Wednesday 8 May 2019

Too Too Funny If anyone would understand why Chucky Leblanc and McInnes & Cooper deserve each other it would be Justice Richard Bell

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 19:58:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Romain Viel I just called
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<



https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 47 others
Too Too Funny If anyone would understand why Chucky Leblanc and McInnes & Cooper deserve each other it would be Justice Richard Bell


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/too-too-funny-if-anyone-would.html


 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYvcdEeUQK8&t=703s


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ingrid Holst <IHolst@calgarypolice.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:31:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Chucky howcome your buddy the Attorney General Ms Blais and her Deputy Ms Keating worry more about the money in McCorkill's estate that they do about the sexual abuse of women and children?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am currently out of the office returning Monday, August 19.  If you require immediate assistance please contact reception at 428-5990.  Thanks!    Ingrid






---------- Original message ----------
From: "Murray, Leanne" <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:32:35 -0300
Subject: Out of Office: Yo Chucky howcome your buddy the Attorney General Ms Blais and her Deputy Ms Keating worry more about the money in McCorkill's estate that they do about the sexual abuse of women and children?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office on vacation from August 5 to 20, 2013, inclusive, and will have limited access to email during this time period.

For immediate assistance from August 5 to 9, 2013, please contact Lynn Davidson at 453-0929 or by email at lynn.davidson@mcinnescooper.com.  For immediate assistance from August 12 to 16, 2013, please contact Margie Loisel at 458-1034 or by email at margie.loisel@mcinnescooper.com; otherwise, I will get back to you as soon as possible upon my return.

McInnes Cooper Canadian Business Law Firm and Lawyer Jaime Connolly in Fredericton!!

285 views


Published on May 6, 2019


https://www.mcinnescooper.com/people/romain-viel/

Romain Viel






Romain is a bilingual lawyer in our Fredericton office. His practice currently focuses on litigation, in particular, commercial litigation. Romain also practices in the fields of bankruptcy and insolvency, asset recovery, property law and municipal law. Romain also has considerable experience with mortgage sale and foreclosure matters.

Romain is from Fredericton and obtained his Juris Doctor from the University of New Brunswick. Prior to beginning his legal studies, Romain obtained two undergraduate degrees with distinction, one in Kinesiology and the second in Business Administration.

Romain is a member of the Canadian Bar Association, the Law Society of New Brunswick, and l’Association des juristes d’expression française du Nouveau-Brunswick. He also sits on the Board of Directors for the Service de garde l’Envolée Daycare in Fredericton as well as the Organizing Committee for the 2017 Jeux de l’Acadie.

In his spare time, Romain enjoys keeping up with two young daughters, running, playing hockey and golf and following the Montreal Canadiens and Toronto Blue Jays.

Education

  • Bachelor of Recreation and Sports Studies, University of New Brunswick (2009)
  • Bachelor of Business Administration, University of New Brunswick (2009)
  • Juris Doctor, University of New Brunswick (2012)

Bar Admissions

  • New Brunswick (2013)

Representative Work

McCorkill v. Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (aka McCorkell), Deceased (2016)

June 9, 2016
Client: Sister of the Deceased
Value: Estate appraised at $250,000
On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an application for leave to appeal a New Brunswick decision invalidating an NB man’s collection of coins and goods to US-based National Alliance in his will on the basis the information the National Alliance disseminates and its purpose are against Canadian public policy. The estate was appraised at $250,000. First retained in July 2013, McInnes Cooper represented the successful party throughout. The decision sets a national precedent, confirming that there is no room for individuals to gift over their estates to groups that promote hate speech in Canada.




