David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Surprise Surprise Surprise (Methinks folks should check my emails N'esy Pas?)
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/methinks-i-know-why-marie-henein-aint.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/three-cabeint-ministers-mark-norman-1.5129957
Former Harper ministers MacKay, Kenney and O'Toole helped Vice-Admiral Norman's defence
3169 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Scotty Davidson
My bet is Trudeau just didn't want his name dragged threw the mud right before the election. A full inquiry is required.
Won Tu
Reply to @Scotty Davidson: Yes, a full inquiry on why the Conservatives didn't bring this information to light sooner, save everyone a bunch of time and money. My guess is this Norman dude wasn't going to go down quietly if he ever went to court. He must have had some dirt on the Conservatives at the time. Funny how Scheer is all about an inquiry into possible obstruction of justice with SNC-Lavelin case and the Liberals, but he's pretty quiet when it involves members of his own party.
Keith Laughton
Reply to @Won Tu:
The investigation was into a leak of a Liberal Cabinet meeting after the change in government so there was no apparent relevance to what happened earlier..
When the charge was laid with the RCMP theory about a series of leaks they were expecting to be interviewed by the RCMP and when that didn't happen they went to the defence team.
So why did the "Open and transparent" Trudeau government spend the last six months fighting legally required disclosure including that authorised by Mr Harper last year?
Regards,
Won Tu
Reply to @Keith
Laughton: "no apparent relevance to what happened earlier" Yes I'm sure
that's why a trio of Conservative ex-ministers stepped in. What's
clear is that with them coming up with a good story (2 years in the
making) we'll never know what happened. Very convenient, just before an
election.
Keith
Laughton
Reply to @Won Tu:
They stepped in when the RCMP theory about leaks during their time in office was first presented.
They knew the RCMP theory was wrong but the RCMP was not interestd in interviewing them
They stepped in when the RCMP theory about leaks during their time in office was first presented.
They knew the RCMP theory was wrong but the RCMP was not interestd in interviewing them
David R. Amos
Reply to @Won Tu: "Yes, a full inquiry on why the Conservatives didn't bring this information to light sooner, save everyone a bunch of time and money. My guess is this Norman dude wasn't going to go down quietly if he ever went to court. He must have had some dirt on the Conservatives at the time."
BINGO
David R. Amos
Reply to @Keith Laughton: "They knew the RCMP theory was wrong but the RCMP was not interestd in interviewing them "
Methinks whereas you have stated that you have no respect for my litigation and my opinions you should ask yourself why the RCMP were playing dumb N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Scotty Davidson: Methinks Trudeau brought this upon himself N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-breach-trust-1.4612144
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may have complicated the work of the Crown by saying publicly that he expected Norman's case to go to trial"
Peter Adams
Great job done gentlemen! Too bad selfie JT wasn't surrounded with like minded people!
You remind us what being a true Canadian is all about!
Eugene D Burles
Reply to @Peter Adams:
A Con Rogues Gallery!
A Con Rogues Gallery!
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eugene D Burles: "A Con Rogues Gallery!"
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Adam Gajewski
Reply to @Peter Adams:
Even better job was done through the absence of Scott Brison's testimony
Mia Stalling
Reply to @Won Tu: cons misspeak all the time and we know Peter will sell anything for money
David R. Amos
Reply to @mia stalling: YUP
David R. Amos
Reply to @Adam Gajewski: "Even better job was done through the absence of Scott Brison's testimony "
How so?
David Semple
'None of the Conservatives were ever formally questioned by the RCMP or the Crown before the breach of trust charge was laid a year ago.'
So let me get this straight. Norman's defense team knew enough to talk to these guys, but the RCMP and the Crown couldn't figure out that might be a smart thing to do?
If that doesn't prove the current government was involved in pulling strings in this case, nothing does
Robert Brannen
Reply to @David Semple:
"MacKay said he was contacted only once by the RCMP on the "very narrow issue" of an email exchange he had several years ago with Norman." --- CBC
Seems that MacKay could have volunteered information if he was truly concerned.
Keith Laughton
Reply to @Robert Brannen:
Please explain why he would provide information regarding a leak from a cabinet meeting that he did not attend since it was after the change in government.
Why didn't the "Open and Transparent' Trudeau PMO and PCO follow through on Mr Harpers authorisation to release the Cabinet confidences to VAdm Norman's defence team last year?
Regards,
Please explain why he would provide information regarding a leak from a cabinet meeting that he did not attend since it was after the change in government.
Why didn't the "Open and Transparent' Trudeau PMO and PCO follow through on Mr Harpers authorisation to release the Cabinet confidences to VAdm Norman's defence team last year?
Regards,
David R. Amos
Reply to @David
Semple: "So let me get this straight. Norman's defense team knew enough
to talk to these guys, but the RCMP and the Crown couldn't figure out
that might be a smart thing to do?"
Methinks you should read my emails to Norman's lawyer beginning in 2017 They are easily found on the Internet N'esy Pas?
Methinks you should read my emails to Norman's lawyer beginning in 2017 They are easily found on the Internet N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Keith Laughton: "Why didn't the "Open and Transparent' Trudeau PMO and PCO follow through on Mr Harpers authorisation to release the Cabinet confidences to VAdm Norman's defence team last year?"
Methinks anyone can Google Federal Court File No T-1557-15 and scroll down to statement number 83 to see how Admiral Norman got off the hook N'esy Pas?
Trust that Harper used this file to his advantage many times in the past
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Luke Armstrong
Trudeau out of sight for a couple of days. Nice!
David R. Amos
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: Methinks that was rather predicable N'esy Pas?
Johnny Roberts
Why is the petite spud at the center of everything that is wrong with Canada? The worst 4 years in Canadian history 2015-2019.
Cameron Kernick
Reply to @Johnny
Roberts: I don't know about' worst 4 years' but defiantly the worst
collapse and failure of a Canadian government with a majority mandate
that is in jeopardy of not being returned for a 2nd mandate. This hasn't
happened in Canadian history outside a massive recession and The Great
Depression. Absolutely the worst failure of leadership this country has
seen in its history.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Cameron Kernick: "Absolutely the worst failure of leadership this country has seen in its history."
Methinks many would agree that Sir John A MacDonald takes the cake in that regard However his opposition was every bit as bad just like current days between Trudeau The Younger and his Red Coats versus Mr Scheer and his Blue Coats N'esy Pas?
Methinks many would agree that Sir John A MacDonald takes the cake in that regard However his opposition was every bit as bad just like current days between Trudeau The Younger and his Red Coats versus Mr Scheer and his Blue Coats N'esy Pas?
Mac Lester
WOW!!!conservatives working for Canadians,
Elaine Hancock
Reply to @Mac Lester: Like they did everyday.
Won Tu
Reply to @Mac Lester:
How do you figure? You think waiting years and years to provide
information to exonerate a public servant serves Canadians? Why did
they sit on this info? Looks fishy to me. Maybe they didn't want a
case in the courts that would drag the Conservatives through the mud
just around election time?
Doug James
Reply to @Won Tu: You
don't get it. Prior to this the Cons were muzzled and would have been
considered breech of privacy had they divulged any information. Its very
likely they got subpoenaed and were finally able to speak about it,
which they legally COULDN'T do prior to this. The fact that it took this
long to question them is more fishy that the prosecution (as directed
by the Libs) didn't want to get that information out.
Keith
Laughton
Reply to @Won Tu:
Actually they reached out to the defence team when the RCMP didn't bother to interview them in order to teat the prosecution's theory.
As a result the prosecution collapsed.
And meanwhile Mr Trudeau had his staff working overtime to block the RCMP, DDPP and the Defence team from accessing government information.
Maybe that was what was in the 60 page completely redacted memorandum from Mr Wernick to Mr Trudeau last October.
Regards,
Actually they reached out to the defence team when the RCMP didn't bother to interview them in order to teat the prosecution's theory.
As a result the prosecution collapsed.
And meanwhile Mr Trudeau had his staff working overtime to block the RCMP, DDPP and the Defence team from accessing government information.
Maybe that was what was in the 60 page completely redacted memorandum from Mr Wernick to Mr Trudeau last October.
Regards,
Nicolas Mazet
Reply to @Doug James:
As opposed to divulging it now. Your argument doesn't stand. Unless you
are implying that he was being tried for being the Conservative's man.
James Holden
Reply to @Doug James:
Wrong.
Harper waived privilege on this case years ago...or so he claimed.
Wrong.
Harper waived privilege on this case years ago...or so he claimed.
Mia Stalling
Reply to @Keith
Laughton: If the Cons had all this information why did they put Mark
Norman through all this? Was it for political gain, or the love of
wasting money and watching the liberals fall into their trap again? They
did nothing for Canada or Canadians it was all an evil game to them
David R. Amos
Reply to @Mac Lester: "WOW!!!conservatives working for Canadians,"
Methinks you know as well as it that its just another smoke a mirror act at the circus N'esy Pas?
Methinks you know as well as it that its just another smoke a mirror act at the circus N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug James: "You don't get it. Prior to this the Cons were muzzled "
Methinks it is you who "don't get it" because you don't wish to N'esy Pas?
Methinks it is you who "don't get it" because you don't wish to N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @mia stalling: "They did nothing for Canada or Canadians it was all an evil game to them "
I concur
I concur
David R. Amos
Reply to @Keith
Laughton: "Maybe that was what was in the 60 page completely redacted
memorandum from Mr Wernick to Mr Trudeau last October."
Spin much?
Spin much?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Won Tu: "Looks fishy to me."
Methinks it stinks as well N'esy Pas?
Methinks it stinks as well N'esy Pas?
Daryll Mcbain
Good of the Conservatives to help an innocent man and stopping political interference.
Kev Altobene
It looked more like
the Cons were doing back deals, and those info were never put on paper.
Funny, they provide the info after 3 years
James Holden
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain:
They covered it up and let Norman dangle to score political points against the Liberals.
They covered it up and let Norman dangle to score political points against the Liberals.
David R. Amos
Reply to @James Holden: YUP
Dan Cooper
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain:
LOL Conservatives obviously waited this long purely for partisan purposes. How noble of them lol.
All the con spinsters sure are on the same talking point page though....
David R. Amos
Reply to @Kev Altobene: Methinks Admiral Norman should ask himself what his own lawyer was not telling him N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Dan Cooper:
Methinks it is all just part of the wicked game the politicians and
lawyers play at other people's expense N'esy Pas?
Daryll Mcbain
Going to be a tuff spin for the Liberals. They have been fighting to keep Conservative era records sealed from the defence lawyers.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain: "Going to be a tuff spin for the Liberals"
Oh So True
Oh So True
Larry Chegus
Such a embarrassment for Trudeau stating even before charges were laid that Norman’s case would go to trail, that is NOT PM material, actually a shame
David R. Amos
Reply to @Larry Chegus: Methinks a lot of liberals wish to forget that Trudeau The Younger said that N'esy Pas?
Max Kaminsky
Gas up the Jet, Katie. I forgot my colouring book in Tofino.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Max
Kaminsky: YO Katie I wonder if I could hitch a ride on the fancy jet we
all pay for in order to visit the RCAF base where my Father's PBY
crashed in WW II. He was the sole survivour of the 9 men on board. You
cannot deny that Trudeau's Papa did not go to war so I have more of
right to visit Tofino than your boss does N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Max
Kaminsky: Methinks you must recall the NDP exposing Peter MacKay's
nonsense about free rides on vacation when he was the Minister of
Defence N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mackay-s-helicopter-story-doesn-t-fly-mps-say-1.1121363
MacKay's helicopter story doesn't fly, MPs say
Pressure builds on defence minister over 'search and rescue training' demonstration
Laura Payton · CBC News · Posted: Dec 02, 2011 12:54 PM ET
"Opposition MPs went on the attack Friday over Defence Minister Peter MacKay's 10-minute trip on a search and rescue helicopter in July 2010, saying the Defence Department is "not a Toys 'R' Us" and calling for his resignation.
NDP MP Ryan Cleary is calling for MacKay's resignation after documents obtained by several media outlets revealed Thursday that MacKay's office requested the airlift from a remote fishing area in central Newfoundland.
"The email trail that has been released doesn't back up his story," Cleary told CBC News."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mackay-s-helicopter-story-doesn-t-fly-mps-say-1.1121363
MacKay's helicopter story doesn't fly, MPs say
Pressure builds on defence minister over 'search and rescue training' demonstration
Laura Payton · CBC News · Posted: Dec 02, 2011 12:54 PM ET
"Opposition MPs went on the attack Friday over Defence Minister Peter MacKay's 10-minute trip on a search and rescue helicopter in July 2010, saying the Defence Department is "not a Toys 'R' Us" and calling for his resignation.
NDP MP Ryan Cleary is calling for MacKay's resignation after documents obtained by several media outlets revealed Thursday that MacKay's office requested the airlift from a remote fishing area in central Newfoundland.
"The email trail that has been released doesn't back up his story," Cleary told CBC News."
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks the plot thickens nicely N'esy Pas?
"Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office in order to make the deal happen."
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/methinks-i-know-why-marie-henein-aint.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-working-with-harper-1.5128872
---------- Original message ----------
From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 18:05:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I repeat What the Hell is the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Hello -
Thank you for contacting the office of Erin O'Toole, Member of Parliament for Durham.
Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email has been received. Your message is important to me and we will do our best to respond to you as soon as possible. I may be unable to respond to your message immediately, as I receive a large volume of correspondence. If your matter is urgent or media-related, please contact our office(s) respective to your area via the following:
Constituency Office
54 King Street East, Suite 103
Bowmanville, ON
L1C 1N3
Tele. (905) 697-1699
Parliamentary Office
Room 621, 180 Wellington
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
Tele. (613) 992-2792
Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact my office.
Sincerely,
Hon. Erin O'Toole
Member of Parliament - Durham
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MacKay, Peter" <Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after all these years?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416) 865-3861.
---------- Original message ----------
From: jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:38:38 -0400
Subject: Office of the Hon. Jason Kenney, PC, MP
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank-you for your email.
This automatic response confirms that your email has been received. Please do not reply.
I may be unable to respond to your message immediately, as I receive a large volume of correspondence. However, I will reply as soon as possible if your email deals with a matter related to my parliamentary duties.
If you have not done so already, please provide your full name, mailing address, and phone number. This will allow me, or a member of my staff, to respond to your email in the most appropriate manner.
To discuss an issue related to Employment and Social Development Canada, please email me at min.hrsd-rhdc@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca
If your email can be more fully addressed by another government department, I will ensure that it is forwarded to the appropriate office with a request that it be responded to as soon as possible.
If this is regarding an urgent matter, you may call one of our two parliamentary offices:
Constituency Office
1168 137 Ave SE
Calgary, AB T2J 6T6
403-225-3480
Ottawa Office
325 East Block
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
613-992-2235
Thank you again for taking the time to write.
Sincerely,
Office of the Hon. Jason Kenney, PC, MP
Calgary Southeast
www.JasonKenney.ca
[cid:image001.png@01CEF5B6.1C616140]
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:05:47 -0400
Subject: Attn Marie Henein Re Your new client Admiral Mark Norman
I just called you again in order to remind you of my old emails and that
I am still alive and paying attention
To: Jim.Hounslow@humanrights.ca, info@jian.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
dholland@torstar.ca, mhenein@hhllp.ca, jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com,
q@cbc.ca, JCruickshank@thestar.ca, jrebick@gmail.com,
jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca, Mason.Stalker@forces.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
president@whitehouse.gov
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mrcoutts@yahoo.com,
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Good day,
Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
has not been forwarded.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 08:04:34 -0400
Subject: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would drop the charges after Mark Norman's
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Good day,
Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
has not been forwarded.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 08:04:34 -0400
Subject: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would drop the charges after Mark Norman's
lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
To: premier@ontario.ca, ddale@thestar.ca, news@newstalk1010.com,
To: premier@ontario.ca, ddale@thestar.ca, news@newstalk1010.com,
q@cbc.ca, JCruickshank@thestar.ca, jrebick@gmail.com, jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca, Mason.Stalker@forces.gc.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, andrew.leslie@parl.gc.ca, kdonovan@thestar.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, andrew.leslie@parl.gc.ca, kdonovan@thestar.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, paul@paulfromm.com, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, mayor@mississauga.ca
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 22 February 2019
Mark Norman's defence team hits Trudeau, Butts with subpoenas
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Prosecutors to drop criminal case of breach of trust against
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman
Accused of leaking cabinet secrets in relation to a $700-million
shipbuilding deal
Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: May 07, 2019 9:25 PM ET
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman was accused of leaking cabinet secrets in
relation to a $700-million shipbuilding deal to lease a supply vessel.
(Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
Federal prosecutors are expected to abandon their criminal prosecution
of the military's former second-in-command, Vice-Admiral Mark Norman,
CBC News has confirmed.
The Public Prosecution Service of Canada plans to withdraw the single
breach of trust charge that was laid last year against the former vice
chief of the defence staff, but has yet to confirm the reasons why,
sources said late Tuesday.
Norman, who was also the former commander of the navy, was accused of
leaking cabinet secrets in relation to a $668-million shipbuilding
deal to lease a supply vessel.
The National Post first reported that the Crown would throw in the towel.
It came after the Public Prosecution Service of Canada took the
unusual step, Tuesday evening, of sending out a notice to the media
advising them that they "may wish to attend" court on Wednesday at 10
a.m.
The high-profile, politically charged case has seen the Liberal
government face allegations of political interference from both the
Opposition Conservatives and Norman's defence team, including Toronto
lawyer Marie Henein.
