Well the comment section started out pretty good with CBC acting in an ethical fashion and not blocking any comments of mine until a couple of their favourite Trolls pounced on me. As soon as I responded the blocking began almost instantly. I registered my indignation and those comments were blocked as well so I quit for the day.
I had had enough of David Fraser and his bullshit today. Trust that I will try to call the other two lawyers mentioned within this article tomorrow.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:19:31 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine canadien.
La ministre est toujours heureuse de prendre connaissance des commentaires de Canadiens sur des questions d'importance pour eux. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin.
Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre demande a été notée et qu'elle recevra toute l'attention voulue.
**********************
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage.
The Minister is always pleased to hear the comments of Canadians on subjects of importance to them. Your email will be read with care.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and will be given every consideration.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:41:44 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Automatic reply: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819 953-5074 & (506) 444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor Lukács 647 724-1727 today
To: mintc@tc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:32:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819
953-5074 & (506) 444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor
Lukács 647 724-1727 today
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
(An English message follows)
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Tenant
compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement,
il se peut qu'il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Veuillez noter que
dans le traitement de la correspondance, nous devons prioriser les
citoyens de la circonscription de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, par
conséquent nous vous invitons à inclure votre adresse résidentielle
dans votre communication.
Pour toutes les questions ou situations qui concernent Transports
Canada, veuillez les envoyer au bureau du ministre à
mintc@tc.gc.ca mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Médias seulement : Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez téléphoner :
1-613-993-0055 ou media@tc.gc.ca mailto:media@tc.gc.ca
Pour les demandes du public, soyez assuré(e) que nous lirons votre
message attentivement.
Cordialement,
Bureau de l'honorable Marc Garneau,
Député de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount,
Ministre des Transports
***
Dear Sir/Madam:
Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Due to the high volume
of emails that we receive daily, there may be a delay in our response.
Please note that we give priority to correspondence received from the
constituents of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, and as such, we ask
that you include your residential address in your communication.
For matters or questions that relate Transport Canada, kindly send
them to the Minister's office at mintc@tc.gc.ca mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca
Thank you for your understanding.
Media only: For requests from the media, please contact:
1-613-993-0055 or media@tc.gc.ca mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca
For requests from the public, you can rest assured that we will
carefully read your message.
Best regards,
Office of the Honourable Marc Garneau,
MP for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount
Minister of Transport
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:31:53 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819 953-5074 & (506)
444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor Lukács 647
724-1727 today
To: Delphine.Denis@tc.gc.ca, liz.barker@cta-otc.gc.ca,
john.dodsworth@cta-otc.gc.ca, Karen.McCrimmon@parl.gc.ca,
marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Elizabeth C. Barker
General Counsel, Legal Services
Canadian Transportation Agency
19th Flr.
15 rue Eddy
Gatineau, Ontario K1A 0N9
Phone: 819-997-9325
Fax: 819-953-9269
Email: liz.barker@cta-otc.gc.ca
John C. Dodsworth
Senior Counsel
Phone: 819-997-9324
Fax: 819-953-9269
Email: john.dodsworth@cta-otc.gc.ca
Everybody knows my concerns are far more serious than these spit and chews
http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/statement-by-karen-mccrimmon-parliamentary-secretary-to-the-minister-of-transport-on-diversion-and-delay-of-air-transat-flight-tsc157-at-the-ottawa-international-airport-637904353.html
---------- Original message ----------From: MTriggs@mpi.mb.ca
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:36:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Michael Triggs and Steve Scarfone I just called Nova Scotia and Manitoba about lawsuits about Freedom of Expression etc etc
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I will be out of the office until Monday August 14, if you require assistance please contact 204-985-8770 ext 7383 or 8257
I will only be checking emails occasionally and may not be able to reply until my return.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:10:39 -0400
Subject: Attn Michael Triggs and Steve Scarfone I just called Nova Scotia and Manitoba about lawsuits about Freedom of Expression etc etc
To: mtriggs@mpi.mb.ca, sscarfone@mpi.mb.ca, jcameron@jccf.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com, brian.gallant@gnb.ca
https://www.jccf.ca/our-cases/#asimil8
The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) has filed a
court application against the Nova Scotia Registrar of Motor Vehicles
(the “Registrar”) after it refused to reinstate the personalized
licence plate of Dartmouth, NS pensioner Lorne Grabher, whose surname
was deemed too “socially unacceptable” for the road.
https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/grabher-Notice-of-Application.pdf
The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) Centre has
filed a court application against Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) on
behalf of Winnipeg resident Nicholas Troller, whose personalized Star
Trek licence plate was deemed “offensive” by MPI.
https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2017-07-27-Troller-FILED-Notice-of-Application.pdf
Michael D. Triggs
A/General Counsel & Corporate Secretary:
Phone: 204-985-8770 Ext: 8263
Fax: 204-942-2217
Email: mtriggs@mpi.mb.ca
Steve M. Scarfone
Legal Counsel:
Phone: 204-985-8770 Ext: 7648
Cell (204) 391-0685
Email: sscarfone@mpi.mb.ca
Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation
Legal Dept., 702- 234 Donald St.
PO Box 6300, Stn. Main
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 4A4
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819 953-5074 & (506)
444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor Lukács 647
724-1727 today
To: admin@jccf.ca, jcarpay@jccf.ca, JKitchen@jccf.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Sean M. Madden" truth@glaringhypocrisy.com
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:41:31 +0100
Subject: In re: to David Amos: "Outing Gregory Arschlock & Other
Aliases of Kai Kieferle of Calgary, Alberta", etc.
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com, mfercho@town.jasper.ab.ca,
rireland@town.jasper.ab.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
Radical@radicalpress.com, monika_schaefer@hotmail.com,
jim.eglinski.c1@parl.gc.ca, west.yellowhead@assembly.ab.ca,
reporter@fitzhugh.ca, editor@fitzhugh.ca, romanesq@shaw.ca,
dan.palmer@greenparty.ca, Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca,
emily.mcmillan@greenparty.ca, publisher@fitzhugh.ca, jcarpay@jccf.ca,
jcameron@jccf.ca, paul@paulfromm.com, brian@brianruhe.ca,
craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, redicecreations@gmail.com, codohvideo@gmail.com, betabake@gmail.com, hall@uleth.ca, blair.mason@gov.ab.ca, rdoull@aberdeenpublishing.com,
lbolton@aberdeenpublishing.com, min.dhariwal@cbc.ca, msampson@cija.ca,
Rick.Bidaisee@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca,
patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, pol7163@calgarypolice.ca
Good day, folks.