https://www.mcinnescooper.com/people/jaime-connolly/


Jaime O. Connolly

Jaime O. Connolly

Office Lead Partner

http://www.cmac-cacm.ca/bios/bell-eng.shtml

Hon. B. Richard Bell

The Honourable B. Richard Bell


The Honourable B. Richard Bell was born in Woodstock, New Brunswick. He joined the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in 1973, graduated as valedictorian of his class, and served as a constable at various locations throughout Nova Scotia until 1976. He received a Bachelor of Laws in 1979 and a Master of Laws in 1998, both from Dalhousie University. Mr. Justice Bell was called to the Bar of New Brunswick in 1979. He was a partner with Buchanan Bell from 1984 to 2000. He then became a senior partner with the firm McInnes Cooper from 2000 to 2006. He was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2004. Mr. Justice Bell was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New Brunswick, Trial Division, in 2006, and a judge of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2007. He was appointed a judge of the Federal Court of Canada, a judge of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada, and Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada on February 5, 2015. During his more than 25 years in practice, Justice Bell appeared before numerous administrative tribunals and all levels of the courts, including the Federal Court, the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. Justice Bell is a former President, Vice-President and Treasurer of the Canadian Bar Association, New Brunswick Branch, and a member of l’Association des juristes d’expression française du Nouveau-Brunswick (N.B.) and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America. He is the author of several legal publications.



 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 10:47:24 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Too Too Funny If anyone would understand why Chucky Leblanc and
McInnes & Cooper deseve each other it would be Justice Richard Bell
To: jaime.connolly@mcinnescooper.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com, leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
leanne.murray (leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com)
The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.

Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: EX15.mc.law

leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found'




 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 09:01:45 -0400
Subject: Too Too Funny If anyone would understand why Chucky Leblanc and
McInnes & Cooper deseve each other it would be Justice Richard Bell
To: john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com, david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com,
Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com,
hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
Yvonne.Colbert@bc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca,
cps@calgarypolice.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.caNewsroom@globeandmail.com,
David.Coon@gnb.cakris.austin@gnb.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.cote@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
GillesLee@edmundston.caCOCMoncton@gmail.com,
markandcaroline@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, heather.black@gnb.ca

Monday, 6 May 2019

Kent North MLA Kevin Arseneau is asked about removing the Lord's
Prayer from Legislature!!!


https://youtu.be/Lfv91omASc8


Posted by Charles Leblanc at 11:55 pm No comments :

McInnes Cooper Canadian Business Law Firm in Fredericton is visited by
Blogger!!!

https://youtu.be/LYvcdEeUQK8

and 2 hours later.....

https://youtu.be/5geUQqlCUS0

Posted by Charles Leblanc at 11:58 am No comments :


https://www.mcinnescooper.com/people/jaime-connolly/



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:19:23 -0400
Subject: RE: My last call to David Fraser of McInnes & Cooper
To: john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com, david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com,
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
<sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, "len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly"
<hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
Yvonne.Colbert@bc.ca, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, "Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canadian-transportation-agency-facebook-post-gabor-lukacs-1.4235123


Transportation agency accused of censorship after deleting online criticism
'This is a form of censorship ... and this is a violation of freedom
of speech,' says air passenger advocate
By Yvonne Colbert, CBC News Posted: Aug 08, 2017 6:00 AM AT


44 Comments


Ben Smith
lol same as on this site... and we own the CBC too.

Life under the Liberals.... always harder for some reason.


Gabor Lukacs
@Ben Smith
CBC is is not a governmental body. It is not subject to s. 2(b) of the Charter.

Darryl McBride
@Gabor Lukacs The CBC is tax payer funded and should be subject to the charter.

David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@Gabor Lukacs It is a Crown Corp that has a particular mandate to be
non partisan


David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@Darryl McBride I agree Furthermore what does CBC call it when they
block my comments?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, David" <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000
Subject: Your call
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

David,

could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just
now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand
it all and then the line just cut out.

Thanks,

d.
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos:

I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.

Thank you.

John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.mcinnescooper.com/>

John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper

tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350

1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1

asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215



Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Good Day Sir

After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time

Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.

These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.

This is the docket in Federal Court

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T

These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings

Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug

January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015

April 3rd, 2017

https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing


This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All


The only hearing thus far

May 24th, 2017

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown


This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity

Date: 20151223

Docket: T-1557-15

Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015

PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell

BETWEEN:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS

Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Defendant

ORDER

(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)

The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.