LISTEN
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
FRONT BURNER
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
The defence has claimed, in both arguments and court filings, that the
Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office have attempted to
orchestrate the prosecution of the case. They also have alleged that
former Treasury Board president Scott Brison tried to kill the lease
deal on behalf of a rival shipyard.
The Liberal government, the public prosecution service and Brison have
all denied the accusations, which were made in court and in court
filings.
The tipping point may have come last week, however, when it was
revealed that former parliamentary secretary — and soon-to-be former
Liberal MP — Andrew Leslie had offered to testify for the defence.
Leslie, a former lieutenant-general, has intimate knowledge of the
military procurement system and could have provided insight into the
behind-the-scenes manoeuvring within the Liberal government as the
case against Norman unfolded.
Fight for documents
The case has been a routine feature of question period in the House of
Commons with the Conservatives hammering the Liberals over the slow
pace of handing over federal government documents to the defence and
for the refusal of officials to cover Norman's legal costs.
His lawyers have been fighting for access to federal documents for
months. Hundreds of those documents have been released, but many key
records were redacted.
The federal government has claimed the documents were blacked out to
protect solicitor-client privilege and because they contain cabinet
secrets. The defence team challenged those claims, arguing that
Norman's prosecution is politically motivated.
The battle over documents focuses on up to 36 memos, analysis reports
and emails involving the Privy Council Office and the Prime Minister's
Office.
Uncertain future for Norman
The allegations against Norman first surfaced in January 2017, when
his suburban home was raided by the RCMP and he was suspended from his
job as vice chief of the defence staff.
It took the RCMP and the Crown more than a year to formally charge him
with a single count of breach of trust, alleging he leaked cabinet
secrets to both an executive at the Davie Shipyard, in Levis, Que.,
which leased a supply ship to the navy, and to a CBC journalist.
The Crown alleged there were 12 instances where details of what
federal ministers were saying and thinking about the project were
illegally revealed. The vast majority of those alleged incidents
involved the negotiation period under the former Conservative
government.
Listen
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
Mark Norman's defence points to SNC-Lavalin testimony in bid to
unlock secret documents
The prosecution also claimed that Norman leaked the results of a
November 2015 cabinet subcommittee meeting under the Liberals, when,
newly elected at the time, they decided to put the supply ship lease
deal on hold for further study.
The government eventually reversed its decision and allowed the deal
to proceed after a public backlash because of the leak.
It is unclear what Norman's future may be after Wednesday's court proceeding.
A veteran of three decades and eligible to retire, he was moved out of
the vice chief of defence staff post, but has remained in uniform in a
temporary duty post throughout the legal proceedings
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, paul@paulfromm.com, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, mayor@mississauga.ca
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 22 February 2019
Mark Norman's defence team hits Trudeau, Butts with subpoenas
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Prosecutors to drop criminal case of breach of trust against
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman
Accused of leaking cabinet secrets in relation to a $700-million
shipbuilding deal
Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: May 07, 2019 9:25 PM ET
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman was accused of leaking cabinet secrets in
relation to a $700-million shipbuilding deal to lease a supply vessel.
(Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
Federal prosecutors are expected to abandon their criminal prosecution
of the military's former second-in-command, Vice-Admiral Mark Norman,
CBC News has confirmed.
The Public Prosecution Service of Canada plans to withdraw the single
breach of trust charge that was laid last year against the former vice
chief of the defence staff, but has yet to confirm the reasons why,
sources said late Tuesday.
Norman, who was also the former commander of the navy, was accused of
leaking cabinet secrets in relation to a $668-million shipbuilding
deal to lease a supply vessel.
The National Post first reported that the Crown would throw in the towel.
It came after the Public Prosecution Service of Canada took the
unusual step, Tuesday evening, of sending out a notice to the media
advising them that they "may wish to attend" court on Wednesday at 10
a.m.
The high-profile, politically charged case has seen the Liberal
government face allegations of political interference from both the
Opposition Conservatives and Norman's defence team, including Toronto
lawyer Marie Henein.
LISTEN
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
FRONT BURNER
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
The defence has claimed, in both arguments and court filings, that the
Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office have attempted to
orchestrate the prosecution of the case. They also have alleged that
former Treasury Board president Scott Brison tried to kill the lease
deal on behalf of a rival shipyard.
The Liberal government, the public prosecution service and Brison have
all denied the accusations, which were made in court and in court
filings.
The tipping point may have come last week, however, when it was
revealed that former parliamentary secretary — and soon-to-be former
Liberal MP — Andrew Leslie had offered to testify for the defence.
Leslie, a former lieutenant-general, has intimate knowledge of the
military procurement system and could have provided insight into the
behind-the-scenes manoeuvring within the Liberal government as the
case against Norman unfolded.
Fight for documents
The case has been a routine feature of question period in the House of
Commons with the Conservatives hammering the Liberals over the slow
pace of handing over federal government documents to the defence and
for the refusal of officials to cover Norman's legal costs.
His lawyers have been fighting for access to federal documents for
months. Hundreds of those documents have been released, but many key
records were redacted.
The federal government has claimed the documents were blacked out to
protect solicitor-client privilege and because they contain cabinet
secrets. The defence team challenged those claims, arguing that
Norman's prosecution is politically motivated.
The battle over documents focuses on up to 36 memos, analysis reports
and emails involving the Privy Council Office and the Prime Minister's
Office.
Uncertain future for Norman
The allegations against Norman first surfaced in January 2017, when
his suburban home was raided by the RCMP and he was suspended from his
job as vice chief of the defence staff.
It took the RCMP and the Crown more than a year to formally charge him
with a single count of breach of trust, alleging he leaked cabinet
secrets to both an executive at the Davie Shipyard, in Levis, Que.,
which leased a supply ship to the navy, and to a CBC journalist.
The Crown alleged there were 12 instances where details of what
federal ministers were saying and thinking about the project were
illegally revealed. The vast majority of those alleged incidents
involved the negotiation period under the former Conservative
government.
Listen
How the Mark Norman trial could be 'a huge political circus'
Mark Norman's defence points to SNC-Lavalin testimony in bid to
unlock secret documents
The prosecution also claimed that Norman leaked the results of a
November 2015 cabinet subcommittee meeting under the Liberals, when,
newly elected at the time, they decided to put the supply ship lease
deal on hold for further study.
The government eventually reversed its decision and allowed the deal
to proceed after a public backlash because of the leak.
It is unclear what Norman's future may be after Wednesday's court proceeding.
A veteran of three decades and eligible to retire, he was moved out of
the vice chief of defence staff post, but has remained in uniform in a
temporary duty post throughout the legal proceedings
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:40:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I wonder if Doug Ford and Marie Henein or
their old buddies such Daniel Dale remember these emails?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:40:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I wonder if Doug Ford and Marie Henein or
their old buddies such Daniel Dale remember these emails?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Dale, Daniel" <ddale@thestar.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:40:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I wonder if Doug Ford and Marie Henein or
their old buddies such Daniel Dale remember these emails?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'm away until May 15.
- Daniel
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks I know why Marie Henein ain't smiling and so does Trudeau N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/methinks-i-know-why-marie-henein-aint.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-breach-trust-charge-dropped-1.5127463
'I acted with integrity': Mark Norman claims exoneration after Crown stays breach-of-trust
5774 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David R. Amos
Methinks the plot thickens nicely N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-working-with-harper-1.5128872
"What became clear — throughout the process — was that Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office in order to make the deal happen.
"There was a political will to get this done," said one former Conservative staffer, speaking on condition of anonymity, who was intimately familiar with the project at the outset.
As the case against Norman developed, many members of the former government expected the Mounties to come knocking. But they never did, said the staffer.
Allusions to the involvement of Harper's office were sprinkled through court records in interviews with federal bureaucrats conducted by the RCMP, but the extent to which the former commander of the navy worked with them was not made clear."
Simon McVeigh
Reply to @David R. Amos: ... so why didn't the RCMP interview them, or ask for them to appear in court? ... No, the Liberals OWN this... Norman exposed the fact that Trudeau wanted to shift the contract at a cost of $89 Million... once revealed, he was forced to stick to the original ship builder... who delivered what was needed ON TIME... and ON BUDGET... Trudeau went after Norman, besmirched his good name... and LOST ! Now we wait for the countersuit against the Liberals... or more info from Norman on how Liberal operatives mistreated him.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Simon
McVeigh: Methinks many would agree that the RCMP and the prosecutors OWN
this even more than Harper and Trudeau certainly do because nobody is
above the law N'esy Pas?
Keith Laughton
Reply to @David R. Amos:
Given that Mr Trudeau's PMO/PCO did not release the information to either the RCMP or the DPP I don't think they can be faulted.
If the "Open and Transparent" had release it earlier then the prosecution would not have been commenced thereby reducing the large legal bill faced by the Government.
Regards,
Given that Mr Trudeau's PMO/PCO did not release the information to either the RCMP or the DPP I don't think they can be faulted.
If the "Open and Transparent" had release it earlier then the prosecution would not have been commenced thereby reducing the large legal bill faced by the Government.
Regards,
David R. Amos
Reply to @Keith
Laughton: Methinks you should read my lawsuit (Federal Court File No
T-1557-15 Statement 83 in particular) After all it was filed when Harper
was the Prime Minister while I was running against Harper et al in the
election of the 42nd Parliament and Trudeau had yet to become a member
of the Privy Council N'esy Pas?
Jamie Gillis
Reply to @David R. Amos:
If you recognize the spin in all that, intentional or not (I'm undecided as to how unbiased Brewster is in his reporting), I for one don't actually see anything inappropriate here. "Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office"? Well clutch my pearls!
Try this: according to his own statement in court, the CDS, Gernal Vance was wined and dined by Gerald B. and Katie Telford *the evening the General relieved VAdm Norman*!!! He says they didn't talk about it, but it still raises my eyebrows a lot more than an Admiral working with govt. to get a desperately needed supply ship for the RCN.
If you recognize the spin in all that, intentional or not (I'm undecided as to how unbiased Brewster is in his reporting), I for one don't actually see anything inappropriate here. "Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office"? Well clutch my pearls!
Try this: according to his own statement in court, the CDS, Gernal Vance was wined and dined by Gerald B. and Katie Telford *the evening the General relieved VAdm Norman*!!! He says they didn't talk about it, but it still raises my eyebrows a lot more than an Admiral working with govt. to get a desperately needed supply ship for the RCN.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Jamie Gillis: "Well clutch my pearls!"
Hold on tight when you Google the 3 stooges and yours truly
Katie Telford Gerald Butts Jonathan Vance David Amos
Hold on tight when you Google the 3 stooges and yours truly
Katie Telford Gerald Butts Jonathan Vance David Amos
Keith Laughton
Reply to @David R. Amos:
As I have told you before I am uninterested in your various lawsuits which are not related to the subject of the article
Regards
Robert Morris
The charges against Norman were stayed after former conservative cabinet ministers provided new information......if these former ministers possessed important information about this case, why did they take so long to come forward with it......perhaps scheer should explain to Canadians why his party let an innocent man get dragged through the mud when they could have prevented it......
Flip Anderson
Reply to @Robert Morris:
Harper welcomed the investigation.
Harper also signed a waiver and released all documents under his watch.
Harper also said all documents should be released unredacted.
So.
Why would Trudeau not release the conservative documents.
Why would Trudeau not release Normans' email, text and notes related to the case.
And when Trudeau released Liberal documents between himself and Wernick, they were fully redacted citing client/solicitor privilege even though Trudeau or Wernick are NOT lawyers.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Flip Anderson: Methinks those are very good questions sir. Everyone should wish you luck getting ethical answers N'esy Pas?
Flip Anderson
Reply to @David R. Amos: Ethics and the current government are like oil and water, they just don't mix.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Flip Anderson: "Ethics and the current government are like oil and water, they just don't mix."
Methinks you are preaching to the whistleblower N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Methinks you are preaching to the whistleblower N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Brian Allen
Reply to @Robert Morris:
Conservatives for 3+ years have been trying to protect Canadians from being dragged through the mud...but the Liberal majority gifted to Junior and his All-Stars have allowed, initiated, availed and endorsed the mudslide of Canadian values, tax-dollars, and respect world-wide.
Luke Armstrong
The Vice-Admiral is a humble and well respected man. So unlike Justin Trudeau.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: Methinks you should read our emails N'esy Pas?
Brian Allen
If only our pm had this man’s integrity and intellect.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Brian
Allen: Methinks many would agree that he was just following political
orders Thats how he came up through the ranks N'esy Pas?
Brian Allen
Sajjan won’t give VA Norman his old job back?
In October if not before....the Architect will be looking for a job.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Brian Allen: Methinks either you or I missed something because I heard Norman already has the job back N'esy Pas?
Brian Allen
Reply to @David R. Amos:
You’re missing a whole lot of things Dave... N’esy Pas?
You’re missing a whole lot of things Dave... N’esy Pas?
Keith
Laughton
Reply to @David R. Amos:
You heard wrong.
Regards,
You heard wrong.
Regards,
David R. Amos
Reply to @Brian Allen: Are you certain?
"Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jonathan Vance issued a statement today saying he will be discussing Norman's return to regular duty at the earliest opportunity."
Brian Allen
Marie Henein would make an excellent PM.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Brian Allen: Now thats funny
Mike Kennedy
Justin can barely make it out of bed without stepping in it. Quite entertaining really.
David R. Amos
Reply to @mike kennedy: Welcome to the Circus
Mike Kennedy
PMO needs to be investigated again.
Jennifer McIsaac
Reply to @mike kennedy:
Oh, not doing something is an offense now is it?
Anne Bérubé
Reply to @Jennifer
McIsaac: Not doing something? For starters, Trudeau and his gang ruined
Norman's career (and a huge career this was). It is time for payback,
Courts please!
Archie Brow
Reply to @Jennifer
McIsaac: “doing nothing”, the lawyers, public service hours dedicated to
this mess has cost taxpayers over a million, you must think money grows
on trees.
Keith Laughton:
Reply to @Jennifer McIsaac:
Well not responding to court ordered disclosure in an ongoing court case is an offence.
I guess we wil have to see if the "Open and Transparent" Trudeau government is willing to let the truth come out.
Or will we just see more 60 page redacted memoranda.
Regards,
Well not responding to court ordered disclosure in an ongoing court case is an offence.
I guess we wil have to see if the "Open and Transparent" Trudeau government is willing to let the truth come out.
Or will we just see more 60 page redacted memoranda.
Regards,
David R. Amos
Reply to @mike kennedy: Methinks I know why Marie Henein ain't smiling and so does Trudeau N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Archie Brown: "the lawyers, public service hours dedicated to this mess has cost taxpayers over a million"
Methinks you underestimate how much our politicians and bureaucrats love to spend our tax funds It appears to me that 400 grand was not enough for the lawyers on one side of a non event at the circus N'esy Pas?
"Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan announced today the federal government would be paying Norman's legal fees. A private crowdsourcing initiative already has raised more than $400,000 for Norman's defence.
The prosecution said Norman's actions were inappropriate and secretive, but that doesn't mean a crime was committed.
"Inappropriate does not mean criminal," said Barbara Mercier, the lead prosecutor."
Ray Luker
Once again the Liberals have repeatedly shown that they are barely fit to rule a banana republic, much less a G7 nation like Canada.
Usually you have to go to South American tin-pot dictatorships like Venezuela to find such a strong stench of corruption, but one-term Trudy’s eco-Marxist regime is already riff with it and it’s been a cool spring, by fall their stench will be unbearable.
Canada deserve better than this..
David Mccaig
Reply to @Ray Luker:
'I acted with integrity': Mark Norman claims exoneration after Crown stays breach-of-trust charge.
No he's got a political agenda against our government.
'I acted with integrity': Mark Norman claims exoneration after Crown stays breach-of-trust charge.
No he's got a political agenda against our government.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Ray Luker:
Nothing like a story involving the military to bring out all these right wing types.
Nothing like a story involving the military to bring out all these right wing types.
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @david mccaig: "No he's got a political agenda against our government."
Methinks Trudeau drew first blood not Norman N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-breach-trust-1.4612144
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may have complicated the work of the Crown by saying publicly that he expected Norman's case to go to trial"
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos: WOW Methinks CBC just made a a HUGE Faux Pas N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: "Nothing like a story involving the military to bring out all these right wing types. "
Methinks you are no such thing yet you have a lot to say N'esy Pas?
Methinks you are no such thing yet you have a lot to say N'esy Pas?
Richard Dekkar
Thank you Vice Admiral Norman for your service and dedication. Canadians are behind you and we know what to do this October to make sure this can’t happen again.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Richard Dekkar: Yea Right Methinks anyone can Google two names David Amos Admiral Norman N'esy Pas?
Daryll Mcbain
Time for the RCMP to investigate the PMO.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain:
Bet the CBC managementgiggled when they were posting this article , that it would be to cons like light to moths.
Daryll Mcbain
Reply to @david mccaig: don’t care for our Justice system independence I see.
Lawrence Farrel
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain: It's LONG PAST time.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lawrence Farrell: I concur
Methinks anyone can Google Federal Court File No T-1557-15 and scroll down to statement number 83 to see how Admiral Norman got off the hook N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain: "don’t care for our Justice system independence I see."
Methinks everybody knows that is a myth N'esy Pas?
Bill Edward Goate
Translation: The prosecutors have been told that the Liberal Party can't afford any more embarrassments or unwelcome scrutiny.
