2005
> served
> > the attached documents to the office of the Clerk of Quincy District
> Court
> > and a true copy was served upon Stephen A. Wiener or Harry J. Theodoss,
> of
> > the Law Office of Howard Lee Schiff, PC, 340 Main Street Suite 959,
> > Worcester, MA 01608 or whatever other lawyer appears in court today to
> > represent the interests of Morgan Stanley.
> >
> >
> > David A. Woodman
> >
> >
> > P.O. Box 2
> >
> >
> > South Acworth, NH. 03607
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: press@citizensforethics.org
> > Cc: canada@canadianembassy.org ; greg@glennon2005.com ;
> > info@electtomobrien.com ; josh@timforrep.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:15 PM
> > Subject: Guess who is coming to Washington to have long talk with Franky
> > McKenna
> >
> >
> > The following are your fine and fancy Yankee words written by
> > newsmen Franky Boy about their own sense ethics. Then a few of mine and
> > Franky's. Time will tell the tale as to who is a liar and who is not EH?
> > Never forget Franky Boy will soon work for me and I deserve some service
> and
> > some very honest answers from all Canadians in Public Service that had
> > deliberately failed to act within the scope of their employment and
> protect
> > my freedom from Yankee malice in their support of public corruption in
> Canada
> > and the USA.
> >
> > Washington will likely never be the same once two men from the
> same
> > point on the map in the Maritimes but from opposite ends of the spectrum
> lock
> > horns in arguments about ethical conduct inside the Bush's Beltway.
> >
> > McKenna denies 'cozy' relationship with Washington
> > Last Updated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:01:05 EST
> >
> > CBC News
> > OTTAWA - Former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, who was officially
> named
> > to be Canada's new ambassador to the United States on Friday, refuted
> > critics' claims that he has strong ties to the White House and other
> > political and business leaders.
> >
> > "I think that my connections, if I can be totally candid here, have been
> > totally overblown."
> >
> > "Am I cozy with folks? I'm afraid I'm not."
> >
> > Some critics have questioned his links with a controversial Washington
> > D.C.-based investment firm, The Carlyle Group.
> >
> > The group's multimillion-dollar investors have included members of the
> family
> > of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. It owns companies that make
> equipment for
> > the American military, and has hired high-profile former politicians
> > including former U.S. president George H.W. Bush and former U.S.
> secretary of
> > state James Baker.
> >
> > But McKenna downplayed his level of involvement with Carlyle, saying he
> was
> > on the company's Canadian advisory board. He said the board eventually
> became
> > inactive and has since been dormant.
> >
> > "I must tell you, I have a relationship with a few members of the Bush
> > family. But it is not a very tight, strong relationship," he said.
> >
> > "I've met with Bush Sr. and Clinton. I know some of the people in some
> of the
> > parties. But I wouldn't pretend to call (the relationship) cozy. It's
> not."
> >
> > McKenna acknowledged that it's important to have political friendships
> and
> > that he does have some U.S. ties that will form "the basis of a good
> working
> > relationship."
> >
> > The appointment is effective March 1. It comes weeks after speculation
> that
> > Prime Minister Paul Martin would name McKenna to the post.
> >
> > McKenna warned that he's not going to be able to go into Washington and
> solve
> > long outstanding trade issues like softwood lumber and BSE.
> >
> > "It's just not going to happen," said McKenna.
> >
> > "There aren't miracle solutions to these issues."
> >
> > He said his biggest challenge is to raise Canada's profile.
> >
> > "Our greatest enemy in the United States is indifference."
> >
> > McKenna, 57, has been practising law and sitting on several corporate
> boards
> > since he left New Brunswick politics in 1997.
> >
> > He said he will be severing his ties with corporate positions, including
> his
> > job as chairman of the board of Can West Global Communications Corp.,
> which
> > publishes the National Post and several other large Canadian newspapers.
> >
> >
> > Elizabeth Beale, president of the Atlantic Provinces Economic Council,
> said
> > she believes McKenna will do well in Washington.
> >
> > "He's always been a kind of radical guy who's welcomed the input from the
> > little guy. And I think that's one of his strong assets that he has, that
> > creative side to his problem solving."
> >
> > University of Moncton professor Donald Savoie, who has written and
> consulted
> > extensively on federal politics and economics, calls his longtime friend
> a
> > good choice for the job.
> >
> > "I think Frank McKenna is an extremely bright man. He will figure out
> what he
> > needs to do to get the job done," Savoie told CBC Newsworld Friday.