In the interest of demonstrating the general character of the sort of
people who plague us all — presently in the semi-literate form of
David Amos, via his emails of the past 24 hours — I offer up this
GLARING Hypocrisy post, entitled "Outing Gregory Arschlock & Other
Aliases of Kai Kieferle of Calgary, Alberta".
This was published on Monday, August 1, and has been shared widely
around the world since.
Also, to learn more about the historical context and the supreme
urgency of the situation at hand, the essay "Toppling the Jew World
Order: It’s Now or Never!" was the opening post of GLARING Hypocrisy,
launched on June 16, 2016. The essay has since been shared more than
3,000 times on social media, including via the Renegade Tribune site,
on which it was cross-posted.
Please feel free to help either or both of these posts get further
afield still by sharing with your circles of influence and
acquaintance, et al.
With warm regards,
Sean P.S. Thank you, Al — on behalf of free men and women everywhere
— for giving voice, below, to what you know about David Amos and his
affiliations ...
Sean M. Madden
Co-Founder & Editor
GlaringHypocrisy.com
truth@glaringhypocrisy.com
Follow & Connect:
Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | YouTube
> So, David Raymond Amos of Edmonton, you're a JEW and a professor! Where?
> At the U of A? Are you a member of the JEWISH FEDERATION OF EDMONTON? Are
> you a believer in the Jews as the "chosen people"? Where were you born? I
> see you taught in Israel. And you describe yourself as a "boozer"! Very
> interesting. What, if anything, do you expect me to believe of what you
> have written? I'm 80 years young and no dummy, so try and be as honest as
> possible with your answers. If you have any questions of me I would be only
> too pleased to answer them.........................EXPEDITIOUSLY.
>
> Al Romanchuk
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Al Romanchuk romanesq@shaw.ca
> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:42:19 -0600
> Subject: Re: RE Barry Winters / EPS File#15-024047 and his fellow ZIONISTS
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> You talk gobbledeegook! Please explain what you mean in good English.
>
> Al
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:14:44 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819 953-5074 & (506)
444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor Lukács 647
724-1727 today
To: choosa@gov.ns.ca, mcgratst@gov.ns.ca, JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Stephen T. McGrath
Senior Solicitor, Legal Services Division
Phone: 902-424-6288
Email: mcgratst@gov.ns.ca
Sheldon A. Choo
Phone: 902-424-6425
Email: choosa@gov.ns.ca
Dept. of Justice Legal Services,
8th Flr., 1690 Hollis St.
PO Box 7, Stn. Central
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
Phone: 902-424-4030
Fax: 902-424-4556
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:05:50 -0400
Subject: Re My calls to both Douglas Smiths 819 953-5074 & (506) 444-2800, Toby Mendeland 902 431-3688 and Dr. Gábor Lukács 647 724-1727 today
To: Douglas.Smith@otc-cta.gc.ca, Doug.Smith2@gnb.ca, info@law-democracy.org, lukacs@airpassengerrights.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/re-cbc-censorship-and-my-last-call-to.html
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
RE CBC censorship and My last call to David Fraser of McInnes & Cooper
about such things he yaps about constanty within CBC
Well the comment section started out pretty could with CBC acting in
an ethical fashion and not blocking any comments of mine until a
couple of their favourite Trolls pounced on me. As soon as I responded
the blocking began almost instantly. I registered my indignation and
those comments were blocked as well so I quit for the day.
I had had enough of David Fraser and his bullshit today. Trust that I
will try to call the other two lawyers mentioned within this article
tomorrow.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canadian-transportation-agency-facebook-post-gabor-lukacs-1.4235123
"The Canadian Transportation Agency and an air passenger rights
activist are engaged in an online battle that pits freedom of
expression against a government agency's right to delete negative
comments from its social media accounts.
Gabor Lukacs has won 24 of 27 court cases against airlines, which were
taken to the agency. Recently, he posted "5 Reasons not to Trust the
Canadian Transportation Agency" on the agency's Facebook page.
The post compares the number of air passenger complaints in recent
years to the dwindling number of enforcement actions against airlines.
It also names some agency employees, including Doug Smith, its chief
dispute officer.
The post includes a discipline history of Smith from the Law Society
of Upper Canada in 2004, when he was suspended from practising law."
The Other DOUGLAS SMITH
Regional Manager
Fredericton Criminal Law Services (Regional Office )
New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission
Contact Information
Phone : (506) 444-2800
Fax : (506) 462-2290
Email : Doug.Smith2@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:19:23 -0400
Subject: RE: My last call to David Fraser of McInnes & Cooper
To: john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com, david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com,
Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com,
ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
Yvonne.Colbert@bc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canadian-transportation-agency-facebook-post-gabor-lukacs-1.4235123
Transportation agency accused of censorship after deleting online criticism
'This is a form of censorship ... and this is a violation of freedom
of speech,' says air passenger advocate
By Yvonne Colbert, CBC News Posted: Aug 08, 2017 6:00 AM AT
44 Comments
Ben Smith
lol same as on this site... and we own the CBC too.
Life under the Liberals.... always harder for some reason.
Gabor Lukacs
@Ben Smith
CBC is is not a governmental body. It is not subject to s. 2(b) of the Charter.
Darryl McBride
@Gabor Lukacs The CBC is tax payer funded and should be subject to the charter.
David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@Gabor Lukacs It is a Crown Corp that has a particular mandate to be
non partisan
David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@Darryl McBride I agree Furthermore what does CBC call it when they
block my comments?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000
Subject: Your call
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
David,
could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just
now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand
it all and then the line just cut out.
Thanks,
d.