Adam Gajewski
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate:
The reasons for a couple of sudden resignations in the treasury department will not be aired in the court. We live in hope there was no political interference to drop the case.
The reasons for a couple of sudden resignations in the treasury department will not be aired in the court. We live in hope there was no political interference to drop the case.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate:
"prosecutors have been told that the Liberal Party can't afford any more embarrassments or unwelcome scrutiny."
So now the cons are accusing the prosecutors of obstructing the law.
"prosecutors have been told that the Liberal Party can't afford any more embarrassments or unwelcome scrutiny."
So now the cons are accusing the prosecutors of obstructing the law.
Frank Goodwood
Reply to @david mccaig:
David, you do realize that this the CBC and that it's audience is mostly Liberals right? The comments are overwhelming negative when it comes to JT. What does that tell you?
David, you do realize that this the CBC and that it's audience is mostly Liberals right? The comments are overwhelming negative when it comes to JT. What does that tell you?
David Mccaig
Reply to @Frank Goodwood:
Canada is comprised mostly of people whose political ideolgy live on the left side, despite valiant attempts by tbe corporate media owned by billionaires trying the best to bamboozle clear thinking Canadians into voting for billionaires best interests and voting for cons and against their own best interests.
Canada is comprised mostly of people whose political ideolgy live on the left side, despite valiant attempts by tbe corporate media owned by billionaires trying the best to bamboozle clear thinking Canadians into voting for billionaires best interests and voting for cons and against their own best interests.
Jim Lau
Reply to @david
mccaig: Billionaires, Corporations, and Corporate media are the ones who
have the likes of you bamboozled to support the left agenda and thumb
your nose at ethics, rule of law, and truth. But you don't get it, that
is clear
Bill Laplante
Reply to @Jim Lau: You must be talking about Soros and the "Tide foundation" and others bankrolled like Leadnow
David Mccaig
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate:
What is it about the loyalty of cons that so attracts Vlad Putin to want to support these right wingers.
What is it about the loyalty of cons that so attracts Vlad Putin to want to support these right wingers.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate:
Funny i dont see Vad Putin helping the liberals or the US democrats , nope just cons.
Funny i dont see Vad Putin helping the liberals or the US democrats , nope just cons.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate:
You'd think any party that believes in freedom and democracy and wouldnt be hiding their involvement with Russian mafia, but here we have day after day of right wingers praising Putin.
You'd think any party that believes in freedom and democracy and wouldnt be hiding their involvement with Russian mafia, but here we have day after day of right wingers praising Putin.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Bill Edward Goate: BINGO
David R. Amos
Reply to @Adam Gajewski: Welcome to the Circus
David R. Amos
Reply to @Frank Goodwood: Methinks Mccaig hasn't figured out who owns CBC N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Bill Laplante: "You must be talking about Soros"
Of that I have no doubt Methinks he works for him N'esy Pas?
Of that I have no doubt Methinks he works for him N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: "here we have day after day of right wingers praising Putin."
Methinks everybody has figured out your agenda by now N'esy Pas?
Methinks everybody has figured out your agenda by now N'esy Pas?
Richard Dekkar
Now Canadians need to know what was in those documents that was so damaging that Trudeau had to interfere and stop a prosecution to save his skin.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Richard Dekkar: "Now Canadians need to know what was in those documents"
Methinks you should check my documents and emails that I have been publishing on the Internet for years while I ran for public office six times thus far N'esy Pas?
Don Cameron
Ha!
This was predictable, once the slea ze about the Trudeau PMO started to come out.
Brison and Leslie not running again in the upcoming election because of this scandal.
I hope there is a whistle blower out there with the courage to release documents. Canadians deserve to know the truth.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Don Cameron: "I hope there is a whistle blower out there with the courage to release documents. Canadians deserve to know the truth."
Please read Federal Court File No T-1557-15 Statement 83 in particular ASAP
David R. Amos
Reply to @Don Cameron: Please read this as well
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Jerry MaGuire
"It's a beautiful day, thank you."
Canadians will be saying that on Oct 20th, the day after this government is defeated.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Jerry MaGuire: Methinks all the political animals know that climate change or not its gonna be a long hot summer before the fat lady sings on Oct 20th N'esy Pas?
Elaine Hancock
Another day, another Trudeau mess.
Drew Allen
Reply to @Elaine Hancock:
Harpers fault? That will be the next excuse.
Harpers fault? That will be the next excuse.
Elaine Hancock
Reply to @drew allen: I guess. With the help of Admiral Norman the navy got a supply ship on time and on budget, Horrors!
David R. Amos
Reply to @Elaine Hancock: "I guess. With the help of Admiral Norman the navy got a supply ship on time and on budget, Horrors! "
Well put
David R. Amos
Reply to @drew allen: No doubt
Daryll Mcbain
If Harper did this the Liberals would be rioting in the streets breaking stuff.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Daryll Mcbain: "If Harper did this the Liberals would be rioting in the streets breaking stuff."
Kinda like they did with the Duffy matter right?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/three-cabeint-ministers-mark-norman-1.5129957
Former Harper ministers MacKay, Kenney and O'Toole helped Vice-Admiral Norman's defence
Neither Crown nor defence revealed what information led to abandoning of Norman case
Three former federal cabinet ministers
have confirmed they spoke to Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's defence team
about information that may have been key to the Crown's decision to halt
the criminal prosecution of the military's former second-command.
Peter MacKay, who held the justice and defence portfolios, Erin O'Toole, the former veterans affairs minister, and Jason Kenney, the last defence minister in former prime minister Stephen Harper's government, all say they spoke to lawyers representing the career naval officer.
Norman was charged with a single count of breach of trust, kicking off a high-stakes political drama that reached a climax Wednesday when prosecutors stayed the charge.
CBC News reported Wednesday night that the case began to collapse in March — partly under the weight of information suppled by the ex-ministers and by several former Conservative government staffers who were key players in the previous government's decision in 2015 to lease a supply ship for the navy for $668 million.
Norman, the former head of the navy, was accused of leaking cabinet secrets on 12 occasions to the Davie Shipyard — the Levis, Que. operation which won the supply ship contract — and former CBC journalist James Cudmore.
None of the Conservatives were ever formally questioned by the RCMP or the Crown before the breach of trust charge was laid a year ago.
Both
MacKay and Kenney said they believe the information they gave the
defence factored into the eventual decision to stay the charge.
"Absolutely," MacKay told CBC News in a telephone interview from Minneapolis on Thursday, adding that his discussion with Norman's Toronto-based lawyer Marie Henein "was very involved." He said he made it clear to Henein that Norman was working with the full support of cabinet to deliver the temporary supply ship.
MacKay said he was contacted only once by the RCMP on the "very narrow issue" of an email exchange he had several years ago with Norman.
The National Post reported Thursday that Kenney also had a long conversation with Henein, which has since been confirmed by CBC News.
In an Instagram post, Kenney said that as minister of defence he "worked directly with then-commander of the navy, Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, to come up with an accelerated process which ended up with the cabinet deciding to sign a contract with Davie Shipyards to produce an interim joint supply ship."
The meeting with Norman's lawyers, he said, took place last year in Toronto and he "gave them information, which I believe would have helped with his exoneration had this case gone to trial."
O'Toole said he also spoke with the defence team, but does not believe what he said would have been material. He said he questions how critical the information provided to the defence by Conservatives was to the decision to stay the charge against Norman.
"I think it's a simplification to say that the defence questioned a few Conservatives and that led to this going away," he said.
The Crown "didn't question me and they clearly felt they had a case against Admiral Norman before," O'Toole added. "I really think it was the slow and deliberate delays by the Trudeau government on the release of information that Mark Norman needed to defend himself."
Neither the Crown nor the defence would say what information led to the case being abandoned.
Henein told reporters at a news conference on Wednesday that the information uncovered by her team was directly related to the lease contract four years ago.
The Conservatives faced attacks on social media on Thursday, with some suggesting they should have come forward sooner to help clear Norman's name.
O'Toole fired back, saying former prime minister Stephen Harper publicly offered to waive cabinet secrecy surrounding the agreement — something that was rejected by the Liberal government.
Arif Vernani, the Liberal parliamentary secretary for justice, accused O'Toole during question period today of trying to smear the Mounties.
"What I think is important to underscore is there are men and women in uniform, namely the RCMP, that took charge of the very investigation that he's impugning," he said. "And he's impugning the law enforcement officials and the independence of their work."
Henein
told reporters that the information the defence presented to the Crown
at the end of March was something that would have been in the possession
of federal bureaucrats — but was not shared with either the RCMP or the
Crown.
New Democrats have called for an inquiry to find out who withheld the information.
Norman said he wants to get back to work and the military's top commander has said he would welcome Norman's return.
"We have missed Vice-Admiral Norman a great deal and I look forward to welcoming him back to work as soon as possible," Vance said Wednesday.
The two have not met to discuss when that will happen, nor what job Norman would do once reinstated, said a spokesman in the office of the chief of the defence staff.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and PracticesPeter MacKay, who held the justice and defence portfolios, Erin O'Toole, the former veterans affairs minister, and Jason Kenney, the last defence minister in former prime minister Stephen Harper's government, all say they spoke to lawyers representing the career naval officer.
Norman was charged with a single count of breach of trust, kicking off a high-stakes political drama that reached a climax Wednesday when prosecutors stayed the charge.
CBC News reported Wednesday night that the case began to collapse in March — partly under the weight of information suppled by the ex-ministers and by several former Conservative government staffers who were key players in the previous government's decision in 2015 to lease a supply ship for the navy for $668 million.
Norman, the former head of the navy, was accused of leaking cabinet secrets on 12 occasions to the Davie Shipyard — the Levis, Que. operation which won the supply ship contract — and former CBC journalist James Cudmore.
None of the Conservatives were ever formally questioned by the RCMP or the Crown before the breach of trust charge was laid a year ago.
"Absolutely," MacKay told CBC News in a telephone interview from Minneapolis on Thursday, adding that his discussion with Norman's Toronto-based lawyer Marie Henein "was very involved." He said he made it clear to Henein that Norman was working with the full support of cabinet to deliver the temporary supply ship.
MacKay said he was contacted only once by the RCMP on the "very narrow issue" of an email exchange he had several years ago with Norman.
The National Post reported Thursday that Kenney also had a long conversation with Henein, which has since been confirmed by CBC News.
Document delays frustrated defence: O'Toole
In an Instagram post, Kenney said that as minister of defence he "worked directly with then-commander of the navy, Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, to come up with an accelerated process which ended up with the cabinet deciding to sign a contract with Davie Shipyards to produce an interim joint supply ship."
The meeting with Norman's lawyers, he said, took place last year in Toronto and he "gave them information, which I believe would have helped with his exoneration had this case gone to trial."
O'Toole said he also spoke with the defence team, but does not believe what he said would have been material. He said he questions how critical the information provided to the defence by Conservatives was to the decision to stay the charge against Norman.
"I think it's a simplification to say that the defence questioned a few Conservatives and that led to this going away," he said.
The Crown "didn't question me and they clearly felt they had a case against Admiral Norman before," O'Toole added. "I really think it was the slow and deliberate delays by the Trudeau government on the release of information that Mark Norman needed to defend himself."
Smearing the Mounties?
Neither the Crown nor the defence would say what information led to the case being abandoned.
Henein told reporters at a news conference on Wednesday that the information uncovered by her team was directly related to the lease contract four years ago.
The Conservatives faced attacks on social media on Thursday, with some suggesting they should have come forward sooner to help clear Norman's name.
O'Toole fired back, saying former prime minister Stephen Harper publicly offered to waive cabinet secrecy surrounding the agreement — something that was rejected by the Liberal government.
Arif Vernani, the Liberal parliamentary secretary for justice, accused O'Toole during question period today of trying to smear the Mounties.
"What I think is important to underscore is there are men and women in uniform, namely the RCMP, that took charge of the very investigation that he's impugning," he said. "And he's impugning the law enforcement officials and the independence of their work."
New Democrats have called for an inquiry to find out who withheld the information.
Norman said he wants to get back to work and the military's top commander has said he would welcome Norman's return.
"We have missed Vice-Admiral Norman a great deal and I look forward to welcoming him back to work as soon as possible," Vance said Wednesday.
The two have not met to discuss when that will happen, nor what job Norman would do once reinstated, said a spokesman in the office of the chief of the defence staff.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-working-with-harper-1.5128872
Information from former Conservative cabinet ministers helped put an end to Norman case
'It's a complex legal charge ... We didn’t have the entire information,' Crown says
The
Crown's case against Vice-Admiral Mark Norman unexpectedly began to
collapse in March partly under the weight of information from several
former Conservative cabinet ministers and staffers, CBC News has
learned.
They were key players in the previous government's $668 million deal to have the Davie Shipyard, in Levis, Que., convert and lease a supply ship to the navy, say multiple sources, some of whom were interviewed by a lawyer representing the former vice-chief of the defence staff.
These individuals were never questioned by the RCMP or the Crown in the run-up to a breach of trust charge being laid against Norman a year ago.
The former commander of the navy was accused of leaking cabinet secrets on 12 separate occasions, almost all of them involving the period of time prior to the last election.
What became clear — throughout the process — was that Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office in order to make the deal happen.
"There was a political will to get this done," said one former Conservative staffer, speaking on condition of anonymity, who was intimately familiar with the project at the outset.
As
the case against Norman developed, many members of the former
government expected the Mounties to come knocking. But they never did,
said the staffer.
Allusions to the involvement of Harper's office were sprinkled through court records in interviews with federal bureaucrats conducted by the RCMP, but the extent to which the former commander of the navy worked with them was not made clear.
The Crown acknowledged Wednesday that it did not have the full picture when it decided to charge the 38-year military veteran.
"It's a complex legal charge," said lead Crown attorney Barbara Mercier. "We didn't have the entire information."
The new evidence, gathered by Norman's lawyers and presented to the Crown on March 28, included some documents which were not uncovered during the investigation, something Norman's lead defence lawyer blamed on government obstruction.
"It should have been handed over," Marie Henein told reporters. "It should have been handed over to the prosecution. It was not. As to the why, I don't know. I leave you to answer that."
The Crown announced earlier today that it had stayed the charge against Norman, saying new information had come to light through Norman's defence team that convinced the prosecution there was no longer a reasonable chance of conviction.
Norman was accused of leaking to both an executive at the Davie Shipyard and to a CBC journalist.
Defence
Minister Harjit Sajjan also announced Wednesday the federal government
would be paying Norman's legal fees. A private crowdsourcing initiative
already has raised more than $400,000 for Norman's defence.
The prosecution said Norman's actions were inappropriate and secretive, but that doesn't mean a crime was committed.
"Inappropriate does not mean criminal," said Mercier.
A breach-of-trust charge can be laid against an appointed or elected official discharging a public duty.
To convict, the Crown must prove the accused person's conduct represented a "serious and marked" departure from the standards expected in that position, and that the accused acted outside the public interest towards a dishonest, partial, corrupt or oppressive purpose.
They were key players in the previous government's $668 million deal to have the Davie Shipyard, in Levis, Que., convert and lease a supply ship to the navy, say multiple sources, some of whom were interviewed by a lawyer representing the former vice-chief of the defence staff.
These individuals were never questioned by the RCMP or the Crown in the run-up to a breach of trust charge being laid against Norman a year ago.
The former commander of the navy was accused of leaking cabinet secrets on 12 separate occasions, almost all of them involving the period of time prior to the last election.
What became clear — throughout the process — was that Norman was working in close cooperation with staff in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office in order to make the deal happen.
"There was a political will to get this done," said one former Conservative staffer, speaking on condition of anonymity, who was intimately familiar with the project at the outset.
Allusions to the involvement of Harper's office were sprinkled through court records in interviews with federal bureaucrats conducted by the RCMP, but the extent to which the former commander of the navy worked with them was not made clear.
The Crown acknowledged Wednesday that it did not have the full picture when it decided to charge the 38-year military veteran.
"It's a complex legal charge," said lead Crown attorney Barbara Mercier. "We didn't have the entire information."
'It should have been handed over'
The new evidence, gathered by Norman's lawyers and presented to the Crown on March 28, included some documents which were not uncovered during the investigation, something Norman's lead defence lawyer blamed on government obstruction.
"It should have been handed over," Marie Henein told reporters. "It should have been handed over to the prosecution. It was not. As to the why, I don't know. I leave you to answer that."
The Crown announced earlier today that it had stayed the charge against Norman, saying new information had come to light through Norman's defence team that convinced the prosecution there was no longer a reasonable chance of conviction.
Norman was accused of leaking to both an executive at the Davie Shipyard and to a CBC journalist.
The prosecution said Norman's actions were inappropriate and secretive, but that doesn't mean a crime was committed.
"Inappropriate does not mean criminal," said Mercier.
A breach-of-trust charge can be laid against an appointed or elected official discharging a public duty.
To convict, the Crown must prove the accused person's conduct represented a "serious and marked" departure from the standards expected in that position, and that the accused acted outside the public interest towards a dishonest, partial, corrupt or oppressive purpose.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-breach-trust-charge-dropped-1.5127463
'I acted with integrity': Mark Norman claims exoneration after Crown stays breach-of-trust charge
Crown says there is no longer a reasonable prospect of conviction against the military's former 2nd in command
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman said today he's pleased to be "exonerated of any wrongdoing" but is disappointed by the "alarming and protracted bias" in his breach-of-trust case.
During a news conference in Ottawa following the announcement that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada would be staying a single breach-of-trust charge against him, Norman said he has no regrets about his conduct.