> >
> > "The one thing that would worry me a bit is that there's a lot of
> > expectations out there because he's fairly dynamic ... There's a lot of
> > people who feel that in the first two weeks, he will solve softwood
> lumber,
> > he will solve mad-cow [disease] and so on."
> >
> >
> > McKenna has stayed active in partisan politics since leaving the
> premier's
> > office and has been seen as a possible federal Liberal leadership
> candidate
> > at some point down the road.
> >
> > Bilingual and well-known outside New Brunswick, he mulled running
> federally
> > in the June 2004 election, but decided against it.
> >
> > Journalistic Ethics
> >
> > The Center for Public Integrity subscribes to the Code of Ethics of the
> > Society of Professional journalists, reprinted here in full:
> >
> > Preamble
> > Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public
> > enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of
> democracy.
> > The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and
> > providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.
> > Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve
> the
> > public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the
> > cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a
> > dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the
> Society's
> > principles and standards of practice.
> >
> > Seek Truth and Report It
> > Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering,
> reporting and
> > interpreting information.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise
> care to
> > avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
> > b.. Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the
> > opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
> > c.. Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as
> much
> > information as possible on sources' reliability.
> > d.. Always question sources' motives before promising anonymity.
> Clarify
> > conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep
> > promises.
> > e.. Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material,
> > photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not
> > misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of
> > context.
> > f.. Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image
> enhancement
> > for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo
> > illustrations.
> > g.. Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If
> re-enactment
> > is necessary to tell a story, label it.
> > h.. Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering
> > information except when traditional open methods will not yield
> information
> > vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of
> the
> > story.
> > i.. Never plagiarize.
> > j.. Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human
> experience
> > boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.
> > k.. Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values
> on
> > others.
> > l.. Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity,
> > geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social
> > status.
> > m.. Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
> > n.. Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of
> > information can be equally valid.
> > o.. Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and
> > commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
> > p.. Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the
> lines
> > between the two.
> > q.. Recognize a special obligation to ensure that the public's
> business is
> > conducted in the open and that government records are open to inspection.
> > Minimize Harm
> > Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human
> beings
> > deserving of respect.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news
> > coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and
> > inexperienced sources or subjects.
> > b.. Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of
> those
> > affected by tragedy or grief.
> > c.. Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm
> or
> > discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
> > d.. Recognize that private people have a greater right to control
> > information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek
> > power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify
> > intrusion into anyone's privacy.
> > e.. Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
> >
> > f.. Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex
> > crimes.
> > g.. Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal
> filing of
> > charges.
> > h.. Balance a criminal suspect's fair trial rights with the public's
> right
> > to be informed.
> > Act Independently
> > Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the
> > public's right to know.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
> > b.. Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise
> > integrity or damage credibility.
> > c.. Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and
> shun
> > secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in
> > community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
> > d.. Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
> > e.. Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power
> accountable.
> > f.. Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and
> resist
> > their pressure to influence news coverage.
> > g.. Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid
> > bidding for news.
> > Be Accountable
> > Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each
> > other.
> >
> > Journalists should:
> >
> > a.. Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the
> public
> > over journalistic conduct.
> > b.. Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
> > c.. Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
> > d.. Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
> > e.. Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
> > Sigma Delta Chi's first Code of Ethics was borrowed from the American
> Society
> > of Newspaper Editors in 1926. In 1973, Sigma Delta Chi wrote its own
> code,
> > which was revised in 1984 and 1987. The present version of the Society of
> > Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics was adopted in September 1996.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > January 16, 2004
> >
> > Melanie Sloan, Executive
> > Director Neil Gordon
> >
> > Citizens for Responsibility
> > and Peter Newbatt Smith
> >
> > Ethics in Washington
> > The Center for Public Integrity
> >
> > 11 DuPont Circle, N.W.,
> > 2nd Floor 910 17th Street, NW, 7th Floor
> >
> > Washington, D.C. 20036
> > Washington, DC 20006
> >
> > Phone 202 588-5565
> > Phone 202 466-1300
> >
> > Fax 202 588-5020
> > Fax 202 466-1101
> >
> > RE: Corruption
> >
> > Madam and Sirs,
> >
> > I am sorry but after so many encounters with so many lawyers that
> > expound about the law and ethics and newsmen that lie like cheap rugs, I
> > simply don't believe any lawyer is worthy of the public trust and
> especially
> > not lawyer/politicians or the one's they appoint. I think even less of
> > newsmen because everybody knows lawyers are liars but they want to
> believe
> > the newsmen. The fact Ms. Sloan was once a US Attorney causes more
> doubt. I
> > must say the similar holds true for Charles Lewis. Feel free to prove me
> > wrong but trust that I ain't holding my breath waiting to see a fine
> display
> > of ethical behavior. I am proceeding alone. Whereas I have put your
> > organizations in the same boat as Taxpayers Against Fraud, I have sent
> you
> > the same documents etc. that were sent to them. They should assist Mr.