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 8/3/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:39:12 -0600
Subject: Re Our Rights under the Charter Whereas Joseph Hickey won't
talk to me perhaps Perhaps Dr. Gábor Lukács will do so someday EH?
To: lukacs@airpassengerrights.ca, joseph.hickey@ocla.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
FYI I just called both of them from 902 800 0369 and they did not pick up
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/air-passenger-advocate-launches-constitutional-challenge-1.2281401
http://topgroups.ca/~lukacs/
http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/2013-09-22-OCLA-Lukacs-motion_to_intervene-DIGITAL.pdf
Dr. Gábor Lukács
Halifax, NS
Tel: (647) 724 1727
Fax: (902) 404-5644
Email: lukacs@airpassengerrights.ca
Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA)
180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 204
Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5
Joseph Hickey, Executive Director
Tel: (613) 252-6148
Email: joseph.hickey@ocla.ca
-------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:41:29 -0700
Subject: The mindless B.C. Attorney General Suzanne Anton should have
noticed the OCLA Petition by now EH Mr Wilson of the RCMP?
To: fauxcapitalist@yahoo.com, joseph.hickey@ocla.ca,
ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca, t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca, suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca, josh@bccla.org, frankffrost@hotmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, denis.rancourt@gmail.com, president@uottawa.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca, david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca
Perhaps some clever lawyer should explain to her the pdf files hereto
attached EH David Eby???
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=6596
http://www.change.org/p/hon-suzanne-anton-attorney-general-of-bc-jag-minister-gov-bc-ca-hon-suzanne-anton-retract-your-consent-for-the-criminal-proceedings-against-mr-arthur-topham?utm_source=guides&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=petition_created
Ontario Civil Liberties Association
180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 204
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K2P 1P5
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2014/10/16/jason-erb-interviews-arthur-topham-on-exposing-faux-capitalism-october-16-2014/
Jason Erb interviews Arthur Topham on Exposing Faux Capitalism, October 16, 2014
October 16, 2014 by FauxCapitalist
On a special October 16, 2014 episode of Exposing Faux Capitalism, I
interviewed Arthur Topham, who has been charged as a political thought
criminal for allegedly violating Canada’s Criminal Code provisions for
“willfully promoting hatred,” for his writings at his site,
RadicalPress.com.
In this interview, the issues we discussed included:
- The Ontario Civil Liberties Association supporting his case and
calling for a repeal of all “hate crime” provisions in the Criminal
Code and circulating a petition calling for the B.C. Attorney General
to revoke her consent for the prosecution of Arthur Topham.
– He was charged with a crime after the Human Rights Commission was no
longer to hear so-called hate cases in 2012.
– The tight control of the media and the blackout on mass media
coverage of his case ever since November 2012 with a single National
Post article.
– The phony media, with so-called liberal newspapers like the Toronto
Star not making counter-point arguments to the supposed right-wing
National Post newspaper on their article.
– The inconsistencies in the charge and with his prosecution.
– The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees those charged “to be
tried within a reasonable time,” yet he was charged in 2012, and his
trial has finally been scheduled for October 2015.
– The political nature of the crime, with the Attorney General of the
province having to sign off on it.
– The selective application of the law, with others not prosecuted,
despite doing similar or more things than Arthur Topham did.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 11:57:49 -0600
Subject: I called Jim Eglinski and Ryan Maguhn's campaign manager as
well The sneaky ex RCMP dude hung up on me twice and the little
Librano lady admitted knowing who I was but just laughed at my
concerns
To: dhowell@edmontonjournal.com, lgunter@shaw.ca,
reporter@hintonvoice.ca, ed.moore@sunmedia.ca, dwight@moosefm.ca,
rrimer@newcap.ca, david.cournoyer@gmail.com, wctpress@telus.net,
reporter@fitzhugh.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, q@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, nick.moore@bellmedia.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, Rob.Merrifield@gov.ab.ca
Go Figure
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Yellowhead+voters+polls+federal+byelection/10285181/story.html
http://www.edsonleader.com/2014/10/30/conservative-candidate-has-always-wanted-to-serve-the-people
http://hintonvoice.com/federal-byelection-coming-to-yellowhead-p2859-73.htm
http://energeticcity.ca/article/news/2014/10/19/former-fort-st-john-mayor-now-running-to-be-mp
http://www.theeagle.ca/index.asp?mn=3&id=13631&cc=2
http://daveberta.ca/tag/jim-eglinski/
http://www.whitecourtpress.com/jim-eglinski-in-the-running/
http://www.fitzhugh.ca/meet-the-candidates-for-yellowhead-mp/
http://www.elections.ca/Scripts/vis/candidates?L=e&ED=48028&EV=40&EV_TYPE=3&PROV=AB&PROVID=48&QID=-1&PAGEID=17
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/fwd-yo-bobby-boy-paulson-whereas-many.html
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/fyi-newfy-rcmp-dudes-john-warr-and.html
>>>> ---- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
>>>> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
>>>> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>>>> Subject: David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Hello Lisa,
>>>>
>>>> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
>>>> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our federal
>>>> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency
>>>> of Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That story
>>>> appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
>>>> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report
>>>> on the candidates' debate held June 18.
>>>>
>>>> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
>>>> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
>>>> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
>>>> photo that ran, but this one is very similar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>>>>
>>>> Gisele McKnight editor
>>>> Kings County Record
>>>> Sussex, New Brunswick
>>>> Canada
>>>> 506-433-1070
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>>>>
>>>> By Erin Hatfield
>>>>
>>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
>>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>>>>
>>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
>>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
>>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
>>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>>>>
>>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
>>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
>>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
>>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
>>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
>>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
>>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>>>>
>>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
>>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
>>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
>>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>>>>
>>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
>>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
>>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
>>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
>>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
>>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
>>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
>>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
>>>> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
>>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>>>>
>>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
>>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
>>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
>>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
>>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
>>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>>>>
>>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
>>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
>>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
>>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
>>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
>>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
>>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
>>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
>>>> abiding citizens."