"I am confident that at all times I acted with integrity, I acted ethically and I acted in the best interests of the Royal Canadian Navy, the Canadian Forces and, ultimately, the people of Canada," he said.
Norman had been accused of leaking cabinet secrets in relation to a $668-million shipbuilding deal to lease a supply vessel. He was accused of leaking to both an executive at the Davie Shipyard in Levis, Que., which leased a supply ship to the navy, and to a CBC journalist.
Norman said he is now looking forward to getting back to work, but is disappointed it took this long.
"The alarming and protracted bias of perceived guilt across the senior levels of government has been quite damaging and the emotional and financial impacts of the entire ordeal have taken a toll," he said.
Norman said he has an "important story" to tell Canadians, which he will be sharing in the coming days.
The Crown announced earlier today that it had stayed the charge, adding that new information that had come to light through Norman's defence team convinced the prosecution that there was no longer a reasonable chance of conviction.
Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan announced today the federal government would be paying Norman's legal fees. A private crowdsourcing initiative already has raised more than $400,000 for Norman's defence.
The prosecution said Norman's actions were inappropriate and secretive, but that doesn't mean a crime was committed.
"Inappropriate does not mean criminal," said Barbara Mercier, the lead prosecutor.
A breach-of-trust charge can be laid against an appointed or elected official discharging a public duty.
To convict, the Crown must prove the accused person's conduct represented a "serious and marked" departure from the standards expected in that position, and that the accused acted outside the public interest towards a dishonest, partial, corrupt or oppressive purpose.
Watch: How the Vice-Admiral Mark Norman story unfolded this morning
CBC News
How the Norman trial unfolded Wednesday morning
The Public Prosecution
Service of Canada dropped their charges against Vice-Admiral Mark
Norman. Here's how the morning unfolded around his case. 0:55
"This was a very complex case ... I cannot get into the specifics of that information. The defence counsel gave it to us under certain conditions for our purposes only," she said.
"But I will say that, absorbing it, comparing it to investigation materials, we came to that conclusion, that there's no probable prospect of conviction."
Mercier insisted that there was no political interference in the case.
"The Department of Public Prosecutions decided to lay the charge, and they decided today, we decided alone, without political interference whatsoever, that we couldn't make the charge," she said.
Asked when he intends to return to work as he left the courthouse, Norman replied, "As soon as I possibly can."
'Bittersweet' outcome
His lawyer Marie Henein issued a statement on his behalf, calling the Crown's decision "bittersweet" because the personal cost to Norman and his family from the two-year legal battle can never be repaid.
"It has been difficult and demoralizing," the statement reads. "We have resilient institutions in this country and eventually those institutions got to the right result. But let's not forget, that only came after a long and hard fight and at great personal cost to Vice-Admiral Norman."
Watch: Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's full press conference with lawyer Marie Henein
CBC News
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman spoke to reporters after charge dropped
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman
held a news conference with his lawyer Marie Henein after federal
prosecutors drop breach of trust charge against him. 32:41
"No person in this country should ever walk into a courtroom and think they are fighting their elected government or any sort of political factors at all," she said.
The high-profile, politically charged case saw the Liberal government face allegations of political interference from both the Opposition Conservatives and Norman's defence team.
The defence had claimed, in both arguments and court filings, that the Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office had attempted to orchestrate the prosecution of the case.
The defence also alleged that former Treasury Board president Scott Brison tried to kill the lease deal with the Davie shipyard in Levis, Que. on behalf of rival Irving Shipbuilding in his home province of Nova Scotia.
The Liberal government, the public prosecution service and Brison have all denied the accusations, which were made in court and in court filings.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called for an independent investigation of how the case was handled.
"What we've seen in this case is some deep concerns around a cosy relationship between the Liberal government and the Irving companies. We've heard concerns around Scott Brison's implication and involvement, and we also heard some allegations of direct political interference of the Prime Minister's Office in the handling of this case," he said.
"The process involved in a public prosecution like this is entirely independent of my office," he said.
"It's an independent process and we have confidence in the work done by the director of public prosecutions."
At Norman's pre-trial hearings, his defence team accused the government of blocking access to documents. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer accused Trudeau today of trying to destroy Norman's reputation and career because the vice-admiral "stood up to him."
"We still have lots of questions about why the government was so afraid of the truth coming to light, why they withheld documents, why they refused to hand over information that Mark Norman and his lawyer were asking for to help clear his name and shed light on this," he said.
Director of Public Prosecutions Kathleen Roussel issued a statement that said the Crown concluded it could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Norman's conduct in this case amounted to a "serious and marked departure from the standards expected of a person in his position of trust." That decision was based on the evidence, the law and the "principles regarding reasonable prospect of conviction," she said.
No political influence
"No other factors were considered in this decision, nor was there any contact or influence from outside the PPSC, including political influence in either the initial decision to prosecute Mr. Norman or in the decision to stay the charge today," Roussel said.
Andrew Leslie, a retired lieutenant-general who was elected in 2015, announced May 1 he was stepping away from politics after one term as a Liberal MP. It was reported last week that Leslie would be testifying for Norman's defence.
When Norman arrived at the Ottawa courthouse Wednesday morning, Leslie was there to greet him.
CBC News caught up with Chantier Davie CEO Spencer Fraser outside the courtroom Wednesday. He said there will be an opportunity to speak more about the case as it "gets more explored."
"Today, I want to talk about the fact that justice has been served and Mark Norman is innocent, as we've always said he is," he said.
One other person has been charged in relation to the alleged leak of cabinet information. Matthew Matchett, a federal procurement official who was named in documents related to Norman's defence, was charged with a single count of breach of trust in February. He pleaded not guilty at a hearing in March and elected to stand trial by judge and jury.
The Crown's decision to abandon the case spares the Liberal government potential embarrassment at a critical time. Norman's trial was to begin in August, just weeks before the federal election campaign is set to begin.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Vice-Admiral
Mark Norman speaks briefly to reporters as he leaves the courthouse in
Ottawa following his first appearance in his trial for breach of trust,
on Tuesday, April 10, 2018. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)
Mark Norman says he's 'anxious to get to court' in breach-of-trust case
The vice-admiral's trial may turn into a debate on the limits of leaking in a government town
Canada's second-highest-ranking military commander broke his
long silence Tuesday following his first court appearance on a single
charge of breach of trust.
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, in full uniform, did not enter a plea in Ottawa today — the opening day of an extraordinary case that will offer a new test of the RCMP's sensitive investigations unit.
His lawyer, Marie Henein, and the Crown agreed to dates for a pretrial hearing, to lay the groundwork for later court proceedings.
Norman, who had been silent since his suspension in January 2017, signalled he intends to fight.
"I'm anxious to get to court and get this dealt with as quickly as possible and get back to serving the people of Canada," he said.
The hearing is just the beginning of the legal process, which could culminate in a trial sometime next year, just prior to the federal election.
Henein said she wants the case heard as quickly as possible.
"I am tired of shadow boxing," she said. "It's time to step in the courtroom and deal with the evidence. I don't try my cases on the courthouse steps. I try them in a courtroom.
"And that is what we are ready to do. So we want to get this going, get this dealt with, and let the public know exactly what this case is about."
The charge against Norman was laid last month after nearly two years of Mounties investigating an alleged leak of cabinet secrets.
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, in full uniform, did not enter a plea in Ottawa today — the opening day of an extraordinary case that will offer a new test of the RCMP's sensitive investigations unit.
His lawyer, Marie Henein, and the Crown agreed to dates for a pretrial hearing, to lay the groundwork for later court proceedings.
Norman, who had been silent since his suspension in January 2017, signalled he intends to fight.
"I'm anxious to get to court and get this dealt with as quickly as possible and get back to serving the people of Canada," he said.
The hearing is just the beginning of the legal process, which could culminate in a trial sometime next year, just prior to the federal election.
Henein said she wants the case heard as quickly as possible.
"I am tired of shadow boxing," she said. "It's time to step in the courtroom and deal with the evidence. I don't try my cases on the courthouse steps. I try them in a courtroom.
"And that is what we are ready to do. So we want to get this going, get this dealt with, and let the public know exactly what this case is about."
The charge against Norman was laid last month after nearly two years of Mounties investigating an alleged leak of cabinet secrets.
Politics News
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman in court
Norman and his lawyer Marie Henein spoke very briefly to reporters at the Ottawa court house 0:54
The
RCMP focused their probe on published reports in November 2015 that the
Liberal government, newly elected at the time, was having second
thoughts about a $668 million contract to lease a supply ship for the
navy.
The leak embarrassed the government, which relented and allowed the leasing project, being run out the Chantier-Davie shipyard, in Levis, Que., to proceed.
Both Norman and Henein addressed the court on Tuesday.
A small group of supporters was on hand to witness the proceedings. Some were handing out small Canadian flags and many have contributed to a fund to pay Norman's legal fees.
There's a lot at stake for just about everyone involved in the case, said a military law expert.
Retired colonel Michel Drapeau said this case represents the first time a senior leader in the Canadian military has been prosecuted for alleged corruption.
The legal bar that the Crown will have to meet in order to prove a breach of trust was set fairly high by the Supreme Court of Canada.
In a landmark 2006 case against a former local police chief in Quebec, the high court said that prosecutors must prove criminal intent in order to prove breach of trust — that there has to be some personal benefit involved, and that the actions of the government official have to amount to a "marked departure" from acceptable standards of conduct.
That's going to be a steep hill for the Crown to climb, said Drapeau.
"It has to be demonstrated that he had a culpable intent. Wow. To do that you have to look at what benefit, what personal advantages there were. Does he get a promotion out of it?"
Vice-Admiral
Mark Norman listens as his lawyer Marie Henein speaks to reporters as
they leave the courthouse in Ottawa following his first appearance for
his trial for breach of trust, on Tuesday, April 10, 2018. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)
The
Mounties alleged, in search warrants unsealed last year, that they
believed Norman was carrying on an inappropriate back-channel
conversation with an old friend who is now a senior executive at the
Quebec shipyard where the leased supply ship was being outfitted for the
navy.
When
the Liberals put the project on hold, RCMP claimed Norman leaked the
decision to the shipyard, which passed it along to lobbyists and,
eventually, the media.
"I believe Norman did this to influence decision-makers within government to adopt his preferred outcome," RCMP Cpl. Matthieu Boulanger wrote in the warrant used to search Norman's home.
Whether the Crown can point to a motivation more nefarious than a wish to win a bureaucratic turf war remains to seen, said Drapeau.
Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau may have complicated the work of the Crown by
saying publicly that he expected Norman's case to go to trial. (Chad Hipolito/Canadian Press)
The
other major obstacle facing prosecutors is something that may be
outside their control: the fact that information is used as political
weapon in Ottawa every single day.
Leaks and off-the-record briefings are standard tools deployed by politicians and public servants to shape the political message.
Drapeau said the Crown's ability to argue Norman's alleged behaviour was a "marked departure" from the Ottawa norm is being sorely tested almost every week.
The most recent example is the political brawl over whether national security adviser Daniel Jean revealed sensitive cabinet information in background discussions he had with journalists during Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's recent trip to India.
On Monday, Parliament's national security committee announced it was conducting a review of Jean's actions that would look at, among other things, "inappropriate use of intelligence."
The Liberal government has insisted Jean didn't cross the line. But the key question in the Daniel Jean affair — what is, and is not, a cabinet secret, and how such secrets should be handled — is also in play in Norman's case.
"You can define what a cabinet confidence is. That is pretty easy," said Drapeau. "But you have to live it. Ministers and other people of government use confidences and purposely leak information that is and should be protected as cabinet confidences."
Another perceived point of vulnerability for the Crown likely will be Prime Minister Trudeau's own words. On at least two occasions, Trudeau said he expected the case against the admiral to end up in court.
Norman has been suspended but not removed from his position as vice-chief of the defence staff since shortly after his home was raided by the RCMP in early January 2017.
Drapeau said that, even if he is acquitted, Norman could face separate administrative charges in the military justice system, notably charges of prejudice to good order and discipline.
"If they really wanted to draw blood and punish him, which seems to be the intention of government, they could get it done that way," he said.
Norman's next court appearance will be May 16.
The leak embarrassed the government, which relented and allowed the leasing project, being run out the Chantier-Davie shipyard, in Levis, Que., to proceed.
You can define what a cabinet confidence is. That is pretty easy. But you have to live it.- Military law expert Michel DrapeauThe RCMP unit leading the probe is the same one that investigated the Senate expense scandal, which ended with Sen. Mike Duffy being charged with — and later acquitted on — 31 counts of fraud, breach of trust and bribery.
Both Norman and Henein addressed the court on Tuesday.
A small group of supporters was on hand to witness the proceedings. Some were handing out small Canadian flags and many have contributed to a fund to pay Norman's legal fees.
There's a lot at stake for just about everyone involved in the case, said a military law expert.
Retired colonel Michel Drapeau said this case represents the first time a senior leader in the Canadian military has been prosecuted for alleged corruption.
A high legal hurdle
The legal bar that the Crown will have to meet in order to prove a breach of trust was set fairly high by the Supreme Court of Canada.
In a landmark 2006 case against a former local police chief in Quebec, the high court said that prosecutors must prove criminal intent in order to prove breach of trust — that there has to be some personal benefit involved, and that the actions of the government official have to amount to a "marked departure" from acceptable standards of conduct.
That's going to be a steep hill for the Crown to climb, said Drapeau.
"It has to be demonstrated that he had a culpable intent. Wow. To do that you have to look at what benefit, what personal advantages there were. Does he get a promotion out of it?"
"I believe Norman did this to influence decision-makers within government to adopt his preferred outcome," RCMP Cpl. Matthieu Boulanger wrote in the warrant used to search Norman's home.
Whether the Crown can point to a motivation more nefarious than a wish to win a bureaucratic turf war remains to seen, said Drapeau.
Leaks and off-the-record briefings are standard tools deployed by politicians and public servants to shape the political message.
Drapeau said the Crown's ability to argue Norman's alleged behaviour was a "marked departure" from the Ottawa norm is being sorely tested almost every week.
The Daniel Jean factor
The most recent example is the political brawl over whether national security adviser Daniel Jean revealed sensitive cabinet information in background discussions he had with journalists during Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's recent trip to India.
On Monday, Parliament's national security committee announced it was conducting a review of Jean's actions that would look at, among other things, "inappropriate use of intelligence."
The Liberal government has insisted Jean didn't cross the line. But the key question in the Daniel Jean affair — what is, and is not, a cabinet secret, and how such secrets should be handled — is also in play in Norman's case.
"You can define what a cabinet confidence is. That is pretty easy," said Drapeau. "But you have to live it. Ministers and other people of government use confidences and purposely leak information that is and should be protected as cabinet confidences."
Another perceived point of vulnerability for the Crown likely will be Prime Minister Trudeau's own words. On at least two occasions, Trudeau said he expected the case against the admiral to end up in court.
Norman has been suspended but not removed from his position as vice-chief of the defence staff since shortly after his home was raided by the RCMP in early January 2017.
Drapeau said that, even if he is acquitted, Norman could face separate administrative charges in the military justice system, notably charges of prejudice to good order and discipline.
"If they really wanted to draw blood and punish him, which seems to be the intention of government, they could get it done that way," he said.
Norman's next court appearance will be May 16.
About the Author
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:05:47 -0400
Subject: Attn Marie Henein Re Your new client Admiral Mark Norman
I just called you again in order to remind you of my old emails and that
I am still alive and paying attention
To: Jim.Hounslow@humanrights.ca, info@jian.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
dholland@torstar.ca, mhenein@hhllp.ca, jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com,
q@cbc.ca, JCruickshank@thestar.ca, jrebick@gmail.com,
jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca, Mason.Stalker@forces.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
president@whitehouse.gov
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mrcoutts@yahoo.com,
On 11/7/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> John Cruickshank is the Publisher of the Toronto Star and President of
> Star Media Group. Reach him at 416-367-2000 jcruickshank@thestar.ca
>
>
> https://ca.news.yahoo.com/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 01:23:00 -0700
> Subject: Re: A group of high-profile criminal defence lawyers are
> offering pro bono legal assistance to alleged victims of Jian
> Ghomeshi???.
> To: marcy@marcysegal.com, Alvin@rsjlaw.ca, jacob@rsjlaw.ca, Glen
> Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>,
> "scott.macrae" <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, dotis@thestar.ca, tanovich@uwindsor.ca
>
> Interesting to say the least
>
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/
>
> On 11/7/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.thestar.com/
>>
>> http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/
>>
>> David M. Tanovich (@dtanovich) | Twitter
>> https://twitter.com/dtanovich
>> The latest Tweets from David M. Tanovich (@dtanovich). Windsor Law Prof
>> teaching & writing about criminal law, evidence & ethics with a focus
>> on critical
>> race ...
>>
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>> Daniel Otis (@dsotis) | Twitter
>> https://twitter.com/dsotis
>> The latest Tweets from Daniel Otis (@dsotis). @TorontoStar reporter.
>> Formerly
>> writing from Cambodia and Burma. Send tips to dotis@thestar.ca. Toronto
>> ...
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:31:36 -0700
>> Subject: The one very true thing Mayor Rob Ford said was that Mark
>> Pugash making $178,000 as a communications director Toronto Police was
>> pretty shocking
>> To: info <info@jian.ca>, corporatecommunications@
>> ddale@thestar.ca, mark.pugash@torontopolice.on.