> Gordon
> > in his work on prosecutorial misconduct
> >
> > What may interest Ms. Sloan the most would be my attack on the
> > Medicare crows but that is just the tip of the iceberg. I have also
> included
> > some documents that should cause you to sit up and take notice of my
> doings
> > with the SEC. It was truly comical how quick the SEC settled with Putnam
> > Investments after their lawyers called me with a few questions. If I
> told you
> > how many lawyers, politicians, members of the press, who they are and how
> > long they have had the same documents that you now hold in your hand, I
> doubt
> > you would believe me. What is absolutely unbelievable is that only one
> lawyer
> > and only two reporters have ever made any sort of inquiry about them.
> After I
> > told them more, I heard from them no more. The copy of wiretap tape
> numbered
> > 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order
> that
> > it may be properly investigated. At the very least I have now made you
> all
> > witnesses to my pursuit of justice. I will name you as such in my next
> > complaint. For now I will wait to witness what you do with your newfound
> > knowledge. I am sorry to have such a negative attitude towards lawyers
> and
> > newsman. Rest assured I came by it honestly. I am about to start a circus
> > down in Dixie. I am going to do my best to keep the public entertained
> and
> > therefore interested enough to become disgusted to reflect it in the next
> > election.
> >
> > Cya'll in CourtJ
> >
> >
> > David R. Amos
> >
> >
> PO
> > Box 2
> >
> >
> > South Acworth, NH 03607
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:53 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lisa just so ya know
> >
> >
> > David, well I don't know what to say. The big boys stick together. I
> > contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office to find out what the "other"
> charges are
> > against you. There aren't any. The only thing there are the civil suits
> you
> > have filed against everyone. If I had solid documentatation of
> malfeasance,
> > corruption and theft we would have no choice but publish. However,
> opinion is
> > a different story. If you have hard evidence I will be glad to look at
> it,
> > but newspaper stories from a myriad of different issues cannot be made
> into
> > an article. I appreciate your anger over many of these issues. Maybe you
> > should start a web blog? Lisa C.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> > To: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
> > Cc: <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>
> > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 11:54 PM
> > Subject: A few suggestions . . .
> >
> >
> > > David,
> > >
> > > If you want to have your story out in articles, I suggest
> > > you contact Michael Ruppert at editor@copvcia.com.
> > >
> > > If you want to have your story out in a book, I suggest
> > > you contact Sander Hicks at sander@voxpopnet.net.
> > >
> > > If you want people to take you seriously, I suggest you
> > > not hang up on them when they want to be helpful.
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Sander Hicks
> > > Chief Instigator
> > > VOX POP
> > > Books, Coffee, Democracy
> > >
> > > http://voxpopnet.net
> > > http://www.drenchkiss.com
> > >
> > > Drench Kiss Media Corporation
> > > 1022 Cortelyou Road
> > > Flatbush, Brooklyn 11218
> > >
> > > 718 940 2084
> > > 718 940 0346 (fax)
> > > 347 446 4461 (cell)
> > >
> > > "World Peace is ours, it comes from within."
> > > -Jeff Bullard, Taos, NM
> > >
> > > http://www.SanderHicks.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu ; editor@copvcia.com ; sander@voxpopnet.net
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:19 AM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:32 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: info@culturalrenewal.ca
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 4:28 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: martelj@bennettjones.ca
> Cc: nmiller@corridor.ns.ca ; tmartel@corridor.ns.ca ;
> phopkins@corridor.ns.ca ; pr@potashcorp.com ;
> mackinnonh@bennettjones.ca ; rileyb@bennettjones.ca ;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 2:17 PM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: investinfo@doj.nh.gov
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:34 AM
> Subject: Fw: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: investinfo@doj.state.nh.us
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:50 PM
> Subject: What the hell the Bloggers are starting to talk
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: mbevis@nhpr.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:35 PM
> Subject: Fw: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or
> later
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: INFO7@elections.ca ; ombudsman@npr.org ; ombudsman@washpost.com
> Cc: info@cfif.org ; 2020@abc.com ; niteline@abc.com ;
> cnn.feedback@cnn.com ; info@cnbc.com ; comments@foxnews.com ;
> world@msnbc.com ; today@nbc.com ; dateline@nbc.com ; newshour@pbs.org
> ; atc@npr.org ; letters@latimes.com ; letters@nytimes.com ;
> editor@usatoday.com ; editors@interactive.wsj.com ;
> letters@newsweek.com ; letters@time.com ; letters@usnews.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:55 PM
> Subject: Fw: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or
> later
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com ; michel.lalande@bell.ca ;
> jean-francois.legault@bell.ca ; christopher.ginther@bell.ca ;
> atvnews@ctv.ca ; bcecomms@bce.ca ; info@obamaforillinois.com ; moto
> maniac ; frontline@wgbh.org ; drsutherland@earthlink.net ;
> programming@thirteen.org ; MarkNix13@aol.com ; info@nationaldesk.com ;
> newshour@pbs.org ; now@thirteen.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 6:16 PM
> Subject: This is too funny many other newsmen will gossip sooner or later
>
>
> To explain this a little to the newsmen that get this next.