>>>>
>>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
>>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
>>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
>>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>>>>
>>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
>>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
>>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
>>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
>>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
>>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>>>>
>>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
>>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
>>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
>>>> process for the June 28 vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
>>>> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>>>>
>>>> McKnight/KCR
>>>>
>>>> The Unconventional Candidate
>>>>
>>>> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>>>>
>>>> By Gisele McKnight
>>>>
>>>> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
>>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
>>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>>>>
>>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>>>>
>>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
>>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
>>>> running for office in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
>>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>>>>
>>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
>>>> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>>>>
>>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
>>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>>>>
>>>> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
>>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>>>>
>>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
>>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
>>>> needed to change his life.
>>>>
>>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
>>>> sometimes in midlife."
>>>>
>>>> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
>>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
>>>> Panhead motorcycle.
>>>>
>>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
>>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
>>>> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
>>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>>>>
>>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
>>>> and conversation all over North America.
>>>>
>>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
>>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
>>>> himself.
>>>>
>>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
>>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
>>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
>>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>>>>
>>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
>>>> life.
>>>>
>>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
>>>> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>>>>
>>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>>>>
>>>> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
>>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
>>>> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>>>>
>>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>>>>
>>>> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
>>>> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>>>>
>>>> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
>>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
>>>> name a few.
>>>>
>>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
>>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
>>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
>>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
>>>>
>>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
>>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>>>>
>>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>>>>
>>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
>>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
>>>> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>>>>
>>>> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
>>>> your X by his name.
>>>>
>>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
>>>> say, 'what the hell.'"
Etc Etc Etc
Transportation agency accused of censorship after deleting online criticism
'This is a form of censorship ... and this is a violation of freedom of speech,' says air passenger advocate
By Yvonne Colbert, CBC News Posted: Aug 08, 2017 6:00 AM AT589 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Tony MacLellan
Personally, I find it ironic
that the CBC is running a story on censored comments, when they censor
comments all the time. They decide which articles to allow comments, and
they censor many comments that don't fall into their mandate.
Gigi De Paoli
@Tony MacLellan
CBC News is not a government department and is certainly not a conduit for consumers to lobby the government of the day. It wasn't under Harper and it isn't now.
BIG difference between the CBC and the CTA.
CBC News is not a government department and is certainly not a conduit for consumers to lobby the government of the day. It wasn't under Harper and it isn't now.
BIG difference between the CBC and the CTA.
David Raymond Amos
@Tony MacLellan I second your observation wholeheartedly and the lawyers Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly know it
David Raymond Amos
@Gigi De Paoli A few questions for you to ponder if CBC allows you to read this
Who does CBC work for if not you and I?
Furthermore who are their moderators to censor anyone without a valid reason?
Are we not entitled to read an open a honest debate in a purportedly just democracy within a website financed by its citizens and overseen by a Canadian Cabinet Minister?
Harold Fitzgerald
Who does CBC work for if not you and I?
Furthermore who are their moderators to censor anyone without a valid reason?
Are we not entitled to read an open a honest debate in a purportedly just democracy within a website financed by its citizens and overseen by a Canadian Cabinet Minister?
Kat Burd
@Darryl McBride - No, the CBC
CEO and EXEC were all appointed by Hapless before he got run out on a
rail... Well he knew they wouldn't resign when asked.
David Raymond Amos
@Kat Burd You don't sit on the fence do ya?
David Allan
@David Raymond Amos
"Who does CBC work for if not you and I? "
The CBC doesn't work for us. Such a notion is ridiculous. Where did you get that idea, that they should be working for anyone beyond factual reporting on events?
I assume you mean the CBC in the context of their news division and not the rest of everything else they do.
"Who does CBC work for if not you and I? "
The CBC doesn't work for us. Such a notion is ridiculous. Where did you get that idea, that they should be working for anyone beyond factual reporting on events?
I assume you mean the CBC in the context of their news division and not the rest of everything else they do.
David Allan
@Winston Smith
"The CBC receives taxpayer funding. Any agency that receives money from the public should have to follow the charter."
Cite which part of the charter they aren't following.
"The CBC receives taxpayer funding. Any agency that receives money from the public should have to follow the charter."
Cite which part of the charter they aren't following.
David Raymond Amos
@David Allan Will this do for you?
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
David Raymond Amos
@David Allan
"I assume you mean the CBC in the context of their news division and not the rest of everything else they do."
Wrong assumption sir.
I ment everything CBC says and does is on our time our dimes and our airwaves etc.
"I assume you mean the CBC in the context of their news division and not the rest of everything else they do."
Wrong assumption sir.
I ment everything CBC says and does is on our time our dimes and our airwaves etc.
Karen King
@David Raymond Amos
But they are not free to be vulgar, nasty, name calling, blatant lies and out right threats.
But they are not free to be vulgar, nasty, name calling, blatant lies and out right threats.
Rick James
@David Raymond Amos you are
free to express. maybe if you aren't expressing something in a civil or
digestible way then it doesn't comply with the terms of use. I can't
post whatever I want on whatever forum I want.
David Raymond Amos
@Karen King What is it that you are trying to imply about me?
David Raymond Amos
@Rick James CBC has a mandate to be nonpartisan Do you see me mentioned?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
David Raymond Amos
@Karen King What do I say that is so offensive that it allows CBC to ignore its mandate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFGO8lj8A5k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFGO8lj8A5k
Jackie Pride
The Canadian Transportation Agency - please tell us what specifically was unproven or inaccurate in Mr. Lukacs' post.
Sticking a head into the sand is a bad choice of action.
Sticking a head into the sand is a bad choice of action.
Colin Rasmussen
@Jackie Pride
The reason that it doesn't not add to the normal flow of discussion. By law in Canada you cannot be convicted for something on the basis of prior bad acts. So, even if the current dispute officer once had issues with the Law Society, that is not relevant to his current performance on the job.
The reason that it doesn't not add to the normal flow of discussion. By law in Canada you cannot be convicted for something on the basis of prior bad acts. So, even if the current dispute officer once had issues with the Law Society, that is not relevant to his current performance on the job.
Gabor Lukacs
@Colin Rasmussen
You appear to confuse criminal law with what is appropriate.
For example, someone who was convicted of fraud or embezzlement should not be a treasurer or financial officer.
You appear to confuse criminal law with what is appropriate.