At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
he stated:

As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.

Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.

In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.


AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
is no order as to costs.

“B. Richard Bell”
Judge


Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.

 I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?

"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:

January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate

December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!

Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?


Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 06:57:48 -0400
Subject: Oh My My Now I know why Dean Roger Ray included the cop
Caitlyn Fisher of the RCMP within his wacko emails Perhaps she should
talk to her lawyer Liliana Longo ASAP EH?
To: Dean Ray <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, derek.strong@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Richard Harris
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, danadurnford
<danadurnford@hotmail.com>, cd1 <cd1@connectingdots1.com>
Cc: "philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca" <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>,
"craig.callens" <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, justice
<justice@mail.gov.nl.ca>, "brian.jean" <brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca>,
"derek.fildebrandt" <derek.fildebrandt@assembly.ab.ca>,
"pat.sawyer@civilenforcement.com" <pat.sawyer@civilenforcement.com>,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"bluelightning_03@hotmail.com" <bluelightning_03@hotmail.com>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Caitlyn.fisher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
<Caitlyn.fisher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "salexander42@hotmail.com"
<salexander42@hotmail.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"sodonnell@postmedia.com" <sodonnell@postmedia.com>,
"nbergot@postmedia.com" <nbergot@postmedia.com>,
"cjerema@postmedia.com" <cjerema@postmedia.com>,
"pbacon@postmedia.com" <pbacon@postmedia.com>, "cclancy@postmedia.com"
<cclancy@postmedia.com>, "jfrench@postmedia.com"
<jfrench@postmedia.com>, "kgerein@postmedia.com"
<kgerein@postmedia.com>, "jgraney@postmedia.com"
<jgraney@postmedia.com>, "bmah@postmedia.com" <bmah@postmedia.com>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Dean Ray <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>
Sent: August 7, 2017 5:30:16 PM
To: Caitlyn.fisher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Fw: Message from external website: [David Raymond Amos ]


---------- Original message ----------
From: EPS - Main (Group) <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>
Sent: October 17, 2016 8:43 AM
To: 'deanrogerray@hotmail.com'
Subject: FW: Message from external website: [David Raymond Amos ]

Dean Roger Ray,

This is to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please be advised that the Edmonton Police Service does not accept
complaints, concerns, crimes of service or disclosure via email or by
fax.

If you live outside the Edmonton area, you may report this to your
local police as all police agencies have a protocol in filing police
reports.  That police agency would then forward their police report to
the appropriate police agency for investigation/information.

If you live in Edmonton you may report this, in person, to any police
station in Edmonton.  Members assigned to these locations are
available to assist with inquiries and will assign a case file number
for investigation, if necessary.   To obtain further information and
address locations please refer to
http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/ContactEPS/EPSPoliceStations.aspx

[http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/~/media/EPS%20External/Images/Division%20Locations/stationmap_2015.ashx?la=en]<http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/ContactEPS/EPSPoliceStations.aspx>

Police Station Locations<http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/ContactEPS/EPSPoliceStations.aspx>
www.edmontonpolice.ca
The Edmonton Police Service has several locations throughout the city
to serve the citizens of Edmonton, Alberta. In addition to Police
Headquarters downtown, there ...

Thank you,

Mail Services Unit

Edmonton Police Service

---------- Original message ----------
From: www.edmontonpolice.ca@qwwcd95.ca [mailto:www.edmontonpolice.ca@qwwcd95.ca]
Sent: October 17, 2016 00:49
To: EPS - Main (Group)
Subject: Message from external website: [David Raymond Amos ]

The following email was received from the external EPS website. Please
take appropriate actions.