> Please notice that Brian Mulroney's buddies buried their heads in the
> sand and had shown me their arse once I had busted their boss in front
> of his friends. Meanwhile all the fellas under Bell Canada's wing are
> all still playing dumb, even though everybody knows Obama is scum.
> Just like his adversaries, Mulroney's chums. To top it all off
> Frontline knows absolutely every goddamned thing since the time I was
> running for Parliament. I am not smart enough to make this up and it
> is too funny not to share. But first I must give it to the French
> fellas at Quebecor byway of Bill Gates because that is the kind of guy
> that I am. Somebody has to make Mulroney pay for his sins. :)
>
> Message from yahoo.com.
> Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
>
> <lavoie.luc@quebecor.com>:
> Connected to 199.202.93.13 but sender was rejected.
> Remote host said: 554 Mail from motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com rejected
> for policy reasons.
>
> --- Original message follows.
>
> Return-Path: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>
> The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K.
>
> Message-ID: <20041014220302.48007.qmail@
> Received: from [206.149.208.172] by web20025.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
> Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:03:02 PDT
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Another kettle of Fish
> To: newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> Cc: lavoie.luc@quebecor.com, michel.lalande@bell.ca,
> jean-francois.legault@bell.ca, christopher.ginther@bell.ca,
> atvnews@ctv.ca,
> bcecomms@bce.ca, info@obamaforillinois.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1404269537-
>
> --0-1404269537-1097791382=:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="0-1581892408-
>
> --0-1581892408-1097791382=:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
> Brian Mulroney
> c/o Luc Lavoie
> Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs
> Quebecor Media Inc.
> (514) 380-1974
> (514) 236-8742 (cell)
>
> Hey,
>
> I just called Luc Lavoie's office and left a message but not my phone
> number. From now on I want hard copy. Lets just say Mulroney should have
> done the Right and Honourable thing a long time ago, particularly as soon
> as
> I notified the lawyers working at Cendant Corporation. I served them once
> in
> person and once by confiremd US Mail. Maybe Belinda should have had him
> call
> me when I contacted her. I know I am the reason he did not speak at the
> Conservative leadership convention. I also know Mulroney, Arthur Hamiliton
> and John Crosbie were likely some the lawyers who advised Harper to shut up
> about what he knew about the Arar Commission.
>
> I had a great laugh to see the spit and chew between Senator Kerry and
> Mulroney but I also know that Mulroney is the reason that Forbes and Sun
> Media has not reported my doings with the SEC in the USA or even my of run
> for Parliament. Ain't it funny how everyone said Fundy was a riding to
> watch
> but no one whispered my name. I know I do not have to be redundant and
> send the same documents and wiretap tape to you that I sent to Mulroney and
> his many associates long ago before I complain of all the various companies
> and lawyesr he is in bed with. Title 18 in the USA will make all the
> lawyers
> fall on their own sword. Hell even you guys claim the merits of the
> internet
> and email is just as efective as the US Mail in the litigation process. Ask
> Frank Quatronne or Martha Stewart about that before you disagree. Bill
> Gates' lawyer offered no comment so I sent that bastard US Mail just to rub
> it in. IF you think I am pissed off you are right. Brian Mulroney could
> have
> easily stopped the distruction of my Clan's beloved Beach House but he
> would
> rather have stood with his corrupt friends than me. Or is it simpler than
> that? Did Mulroney just want his peice of the action in the fraudulent Real
> Estate transaction by Coldwell Bankers because he thought I had no hope of
> stopping it myself? We all know how Mulroney loves money. Airplane deals
> proved that.