For example, someone who was convicted of fraud or embezzlement should not be a treasurer or financial officer.
David Raymond Amos
@Gabor Lukacs Please explain that reasoning real slow to the USDOJ and David Aufhauser of the UBS Bank
Harold Fitzgerald
Fraser's comments may mean CBC will have to permit comments on ALL stories and stop deleting comments. Interesting.
Edward King
@Harold Fitzgerald
I would find it refreshing if the CBC Mods would stop censoring comments. As long as they're not illegal, they should be allowed in a free society and website that is taxpayer funded.
I would find it refreshing if the CBC Mods would stop censoring comments. As long as they're not illegal, they should be allowed in a free society and website that is taxpayer funded.
David Raymond Amos
@Harold Fitzgerald Fraser cannot hold anyone accountable unless he sues them.
However Minister Joly has all the power over CBC and fails to exercise her mandate. That is what is more that interesting to me particularly after she answered me in writing over a year ago.
https://www.scribd.com/document/317811875/Melanie-Joly-vs-Hubby-Lacroix
However Minister Joly has all the power over CBC and fails to exercise her mandate. That is what is more that interesting to me particularly after she answered me in writing over a year ago.
https://www.scribd.com/document/317811875/Melanie-Joly-vs-Hubby-Lacroix
Peter Johnson
a story about censorship on a site that practices it?
Rick James
@Peter Johnson An
orginization has every right to chose what goes up on thier site. They
are not hindering you from saying whatever you want. If you have
profound insight to share that doesn't make it up on the CBC, put out
your own publication or start a blog. You don't have the right to say
what you want on online forums. Same goes for any online forum. Read the
rules of conduct. Every forum has one
David Raymond Amos
@Peter Johnson Oh woe is CBC and the irony of it all N'esy Pas Hubby Lacriox?
David Raymond Amos
@Rick James FYI I have a blog about this very article Trust that you are quoted
ricky tarr
Now that 2015 is history the professional politicians and their legions of bureaucrats travel the world and continue enjoy the fruit of our labours but we are still paying bigtime (look out for carbon tax) to watch the silly circus that makes a joke out of off democracy on a daily basis
Rick James
@David Raymond Amos I'm sure
teh half a doezen readers will be outraged. I'd also dig deeper into
CBC's forum and ownership rules. I'm not sure you can quote material
from their forums and post it in your blog. Had Rick James been my
actual name (and lucky for you it isn't) you'd be getting a shout from
my lawyer pretty dam quick since I never gave you permission to quote
me.
David Raymond Amos
@Rick James Are you bragging
that you are breaking CBC's rules? You are supposed to be registered in
your true name and the lawyer Alex Johnston who also happens to be the
outgoing Governor General's daughter was hired to make certain of that
fact. N'esy Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?
That said Mr Anonymous Please introduce me to your lawyer tell him to just query the Federal Court Docket and he will have a ll the info he requires to contact me. Better yet what is your lawyer's true name?
That said Mr Anonymous Please introduce me to your lawyer tell him to just query the Federal Court Docket and he will have a ll the info he requires to contact me. Better yet what is your lawyer's true name?
Rick James
@David Raymond Amos not
bragging whatsoever, please feel free to report me and the otehr 99% of
the commentators that don't use thier real names. As far as our little
side beef goes, well, you seem to be good a deflecting the fact that you
have no right to take things people post without their knowledge or
permission if thier personal information is attached to it. If you are
doing this you will most assurednly run into legal issues. You aren't
Facebook, you have no right to use the personal information of others
pasted on a 3rd party sourse. our little conversation has digressed
quite a bit, so I'll wish you a good day and move on.
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Rick James When you grow up and get a real name perhaps then you can hire a lawyer to argue me.
In the "mean" I will look on you as just another nameless Troll whom CBC supports for no reason I will ever understand.
In the "mean" I will look on you as just another nameless Troll whom CBC supports for no reason I will ever understand.
ricky tarr
"Do not, in our opinion..."
Government, you do NOT have an opinion.
You serve the people and it's the people who have an opinion - you do as the people tell you!
Oh wait, that's in USA.
I guess Canada not a real democracy.
Government, you do NOT have an opinion.
You serve the people and it's the people who have an opinion - you do as the people tell you!
Oh wait, that's in USA.
I guess Canada not a real democracy.
Jean St. Amour
@David Allan Actually we have a bought and paid for democracy.
David Raymond Amos
@Jean St. Amour Democracy as
been bought alright but it was done with our countess Forefathers (and
Mothers) blood, sweat and tears back to the time of the Magna Carta not
the by the political donations of a wealthy few whose favourite party
happen to win the past election. (BTW Methinks Harper and Mulcair lost.
Trudeau won many votes merely because lots of folks who don't normally
vote wanted to smoke dope legally and wanted rid of the first past the
post system)
Now that 2015 is history the professional politicians and their legions of bureaucrats travel the world and continue enjoy the fruit of our labours but we are still paying bigtime (look out for carbon tax) to watch the silly circus that makes a joke out of off democracy on a daily basis
Gisele Savoie
Shame on you Canadian
Transportation Agency. Censorship is never acceptable. Many young men
fought and died so we could have democracy and no censorship.
Dave HUNT
@Gisele Savoie Garbage, no
war and no rights exist for facebook pages, especially pages lukacs
keeps spamming with garbage. This is a non story.
Bigger rights and speech stories exist in this country, so CBC gives us this.
Bigger rights and speech stories exist in this country, so CBC gives us this.
David Raymond Amos
@Dave HUNT I agree
Thadius Miklyshnewcicz
Not unlike the censorship of comments on the CBC website?
David Raymond Amos
@Thadius Miklyshnewcicz So
far today I am batting a 1000. For some strange reason no "Content
disabled" yet. Heres hoping that I didn't just jinx it.
David Raymond Amos
Karen King
@David Raymond Amos
I think a lot of it is done by folks here...see the flag at the upper right corner?? Folks who do not like your opinion can also take action.
I think a lot of it is done by folks here...see the flag at the upper right corner?? Folks who do not like your opinion can also take action.