NAME: Dean Roger Ray

EMAIL: deanrogerray@hotmail.com<mailto:deanrogerray@hotmail.com>

SUBJECT: David Raymond Amos

MESSAGE: https://web.archive.org/web/20161017045115/http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/10/re-constant-telephone-harassment-since.html<https://web.archive.org/web/20161017045115/http:/davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/10/re-constant-telephone-harassment-since.html>

I am a victim of severe harassment by David Raymond Amos and Barry
Winters and others. In His own blog David Raymond Amos has listed he
knew the number I was harassed on. The old number 403 -864 - 2495 He
has claimed he is now harassed by this phone number and has traced it.

________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION:
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
to which it has been addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or
the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If this communication has been received in error, respond immediately
via telephone or return e-mail, and delete all copies of this
material.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/10/re-constant-telephone-harassment-since.html

Sunday, 16 October 2016RE Constant telephone harassment since last
April about food orders etc for Barry Winters in Edmonton and his
buddies Patrick Doran in Calgary and Dean Roger Ray in Sylvan Lake

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:50:59 +0000
Subject: RE: [Possible Spam/Pourriel] RE Constant telephone harassment since
last April about food orders etc for Barry Winters in Edmonton and his buddies
Patrick Doran in Calgary and Dean Roger Ray in Sylvan Lake
To: David Amos

Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.

Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.

Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre


https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=36658 


36658

Canadian Association for Free Expression v. Fred Gene Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (a.k.a. McCorkell), deceased, et al.
(New Brunswick) (Civil) (By Leave)



Keywords

Wills and estates - Wills.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Wills and Estates — Wills — Bequest void declared for public policy reasons — Whether the judgment below is in conflict with jurisprudence in other provincial Courts of Appeal — Whether the character, morals and actions of an intended beneficiary or the likely use of bequest by the intended beneficiary can be considered when deciding whether to uphold an otherwise valid will.

Mr. McCorkill died in February 2004, having made his last will and testament in 2000. In the dispositive clause of his will, he transferred all of his property to his trustee in trust to pay all his debts and taxes and to “pay or transfer the residue of [his] estate…to the NATIONAL ALLIANCE, a Virginia corporation”, at the address he used for his executor, William Luther Pierce, and his alternate executor, the respondent Fred Gene Streed. Mr. Streed received Letters Probate of Mr. McCorkill’s will in May 2013. In July 2013, Mr. McCorkill’s sister, the respondent Isabelle McCorkill, requested, inter alia, that the bequest to the National Alliance be declared void as being illegal or contrary to public policy. Leave to intervene was granted to the Province of New Brunswick, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, the League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada, and the applicant, the Canadian Association for Free Expression (“CAFE”).

Grant J. found that the purposes of the National Alliance and the activities and communications it undertook were racist, white supremacist, and hate-inspired, contrary to s. 319(2) of the Criminal Code¸ R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, and contrary to the public policy of both Canada and New Brunswick. He declared the residual bequest to the National Alliance void, and, as that left an intestacy, he ordered that the residue be divided amongst Mr. McCorkill’s next of kin under the Devolution of Estates Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, c. D-9. He declined to remove Mr. Streed as executor as that remedy did not flow from his decision and would require a separate application under the Probate Rules. CAFE’s appeal was dismissed.


Counsel

36658

Canadian Association for Free Expression v. Fred Gene Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (a.k.a. McCorkell), deceased, et al.
(New Brunswick) (Civil) (By Leave)



Party: Canadian Association for Free Expression

Counsel
Andy W. Lodge
Address
BLR Law
20 Marr Road
Suite 200
Rothesay, New Brunswick
E2E 5X5
Telephone: (506) 848-4444
FAX: (506) 848-4445
E-mail: andylodge@blrlaw.ca

Party: Fred Gene Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (a.k.a. McCorkell), deceased

Counsel
John D. Hughes
Address
145 Whitfield Trites Road
Moncton, New Brunswick
E1G 4R3
Telephone: (506) 382-9072
FAX: (506) 382-9073
E-mail: johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com

Agent
Marie-France Major
Address
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
E-mail: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: McCorkill, Isabelle Rose