>
> What say you J. Serge Sasseville do you stand with your boss and his
> peers or me? I know Lavoie will hang with Mulroney until the bitter end.
> Perhaps you may wish to confer with Martine Turcotte or Robert C. Pozen,
> they have just received the most recent hard copy of material. Proof of my
> contact with Mulroney can be found within the stuff if perchance he tries
> to
> call me a liar. There is still time for you three folks to act in a ethical
> manner and uphold the law according to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
> After Sept 3rd your are too late. that is the day Massachusetts Trail Court
> tries to call me a criminal and I demand a jury of my peers.
>
> This is not an offer to settle before I file my complaints. That came
> along ago to Mulroney and his buddies. Now I look forward to arguing the
> bastard or any lawyer he chooses to send against me. I had offered to
> settle
> with BCE before I complained of them but the deal was off the instant they
> tried to puill a fast one in an effort to delay me in the hope no doubt
> that
> some bad acting Yankee might put a stop to me when I return to the USA.
> Their silence since has spoken volumes. Martine should have contacted me
> the
> instant ATV got the hard copy like i told her they would. I will forward
> you
> some of our email exhange so that we may all get to know each other quite
> well. these emails will be forwarded to many others but I ain't telling you
> who. My next emails come byway of Yahoo as a double check in case you
> choose
> to block me.
>
> Say hey to Mulroney for me and I will try to say hey to Kerry for you.
> Maybe Ms. Turcotte will share with you what she knows about Kerry and
> Mulroney will tell her what he knows about William Cohen and why he quit
> Cendant Corp so fast. Maybe Joe Day will tell you about Barack Obama and
> me.
> I am about to tell Obama about Day. Turn about is fair play. Obama used my
> stuff against Senators Edwards and Kerry to become a big wig in Beantown
> last month. I can use a Senator from Canada to take the wind out of his
> sails the following month. An Alliance dude once called Sun Media a bunch
> of
> scumbags. I would have to agree and laugh because it was a case of the pot
> calling the kettle black.
>
> Cya'll in Court :)
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave.
>
> Milton MA. 02186
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: moto maniac
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:00 PM
> Subject: Fw: Ron Show this to Joyce this is too funny
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Romina Sestito
> Cc: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; corp.website@sunlife.com ;
> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net ; davies.carl@nbpub.com ;
> news@timestranscript.com ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ; nbombud@gnb.ca ;
> advocacycollective@yahoo.com ; brad.green@gnb.ca ;
> dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca ; slevin@mail.house.gov ;
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Efford.J@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
> Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; scotta@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ;
> davidorchard@sasktel.net ; rosent@math.toronto.edu ;
> Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ;
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ; Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca ;
> randall.shafer@comcast.net ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ;
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; caomc@nb.aibn.com ;
> jeffrey.rudman@wilmerhale.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:56 PM
> Subject: Ron Show this to Joyce this is too funny
>
>
> Romina
>
> What are you trying to do sucker me? I am telling my own tale
> in court. I am suing your company, Bell Canada. Get it?
>
> May I suggest that you talk to your own lawyer, Martine Turcotte
> and decide what planet you all come from. I just got out of a jail
> after being put there by the bastards your lawyers assisted to cover
> up the crimes practiced against me. Discuss my troubles with Robert C,
> Pozen or Martine Turcotte not me.
>
> If you or any of your company wish to communicate with me,
> address your concerns to my attorney, Joyce Richardson. Turcotte
> should have her number.
>
> If Sunlife ain't figured it out yet as to why I am about to
> sue them. They had best check with Jeff Carp about the stuff I sent
> him at MFS and his prior association with Hale and Dorr. Jeff Rudman
> would be good fella to start with but defintely not the last within
> the aforesaid law firm.
>
> David R. Amos
>
My name is Sara Johnson, I live in california U.S.A and i am a happy woman today? I told my self that any Loan lender that could change my Life and that of my family after been scammed severally by these online loan lenders, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to Them. he gave happiness to me and my family, although at first i found it hard to trust him because of my experiences with past loan lenders, i was in need of a loan of $300,000.00 to start my life all over as a single parents with 2 kids, I met this honest and GOD fearing loan lender online Dr. Dave Logan that helped me with a loan of $300,000.00 U.S. Dollars, he is indeed a GOD fearing man, working with a reputable loan company. If you are in need of loan and you are 100% sure to pay back the loan please contact him on (daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com and Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 ) .. and inform them Sara Johnson directed you.. Thanks. Blessed Be.
ReplyDelete