>> "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, neil.rabinovitch@dentons.com,
>> mhenein@hhllp.ca, jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com, q <q@cbc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Janice P. Rubin
>> Rubin Thomlinson LLP - Toronto
>> Phone: (416) 847-1814
>> Fax: (416) 847-1815
>> E-mail: jrubin@rubinthomlinson.com
>>
>> Marie Henien
>> Tel: 416-368-5000
>> mhenein@hhllp.ca
>>
>> Neil S. Rabinovitch
>> neil.rabinovitch@dentons.com
>> Toronto
>> D + 1 416 863 4656
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> Corporate Communications
>> E-mail Corporate Communications
>> 40 College St., Toronto, ON , M5G 2J3
>> Phone: 416-808-7100
>> Fax: 416-808-7102
>> Unit Commander: Director Mark Pugash
>>
>> Corporate Communications is responsible for internal and external
>> communications for the Toronto Police Service.
>>
>> They are also responsible for producing the Service's Annual Report,
>> the monthly newspaper, "The Badge," as well as providing content for,
>> and maintaining, the Service's internet and intranet websites.
>>
>> http://toronto.ctvnews.ca/rob-
>> .
>> Published Friday, March 7, 2014 10:38AM EST
>> Last Updated Saturday, March 15, 2014 1:50PM EDT
>>
>> Mayor Rob Ford has called-out some Toronto police employees after a
>> ‘Sunshine List’ revealed that nearly 3,000 police officers and
>> employees received salaries of more than $100,000 last year.
>>
>> Ford said that while he respects the work done by front-line police
>> officers, he says the high salaries afforded to Toronto police
>> employees like Mark Pugash, Toronto Police Director of Corporate
>> Communications, are “shocking.”
>>
>> “When you look at Mr. Pugash making $178,000 as a communications
>> director, that’s pretty shocking,” Ford told reporters Friday. “But I
>> support our front-line officers. They work hard. They deserve the
>> money.”
>>
>> Photos
>> City of Toronto police chief Bill Blair speaks to the media in
>> Toronto on Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN
>> PRESS)
>> When reached by CP24, Pugash dismissed Ford’s comments.
>>
>> "I do not respond to personal attacks," he told CP24 Friday night.
>>
>> Ford’s comments come on the same day an annual report revealed that
>> some 2,938 Toronto Police Service employees made more than $100,000
>> last year.
>>
>> That includes a number of cadets-in-training and so-called Green
>> Hornet parking enforcement officers.
>>
>> Chief Bill Blair tops the list of highest paid cops on the force. He
>> made more than $334,000 in 2013, with an additional $3,300 in taxable
>> benefits.
>>
>> In total, nearly 40 per cent of the Service’s 8,000 workers made the
>> so-called “Sunshine List” in 2013.
>>
>> The base salary for a Toronto constable ranges from $89,000 to $97,000 a
>> year.
>>
>> Plain-clothes officers earn between $95,000 and $103,000.
>>
>> With files from Paul Bliss and CP24
>> ..
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://toronto.ctvnews.ca/rob-
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:25:08 -0700
>> Subject: IF Jian Ghomeshi and his producer were truly clever and
>> ethical dudes they would have called me back many years ago EH Hubby
>> Baby Lacroix?
>> To: info@jian.ca, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, Glen Canning
>> <grcanning@gmail.com>, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell
>> <acampbell@ctv.ca>, Elizabeth.May.a1@parl.gc.ca, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "mckeen.randy" <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>,
>> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <FRANCINE.LEFEBVRE@cbc.ca>, "Amato, Mike #509" <509@yrp.ca>
>>
>> http://www.jian.ca/contact/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:31:25 -0600
>> Subject: I just called Francine Lefebvre.from (902 800 0369) and left
>> a voicemail message for the lawyer Hubert T. Lacroix
>> To: ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, FRANCINE.LEFEBVRE@cbc.ca, bruce
>> <bruce@brucehyer.ca>, "bruce.hyer" <bruce.hyer.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> "yvon.godin.a1" <yvon.godin.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.a1"
>> <dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.radio-canada.
>>
>> Hubert T. Lacroix, President and Chief Executive Officer; Phone:
>> 514-597-5101
>> Par: FRANCINE.LEFEBVRE@CBC.CA. No. Matricule: ' (514) 597-5101
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:17:34 -0600
>> Subject: If Chucky Leblanc wanted to act like a true journalist he
>> would have at least asked your buddy Rodney Wadden or Jacques Poitras
>> and Terry Seguin some serious questions BEFORE you were elected N'esy
>> Pas Stevey Boy Horseman?
>> To: "stephen.horsman" <stephen.horsman@nbliberal.ca>
>> <rodney.wadden@fredericton.ca>
>> COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, atip@cbc.ca, "ht.lacroix"
>> <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
>> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
>> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> "leanne.murray" <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
>> <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <chris.macpherson@fredericton.
>> <nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
>> "mike.cameron3" <mike.cameron3@bellmedia.ca>, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.radio-canada.
>>
>> Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
>> Sylvie Gadoury
>> Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator
>> 181 Queen Street
>> P.O. Box 3220, Station C
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 1E4
>> Telephone: 613-288-6165
>> Facsimile: 613-288-6279
>> atip@cbc.ca
>>
>> http://www.cbc.radio-canada.
>>
>> Page 12
>>
>> A-2013-0007 / ACY Request Summary
>>
>> ROUTINE 2013—05—03 2013—07—12 2013—06—25
>>
>> I am seeking any emails from the following employees of
>> CBC/Radio-Canada: Jacques Poitras, Terry Seguin, CBC Information
>> Morning (Moncton). With mention of the following keywords:
>> “BullyingCanada”, “David Amos”, “Rob Frenette”.
>>
>> Disclosed in part
>>
>>
>> CBC responsible for surge in info complaints: report
>>
>> By THE CANADIAN PRESS
>> May 27, 2008
>>
>> OTTAWA � The Canadian Broadcasting Corp. is behind an unprecedented
>> flood of complaints to Canada�s information watchdog.
>>
>> The latest annual report from Information Commissioner Robert Marleau
>> says his office received 536 complaints about the public broadcaster
>> in 2007-2008, more than any other department or agency of government.
>>
>> And more than 90 per cent of the CBC complaints that Marleau has
>> finished investigating were found to be valid.
>>
>> Most of those complaints were about delays in responding to requests
>> under the Access to Information Act, which for a $5 fee allows
>> ordinary Canadians to ask for government documents and files.
>>
>> Released today, Marleau�s report notes that almost all of the CBC
>> complaints came from a single source, which neither he nor the Crown
>> corporation can name because of privacy rules.
>>
>> The Federal Accountability Act made CBC subject to access law last
>> Sept. 1, and the corporation has since been inundated with requests
>> for information, including queries about expense claims filed by
>> senior managers.
>>
>> The public broadcaster announced last December that it was beefing up
>> its access-to-information unit to cope with the large numbers of
>> requests.
>>
>> �CBC officials co-operated with us fully as we worked with them to
>> establish target dates to respond to the requests,� says the annual
>> report.
>>
>> �We worked with the complainant to prioritize some of them and
>> reported weekly on CBC�s progress.�
>>
>> Access-to-information legislation requires departments to respond
>> within 30 days of receiving a request unless there is a legitimate
>> reason for extending the time period.
>>
>> Marleau�s office received 1,070 more complaints in 2007-2008 than it
>> did the year before, an 81 per cent increase.
>>
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 21,527
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 159.33.64.# (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
>> ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (U.K.) en-gb
>> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
>> Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.101 Safari/537.36
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor Resolution : 1366 x 768
>> Color Depth : 24 bits
>> Time of Visit Oct 28 2014 7:03:40 am
>> Last Page View Oct 28 2014 7:03:40 am
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL https://www.google.ca/
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-3:00
>> Visitor's Time Oct 28 2014 8:03:40 am
>> Visit Number 21,527
>>
>> Just Dave
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 21,521
>> Domain Name (Unknown)
>> IP Address 159.33.64.# (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
>> ISP Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : Canada (Facts)
>> State/Region : Ontario
>> City : Ottawa
>> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
>> Language English (U.K.en-gb
>> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
>> Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.104 Safari/537.36
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
>> Color Depth : 24 bits
>> Time of Visit Oct 27 2014 12:33:43 pm
>> Last Page View Oct 27 2014 12:33:43 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL https://www.google.ca/
>> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-3:00
>> Visitor's Time Oct 27 2014 1:33:43 pm
>> Visit Number 21,521
>>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>
>> Former police constable charged with assault
>> CBC News Posted: Oct 28, 2009 6:55 PM MT|
>>
>> A former Edmonton police constable is facing a criminal charge of
>> assault with a weapon after an incident said to have taken place while
>> he was on duty in 2006.
>>
>> Rodney Wadden was with Edmonton police for nine years before resigning
>> in April to take a job as a constable with the Fredericton police
>> department.
>>
>> The criminal charge came after an investigation by the Alberta Serious
>> Incident Response Team, an independent civilian agency that looks into
>> all incidents in Alberta involving police that result in death or
>> serious injury.
>>
>> "The incident involved members of the Edmonton Police Service who
>> attended at a house and arrested an individual found at that
>> location," the agency's executive director, Clifton Purvis, said
>> Wednesday.
>>
>> Wadden was charged in early September. This is the first time an
>> Edmonton officer has been charged after an investigation by the
>> Serious Incident Response Team since the agency was set up by the
>> province in 2007.
>>
>> Purvis would not release other details about the incident because the
>> matter is before the courts. Wadden is expected to make his first
>> appearance in court in early November.
>>
>> But CBC News obtained a statement of claim related to a $450,000 civil
>> lawsuit filed a year ago in relation to the alleged incident.
>>
>> In it, two homeowners allege that Wadden and a number of other police
>> officers "unlawfully and forcefully entered" their residence without a
>> warrant or their consent and began questioning them.
>>
>> The court document alleges one of the officers, who is not named,
>> threw one of the homeowners onto the ground and stood on his head,
>> while three other officers kicked his head, chest, arms and legs and
>> used a Taser on him twice.
>>
>> The allegations have not been proven in court.
>>
>> Police in Fredericton were aware of the charge against Wadden and said
>> he will remain on the job as a patrol officer.
>>
>> According to published media reports, while off-duty in 2005, Wadden
>> pulled a woman from a car that was on fire after it collided with a
>> truck. In 2002, he helped save several families from a fire.
>>
>> http://www2.canada.com/
>>
>> Former city cop pleads guilty to Taser assault
>> Officer once rescued woman from burning car
>> Alexandra Zabjek, Edmonton Journal
>> Published: Friday, June 18 2010
>>
>> A police officer once honoured for pulling a woman from a burning car
>> pleaded guilty Thursday to assault for unnecessarily using a Taser on
>> a man in his custody.
>>
>> Const. Rodney Wadden no longer works for the Edmonton police
>> department. He received a conditional discharge for the 2006 incident,
>> which means he will not have a criminal record if he successfully
>> completes a 12-month probationary period.
>>
>> In handing down his decision, Provincial Court Judge Leo Burgess
>> acknowledged it would likely be difficult for Wadden to keep a police
>> job if he had a criminal record. He also noted Wadden's strong work
>> history and the "public humiliation and embarrassment" he has
>> experienced since the case has gone to court.
>>
>> He said a conditional discharge would deter similar conduct and
>> denounce Wadden's assault on Marty Lacerte. "I'm not going to say it's
>> the most serious set of circumstances, but it is serious," Burgess
>> said.
>>
>> According to an agreed statement of facts, Wadden and another officer
>> approached Lacerte's vehicle on Oct. 25, 2006, because they suspected
>> him of drug trafficking.
>>
>> Lacerte sped away, dragging Wadden's partner for a short distance.
>> That constable eventually fell to the ground and suffered minor
>> injuries.
>>
>> The next day, Wadden and several officers went to Lacerte's home to
>> arrest him. Lacerte answered the door in an "aggravated stance" with
>> his fists clenched.
>>
>> Wadden used several "hand stuns" on Lacerte, who was arrested,
>> handcuffed and seated in a chair.
>>
>> As the other officers searched the home, Wadden kept an eye on Lacerte
>> in the living room where drug paraphernalia was found.
>>
>> As the investigation continued, Lacerte became loud, belligerent and
>> physically aggressive.
>>
>> Another officer walked into the living room and saw Wadden "deploy his
>> Taser twice on Lacerte when it was not necessary to do so."
>>
>> An investigation into the incident was launched in 2009, about six
>> months after Lacerte launched a $450,000 lawsuit against Wadden and
>> the other officers.
>>
>> Crown prosecutor Jeff Morrison asked for Wadden to receive either a
>> fine or probation.
>>
>> Wadden became a constable in 2000. In 2005, he was off duty and
>> shopping with his wife when a car and tractor-trailer collided. Wadden
>> pulled an elderly woman from the back seat of the burning car and
>> performed cardio-pulmonary resuscitation until paramedics arrived.
>>
>> He received a bravery award from the force in 2006.
>>
>> azabjek@thejournal.canwest.com
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:12:30 -0600
>> Subject: I will lay odds that the lawyer Brian Gallant, the Cop Rodney
>> Wadden and their buddies in the RCMP are rather nervous about now EH
>> Brucy Baby Northrup???
>> To: rodney.wadden@fredericton.ca, Brian Gallant
>> <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, bruce grandy <bruce.grandy@gnb.ca>,
>> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "john.green"
>> <john.green@gnb.ca>, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "Wayne.Gallant"
>> <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
>> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, jacques boucher
>> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "chris.macpherson"
>> <chris.macpherson@fredericton.
>> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, "rod.knecht"
>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> smcintyre <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, "gparsons@sylvanlake.ca"
>> <gparsons@sylvanlake.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
>> <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <bluelightning_03@hotmail.com>
>>
>> If not perhaps the politcians and cops etc should checkout the first
>> frames of this video by your old buddy Dean Roger Ray aka Dirty Dicky
>> Dean then scroll down for a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> BTW Chucky, Andre and Pam Thanks for the tips No doubt the Libranos
>> under Brian Gallant are grateful too EHDavey Baby Coon?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> Here are some more tips for you
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> Saturday, September 13, 2014
>> Charles Leblanc, Child Pornographer, Child Fucker, Convicted Criminal And
>> Liar
>>
>> Fredericton City Police have investigated convicted felon Charles
>> Leblanc for the sexual exploitation of children for some time now.
>> Charges have not been laid yet. But where's there's smoke, there's
>> fire. Charles Leblanc has an extensive, shady and violent criminal
>> record (including assault with a weapon) so it is a very good thing
>> the Fredericton Police Force keep a close eye on the mentally retarded
>> serial criminal offender.
>>
>> Google removed Charles Leblanc's last blog, because he maliciously,
>> and deliberately defamed, maligned, and posted pictures of scores of
>> serving police officers labeling them pedophiles, corrupt, steroid
>> monkeys, drug users to defame them, their families, and their
>> children. Charles Leblanc quickly by fraudulent means got another blog
>> through Google. Charles Leblanc had to resort to fraud because he uses
>> his blog to "panhandle" in cyber-space, and supplement his welfare
>> income. He begs for furniture, camera equipment, police scanners,
>> usage of vehicles, cash, free dinners, free lunches, clothing, and
>> anything else he may desire. He is not only a welfare parasite, but a
>> cyber-space parasite as well. So it was imperative Charles Leblanc get
>> another blog, so he could keep getting beer, and dining out.
>>
>> Charles Leblanc is semi-literate. He can't write, can't be bothered to
>> employ "spell check," he hasn't a clue what grammar is, and he's quite
>> proud of his ignorance, and complete lack of education. He is lazy,
>> unemployed, mentally deficient, on welfare, what many would call the
>> stereo-typical maritime kanadian.
>>
>> This is the last week of the ongoing New Brunswick provincial election
>> campaign. The incumbent conservative government of David Alward is
>> promoting the responsible development of Shale Gas and other natural
>> resources. The choice for New Brunswickers is clear. Develop natural
>> resources, or continue to be the economic and societal cesspool of
>> Canada. To continue to be a sinkhole of federal equalization payments
>> from the decent hardworking people of Alberta, Saskatchewan, BC, and
>> Newfoundland... or to become self-reliant economically. Maritime
>> kanada is the economic, societal and cultural dung heap of Canada. New
>> Brunswickers have an unique opportunity to change that for themselves
>> this election.
>>
>> But they won't! New Brunswick will continue to be a parasitic
>> province" within the kanadian Federation. Just like Charles Leblanc is
>> a pedophile and parasite in Fredericton New Brunswick.
>>
>> If you are a parent in Fredericton keep your children close, because
>> Charles Leblanc will stalk them and fuck them. When it concerns
>> pedophiles, and child fuckers like Charles Leblanc of Westmoreland
>> Street, Fredericton amerkan gun laws and violent vigilante(ism) is a
>> very good idea.
>> Posted by Seren at 6:46 AM No comments:
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> Thursday, November 14, 2013
>> David Alward versus the New Brunswick Inbreds
>>
>> All the educated, skilled, hardworking real Canadians of British
>> Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and even Newfoundland hope and pray to
>> whatever deity that is politically correct these days, that shale gas
>> is developed in New Brunswick, and in elsewhere in Maritime Kanada. We
>> tire of subsidizing Maritime Kanada's. governments, social programmes,
>> the 85 % of the self described Elsipogtog "first nation" that receive
>> welfare charity and charitable "donations" from Indian and Northern
>> Affairs.