Counsel
Marc-Antoine Chiasson
Address
McInnes Cooper
644, rue Main
Bureau 400
Moncton, New Brunswick
E1C 1E2
Telephone: (506) 857-8970
FAX: (506) 857-4095
E-mail: marc.chiasson@mcinnescooper.com

Agent
Jeff G. Saikaley
Address
CazaSaikaley LLP
350-220 Laurier West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Z9
Telephone: (613) 565-2292
FAX: (613) 565-2087
E-mail: jsaikaley@plaideurs.ca

Party: Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs

Counsel
Danys R. X. Delaquis
Address
Canty Lutz Delaquis Grant
43 Broad Street
Saint John, New Brunswick
E2L 4R9
Telephone: (506) 658-0433
FAX: (506) 658-0599
E-mail: ddelaquis@cldglaw.com

Party: Province of New Brunswick, as represented by the Attorney General

Counsel
Richard A. Williams
Address
Attorney General of New Brunswick
P.O. Box 6000, Stn. A
Frederiction, New Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Telephone: (506) 453-2222
FAX: (506) 453-3275
E-mail: richard.williams@gnb.ca

Agent
D. Lynne Watt
Address
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street
Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-8695
FAX: (613) 788-3509
E-mail: lynne.watt@gowlingwlg.com

Party: League for Human Rights of B'Nai Brith Canada

This party is not represented by counsel.


 https://canliiconnects.org/en/commentaries/30024

NB Court Decides Bequest to US Neo-Nazi Group is Against Public Policy - and Void

McCorkill v. Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (aka McCorkell), Deceased, 2014 NBQB 148 (CanLII)
On June 5, 2014 the NB Court of Queen’s Bench decided both the information US-based National Alliance (NA) disseminates and the NA’s purpose are against Canadian public policy – and so is the gift an NB man left to the NA in his will. Based on this decision, there are limits to not only what you leave your money for – but also to whom you leave it.

Mr. McCorkill left all of his estate to the NA in his will. After Mr. McCorkill died, his sister asked the NB Court to void the bequest because it was illegal and/or against public policy because the NA and its activities breach Canadian law. The NA denied this and argued that regardless, the Court could not void the gift based on the beneficiary’s identity, only the specific purposes attached to the bequest – and there were none.

In strongly worded and unequivocal reasons, the NB Court of Queen’s Bench decided the bequest to the NA is invalid. No other Canadian Court is required to follow the decision, but could choose to do so because it is based on Canadian laws (the Criminal Code of Canada, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, international conventions to which Canada is a party, and Provincial human rights laws generally) that apply across Canada:


  • Hate Propoganda. McCorkill’s sister submitted extensive evidence about the NA’s purposes and activities – and based on it, the Court decided the information the NA disseminates is “hate propaganda”.


  • Not in Canada. Dissemination of the NA’s writings might be legal in the US – but it is illegal in Canada: public incitement of hatred is a criminal offence here.


  • Against Public Policy. Activity that is illegal – and also contrary to the values of the CanadianCharter of Rights, Provincial human rights laws and international conventions promoting equality and dignity of the person and prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race and ethnic origin – is against Canadian and NB public policy.


  • The Character of the Beneficiary. The evidence proved that the NA’s identity was indistinguishable from the purpose for which Mr. McCorkill intended the bequest to be used: the only thing the NA would or could do with the bequest was be to further its illegal purposes.


  • Flood Gates Reversed. The Court quickly rejected the argument that voiding the gift would lead to a flood of estates litigation – and countered that not voiding it could lead to a flood of illegal gifts.
Courts rarely interfere with a person’s freedom to choose who will receive her assets after her death on the basis it’s against public policy – and rarer still based on who the beneficiary is, as opposed to the purpose for which the giver says the bequest must be used. The Court’s key decision that the NA’s identity and its purpose are indistinguishable was heavily influenced by the volume and nature of the evidence and the unique facts, but it’s now clear that there are limits to what you leave your money for – and to whom you leave it.