David Raymond Amos
@Karen King Try telling me something I don't know
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
@Karen King BTW before and your pals can attempt to flag down my comments CBC must allow them to exist first. Correct?
@David Raymond Amos Surprise
Surprise Surprise The Mother Corp blesses me with my first "Content
disabled" notice today for merely responding to one of CBC favourite
Trolls..Go figure why I sent you lawyers the email out of the gate N'esy
Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?
Ben Smith
lol same as on this site... and we own the CBC too.
Life under the Liberals.... always harder for some reason.
Life under the Liberals.... always harder for some reason.
David Raymond Amos
@Darryl McBride Trust that I
call it far worse than that in light of the fact that CBC denied I was
running for public office in five separate elections since 2004
Gabor Lukacs
@Ben Smith
CBC is is not a governmental body. It is not subject to s. 2(b) of the Charter.
CBC is is not a governmental body. It is not subject to s. 2(b) of the Charter.
Darryl McBride
@Gabor Lukacs The CBC is tax payer funded and should be subject to the charter.
David Raymond Amos
@Gabor Lukacs It is a Crown Corp that has a particular mandate to be non partisan
David Raymond Amos
@Darryl McBride I agree Furthermore what does CBC call it when they block my comments?
wayne watson
Don Rose (Content disabled)
Edward King
mike potter
Darryl McBride
@David Raymond Amos I believe they call it manipulation of public opinion.
David Raymond Amos
@Darryl McBride Interesting that my response to you went from the bottom of this thread to the top eh?
wayne watson
The agency is getting more attention from their reaction then they would have, had they ignored it.
David Raymond Amos
@wayne watson Thats what they wanted
Don Rose (Content disabled)
CBC is posting an article
about online censorship? Really? If this isn't laughable hypocrisy at
it's height I don't know what it.
David Raymond Amos
@Don Rose (Content disabled) Trust that I am enjoying the circus too
Karen King
@Don Rose (Content disabled)
The hypocrisy is in the folks here that think that just because they pay taxes they are supposed to be able to do whatever they want.
The hypocrisy is in the folks here that think that just because they pay taxes they are supposed to be able to do whatever they want.
Manny Fredrick
@Karen King It's usually the ones who don't pay any taxes who say that kind of thing.
David Raymond Amos
@Manny Fredrick Oh so true
Edward King
It's ironic for CBC to be
posting a story about censorship with comments being removed from a
website, especially when their Mods do the very same thing here on this
website. A case of the pot calling the kettle black it would seem.
Simon Kung
@Edward King CBC's moderation
is owned by the Dentsu Corporation of Japan. Dentsu has an official
partnership with Facebook to develop Facebook ads and marketing
strategies..
Content disabled
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Simon Kung I thought a
company in Toronto oversaw CBC's moderators. I called them and emailed
them months ago and they did not confirm or deny it
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos Another "Content disabled" ???
. Methinks I struck a nerve with your moderators N'esy Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?
. Methinks I struck a nerve with your moderators N'esy Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?
Irv Millar
Who makes the decision to
deem a quote negative? An opinion is the most basic form of freedom of
expression. When an individuals political law abiding beliefs are
censored or disabled on these Canadian forums we are that much closer
to a full blown dictatorship. Are these sites being operated and
monitored by for profit third parties? Are these sites being operated
and monitored by a 100% owned and controlled Canadian service? Or are
they just bots? Does anyone really know?
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Irv Millar Within the
comment thread above @Simon Kung claims that Dentsu Corporation of Japan
controls our opinions If that is true then there will be Hell to pay.
You have my word on it N'esy Hubby Lacriox and Minister Joly?
Content disabled
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos YUP I struck a nerve alright
Marc Belanger
While I support Mr. Lukacs
right to complain in general, I can't say that I support his right to do
so on the agency Facebook page, as that page, in my opinion, belongs to
them and they can administer it as they want. I believe that what will
end up if he wins is that they will simply take down the whole page,
thereby solving their problem. I don't believe anybody can force me to
accept postings I disagree with on my Facebook page. I believe an MP
inquiry would be more productive.
Elliot Carlin
@Marc Belanger
........"...belongs to them ". I'd suggest that it would be more
accurate to say that it belongs to you and me and all of us.
Dave Lane
@Marc Belanger Belongs to
them? Maybe you need to take a crash course on Canada. It belongs to
you, even if you don't get it. Sad. #canthelppeoplewhocanthelpthemlseves
Gabor Lukacs
@Marc Belanger
Individuals can delete messages from their Facebook pages as they want.
Governmental agencies cannot.
Individuals can delete messages from their Facebook pages as they want.
Governmental agencies cannot.
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Gabor Lukacs What is your lawyer's name?
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos CBC blocks
three comments in a row WOW. Not much sense wasting anymore of my
precious time with CBC's severe lack of Integrity and the moderators
working on this shift N'esy Pas Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly?
Bradley Jones
It's pretty ironic for the CBC to bleat about online comment censorship when it does the exact same thing.
Let's see if this comment remains.
Let's see if this comment remains.
Rick James
@Bradley Jones you need to
get a better understanding of what censorship is. A company can choose
what they want to have on thier property
Brad West
@Rick James Wrong. Not if it
violates the laws and rights of a people, so no. Plus, when do
corporations come first again??? Last I checked, I put people before
sociopathic entities.
Dave Lane
@Rick James Where did you read that? Rebel without a clue network or facebook? LOL Sad. #themillennialdisasterisuponus
David Raymond Amos
@Dave Lane You tell him Dave
but he won't read it let alone understand it The "Not Really' Mr James
already bragged that he is breaking CBC's rules and their moderator
allowed it while blocking me
John Nelson
Wow! Here we have two
government agencies, the CTA and the CBC, who routinely block or take
comments that don't agree with the narrative they are trying put across.
Sunny ways indeed.
David Raymond Amos
@John Nelson Some say Trudeau "The Younger's" future is so bright he has to where shades I have my doubts
Norm Duck
Look what happens on CBC on
the dislikes , u get 20 dislikes in a second making your comment look
bad so others won't read it , This is from the Liberal party or CBC .