>>
>> New Brunswick and the rest of Maritime kanada is the asshole, the anal
>> orifice, the parasitic stink hole of Canada. New immigrants don't go
>> to maritime kanada because there is nothing different there, than the
>> undeveloped third world hell hole they came from.
>>
>> I credit Premier Alward, and his government for their valiant,
>> righteous and altruistic attempt to develop shale gas responsibly.
>> Jobs, economic activity is what spurs education, employment
>> opportunities, better health care and longer lives. It is gallant
>> attempt to pull New Brunswick from economic stagnation and educate a
>> stupid and lazy populace.
>>
>> Only in New Brunswick and maritime kanada do part time fishermen and
>> farmers call themselves seasonal workers, and collect pogey and do
>> nothing for the rest of the year. Hardworking decent people in Western
>> Canada don't do that. That appears indigenous to the lazy inbred
>> provinces of Maritime kanada.
>>
>> It must be frustrating for the Alward government to fight many
>> generations of ignorance, and stupidity to try and lift New Brunswick
>> to a position level to the rest of Canada's real contributors to
>> confederation.
>> Posted by Seren at 4:25 PM
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> Thursday, November 28, 2013
>> Little David Alward and New Brunswick wants a pipeline
>>
>> The Premier of Canada's economic and political hemorrhoid, New
>> Brunswick David Alward is here today in the great province of Alberta
>> to beg. To beg for a pipeline from Alberta to refineries in Saint John
>> and Quebec. Premier David Alward wants to put New Brunswick to work.
>> To give job opportunities to New Brunswickers so they do not have to
>> leave the province to find work, make a living, or raise their
>> families.
>>
>> Premier Alward wants to change the parasitic, indolent and slothful
>> culture that embodies, embodied New Brunswick and maritime kanada from
>> the beginnings of kanadian confederation, to today. Indian, so called
>> "proud natives" in New Brunswick enjoy their 85% unemployment because
>> "treaty money," pogey and social assistance is what these animals call
>> "traditional native life and culture."
>>
>> So what passes for the "liberal minded nouvau riche," eco-terrorists,
>> drunk injins and New Brunswick very part time labour force are against
>> shale oil fracking, pipelines or any other activity that may force
>> upon them the spectre of, honest labour!
>>
>> Still it heartwarming to Albertans and the other citizens of provinces
>> that pay equalization to New Brunswick and the rest of maritime kanada
>> to see there are a courageous, and intelligent few trying to change
>> things in maritime kanada. The economic and political hemorrhoid of
>> Canada.
>>
>>
>> N.B. Premier David Alward addresses Alberta legislature
>> CBC News Posted: Nov 28, 2013 5:40 PM MT Last Updated: Nov 28, 2013 5:40
>> PM
>> MT
>>
>> New Brunswick Premier David Alward and Alberta Premier Alison Redford
>> speak to reporters at the Alberta legislature. Alward addressed the
>> legislature on Thursday about the proposed Energy East pipeline.
>>
>> (Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of
>> external links.)
>> New Brunswick Premier David Alward told the Alberta legislature on
>> Thursday that the proposed pipeline from Alberta to refineries in
>> eastern Canada could bring jobs to the entire country, as well as his
>> own province.
>>
>> Alward told MLAs that about 15,000 people from New Brunswick work
>> outside the province in the natural resource sector, including his own
>> son.
>> "My youngest son Ben is 23. He's a Red Seal plumber and a last block
>> pipefitter who works in Kearl Lake,” Alward said.
>> “And as I was flying here today, Ben was flying home for a week."
>>
>> The proposed $12 billion, $4,500 kilometre TransCanada pipeline could
>> take Alberta crude oil from Edmonton to refineries in Quebec and Saint
>> John, N.B.
>> Alward and Alberta Premier Alison Redford are trying to convince other
>> provinces that the project could benefit them as well.
>> “Canadians want to work and need to work,” Alward said. “Canadians
>> want to built prosperity and economic opportunity no matter what
>> region they live [in].
>> “Projects like the Energy East pipeline will translate into thousands
>> of jobs in communities across Canada.”
>>
>> "I think it is an important conversation for provinces right across
>> the country to have,” Redford said.
>> ”But my sense is that it's going in the right direction and that
>> people are understanding, as you said, that the dots all connect at
>> some point.”
>> Alward is the first sitting premier from another province to address
>> the Alberta legislature. Alward and Redford will both be attending the
>> Bennett Jones Lake Louise World Cup Business Forum.
>>
>>
>> With files from the Canadian Press
>> Posted by Seren at 6:45 PM
>>
>> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.
>> Subject: New VM (3) - 0:03 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
>> "BRIAN GALLANT" <5068536034>
>> To: "DAVID AMOS" <myson333@yahoo.com>
>> Date: Monday, August 27, 2012, 10:07 AM
>>
>>
>> Dear magicJack User:
>>
>> You received a new 0:03 minutes voicemail message, on Monday, August
>> 27, 2012 at 01:07:06 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from "BRIAN GALLANT"
>> <5068536034>.
>>
>>
>> Brian Gallant (born 1982) is leader of the New Brunswick Liberal
>> Association which forms the official opposition in the New Brunswick
>> Legislative Assembly. He was elected party leader on October 27, 2012
>> defeating two other candidates at the party's leadership election.
>> Gallant is a lawyer by profession.[1] He first gained a seat in the
>> legislature when he won election as the party's candidate for the 2013
>> Kent by-election.[2]
>>
>> In the 2006 provincial election, Gallant was the Liberal candidate in
>> Moncton East against Conservative Premier Bernard Lord and received
>> 40.6% of the vote in his unsuccessful attempt to unseat the premier.
>>
>> http://www.fredericton.ca/en/
>>
>> Police Seeking Information Involving Fraud Investigations
>>
>> The Fredericton Police Force is seeking information from the public in
>> relation to several fraud complaints involving local financial
>> institutions.
>>
>> During the month of October, 2012, an unidentified suspect travelling
>> throughout the province of New Brunswick is alleged to have opened
>> several fictitious bank accounts in the area. Accounts were opened in
>> the name of a Gail Graham, DOB: 1955-08-01. During the months of
>> December and January, the suspect travelled to different bank branches
>> throughout the province, depositing and cashing many fraudulent
>> cheques, usually in the amount of $12,000 to $20,000; and has
>> accumulated thousands of dollars to date.
>>
>> The suspect is described as a middle aged, Caucasian female, possibly
>> wearing a wig and false tooth. The female enters and exits each
>> financial institution alone on foot and is described as carrying a
>> cane with a slow walk.
>>
>> Police are requesting anyone with any information on the above
>> incidents or the possible identity of the female involved to contact
>> Det. Rodney Wadden of the Fredericton Police Force Economic Crimes
>> Unit at 460-2388, by e-mail at rodney.wadden@fredericton.ca or to
>> contact Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477.
>>
>> From: David Amos
>> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 1:19 AM
>> To: police@fredericton.ca ; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; rob.lafrance ;
>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; motomaniac333@gmail.com ;
>> oldmaison@yahoo.com ; law@stevenfoulds.ca ; andremurraynow@gmail.com ;
>> evelyngreene ; sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca
>> Subject: RE Rob Frenette and his BULLSHIT This is a log of all my
>> calls lately Obviously I called NOBODY 30 times
>>
>> More importantly why are most call to and from your very corrupt
>> local cops NOT logged???
>>
>> magicJack and magicJack PLUS Devices
>> Device Name
>> A9210505051A15
>> magicJack
>> (902) 800-0369
>>
>>
>>
>> Show Contacts | Export Contacts
>>
>>
>> Show Call Logs | Export Call Logs
>> A9210505051A15 Call Logs
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:09:17 -0600
>> Subject: The one very true thing Doug Ford ever said was that the
>> Progressive Conservative party needs an ‘enema’ I bet that put your
>> buddy Mayor Hazel McCallion's knickers in quite a knot EH John Tory?
>> To: info@johntory.ca, info@oliviachow.ca, ddale@thestar.ca,
>> mayor_ford@toronto.ca, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
>> <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>, paul
>> <paul@paulfromm.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
>> info@bonniecrombie.ca, mayor@mississauga.ca, tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org,
>> premier <premier@ontario.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> However Dougy Ford failed to mention that you all need to take your
>> heads out of each other arses first EH Mr VERY unethical "Journalist"
>> Daniel Dale???
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>> Doug Ford says Progressive Conservative party needs an ‘enema’
>>
>> City councillor and brother Rob Ford’s campaign manager, Doug Ford
>> says he would give the Progressive Conservative a party a complete
>> “enema” if he was in charge
>>
>> For the PUBLIC RECORD I called Doug Ford's campaign office awhile back
>> and remided them of this email and they just laughed at me as usual.
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:26:58 -0400
>> Subject: Perhaps Mayor Ford will sit up and pay attention Now?
>> To: ddale@thestar.ca, mayor_ford <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: <drider@thestar.ca>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
>> <councillor_holyday@toronto.ca
>> <h.kunov@utoronto.ca>; <thepeoplespoliticalparty@
>> <pcchoo@ontariondp.ca>; <kmicucc@toronto.ca>; "tim.hudakco"
>> <tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org>; <ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca>; "david.akin"
>> <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>; <battleground@sunmedia.ca>
>> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:01 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby
>> Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby
>> liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Dale, Daniel" <ddale@thestar.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:51:12 -0400
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Need I say I laughed my arse off to
>> watch Ezzy Baby Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the
>> profoundly snobby liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I'll be away until Monday, August 12. Feel free to forward your
>> message to my colleague David Rider at drider@thestar.ca.
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> Daniel Dale is the Star's acting city hall bureau chief. He has won a
>> National Newspaper Award and two Goff Penny awards as Canada's best
>> young journalist.
>>
>> Reach him at 416-869-4343.
>> ddale@thestar.ca
>> Twitter: @ddale8
>> Facebook Page
>>
>> Poll: John Tory poised for comfortable win over Doug Ford
>>
>> Fri Oct 24 2014
>>
>> The Ipsos Reid poll of 1,201 residents put Tory at 42 per cent, Doug
>> Ford at 31 per cent, Olivia Chow at 25 per cent.
>> .Final Campaign Lie Detector: Doug Ford says 20 inaccurate things at
>> Citytv debate
>>
>> Fri Oct 24 2014
>>
>> John Tory made six inaccurate statements at the final debate of the
>> 2014 Toronto election, Olivia Chow three.
>>
>> http://www.mississauga.com/
>>
>> Her Worship Mayor Hazel McCallion
>> Office of the Mayor
>> City of Mississauga
>> 300 City Centre Drive
>> Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C1
>>
>> Phone: (905) 896-5555
>> Fax: (905) 896-5879
>> E-mail: mayor@mississauga.ca
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>> Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion endorses John Tory
>>
>> Toronto mayoral candidate John Tory has received the endorsement of a
>> prominent politician from outside Toronto.
>>
>> By: Daniel Dale City Hall, Published on Fri Oct 24 2014 .
>>
>> Toronto mayoral candidate John Tory has received the endorsement of a
>> prominent politician from outside Toronto: outgoing Mississauga Mayor
>> Hazel McCallion.
>>
>> Open policard for CouncillorDoug Ford “If the Toronto residents elect
>> John Tory, I know he will make every effort to provide the leadership
>> that is lacking at the present time by the mayor of Toronto" on
>> regional cooperation, McCallion said in a statement released by the
>> Tory campaign.
>>
>> Tory, in the statement, called the retiring 93-year-old a "legend."
>>
>> McCallion had already made her support for Tory clear, saying in late
>> September that she hoped he became mayor, the Toronto Sun reported.
>>
>> Doug Ford (open Doug Ford's policard), a populist who has not received
>> any endorsements from notable figures, dismissed McCallion as "just
>> another political person,” though he said he likes her. "It's just
>> political insiders, all they do is line up and want favours,"
>>
>> The election is Monday.
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> Wednesday, 18 December 2013
>>
>> Perhaps Mayor Ford will sit up and pay attention Now?
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:26:58 -0400
>> Subject: Perhaps Mayor Ford will sit up and pay attention Now?
>> To: ddale@thestar.ca, mayor_ford <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: <drider@thestar.ca>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>;
>> <councillor_holyday@toronto.ca
>> <h.kunov@utoronto.ca>; <thepeoplespoliticalparty@
>> <pcchoo@ontariondp.ca>; <kmicucc@toronto.ca>; "tim.hudakco"
>> <tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org>; <ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca>; "david.akin"
>> <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>; <battleground@sunmedia.ca>
>> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:01 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby
>> Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby
>> liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Dale, Daniel" <ddale@thestar.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:51:12 -0400
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Need I say I laughed my arse off to
>> watch Ezzy Baby Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the
>> profoundly snobby liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I'll be away until Monday, August 12. Feel free to forward your
>> message to my colleague David Rider at drider@thestar.ca.
>>
>> - Daniel
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:51:04 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby
>> Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby
>> liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>> To: ddale@thestar.ca, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
>> <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, "michael.coren" <michael.coren@sunmedia.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/
>>
>> Daniel Dale is an urban affairs reporter who has won one National
>> Newspaper Award with the Star. Reach him at 416-869-4343.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:31:49 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby
>> Levant and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby
>> liberal arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>> To: peter@votepetermilczyn.ca, news@newstalk1010.com, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>
>>
>> http://www.newstalk1010.com/
>>
>> http://www.votepetermilczyn.
>>
>> Peter Milczyn Campaign
>> 5500 Dundas St. West
>> Toronto
>> M9B 1B7
>> Email: peter@votepetermilczyn.ca
>> Phone: 647.748.8683
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:41:49 -0300
>> Subject: Need I say I laughed my arse off to watch Ezzy Baby Levant
>> and Faith Goldy of Sun Media bitch about the profoundly snobby liberal
>> arsehole commonly known Clayton Ruby?
>> To: councillor_holyday@toronto.ca, angelasalewsky@gpo.ca,
>> h.kunov@utoronto.ca, thepeoplespoliticalparty@
>> pcchoo@ontariondp.ca, kmicucc@toronto.ca, "tim.hudakco"
>> <tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org>, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, "greg.weston"
>> <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, alenczner@litigate.com, pandrews
>> <pandrews@guelphmercury.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca" <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, mayor_ford
>> <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>
>>
>> Hey Deputy Mayor HolyDay
>>
>> If you are an ethical soul Perhaps you should ask McGuinty's former
>> assistant running in an different byelection some very serious
>> questions about the documents that came with this email email to his
>> boss before I opted to send himRegistered US Mail in 2005. if you were
>> truly wise you would call me ASAP after you scroll down to see what I
>> sent your buddy Mayor Ford if he dd not tell you about it already.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dalton.mcguinty@premier.gov.
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 PM
>> Subject: You can't fool me McGuinty I'm too stupid
>>
>> You lawyers are all the same but at least you can never say that you
>> didn't know. I will call and leave a message with my cell phone I will
>> have proof of that contact as well.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: david.anderson1@sasktel.net
>> Cc: anderd@parl.gc.ca
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:30 PM
>> Subject: Fw: FYI I just called
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: fbastien@bell.net
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:02 PM
>> Subject: Fw: FYI I just called
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: info@ccr-ny.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:50 PM
>> Subject: FYI I just called
>>
>> You are way past too late act ethical now
>>
>> I will offer a brief explaination of the emails found below to Deputy
>> Mayor Holyday and all the other canidates in the current by elections
>> in Ontario..
>>
>>
>> For the Public Record the copies of the emails exchanges I had in 2004
>> with the left wing wacko of called a lawyer by the name of Clayton
>> Ruby and his cohorts were served on me by the the Masschusetts Suffolk
>> Country Assistant District Attorney Alica McDonell in November of 2004
>> in front of a judge in the Dorchester District Court during a suppoed
>> "Pre Trial" Conferance of DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623.
>>
>> The emails had been edited and then forwarded to the mindless lawyer
>> Angel Troccoli by her client Norfolks County Deputy Sheriff Robert F.
>> O'Meara. Even though O'Meara is my brother in law my family and I had
>> not been in direct comminication with him since 2002 When he hired
>> lawyers to attack our rights and interests I communicated only with
>> his lawyers. In fact until the Suffolk County ADA serverd the
>> aforesaid documents about Claton Ruby and I on me we did not even know
>> O'Mear's email address. However at the top of the documents served on
>> us during the heaing was his name and the email address he was
>> obviously using at the time. It was his girlfriend's email address
>> "wickedwanda3@adelphia.net".
>>
>> As soon as the ADA gaveme the documents I told I would gladly argue
>> every word but the Dorchester District Court did not have jurisdiction
>> to argue lawyers arguing within a
>> matter concerning ongoing Inquiry Commissioned by Canadian Parliament.
>> A Month earlier the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs had served
>> upon me a document signed by Judge Sidney Hanlon claiming many
>> falshoods but the funniest statement she made was the she did not
>> believe that I was running for a seat in the 38th Parliament when the
>> Boston Police Dept and her clerks were trying make me stand before
>> her lowly sub municipal court to answer unnanamed charges with an
>> unsigned criminal complaint. When I asked the Boston Police
>> Commissioner and the Suffolk County District Attorney about the
>> obviuos malicious nonsense in June of 2004 they all played dumb and
>> claimed they were not involved. So I took my concerns about their
>> action
>> with the US Ambassdor, The Govern General, the New Brunseick Police
>> Commission, the Canadian Soliticitor General and many other Canadian
>> and Yankee law enforcement authorities as i continued to run in the
>> election of the 38th Parliament..Need I say that when I attempted to
>> remove the matter to the proper jusrdiction of US District Court most
>> of the documents filed in the docket of Dorchester District Court
>> disappeared and the clerks refused to give me attested copies of what
>> remained of it? However I still have my copies of all the docments.