McInnes Cooper’s Marc-Antoine Chiasson represented the successful sister.
Click here to read the NB Court of Queen’s Bench’s decision in McCorkill v. Streed, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (aka McCorkell), Deceased, 2014 NBQB 148 (PDF)

Please contact your McInnes Cooper lawyer or any member of our McInnes Cooper Estates and Trusts Team to discuss this topic or any other legal issue.

McInnes Cooper has prepared this document for information only; it is not intended to be legal advice. You should consult McInnes Cooper about your unique circumstances before acting on this information. McInnes Cooper excludes all liability for anything contained in this document and any use you make of it.

© McInnes Cooper, 2014. All rights reserved. McInnes Cooper owns the copyright in this document. You may reproduce and distribute this document in its entirety as long as you do not alter the form or the content and you give McInnes Cooper credit for it. You must obtain McInnes Cooper’s consent for any other form of reproduction or distribution. Email us at publications@mcinnescooper.com to request our consent.

RELATED CASES AND POSTS

Small chiassonmarc0261 1024x682 by Marc-Antoine ChiassonMcInnes Cooper

https://canliiconnects.org/en/commentaries/39059 


Testamentary freedom not a shield for racist behaviour

Canadian Association for Free Expression v. Streed et al, 2015 NBCA 50 (CanLII)
Toronto trusts and estates litigator Ian Hull says a recent Court of Appeal decision that invalidated a bequest to a white supremacist group is a good reminder that testamentary freedom cannot be used as a shield for discriminatory behaviour.

Hull makes his comments in connection with Canadian Association for Free Expression v. Streed et al, 2015 NBCA 50 (CanLII), a New Brunswick Court of Appeal decision that upheld a lower court decision to invalidate the late Robert McCorkill’s $250,000 bequest to the National Alliance, a U.S.-based Neo-Nazi organization.

“The application judge invalidated a residual bequest to the beneficiary, National Alliance. He made this determination on the basis that the purposes of the National Alliance, and the activities and communications it undertakes to promote its purposes, are illegal and contrary to the public policy of Canada and New Brunswick,” the court wrote.

“Having regard to the application judge’s comprehensive reasons and his determination that the bequest was void as against public policy, we can find no justification to interfere. We are in substantial agreement with the essential features of the carefully considered reasons of the application judge,” the decision continues.

Hull, co-founding partner of Hull & Hull LLP, says the brief decision of the appeal court is helpful in the sense that it dismissed the appeal and embraced the lower court decision, McCorkill v. McCorkill Estate, 2014 NBQB 148 (CanLII).

“This allows us to look at the more fulsome, lower court decision,” says Hull, who was not involved in the case and makes his comments generally. “At the end of the day, I think this was a fairly dramatic gift once the layers of review were exhausted. The court had to look to the extrinsic evidence as to the nature of the National Alliance, and the court concluded that that information that was being disseminated by the group is hate propaganda.”

That evidence included testimony from intervenors including the Province of New Brunswick, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada, and the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE).

Hull notes that while McCorkill’s will wasn’t racist on its face, the court was prepared to take an extra step and look at extrinsic evidence as to the nature of the National Alliance.

“This move supports what I think is a moving trend within the courts. As a public institution they are going to continue to vigilantly and carefully review wills that, either on the face of it or through extrinsic evidence, have overtones of racist and discriminatory behaviour,” he tells AdvocateDaily.com.
Hull says it will be interesting to see how Spence v. BMO Trust Company, 2015 ONSC 615 (CanLII) plays out at the Ontario Court of Appeal next month.

In Spence, Justice Cory Gilmore set aside the will of the deceased who had disinherited one of his daughters while leaving his estate to his other daughter and her two children. The applicant Verolin Spence asserted that the will was void for public policy reasons due to the deceased's racist views and should be set aside resulting in an intestacy.

Spence looked at the racist motivation of the deceased and I think McCorkill is a strong support for that decision to be upheld,” Hull says. “I think both decisions demonstrate that the courts can and should look further within the legal parameters of the case law and look further into the motivations of individuals when it's apparent that racist behaviour is systemic to the motivation.”