Now this is everyday , cam the Liberals and the CBC be sued also
Now this is everyday , cam the Liberals and the CBC be sued also
David Raymond Amos
@Norm Duck You can sue Crown Corp you wish. Winning is the tough part because the Crown controls the courts
Pete Bark
CBC does the same when comments are anything negative towards JT!!!
Rod Johnson
@guy pope
Sorry guy, you don't understand some people's need to feel persecuted...
Sorry guy, you don't understand some people's need to feel persecuted...
Rod Johnson
@Tim Sarant
Insults to "the golden one" are rife on this site - as your post shows. To suggest otherwise means you are either oblivious or dishonest...
Insults to "the golden one" are rife on this site - as your post shows. To suggest otherwise means you are either oblivious or dishonest...
David Raymond Amos
@Rod Johnson Methinks Folks just figured out that this is merely a circus. They need to sit back and laugh at the nonsense
Julie Ali
When I commented on Rachel
Notley's Facebook page in Alberta my posts about the oil and gas
industry as well as the continuing care problems were deleted and I was
blocked from further comments. This sort of blocking of comments is
anti-democratic and represents a modulation of the conversation that is
biased. I do not think that this sort of blocking of comments is
appropriate for the Premier of Alberta.
David Raymond Amos
@Julie Ali Years ago when I
made some comments on the Occupy Wall Street FackBook they had my killed
for quite awhile until FaceBook begged me to come back. i do so because
they are a necessary evil if i wish to do certain things However I
have not used their services much for anything else since then for
obvious reasons.
Hugh Minet
CBC does this quite often.
It goes so far as not opening stories that affect all Canadians but has
little issue of feeding the country its pov.
David Allan
@Hugh Minet
CBC isn't the government.
Learn how your country works.
Read your constitution.
CBC isn't the government.
Learn how your country works.
Read your constitution.
Norm Duck
@David Allan u might want to read the comment again , Hugh never said CBC was the government , i
David Raymond Amos
@Norm Duck My the Trolls are busy I noticed how many dislikes you got for merely pointing out a simple truth.
mike potter
"The agency accused the
Halifax man of directly targeting a number of employees with statements
that bring their integrity into question."
I suspect that when they used the word "integrity" they meant "mistakes".
I suspect that when they used the word "integrity" they meant "mistakes".
David Raymond Amos
@mike potter Speaking of the
integrity of government employees perhaps folks would enjoy an old file
of my I entitled "Integrity Ye Right" and shared with the world before I
ran for seat in Parliament for the second time. Please enjoy and share
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Marilyn Yenson
So the guy posted 250 times in one day on their page.? That is spam. He named employees . That is giving out personal info... and he used his own document to put a spin on his accusations Unproven allegations. What does government have to do? remove all its social media... so that nobody can contact them.. because crybabies like this get in a huff over a deleted post? He could have posted it on his own page if it was really that important. He could have even linked his post to their page and given people the choice if they wanted his spin of information. But no.. this jerk has to ruin it for everyone else who has reasonable requests. Government bodies are not obligated to have social media accounts... and this guy just makes it harder for the average person with a legitimate issue to contact them.
Jean St. Amour
@Marilyn Yenson
It is a Government Group paid for by your taxes. What part of the Public Record should be hidden here? None of it.
It is a Government Group paid for by your taxes. What part of the Public Record should be hidden here? None of it.
David Raymond Amos
@Jean St. Amour Here Here
Robert Uncle
"CONTENT DISABLED"
David Raymond Amos
@Robert Uncle My thought exactly. However as per my MO whatever CBC blocks gets republished verbatim right here
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos OOPS forgot the link.
Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/re-cbc-censorship-and-my-last-call-to.html
Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/08/re-cbc-censorship-and-my-last-call-to.html
Transportation agency accused of censorship after deleting online criticism
'This is a form of censorship ... and this is a violation of freedom of speech,' says air passenger advocate
By Yvonne Colbert, CBC News Posted: Aug 08, 2017 6:00 AM AT
The Canadian Transportation Agency and an air passenger rights
activist are engaged in an online battle that pits freedom of
expression against a government agency's right to delete negative
comments from its social media accounts.
Gabor Lukacs has won 24 of 27 court cases against airlines, which were taken to the agency. Recently, he posted "5 Reasons not to Trust the Canadian Transportation Agency" on the agency's Facebook page.
The post compares the number of air passenger complaints in recent years to the dwindling number of enforcement actions against airlines.
It also names some agency employees, including Doug Smith, its chief dispute officer.
The post includes a discipline history of Smith from the Law Society of Upper Canada in 2004, when he was suspended from practising law.
Smith told CBC News that Lukacs is entitled to put whatever he wants
on his own page. He doesn't dispute the information, but said he's
unsure how that action years ago is relevant to his current job or a
reason not to trust the agency.
Lukacs subsequently received messages that were purportedly from the agency's social media co-ordinator — though no name was given. They said, in part, that: "The agency is committed to an open and transparent dialogue with Canadians and welcomes a variety of perspectives and opinions."
However, it also said its social media guidelines specify that it may remove comments that contain personal information or put forward serious, unproven or inaccurate accusations against individuals or organizations.
The agency accused the Halifax man of directly targeting a number of employees with statements that bring their integrity into question. It told him if the posts continued, the agency would block his ability to comment on both its Facebook and Twitter accounts.
Lukacs wrote back and asked what specifically was unproven or inaccurate, but did not receive a response. CBC News asked the same question, but the agency did not provide details.
Every time Lukacs tried to repost the document, it was removed.
"This is a form of censorship, of government censorship, and this is a violation of freedom of speech," Lukacs told CBC in an interview from Hungary, where he is vacationing. He added that a government body cannot tell Canadians what to think and cannot simply censor comments.
He said all the information in the post comes from public documents and is true, honest and fair opinion based on facts.
Lukacs said the response to his post is an attempt to censor views that are not favourable to the agency.
"This a variant of an Orwellian world where a government body is attempting to decide what citizens should think, what citizens should read, what they should say and what opinions are valid or not," he said.
Part of the agency's mandate is to provide consumer protection for air passengers. On its Facebook page, the agency gives these four reasons for deleting Lukacs's post:
In response to an inquiry from CBC, the agency cited its social media guidelines and the same reasons for deleting the post. It did not respond to a second request for specific inaccurate accusations in the post.