>> and I will gleefully use them against Clayton Ruby anytime I wish
>> because the malice being practiced against my family and I is still
>> ongoing to this very day.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> PS Mayor Ford and his Deputy Mayor Holyday and now Wannabe MPP cannot
>> deny the obvious fact that I gave them a rather huge tip about Clayton
>> Ruby
>> and his liberal cohorts acting against them last December. Then
>> reminded them that they owed me a favour when the Toronto Star and
>> very strange Yankee
>> Gossipers attacked him about the possibility of the Mayor smoking
>> crack. It was small wonder to me that Mayor Ford fied most of his
>> assistants when his
>> buddies in NewsTalk1o10 blocked my emails so I let legions of people
>> know that I had published my emails to Mayor Ford in a blog while
>> Yankees were trying
>> hard to by a questionable video for 200 grand or so in order to
>> embarass and Canadian Mayor. Perhaps the strange dudes in Gawker
>> should hve reviewed the
>> docuemts that I sent them for FREE years ago about their their own
>> Mayor Blomberg their Presidents Bush and Obama and their current
>> former Governors
>> amongt many other crooked Yankees before asking people for money to
>> buy a video from some chickenshit drug dealers in Canada so they could
>> make fun of
>> the dumb poltiicans in my nativeland..
>>
>> The only thing I don't know right now is wheter or not Holyday knows
>> anything about any of this but his poltical boss Hudak should have
>> informed him not me.
>>
>> Trust that Timmy Baby Hudak has been fully informed for years as he
>> supported McGuinty for reasons I that will NEVER understand. His
>> assistant called me
>> out of the blue after the writ was drropped for the last Gerenral
>> Election in Ontario. I was so disgusted i simply asked her if she and
>> her boss knew who to read
>>
>> For Mr Holyday's benefit his is just a little proof of the two emails
>> I sent his boss Hudak and their buddies in Sun Media this year.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:21:10 -0400
>> Subject: The Sun Media constant yapping about Idle No More,
>> chickenshit cops and a possible Kathleen Wynne and Andrea Horwath
>> coalition caused me to think of the right wing wacko Karol Karolak and
>> his concerns about Indians etc
>> To: Iday.srfn@ontera.net, palmater
>> <palmater@
>> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>, cmcormick@aiai.on.ca,
>> karol_karolak@rogers.com, contact@kathleenwynne.ca, "tim.hudakco"
>> <tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org>, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <john.duncan.c2a@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>> http://www.ontla.on.ca/
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: "sandra" <sandra@sandraforleader.ca>; <Fred.kenney@state.vt.us>;
>> "takhar" <takhar@votetakhar.com>; "contact"
>> <contact@kathleenwynne.ca>; "tim.hudakco" <tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org>
>> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:19 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask
>> the nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: <breakingnews@cp24.com>; <mark.pugash@torontopolice.on.
>> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:46 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: I chuckled bigtime watching John Cook, Robyn DooLittle,
>> Ivor Tossell and Chris Waddell
>> talking on CBC about Mayor Ford and how the press often sits on things
>> and says nothing at all.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 14:52:42 -0300
>> Subject: JI chuckled bigtime watching John Cook, Robyn DooLittle, Ivor
>> Tossell and Chris Waddell talking on CBC about Mayor Ford and how the
>> press often sits on things and says nothing at all.
>> To: "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, john@gawker.com,
>> rdoolittle@thestar.ca, Ivor.Tossell@gmail.com,
>> chris_waddell@carleton.ca, alenczner@litigate.com, pandrews
>> <pandrews@guelphmercury.com>, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>, tips@gawker.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> mayor_ford <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>
>>
>> http://blogs.canoe.ca/
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> I must say I find it strange that the Gawker boss
>> would fly to Canada to see a 2 minute video made
>> by a drug dealer that is purportedly about a Mayor
>> that must Yankees never heard of then try to raise a
>> 100 grand to buy it/ Go figure what the gossipers
>> deem important while they ignore far more serious
>> things I gave them for free over two years ago.
>>
>> Methinks I will call Alan Lenczner Mayor' Ford's
>> lawyer again. It would be too much fun not to.
>>
>> Clearly he used my work or at least my name to
>> embarass the hell out Clayton Ruby and his liberal
>> cohorts whilst the press ignored everything as usual.
>>
>> If it worked once it should work twice but this time
>> Ford will owe me a HUGE favour N'esy Pas?
>>
>> In the "Mean" for your benefit perhaps the CROWN
>> should write a MOU between your mandate and I
>> ASAP EH Mr Harper?
>>
>> Why should you nasty neo cons protect evil liberals
>> anymore??? I am certain Mayor Ford agrees that the
>> best defense id attack attack attack. If his lawyer does
>> not agree he can always fire him and hire a wiser one.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:14:15 -0400
>> Subject: This email should make Clayton Ruby very nervous
>> To: mayor_ford@toronto.ca, alenczner@litigate.com, pandrews
>> <pandrews@guelphmercury.com>
>> Cc: ruby@rubyshiller.com, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mayor Ford <Mayor_Ford@toronto.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:58:15 -0500
>> Subject: Re: I just called about the lawyer Clayton Ruby and his
>> sneaky liberal pals (Thank you from Mayor Rob Ford)
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> As I promised during the mayoralty election, I am dedicated to
>> delivering customer service excellence, creating a transparent and
>> accountable government, reducing the size and cost of government and
>> building a transportation city.
>>
>> I will continue to work on behalf of the taxpayers to make sure you
>> get the respect you deserve.
>>
>> This note is to confirm that we have received your email and that we
>> are looking into your matter.
>>
>> Please feel free to follow up to check the status of your email.
>>
>> Thanks again and have a great day.
>>
>> Yours truly,
>>
>> Mayor Rob Ford
>> City of Toronto
>>
>> We're all in this together.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: <mayor_ford@toronto.ca>; <alenczner@litigate.com>
>> Cc: <ruby@rubyshiller.com>; "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> "pandrews" <pandrews@guelphmercury.com>
>> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 4:57 PM
>> Subject: I just called about the lawyer Clayton Ruby and his sneaky
>> liberal
>> pals
>>
>> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: <lorne.gorber@cgi.com>; <info@gg.ca>; <tips@gawker.com>; "thunter"
>> <thunter@tribune.com>; <max@gawker.com>; <Rightardia@gmail.com>;
>> <shusain@firstcdn.com>
>> Cc: <Carter.Stone@nbunion.ca>; <leigh@nbu.ca>; "wrozeluk"
>> <wrozeluk@google.com>; "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:56 PM
>> Subject: Fwd: Perhaps Deputy Minister John Adams of the CSE should teach
>> Wayne Boone and his professor pals how to read EH Rotten Ralphy?
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "david.raymond.amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:20:42 -0400
>> Subject: Perhaps Deputy Minister John Adams of the CSE should teach
>> Wayne Boone and his professor pals how to read EH Rotten Ralphy?
>> To: goodale@sasktel.net, findlay@connect.carleton.ca,
>> andrew_cohen@carleton.ca, jean_daudelin@carleton.ca,
>> fen_hampson@carleton.ca, norman_hillmer@carleton.ca,
>> jeremy_littlewood@carleton.ca, david_long@carleton.ca,
>> james_milner@carleton.ca
>> Cc: wayne_boone@carleton.ca, "john.adams" <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>,
>> garthosman@yahoo.com, John.Sinclair@nbimc.com,
>> augustine_SJ_park@carleton.ca, valerie_percival@carleton.ca,
>> cristina_rojas@carleton.ca, dane_rowlands@carleton.ca,
>> schmidtb@connect.carleton.ca, elinor_sloan@carleton.ca,
>> sucharov@ccs.carleton.ca
>>
>> http://www.forces.gc.ca/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Wayne_Boone <Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:51:21 -0500
>> Subject: RE: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
>> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> I am not certain why you sent this to me, David.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Wayne Boone CD PhD
>> Assistant Professor, Infrastructure Protection and International
>> Security (IPIS) Program
>> The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA)
>> Deputy Director, Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies
>> (CCISS)
>> Room 1315 Dunton Tower
>> Tel: +1 613-520-2600 ext. 6672
>> Cell: +1 613 863-2993
>> Fax: +1 613-520-2889
>>
>> http://www.forces.gc.ca/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:43 AM
>> To: wayne_boone@carleton.ca; dcarment@ccs.carleton.ca;
>> Melissa_Haussman; jeremy_littlewood@carleton.ca; RICHARD_NIMIJEAN
>> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca; amy_guest@carleton.ca; danfour; plee;
>> pleebooks
>> Subject: Fwd: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
>> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
>>
>> http://www1.carleton.ca/
>>
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:33:32 -0400
>> Subject: Notice that I knew Assange before he got World Famous?
>> To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org>
>>
>> From: "Julian Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>
>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> More info http://immi.is/
>>
>> Julian Assange
>> Editor
>> WikiLeaks
>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:00:16 -0400
>> Subject: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my
>> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome?
>> To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <birgittajoy@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:37:13 +0000
>> Subject: Re: RE Canada, the USA, Iceland, Wikileaks, IMMI and Bankers
>> etc the US Attorney Marc Litt no doubt remembers me EH Wendy?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> got your letter David
>> will try to find time to read all the information soon
>>
>> all my best
>> birgitta
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2011, at 4:06 PM, David Amos wrote:
>>
>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB)
>>> <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>
>>> Subject: Out of Office: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I
>>> talked to her and Laura in Clarke's offices
>>> To: "David Amos" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:19 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> G'Day/Bonjour, Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until
>>> Monday 10 January, at which time I should be able to respond to your
>>> email. If you need more immediate assistance, please call Gisele
>>> Allard at 506 658-2696. Thanks/Merci Rick
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)
>>> Subject: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I talked to her and
>>> Laura in Clarke's offices
>>> To: Clarkr@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> <Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> duncal@parl.gc.ca, "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>,
>>> rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, murphb1@parl.gc.ca, "PATRICK. MURPHY"
>>> <PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, birgitta@this.is
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
>>> kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, mike.wilson@fredericton.ca, "jack.macdougall"
>>> <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca
>>> ychoukri@wstephenson.com, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> Travis.ndp@gmail.com, robert.trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> roberttrevors@nbnet.nb.ca, "Gilles. Blinn"
>>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gilles.moreau"
>>> <gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.robclarkemp.ca/
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: I am on the phone to Mr Cullen right now
>>> To: Cullen@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 7:27 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:29:28 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Rebbecca Regan 1 415 436 9333 ext 135
>>> To: info@eff.org, information@eff.org
>>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Facebook <notification+zz2y6stc@
>>> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 04:35:07 -0800
>>> Subject: Birgitta Jonsdottir confirmed you as a friend on Facebook...
>>> To: David Raymond Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Hi David,
>>> Birgitta confirmed you as a friend on Facebook.
>>> Thanks,
>>> The Facebook Team
>>> To view Birgitta's profile or write on her Wall, follow this link:
>>> http://www.facebook.com/
>>> ==============================
>>> This message was intended for david.raymond.amos@gmail.com. If you do
>>> not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future,
>>> please follow the link below to unsubscribe.
>>> http://www.facebook.com/o.php?
>>> Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:32:28 -0400
>>> Subject: Birgitta I don't know if you will get my message in Facebook
>>> so I also sent it this way as a doublecheck
>>> To: birgittajoy@gmail.com
>>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, ingaorama@gmail.com,
>>> agnyrose@hotmail.com, stjani79@hotmail.com, birgitta@this.is
>>>
>>> Happy New Year Birgitta
>>>
>>> My foes have been fairly wicked as of late and attacking my friends as
>>> well. I may head the smiling bastards off at the pass so to speak go
>>> into the woods again with no internet etc before I get a bums rush and
>>> possibly lose another good friend.
>>>
>>> Thus I am passing around the world many email exchanges of mine over
>>> the years before I am out of touch with everyone. One of them is ours
>>> from December 8th. I will forward you one example byway of gmail so
>>> you will see I did not put you down and that accurate I felt you were
>>> entitled to know so that you would not think I was using your name
>>> behind your back.
>>>
>>> I understand that you must be busy particulary over Xmass. Trust that
>>> I am still a fan of yours but I must defend my butt fromany cops etc
>>> and try to keep out of jail the best way I know how with what little
>>> assets I have.
>>>
>>> I truly do wish you well but I do wish Iceland and then later IMMI had
>>> checked my work and got back to me long ago.
>>>
>>> If nothing else please check out this old blog. It contains a very
>>> rare document that should be of interest to IMMI or any whistleblower
>>> that as an interest in money. The nasty left wing blogger dude does
>>> like me at all but at least he created it one month before the RCMP
>>> falsely arrested me and many months before Iceland lost its shirt to
>>> the very corrupt banksters. His blog seems to have certain crooks
>>> quite nervous. If the Yankees, Brits, Saudis and zionists etc are
>>> reading his old blogs about mean old me perhaps IMMI should save them
>>> before they go "Poof" too?
>>>
>>> Here is just one that somebody intereting was checking ot yesterday.
>>> lets just say that Jullian Assange is not the only guy who knows his
>>> way around the Internet. Hell he probably does not even know what the
>>> CSE is. Do you?
>>>
>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>>
>>> Verita Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> P.S. My phone number is 902 800 0369 and I attempted to befriend you
>>> Skpe last spring in order to try to talk to you but you must have
>>> opted to ignore a stranger
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:41:41 -0400
>>> Subject: Most folks do not know this lady or what IMMMI is YET. But
>>> Wikileaks certainly does EH Wayne Lang of the GRC?.
>>> To: arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
>>> advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>
>>> carole <carole@libertymedia.com>, "Wayne.Lang"
>>> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
>>> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
>>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell
>>> <acampbell@ctv.ca>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
>>> Alex@nbu.ca
>>>
>>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>>> first email I ever sent you
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> dear Dave
>>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>>> find some time
>>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>>
>>> thank you for bearing with me
>>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>>
>>> with oceans of joy
>>> birgitta
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:35 AM, David Amos wrote:
>>>
>>>> I truly enjoyed talking to you. More to the point I am happy you took
>>>> the time to listen to mean old me. I was impressed with your openess
>>>> and honesty. In return I took a bit of time to study you more closely
>>>> on the Internet and I am now even more impressed to view the artist in
>>>> you. To hell with the politics and the money for a minute. At the
>>>> risk of sounding odd your sincere soul that I sensed in your voice
>>>> came shining through the various webpages. An honest person practicing
>>>> the wicked art of politicking is a rare thing indeed. I must confess
>>>> that I grinned at the possibility of crossing paths with another
>>>> kindred soul when I saw you employ the expression Me Myself and I
>>>> because I often use that expresssion
>>>>
>>>> I also sent you another email to your politcal email address on June
>>>> 24th, 2010 right after you spoke on CBC. (I can resend it if you wish)
>>>> When you folks ignored that and my calls and only sent me nasty
>>>> responses I gave up on Iceland and IMMI because I had made everyone
>>>> well aware I had no respect for Assange and corrupt parliamentarians
>>>> whatsoever. Assange became the big celebrity after releasing the video
>>>> from Iraq but I felt sorry for the kid who went to jail that had given
>>>> him the stuff. Obviously I sent you folks the email below long before
>>>> Assange made the scene in Iceland. Rest assured that I sent him
>>>> evidence of my concerns about Iceland or he would not had sent me his
>>>> bragging emails the following March.
>>>>
>>>> Now that Assange is in jail with no hope of bail like I was a couple
>>>> of times after CBC has been yapping about him for weeks I was feeling
>>>> a little vindictive so I opted to tease some of his friends and fans
>>>> (such as McCarthy and CBC) by reminding them that I was still alive,
>>>> not in jail and kicking like hell. (A host of cops in seven cars
>>>> pounced on my son (who was visiting me) and I at 2;30 in the morning
>>>> right after the results of the recent election was annnounced Although
>>>> I managed to run them off this time need I say it really pissed me off
>>>> and saddend me to put him on a bus back to Boston)
>>>>
>>>> I did not send you that email with the pdf files attached from my new
>>>> Yahoo address but you will get it in a bit. Heres hoping you will
>>>> enjoy it.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0300
>>>> Subject: RE: Iceland and Bankers Whereas the politicians ignore me
>>>> maybe some fellow bloggers will listen to me eh?
>>>> To: jong@althingi.is, kristjanj@althingi.is, olofn@althingi.is,
>>>> petur@althingi.is, rea@althingi.is, ragnheidurr@althingi.is,
>>>> sdg@althingi.is, sij@althingi.is, siv@althingi.is,
>>>> tryggvih@althingi.is, ubk@althingi.is, vigdish@althingi.is,
>>>> thkg@althingi.is, thorsaari@althingi.is
>>>> Cc: margrett@althingi.is, thorgerdur@thorgerdur.is, saari@centrum.is,
>>>> ha030002@unak.is, svanurmd@hotmail.com, baddiblue@gmail.com,
>>>> dominus@islandia.is, birgitta@this.is, einar@smart.is
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:23:15 -0300
>>>> Subject: Fwd: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>>>> To: johanna@althingi.is
>>>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Dan Fitzgerald
>>>> <danf@danf.net>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:52:42 -0300
>>>> Subject: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled
>>>> To: wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:42 -0300
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>>> To: vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
>>>>> horwitzd@dsmo.com, wrobleskin@dsmo.com, wolfem@dicksteinshapiro.com,
>>>>> Lisa.Baroni@usdoj.gov, ssbny@aol.com, service@ssbla.com,
>>>>> rwing@lswlaw.com, rriccio@mdmc-law.com, lmodugno@mdmc-law.com,
>>>>> griffinger@gibbonslaw.com, mmulholland@rmfpc.com, kmalerba@rmfpc.com,
>>>>> tlieverman@srkw-law.com
>>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, John.Sinclair@nbimc.com,
>>>>> Norma.Kennedy@nbimc.com, jan.imeson@nbimc.com, mc.blais@pcnb.org
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if any lawyer will bother to read this email, understand it
>>>>> and call me back
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>>> office.