For those who think decisions like McCorkill and Spence will open the floodgates to more will challenges, Hull says this is addressed in the lower court decision.

“Each case must be dealt with on its own merits and I have little doubt that the expense of litigation will discourage frivolous applications. It is difficult to imagine too many applications that would be based on such a strong factual background as this one. On the contrary, in my view, if the court allowed this bequest to stand it would increase the risk of opening the door to bequests to other criminal organizations,” wrote Justice William T. Grant of the Court of Queen’s Bench.

“Moreover, the jurisprudence concerning cases that are contrary to public policy goes back 200 years in the English common law tradition and more than a century in Canada alone. Despite that long history, it can hardly be said that there has been a deluge of cases where the courts have intervened in an estate or trust or even a contract on the grounds of public policy,” it continues.

Hull says with the system naturally keeping out the deluge of frivolous actions, it’s not a bad thing that the courts are digging deeper to find improper conduct.

“You don't have testamentary freedom to act like a racist,” he says. “That's been around for a long time, and the fact that the courts may arguably be looking harder to find that behaviour is a good thing.”








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux2QMJPEBMA


Fredericton Lawyer Leanne Murray from McInnes Cooper rudely asked supporter is he was a lawyer?



Published on Oct 18, 2016



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVsciGkLzXg


September 6, 2012 Serving Leanne Murray Solicitor for THE CITY OF FREDERICTON et al.

411 views
September 6, 2012 
Serving Leanne Murray Solicitor for THE CITY OF FREDERICTON et al. 
1. On the 6th day of September 2012, at 12:20 PM I served Leanne Murray, Solicitor for Defendants The City of Fredericton, Fredericton Police Force. Chief of Police Barry MacKnight, Sergeant Myers, Constable Mike Fox, Constable Patrick Small, Constable Nancy Rideout, Constable Debbie Stafford, and Constable Michael Saunders, with the attached documents marked "A" and "B" by leaving a copy with Solicitor Leanne Murray' Office at Mcinnes Cooper, Barker House, Suite 600 570 Queen Street PO Box 610 Fredericton, NB E3B 5A6. 
A. Affidavit of Andre Murray Dated September 6, 2012 
B. Pre- Hearing Brief to be used at the Motion scheduled for Monday September 10, 2012 at 9:30 AM 
2. I was able to identify the person served by means of the fact that, New Brunswick Rules of Court (18.07 Service on Solicitor of Record) allows, service of a document on the solicitor of record for a Party by leaving a copy with an employee in the office of the solicitor. When walking into the Office of Mcinnes Cooper, Barker House, Suite 600 570 Queen Street Fredericton, NB, where Solicitor Leanne Murray is a Associate, I Offered the Documents to Katheleen Casey, receptionist who accepted the documents on behalf of Leanne Murray. Court of Queen's Bench of N.B. File Number FC/45/11 ANDRE MURRAY v. THE CITY OF FREDERICTON ET. AL, 


https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/contacts/contacts_renderer.217559.html

Contact Information

Phone : (506) 453-2791
Fax : (506) 453-5942
Email : leanne.murray@gnb.ca

Mailing Address

Sartain MacDonald Building
P. O. Box 6000
Fredericton, NB
E3B 5H1
Canada

1 comment:

  1. Do you need an urgent loan of any kind? Loans to liquidate debts or need to loan to improve your business have you been rejected by any other banks and financial institutions? Do you need a loan or a mortgage? This is the place to look, we are here to solve all your financial problems. We borrow money for the public. Need financial help with a bad credit in need of money. To pay for a commercial investment at a reasonable rate of 3%, let me use this method to inform you that we are providing reliable and helpful assistance and we will be ready to lend you. Contact us today by email: daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 And whatsapp: +1 (501) 214‑1395

    NEED A LOAN?
    Ask Me.

    ReplyDelete