A spokesperson for the agency said the item was posted "more than 250 times in the last three days."
Lukacs said he developed a program that reposted his remarks as soon as the agency deleted them.
A Halifax-based privacy lawyer said the government needs to think about the type of precedent this is setting and whether it is violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
David Fraser reviewed both the post from Lukacs and the agency's response. Fraser said he found the post relevant and a matter of public interest.
"[Lukacs] has an informed point of view and the fact the government has banned him from an important means of public communication has a significant impact on his freedom of expression and I'm not sure it's necessarily justifiable in the circumstances."
He also did not agree with the justification for removing the post, since the charter says everyone has a right to freedom of expression and censoring someone because their views are politically unpopular isn't justified.
"It really has the appearance of government censoring speech they don't agree with," he said.
Fraser said he doesn't consider the reposting to be spam, calling it someone being persistent in trying to get their message out and taking measures to counteract the deletion.
Toby Mendel, executive director of the Centre for Law and Democracy in Halifax, told CBC News that Lukacs's post is "a perfectly legitimate exercise of freedom of expression."
He called the removal of the post "very, very troubling," and said it's concerning that a public body would try to suppress legitimate criticism.
"One of the reasons our democracy works is because we do have people that engage in robust criticism and that hold public bodies to account," said Mendel, whose organization is dedicated to fostering democracy and human rights, including freedom of speech.
Fraser said the continued use of social media by governments in the future means "they really need to stop and think about what sort of precedent this sets within government for blocking citizens and other stakeholders from communicating with government, about government and with other individuals."
He said as a private citizen, he can delete whatever he wants from his Facebook page, but "the government is constrained by the charter."
Fraser also said the government may be "overreaching" by placing conditions and terms of use on its social media accounts.
"Government can't, unless authorized by law, contractually bind you to a particular kind of code of conduct for things like that."
Gabor Lukacs has won 24 of 27 court cases against airlines, which were taken to the agency. Recently, he posted "5 Reasons not to Trust the Canadian Transportation Agency" on the agency's Facebook page.
The post compares the number of air passenger complaints in recent years to the dwindling number of enforcement actions against airlines.
It also names some agency employees, including Doug Smith, its chief dispute officer.
The post includes a discipline history of Smith from the Law Society of Upper Canada in 2004, when he was suspended from practising law.
Social media guidelines
Lukacs subsequently received messages that were purportedly from the agency's social media co-ordinator — though no name was given. They said, in part, that: "The agency is committed to an open and transparent dialogue with Canadians and welcomes a variety of perspectives and opinions."
However, it also said its social media guidelines specify that it may remove comments that contain personal information or put forward serious, unproven or inaccurate accusations against individuals or organizations.
The agency accused the Halifax man of directly targeting a number of employees with statements that bring their integrity into question. It told him if the posts continued, the agency would block his ability to comment on both its Facebook and Twitter accounts.
Lukacs wrote back and asked what specifically was unproven or inaccurate, but did not receive a response. CBC News asked the same question, but the agency did not provide details.
'Orwellian' censorship, says Lukacs
Every time Lukacs tried to repost the document, it was removed.
"This is a form of censorship, of government censorship, and this is a violation of freedom of speech," Lukacs told CBC in an interview from Hungary, where he is vacationing. He added that a government body cannot tell Canadians what to think and cannot simply censor comments.
He said all the information in the post comes from public documents and is true, honest and fair opinion based on facts.
Lukacs said the response to his post is an attempt to censor views that are not favourable to the agency.
"This a variant of an Orwellian world where a government body is attempting to decide what citizens should think, what citizens should read, what they should say and what opinions are valid or not," he said.
Post repeatedly deleted
Part of the agency's mandate is to provide consumer protection for air passengers. On its Facebook page, the agency gives these four reasons for deleting Lukacs's post:
- "It is repetitive or spam."
- It contains personal information.
- It "puts forward serious, unproven or inaccurate accusations against individuals or organizations."
- It does not "add to the normal flow of the discussion."
In response to an inquiry from CBC, the agency cited its social media guidelines and the same reasons for deleting the post. It did not respond to a second request for specific inaccurate accusations in the post.
A spokesperson for the agency said the item was posted "more than 250 times in the last three days."
Lukacs said he developed a program that reposted his remarks as soon as the agency deleted them.
Justifiable response?
A Halifax-based privacy lawyer said the government needs to think about the type of precedent this is setting and whether it is violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
David Fraser reviewed both the post from Lukacs and the agency's response. Fraser said he found the post relevant and a matter of public interest.
"[Lukacs] has an informed point of view and the fact the government has banned him from an important means of public communication has a significant impact on his freedom of expression and I'm not sure it's necessarily justifiable in the circumstances."
He also did not agree with the justification for removing the post, since the charter says everyone has a right to freedom of expression and censoring someone because their views are politically unpopular isn't justified.
"It really has the appearance of government censoring speech they don't agree with," he said.
'Very, very troubling'
Fraser said he doesn't consider the reposting to be spam, calling it someone being persistent in trying to get their message out and taking measures to counteract the deletion.
Toby Mendel, executive director of the Centre for Law and Democracy in Halifax, told CBC News that Lukacs's post is "a perfectly legitimate exercise of freedom of expression."
He called the removal of the post "very, very troubling," and said it's concerning that a public body would try to suppress legitimate criticism.
"One of the reasons our democracy works is because we do have people that engage in robust criticism and that hold public bodies to account," said Mendel, whose organization is dedicated to fostering democracy and human rights, including freedom of speech.
Charter constraints
Fraser said the continued use of social media by governments in the future means "they really need to stop and think about what sort of precedent this sets within government for blocking citizens and other stakeholders from communicating with government, about government and with other individuals."
He said as a private citizen, he can delete whatever he wants from his Facebook page, but "the government is constrained by the charter."
Fraser also said the government may be "overreaching" by placing conditions and terms of use on its social media accounts.
"Government can't, unless authorized by law, contractually bind you to a particular kind of code of conduct for things like that."
No comments:
Post a Comment