>>>>>
>>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>>> site
>>>>> www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical information
>>>>> regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frá: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Dags: 29.01.2009 19:17:43
>>>>> Til: johanna.sigurdardottir@fel.
>>>>> aih@cbc.ca,
>>>>> Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>>> egilla@althingi.is,
>>>>> william.turner@exsultate.ca, klm@althingi.is, mail@fjr.stjr.is,
>>>>> Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, wendy.williams@landsbanki.is,
>>>>> cdhowe@cdhowe.org,
>>>>> desparois.sylviane@fcac.gc.ca, plee@stu.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
>>>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca" <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, Dan
>>>>> Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, jonina.s.larusdottir@ivr.stjr.
>>>>> Afrit: fyrirspurn@fme.is, audur@audur.is, fme@fme.is,
>>>>> info@landsbanki.is, sedlabanki@sedlabanki.is, tif@tif.is
>>>>> Efni: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious question. Why
>>>>> have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI Some folks in Canada are watching your actions or lack thereof
>>>>> more closely than others. As you well know I am one.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.topix.com/forum/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> You folks should not deny certain responses that I have received over
>>>>> the course of the last few months from your country CORRECT?
>>>>>
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:57:55 -0300
>>>>> Subject: Re: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>>> To: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanx
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/8/08, postur@for.stjr.is <postur@for.stjr.is> wrote:
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>>> waits
>>>>> attendance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Fjármálaeftirlitið - Fyrirspurn <fyrirspurn@fme.is>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:23:41 -0000
>>>>> Subject: Staðfesting á móttöku
>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið hefur móttekið erindi yðar. Erindinu verður svarað
>>>>> við fyrsta tækifæri. Vakin er athygli á heimasíðu
>>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitsins, http://www.fme.is. Þar má finna ýmsar
>>>>> upplýsingar ásamt svörum við algengum spurningum:
>>>>> http://www.fme.is/?PageID=863.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) of Iceland confirms the
>>>>> receipt of your e-mail. Your e-mail will be answered as soon as
>>>>> possible. We would like to point out our website, http://www.fme.is.
>>>>> There you can find information and answeres to frequently asked
>>>>> questions: http://www.fme.is/?PageID=864.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kveðja / Best Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið / Financial Supervisory Authority, Iceland
>>>>>
>>>>> Sími / Tel.: (+354) 525 2700
>>>>>
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:53:47 -0300
>>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me at 506
>>>>> 756
>>>>> 8687
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> I am listening to RBN right now.
>>>>
>>>> I explained a bit of my concerns to people down your way but either
>>>> the talk shows are never aired or I am now banished from their
>>>> talkshow forums.
>>>>
>>>> Do I sound like that bad a fellow?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:36:32 -0300
>>>> Subject: RE the Fed and my whistle blowing efforts in that regard
>>>> To: thecommonsenseshow <thecommonsenseshow@yahoo.com>
>>>>
>>>> These are the missing hearings I am trying to tell you about
>>>>
>>>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>>>
>>>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>>>
>>>> Me talking about a bit Spitzer the year before he got arrested
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> Me talking about Spitzer briefly after he got arrested
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the first page of where I store of my files for public view.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/people/
>>>>
>>>> This is some of my Spitzer stuff as it pertains to New York Do you
>>>> know of dr Ward Dean?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>
>>>> You can find some of my stuff pertaining to the Fed within this file
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>
>>>> Anyone can see the email between the US Attorney in New York and many
>>>> other lawyers etc before and after Madoff plead guilty. I posted it
>>>> right here beginning in comment #327 within a wicked little forum
>>>> about corrupt lawyers and judges on Long Island New York
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theschwartzreport.
>>>
>>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>>> http://www.facebook.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>>> not.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andre Gide
>>
>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>> http://www.facebook.com/
>>
>>
>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>> not.
>>
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> To: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <Office@tigta.treas.gov>;
>> <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>;
>> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>; "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> <ron.klain@revolution.com>; <dboies@bsfllp.com>; <tolson@gibsondunn.com>;
>> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>; "ed.pilkington"
>> <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
>> "news" <news@thetelegraph.com.au>; "leader" <leader@greenparty.ca>
>> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>; <gregory.craig@skadden.com>;
>> <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.
>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:27 PM
>> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
>> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
>> Industries???
>> If anyone should know about such things it is Olson after all he assisted
>> Ashcroft and Bush against me
>>
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
>> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
>> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
>> in Washington.
>>
>> Hevery body and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with
>> the USTreasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of
>> the opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
>> the Internet cannot be argued.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
>> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>>
>> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
>> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
>> against me when Obama was just a State Senator . The proof was
>> when I sent him the documents that came along with the letter found
>> on page 13 of this old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
>> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
>> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
>> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>>
>> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
>> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
>> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
>> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
>> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
>> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
>> no WMD were ever found.
>>
>> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
>> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
>> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
>> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
>> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out of
>> the
>> CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache has known
>> why for a very long time.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Marlys" <edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>
>> To: "moto maniac" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: Please allow me to tell the police for you
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>> To: <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
>> Cc: <comail@lsuc.on.ca>; <McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca>;
>> <vverma@cavalluzzo.com>; <edwardh@ruby-edwardh.com>;
>> <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:35 PM
>> Subject: Please allow me to tell the police for you
>>
>>
>> Hey Mr Ruby
>>
>> I will enjoy arguing how you feel emails informing you of your
>> partner's obligations are criminal acts. I will wager I will be
>> complaining of you first. The first question I will ask any court is
>> whether or not what you just informed me is true and can be found in
>> law. If not has an officer of the court just dillberately
>> misreprsented the law to protect his own interests? If that is true
>> then perhaps your are the one that broke the Rules. What say you Mr.
>> Ruby?
>>
>> The interesting part of this is that a lawyer in the USA just
>> tried to file a criminal harrassment charge against me down there for
>> sending her partner an email similiar to this. To date no one will
>> inform me as to the outcome of the first attempt to charge me with
>> harrassment.
>>
>> This is definitely not spam. Nor is it unsolicited. You are a
>> solicitor and this is your business. You would have no qualms about
>> attacking me on behalf of any client willing to pay your fees. Would
>> it be crimminal harassment if I warned you away from me and you didn't
>> go? The email does come from a Yankee web site.Why not add your
>> complaint to the Yankee lawyer's and we can make it a rather
>> interesting cross border complaint. You do understand that although I
>> am a Canadian Citizen, I am also a permenant American resident thus
>> two different federal codes must be obeyed. Ashcroft had no trouble
>> giving me a hard time with Canada's blessings. Why can't I register my
>> indignation about it to lawyers hired by the Canadian government to
>> investigate a similiar matter at the same time? I think I need a
>> Yankee judge and jury don't you? After all no would in Canada claims
>> jurisdiction over me.
>>
>> I am meeting a bunch of folks that answer for police actions next
>> week. I will show them this email and explain to them how you are
>> associated to Ms. Edwardh and that if a lawyer refuses to uphold the
>> law it not harrassment to remind them of the law before you sue the
>> bastards. you are a big wig in the Upper Canadian Law society.
>> Correct? Don't you think it is time to check the work of your partner
>> and her understanding of the meaning of the word integrity. Better yet
>> ask landslide Annie. She taught law a long time ago down here in New
>> Brunswick. Ask her how fearless and pigheaded some Martimers are and
>> how little respect they have for liars or lawyers. if she won't tell
>> you ask Joe Day or Rob Moore they are both lawyers that were appointed
>> or elected to speak for us in Ottawa amongst the upper Canadian snobs.
>> Cya'll in Court
>> Mr. Clayton Ruby
>>
>> David R. Amos
>>>
>>> >From: "Ruby-Edwardh.com" <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>
>>> >To: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com>
>>> >CC: "mandy machin" <mandy@ruby-edwardh.com>
>>> >Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
>>> >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:34:37 -0400
>>> >
>>> >To continue now is criminal harassment under the Criminal Code. You
>>> > must
>>> > stop. clayton ruby
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: David Amos
>>> > To: Ruby-Edwardh.com
>>> > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 5:28 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The very second you act ethically I will
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: Ruby-Edwardh.com
>>> > To: David Amos
>>> > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 6:18 PM
>>> > Subject: Re: Text of letter to Joe Day
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please remove me from your list. clayton ruby
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: David Amos
>>> > To: ruby@ruby-edwardh.com
>>> > Cc: info@ccr-ny.org ; edwardth@ruby-edwardh.com
>>> > Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:31 PM
>>> > Subject: Fw: Text of letter to Joe Day
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hey Ms. Edwardth
>>> > I talked to Lorne Waldman in person and he acted just like the dude at
>>> > CCR when I talked to him. Talk about an ignorant bunch of snotty
>>> > lawyers
>>> > Mr. Arar is tangled up with. Well you fancy Upper Canadians can never
>>> > say that I didn't tell you about your sneaky Yankee friends. Do I seem
>>> > angry? Well tell Ratner and Waldman to go to hell for me will ya and
>>> > then send me their best lawyers to argue. If Michael Ratner at the
>>> > Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY
>>> > 10012 Phone: (212) 614-6464 Fax: (212) 614-6499 don't think email can
>>> > get him in trouble then he should have a long talk with Frank Quatrone
>>> > or Martha Stewart and then check the US Mail I sent him a long long
>>> > time
>>> > ago. That is what is in the Tif file hereto attached.
>>> > David R. Amos
>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: David Amos
>>> > To: inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca
>>> > Cc: vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
>>> > Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca
>>> > ; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ;
>>> > Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
>>> > Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 3:55 AM
>>> > Subject: Text of letter to Joe Day
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > He can never say that he didn't get it. This is an email is sent as
>>> > triple check as proof that it was done when and where I swear I did
>>> > it.
>>> > That is his front door and although no one came to it because I didn't
>>> > bother knocking I did bring witnesses and obviously took pictures
>>> >
>>> > I can easily prove that I was in contact with Wayne Easter's office on
>>> > November 19th/03 the same day Arar's lawyers from the CCR in the USA
>>> > were. Apparently the Canadian government and Mr. Ashcroft must have
>>> > had
>>> > a different plan as to what to do about me. Doesn't anyone think that
>>> > Anne McLellan, Wayne Easter and I have lots to argue about within the
>>> > Arar Commission. My evidence certainly supports Arar's.
>>> >
>>> > If anyone whois now seated as a Member of Parliament considers
>>> > themselves worthy of the public trust perhaps they should speak up
>>> > andask a few questions and consider asking for a non confidence vote.
>>> > May I suggest that some member of the NDP who is not a lawyer contact
>>> > me
>>> > before I return to the USA. I would prefer to talk to Ed Broadbent. If
>>> > he chooses to recall, I did wish him luck.
>>> >
>>> > Veena tell Geoff Regan to give a call when he gets back from golfing
>>> > with Clinton and McKenna's buddies will ya?
>>> >
>>> > Just so everybody knows I am sending this email to many folks all
>>> > around
>>> > the world.
>>> >
>>> > What do ya thing should I hang around home long enough to see if
>>> > Premier
>>> > Lord calls an election for a Senator in the Federal government or wait
>>> > until he calls a by-election to fill Bernard Richard's vacate seat at
>>> > the provincial level? I know the Yankees are sick and tired of me. But
>>> > i
>>> > did make lots of folks uphome laugh and think about things. Everybody
>>> > calls me a rebel or a fool. Both labels I take as my own with a smile.
>>> > However I must ask why am I so rebelious to expect lawyers to uphold
>>> > the
>>> > law or demand that politicians uphold the Public Trust? Why am I so
>>> > foolish not to trust the law enforcement community? Never forget it
>>> > was
>>> > the US Secret Service that came to my door with a town cop that is
>>> > paid
>>> > to protect and serve me. They did not mind investigating false
>>> > allegations made against me as a by lawyers to protect politicians but
>>> > refused to accept hard evidence of Bank Fraud, Securities Faud and Tax
>>> > Fraud which is well within the scope oftheir employment. The well paid
>>> > governent officials within my own nativeland are more than willing to
>>> > throw me back to the wolves in the USA claiming that they don't have
>>> > jurisdiction over me. Why? Are they pissed I ran for Parliament and
>>> > had
>>> > too much fun telling the truth in the process? Maybe I should hang
>>> > around and have some fun and piss them off some more. Pat Hannraty did
>>> > suggest that in one of the CBC debates that I was excluded from. Joe
>>> > Day
>>> > ran for many positions in government and never succeeded. However once
>>> > he became a top dog lawyer for the Irving Clan he wasn't long finding
>>> > a
>>> > seat. I say the first order of business for any elected Member of
>>> > Parliament would be to inspire and act that makes all Senators be
>>> > elected as well. What say you oh ye honourable members of the NDP? Why
>>> > not put that on Mr. Martin'.s table to chew on.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Friday the 13th of August, 2004
>>> >
>>> > Senator Joseph A. Day Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
>>> > 14 Everett St. 66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
>>> > Hampton, NB Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9
>>> >
>>> > Prime Minister, Paul Martin Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
>>> > 80 Wellington Street 900 Justice Building
>>> > Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2 Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6
>>> >
>>> > Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS) Philippe Rabot > > 340 Laurier
>>> > Avenue West RCMP External Review Committee
>>> > Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8 P.O. Box 1159, Station B
>>> > Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2
>>> > RE: Corruption
>>> >
>>> > Hey Joe,
>>> >
>>> > The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me.
>>> > I
>>> > just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your
>>> > job.
>>> > That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just
>>> > another lawyer who couldn't get elected so you were politically
>>> > appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving
>>> > interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey
>>> > the
>>> > Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically as a
>>> > well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget your
>>> > former employer's interests and do your job.
>>> >
>>> > It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well.
>>> > I
>>> > demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all to
>>> > the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all to
>>> > the other above named government employees and to the Arar Commission
>>> > in
>>> > particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the above named
>>> > persons or their offices and I believe they should be expecting to see
>>> > this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served
>>> > upon you as an officer of the court in confidence in order that it may
>>> > be properly investigated. I have given you many more documents than
>>> > the
>>> > ones I will mention in the following paragraphs. I will send a copy of
>>> > this letter to many people as a double check on your ethics.
>>> >
>>> > One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter
>>> > Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
>>> > attached
>>> > to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to Bernard
>>> > Lord
>>> > and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the aforesaid letter
>>> > to
>>> > be so important because he is the first Canadian public servant in any
>>> > office to even admit knowledge my concerns and allegations in two
>>> > months
>>> > of waiting for a proper response. His position in public service and
>>> > his
>>> > answer forever prove just how bad things really are in Canada and the
>>> > USA. I am not sorry for the delay in providing you with this material
>>> > as
>>> > I planned and stated within the enclosed email. If you had wanted it,
>>> > you would have returned my calls or answered my email.
>>> >
>>> > I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament.
>>> > I
>>> > made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the
>>> > instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and
>>> > up,
>>> > someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or at
>>> > least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any longer
>>> > for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now want me
>>> > in
>>> > court.
>>> >
>>> > The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad
>>> > actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and
>>> > rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the
>>> > first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel
>>> > in
>>> > court on the first day of Brad's new plan to defend the rights of the
>>> > people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and still in
>>> > New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in Henrik's
>>> > court that day was more than willing to take me away and under his
>>> > jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff's paycheck? Even the
>>> > local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip from July
>>> > 29th
>>> > to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed before he wrote
>>> > such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no heed my fair
>>> > warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he should call
>>> > the
>>> > former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter Heed why he
>>> > paid
>>> > no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and Brad Green that I
>>> > wasn't joking and that I am well within the jurisdiction of law
>>> > enforcement in both New Brunswick and New Hampshire.
>>> >
>>> > If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature
>>> > one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to
>>> > argue
>>> > about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a complaint
>>> > against them and several others with the Law Society anyway. I am
>>> > looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before the
>>> > Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my allegations.
>>> > What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical lawyer that I
>>> > can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted ethically in
>>> > a
>>> > Pro Se fashion?
>>> >
>>> > My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me
>>> > about
>>> > NB politicians. I didn't believe what he said about Wayne Steeves the
>>> > second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to argue about
>>> > jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of Professional
>>> > Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about integrity but
>>> > jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing I would want
>>> > is
>>> > such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I would see him in
>>> > court and ended our conversation. He was obviously arguing against me
>>> > for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a sincere and ethical
>>> > effort to listen to me and address my concerns to the powers that be
>>> > on
>>> > my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal friends to chum with. For
>>> > all
>>> > I know he may have just got back from Larry's Gulch so I allowed him
>>> > to
>>> > continue on the fishing expedition byway of email. For his information
>>> > just in case he is that dumb, I brought up the subject of integrity so
>>> > he would stop arguing jurisdiction and act more ethically and
>>> > diligently
>>> > as a lawyer. When he continued, ...
No comments:
Post a Comment